Re: Are my reviewers dishonest or technically incompetent ?

From	Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc>
Newsgroups	comp.theory, comp.ai.philosophy, comp.software-eng, sci.logic
Subject	Re: Are my reviewers dishonest or technically incompetent ?
Message-ID	<20220522190556.000035ba@reddwarf.jmc> (permalink)
References	<4_adnW5_44_d5xf_nZ2dnUU7_83NnZ2d@giganews.com>
Organization	Jupiter Mining Corp
Date	2022-05-22 19:05 +0100

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On Sun, 22 May 2022 13:00:31 -0500
olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> wrote:
> H sees that P is calling the same function from the same machine
> address with identical parameters, twice in sequence. This is the
> infinite recursion (infinitely nested simulation) non-halting
> behavior pattern.

The proofs you are attempting to refute doe not have any infinite
recursion thus you continue to bark up the wrong tree.

/Flibble

Back to comp.software-eng | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Are my reviewers dishonest or technically incompetent ? Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc> - 2022-05-22 19:05 +0100
  Re: Are my reviewers dishonest or technically incompetent ? olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2022-05-22 13:23 -0500
    Re: Are my reviewers dishonest or technically incompetent ? Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc> - 2022-05-22 19:26 +0100
      Re: Are my reviewers dishonest or technically incompetent ? olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2022-05-22 13:30 -0500

csiph-web