Is manual testing really dying?

From	ANTant@zimage.com (Ant)
Subject	Is manual testing really dying?
Newsgroups	comp.software.testing
Message-ID	<dOSdnejqWehG82HInZ2dnUU7-QWdnZ2d@earthlink.com> (permalink)
Date	2015-09-18 15:06 -0500

Show all headers | View raw

Hello.

I noticed people seem to be against manual testings as in getting rid 
of them fully. I can understand having automated testings for repetitive 
testings, but manual testings should exist for cases like visual, 
usability, etc.

What do you guys think?
-- 
Quote of the Week: "Ants can lift up to 50 times their own weight. And 
your monitor is missing. Time to bring out the bugspray." --BBspot's 
Geek Horoscopes (2/28/2003)
Note: A fixed width font (Courier, Monospace, etc.) is required to see this signature correctly.
  /\___/\   Ant(Dude) @ http://antfarm.home.dhs.org (Personal Web Site)
 / /\ /\ \                 Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net
| |o   o| |
   \ _ /    Please nuke ANT if replying by e-mail privately. If credit-
    ( )     ing, then please kindly use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link.

Back to comp.software.testing | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Is manual testing really dying? ANTant@zimage.com (Ant) - 2015-09-18 15:06 -0500

csiph-web