Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.ai.philosophy

comp.ai.philosophy

34888 articles, 394 threads (numbers 331 – 35411) — flat view

| Advanced

Subject Author Date
Modesto Residents Fight Secret Data Center Talks on Old FMC Chemical Site Pelosi Goes To prison <noreply@mixmin.net> 2026-08-10 09:18 +0100
 
AI is "Gay I". alexander <alex@rogers.ca> 2026-08-09 11:17 +0200
 
Masterkey "qu" <troppo@spam.com> 2026-08-09 02:54 +0200
 
Data centers have a politics problem - and industry knows it Pelosi Goes To prison <noreply@mixmin.net> 2026-08-02 12:02 +0100
 
AI Companies Are Buying Antique Books, Ingesting Their Contents to Train Models, and Then Destroying Them at Incredible Scale D. Ray <d@ray> 2026-07-26 23:51 +0000
 
AI bet goes awry: Oracle fires 21,000 employees (2 replies — unroll) Adam Schitt <adam.schitt@dont-email.me> 2026-07-24 07:54 +0200
   → Re: AI bet goes awry: Oracle fires 21,000 employees Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> 2026-07-24 13:11 +0000
     → Re: AI bet goes awry: Oracle fires 21,000 employees Skeeter <invalid@none.com> 2026-07-24 07:57 -0600
 
Body Bags Found Outside OpenAI HQ as Execs Increasingly Fear for Their Lives J D <j_d@invalid.org> 2026-07-20 21:51 +0000
 
Theatheory (not Re: Olcott's system (not Hobbes)) (1 reply — unroll) Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-07-16 14:00 -0700
   → Re: Theatheory (not Re: Olcott's system (not Hobbes)) Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-07-16 15:28 -0700
 
Every LLM agrees with my final resolution to the Liar Paradox (5 replies — unroll) olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-07-10 16:41 -0500
   → Re: Every LLM agrees with my final resolution to the Liar Paradox Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> 2026-07-10 21:50 +0000
   → Re: Every LLM agrees with my final resolution to the Liar Paradox Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2026-07-11 11:26 +0300
   → Re: Every LLM agrees with my final resolution to the Liar Paradox Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk> 2026-07-14 10:53 +0100
     → Re: Every LLM agrees with my final resolution to the Liar Paradox olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-07-14 11:46 -0500
       → Re: Every LLM agrees with my final resolution to the Liar Paradox Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2026-07-15 10:08 +0300
 
Meta's Ray-Ban Smart Glasses Have Officially Earned the Public Nickname "Pervert Glasses" Amid a Massive Privacy Reckoning PF <noreply@mixmin.net> 2026-07-14 08:04 +0100
 
Within Proof Theoretic Semantics Gödel's G has no meaning in PA (397 replies — unroll, only first 100 listed — flat view) olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-20 11:57 -0500
   → Re: Within Proof Theoretic Semantics Gödel's G has no meaning in PA Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2026-04-21 09:41 +0300
     → Re: Within Proof Theoretic Semantics Gödel's G has no meaning in PA olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-21 08:33 -0500
       → Re: Within Proof Theoretic Semantics Gödel's G has no meaning in PA Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2026-04-22 10:19 +0300
         → Re: Within Proof Theoretic Semantics Gödel's G has no meaning in PA olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-22 02:48 -0500
           → Re: Within Proof Theoretic Semantics Gödel's G has no meaning in PA Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2026-04-22 11:19 +0300
             → Re: Within Proof Theoretic Semantics Gödel's G has no meaning in PA olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-22 08:17 -0500
               → Re: Within Proof Theoretic Semantics Gödel's G has no meaning in PA Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2026-04-23 10:06 +0300
                 → Re: Within Proof Theoretic Semantics Gödel's G has no meaning in PA olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-23 08:49 -0500
                 → Re: Within Proof Theoretic Semantics Gödel's G has no meaning in PA Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2026-04-24 09:33 +0300
           → Re: Within Proof Theoretic Semantics Gödel's G has no meaning in PA André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> 2026-04-22 17:06 -0600
             → Re: Within Proof Theoretic Semantics Gödel's G has no meaning in PA olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-04-22 20:21 -0500
               → Re: Within Proof Theoretic Semantics Gödel's G has no meaning in PA André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> 2026-04-24 00:19 -0600
                 → Re: Within Proof Theoretic Semantics Gödel's G has no meaning in PA "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> 2026-04-24 21:12 -0700
                 → Re: Within Proof Theoretic Semantics Gödel's G has no meaning in PA "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> 2026-04-24 21:14 -0700
             → Re: Within Proof Theoretic Semantics Gödel's G has no meaning in PA Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-22 18:25 -0700
               → Re: Within Proof Theoretic Semantics Gödel's G has no meaning in PA Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-04-22 18:29 -0700
             → Re: Within Proof Theoretic Semantics Gödel's G has no meaning in PA Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk> 2026-06-20 17:50 +0100
               → Re: Within Proof Theoretic Semantics Gödel's G has no meaning in PA olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-06-20 12:32 -0500
                 → Re: Within Proof Theoretic Semantics Gödel's G has no meaning in PA Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk> 2026-06-27 07:53 +0100
                 → Re: Within Proof Theoretic Semantics Gödel's G has no meaning in PA Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> 2026-06-27 07:19 -0700
                 → Re: Within Proof Theoretic Semantics Gödel's G has no meaning in PA olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-06-29 08:29 -0500
                 → Re: Within Proof Theoretic Semantics Gödel's G has no meaning in PA André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> 2026-06-29 11:05 -0600
                 → Re: Within Proof Theoretic Semantics Gödel's G has no meaning in PA olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-06-29 13:16 -0500
                 → Re: Within Proof Theoretic Semantics Gödel's G has no meaning in PA André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> 2026-06-29 12:29 -0600
                 → Re: Within Proof Theoretic Semantics Gödel's G has no meaning in PA olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-06-29 14:08 -0500
                 → Re: Within Proof Theoretic Semantics Gödel's G has no meaning in PA André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> 2026-06-29 13:33 -0600
                 → Re: Within Proof Theoretic Semantics Gödel's G has no meaning in PA olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-06-29 14:47 -0500
                 → Re: Within Proof Theoretic Semantics Gödel's G has no meaning in PA André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> 2026-06-29 14:02 -0600
                 → Re: Within Proof Theoretic Semantics Gödel's G has no meaning in PA olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-06-29 15:06 -0500
                 → Re: Within Proof Theoretic Semantics Gödel's G has no meaning in PA André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> 2026-06-29 14:58 -0600
                 → Re: Within Proof Theoretic Semantics Gödel's G has no meaning in PA olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-06-29 16:10 -0500
                 → Re: Within Proof Theoretic Semantics Gödel's G has no meaning in PA André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> 2026-06-29 15:18 -0600
                 → Re: Within Proof Theoretic Semantics Gödel's G has no meaning in PA olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-06-29 16:39 -0500
                 → Re: Within Proof Theoretic Semantics Gödel's G has no meaning in PA André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> 2026-06-29 16:25 -0600
                 → Re: Within Proof Theoretic Semantics Gödel's G has no meaning in PA olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-06-29 17:38 -0500
                 → Re: Within Proof Theoretic Semantics Gödel's G has no meaning in PA André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> 2026-06-29 17:03 -0600
                 → Re: Within Proof Theoretic Semantics Gödel's G has no meaning in PA olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-06-29 18:36 -0500
                 → Re: Within Proof Theoretic Semantics Gödel's G has no meaning in PA André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> 2026-06-29 17:45 -0600
                 → Re: Within Proof Theoretic Semantics Gödel's G has no meaning in PA olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-06-29 19:37 -0500
                 → Re: Within Proof Theoretic Semantics Gödel's G has no meaning in PA André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> 2026-06-29 19:01 -0600
                 → The simple essence of Proof Theoretic Semantics olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-06-29 20:19 -0500
                 → Re: The simple essence of Proof Theoretic Semantics André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> 2026-06-29 19:54 -0600
                 → Re: The simple essence of Proof Theoretic Semantics olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-06-29 21:17 -0500
                 → Re: The simple essence of Proof Theoretic Semantics André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> 2026-06-29 20:31 -0600
                 → Re: The simple essence of Proof Theoretic Semantics olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-06-29 21:42 -0500
                 → Re: The simple essence of Proof Theoretic Semantics André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> 2026-06-29 20:49 -0600
                 → Re: The simple essence of Proof Theoretic Semantics olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-06-29 22:06 -0500
                 → Re: The simple essence of Proof Theoretic Semantics André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> 2026-06-30 15:18 -0600
                 → Re: The simple essence of Proof Theoretic Semantics olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-06-30 16:45 -0500
                 → Re: The simple essence of Proof Theoretic Semantics André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> 2026-06-30 15:56 -0600
                 → Re: The simple essence of Proof Theoretic Semantics olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-06-30 17:04 -0500
                 → Re: The simple essence of Proof Theoretic Semantics dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> 2026-06-30 22:34 -0400
                 → Re: The simple essence of Proof Theoretic Semantics olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-06-30 21:57 -0500
                 → Re: The simple essence of Proof Theoretic Semantics dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> 2026-06-30 23:02 -0400
                 → Re: The simple essence of Proof Theoretic Semantics olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-06-30 22:10 -0500
                 → Re: The simple essence of Proof Theoretic Semantics dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> 2026-06-30 23:17 -0400
                 → Re: The simple essence of Proof Theoretic Semantics olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-06-30 22:49 -0500
                 → Re: The simple essence of Proof Theoretic Semantics dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> 2026-07-01 00:01 -0400
                 → Re: The simple essence of Proof Theoretic Semantics olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-06-30 23:20 -0500
                 → Re: The simple essence of Proof Theoretic Semantics dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> 2026-07-01 07:55 -0400
                 → Re: The simple essence of Proof Theoretic Semantics olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-07-01 09:40 -0500
                 → Re: The simple essence of Proof Theoretic Semantics dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> 2026-07-01 13:33 -0400
                 → Re: The simple essence of Proof Theoretic Semantics olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-07-01 13:01 -0500
                 → Re: The simple essence of Proof Theoretic Semantics André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> 2026-07-01 12:10 -0600
                 → Re: The simple essence of Proof Theoretic Semantics olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-07-01 13:20 -0500
                 → Re: The simple essence of Proof Theoretic Semantics dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> 2026-07-01 14:34 -0400
                 → Re: The simple essence of Proof Theoretic Semantics olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-07-01 13:53 -0500
                 → Re: The simple essence of Proof Theoretic Semantics dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> 2026-07-01 14:57 -0400
                 → Re: The simple essence of Proof Theoretic Semantics olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-07-01 14:06 -0500
                 → Re: The simple essence of Proof Theoretic Semantics André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> 2026-07-01 12:40 -0600
                 → Re: The simple essence of Proof Theoretic Semantics olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-07-01 13:50 -0500
                 → Re: The simple essence of Proof Theoretic Semantics André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> 2026-07-01 13:23 -0600
                 → Re: The simple essence of Proof Theoretic Semantics olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-07-01 14:47 -0500
                 → Re: The simple essence of Proof Theoretic Semantics André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> 2026-07-01 14:11 -0600
                 → Re: The simple essence of Proof Theoretic Semantics olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-07-01 15:28 -0500
                 → Re: The simple essence of Proof Theoretic Semantics André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> 2026-07-01 14:50 -0600
                 → Re: The simple essence of Proof Theoretic Semantics olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-07-01 15:52 -0500
                 → Re: The simple essence of Proof Theoretic Semantics André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> 2026-07-01 15:10 -0600
                 → Re: The simple essence of Proof Theoretic Semantics olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-07-01 17:43 -0500
                 → Re: The simple essence of Proof Theoretic Semantics André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> 2026-07-01 17:09 -0600
                 → Re: The simple essence of Proof Theoretic Semantics olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-07-01 19:05 -0500
                 → Re: The simple essence of Proof Theoretic Semantics André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> 2026-07-01 18:39 -0600
                 → Re: The simple essence of Proof Theoretic Semantics olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-07-01 20:01 -0500
                 → Re: The simple essence of Proof Theoretic Semantics André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> 2026-07-01 19:23 -0600
                 → Re: The simple essence of Proof Theoretic Semantics olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-07-01 21:03 -0500
                 → Re: The simple essence of Proof Theoretic Semantics olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-07-03 00:02 -0500
                 → Re: The simple essence of Proof Theoretic Semantics André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> 2026-07-03 08:45 -0600
                 → Re: The simple essence of Proof Theoretic Semantics olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-07-03 11:48 -0500
                 → Re: The simple essence of Proof Theoretic Semantics André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> 2026-07-03 11:17 -0600
                 → Re: The simple essence of Proof Theoretic Semantics olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-07-03 13:12 -0500
                 → Re: The simple essence of Proof Theoretic Semantics André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> 2026-07-03 12:21 -0600
                 → Re: The simple essence of Proof Theoretic Semantics olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-07-03 13:38 -0500
                 → Re: The simple essence of Proof Theoretic Semantics André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> 2026-07-03 12:46 -0600
                 → Re: The simple essence of Proof Theoretic Semantics olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-07-03 15:43 -0500
                 → Re: The simple essence of Proof Theoretic Semantics André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> 2026-07-03 15:22 -0600
                 → Re: The simple essence of Proof Theoretic Semantics olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-07-03 20:11 -0500
                 → Re: The simple essence of Proof Theoretic Semantics Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2026-07-04 11:49 +0300
                 → Re: The simple essence of Proof Theoretic Semantics olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> 2026-07-04 12:13 -0500
                 → Re: The simple essence of Proof Theoretic Semantics Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> 2026-07-06 10:59 +0300

~Page 1 of ~127 (articles 35393–35411) Older →


csiph-web