Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.std.c |
| Subject | Re: Loop Invariance Optimization Opportunity? |
| Date | 2013-01-18 15:36 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <kdcbp7$5j6$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <kdbifk$nhb$1@dont-email.me> <altersFe0nnU1@mid.individual.net> |
On 1/18/2013 12:25, Wojtek Lerch wrote: > On 18-Jan-13 8:25 AM, Shao Miller wrote: >> GCC without an -O, with -O2, and with -O3 didn't make any difference in >> the behaviour. If an invariance optimization is used, the loop should >> iterate 42 times, instead of 21. > > Have you tried you moving "looper" into a separate translation unit? > > I'm getting 42 with GCC 4.4.2, but 21 with GCC 4.6.3. Aha! Thank you for those measurements! Just out of curiosity, were you using a >= C99 mode (where effective type is applicable)? I had used -ansi and -std=c99 with GCC 4.5.3 for Cygwin, originally. GCC 4.7.2 on Linux x86: gcc -ansi -pedantic -Wall -Wextra -Werror -o rvalue rvalue.c : 21 All combinations of -std=c99, -std=c1x, -std=c11, -O2, -O3 made no difference. CLANG 3.0 on Linux x86: clang -ansi -pedantic -Wall -Wextra -Werror -o rvalue rvalue.c : 21 All combinations of -std=c99, -std=c1x, -O2, -O3 made no difference. Copying the 'struct visible' definition into rvalue2.c and moving 'looper' into it didn't change clang's behaviour. gcc -O2 -ansi -pedantic -Wall -Wextra -Werror -o rvalue rvalue.c rvalue2.c : 22 (?!) Same with -O3. Same with -std=c99, -std=c1x, -std=c11 or any of these with -O3. I cannot reproduce 42. :( -- - Shao Miller -- "Thank you for the kind words; those are the kind of words I like to hear. Cheerily," -- Richard Harter
Back to comp.std.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Loop Invariance Optimization Opportunity? Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2013-01-18 08:25 -0500
Re: Loop Invariance Optimization Opportunity? Wojtek Lerch <wojtek_l@yahoo.ca> - 2013-01-18 12:25 -0500
Re: Loop Invariance Optimization Opportunity? Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2013-01-18 15:36 -0500
Re: Loop Invariance Optimization Opportunity? Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2013-01-21 00:43 -0500
csiph-web