Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica > #3060
| From | "Dr. Wolfgang Hintze" <weh@snafu.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica |
| Subject | Re: querries |
| Date | 2011-06-10 10:37 +0000 |
| Organization | Steven M. Christensen and Associates, Inc and MathTensor, Inc. |
| Message-ID | <isss5j$jcs$1@smc.vnet.net> (permalink) |
| References | <isq4o1$63f$1@smc.vnet.net> |
You need to tell Mathematica something about mu and lambda in order to
make the expressions unambigious.
Then it works out fine.
Example
In[5]:=
Simplify[(mu*lambda)^(b) - (mu^b)*(lambda^b), {mu > 0, lambda > 0}]
Out[5]=
0
Regards,
Wolfgang
"Savits, Thomas H" <savits@pitt.edu> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:isq4o1$63f$1@smc.vnet.net...
> 1) Why does Mathematica not give the value 0 to the expression
> (mu*lambda)^(b) - (mu^b)*(lambda^b)? It seems to treat the expression
> (mu*lambda) as a new variable. I used the greek letters from the
> palette in the actual expression.
>
> 2) Many times I cannot get Mathematica to simplify expressions
> involving the exponential functions, e.g., it won't combine the
> arguments of the Exp functions. Is there a way to force this?
>
> Thanks,
> Tom Savits
> Statistics Department
> University of Pittsburgh
Back to comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
querries "Savits, Thomas H" <savits@pitt.edu> - 2011-06-09 09:45 +0000 Re: querries "Kevin J. McCann" <Kevin.McCann@umbc.edu> - 2011-06-10 10:40 +0000 Re: querries "Dr. Wolfgang Hintze" <weh@snafu.de> - 2011-06-10 10:37 +0000
csiph-web