Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.std.c |
| Subject | Re: Loop Invariance Optimization Opportunity? |
| Date | 2013-01-21 00:43 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <kdikis$iq6$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <kdbifk$nhb$1@dont-email.me> <altersFe0nnU1@mid.individual.net> <kdcbp7$5j6$1@dont-email.me> |
On 1/18/2013 15:36, Shao Miller wrote: > > I cannot reproduce 42. :( > I was able to reproduce 42 by: - Using GCC with -O3 - Using two translation units - Changing the code to have '((void) 0, *vis).i' instead of '(*vis = *vis).i'. Using the comma operator is probably a better demonstration of not possibly changing any effective type considerations, anyway. -- - Shao Miller -- "Thank you for the kind words; those are the kind of words I like to hear. Cheerily," -- Richard Harter
Back to comp.std.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Loop Invariance Optimization Opportunity? Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2013-01-18 08:25 -0500
Re: Loop Invariance Optimization Opportunity? Wojtek Lerch <wojtek_l@yahoo.ca> - 2013-01-18 12:25 -0500
Re: Loop Invariance Optimization Opportunity? Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2013-01-18 15:36 -0500
Re: Loop Invariance Optimization Opportunity? Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2013-01-21 00:43 -0500
csiph-web