Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.software.testing > #842 > unrolled thread

Is manual testing really dying?

Started byANTant@zimage.com (Ant)
First post2015-09-18 15:06 -0500
Last post2015-09-18 15:06 -0500
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.software.testing


Contents

  Is manual testing really dying? ANTant@zimage.com (Ant) - 2015-09-18 15:06 -0500

#842 — Is manual testing really dying?

FromANTant@zimage.com (Ant)
Date2015-09-18 15:06 -0500
SubjectIs manual testing really dying?
Message-ID<dOSdnejqWehG82HInZ2dnUU7-QWdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
Hello.

I noticed people seem to be against manual testings as in getting rid 
of them fully. I can understand having automated testings for repetitive 
testings, but manual testings should exist for cases like visual, 
usability, etc.

What do you guys think?
-- 
Quote of the Week: "Ants can lift up to 50 times their own weight. And 
your monitor is missing. Time to bring out the bugspray." --BBspot's 
Geek Horoscopes (2/28/2003)
Note: A fixed width font (Courier, Monospace, etc.) is required to see this signature correctly.
  /\___/\   Ant(Dude) @ http://antfarm.home.dhs.org (Personal Web Site)
 / /\ /\ \                 Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net
| |o   o| |
   \ _ /    Please nuke ANT if replying by e-mail privately. If credit-
    ( )     ing, then please kindly use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link.

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.software.testing


csiph-web