Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #6712 > unrolled thread
| Started by | HQM <harisqmega@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-07-16 07:07 -0700 |
| Last post | 2016-07-17 09:20 -0700 |
| Articles | 4 on this page of 44 — 7 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.programming
Programming HQM <harisqmega@gmail.com> - 2016-07-16 07:07 -0700
Re: Programming Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-16 16:40 +0100
Re: Programming Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2016-07-17 09:16 -0700
Re: Programming Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-17 17:53 +0100
Re: Programming Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-07-17 20:31 +0100
Re: Programming Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-18 00:57 +0100
Re: Programming Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-18 05:36 +0100
Re: Programming Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2016-07-18 08:13 -0700
Re: Programming Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-18 16:33 +0100
Re: Programming BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-18 16:44 +0100
Re: Programming Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-18 17:01 +0100
Re: Programming Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2016-07-18 09:16 -0700
Re: Programming Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-18 17:23 +0100
Re: Programming Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2016-07-18 09:28 -0700
Re: Programming Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-18 18:00 +0100
Re: Programming BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-18 18:28 +0100
Re: Programming Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-18 18:54 +0100
Re: Programming "Ant" <not@home.today> - 2016-07-18 21:12 +0100
Re: Programming Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-18 21:24 +0100
Re: Programming Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2016-07-18 14:49 -0700
Re: Programming Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-07-18 20:03 +0100
Re: Programming Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-18 20:24 +0100
Re: Programming Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2016-07-18 16:17 -0700
Re: Programming "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-07-19 19:30 -0400
Re: Programming "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-07-19 19:22 -0400
Re: Programming BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-18 16:25 +0100
Re: Programming "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-07-18 21:18 -0400
Re: Programming Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-19 03:35 +0100
Re: Programming "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-07-19 19:37 -0400
Re: Programming Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-20 00:50 +0100
Re: Programming "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-07-19 19:41 -0400
Re: Programming "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-07-20 03:31 -0400
Re: Programming "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-07-19 21:01 -0400
Re: Programming "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-07-18 05:02 -0400
Re: Programming Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-18 10:35 +0100
Re: Programming Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-07-18 10:02 +0100
Re: Programming Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2016-07-18 07:52 -0700
Re: Programming Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-18 16:25 +0100
Re: Programming Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2016-07-18 08:32 -0700
Re: Programming Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-18 16:36 +0100
Re: Programming BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-18 13:02 +0100
Re: Programming Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-18 13:38 +0100
Re: Programming BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-07-16 22:38 +0100
Re: Programming Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2016-07-17 09:20 -0700
Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]
| From | BartC <bc@freeuk.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-18 13:02 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <nmigh7$r9t$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #6713 |
On 16/07/2016 16:40, Richard Heathfield wrote: > Real programs for real users tend to be written in languages such as C > or C++. Toy programs for toy users (e.g. Windows users) tend to be > written in VB.NET or C#. Most users, real or otherwise, don't know or care what language is used to implement their programs. And the OS is what happens to ship with their chosen device. I suspect that by 'real users' you have in mind 'real programmers', who apparently have to use a hard language such as C++ to be worthy of the name. Oh and to use Unix too, that goes without saying! Obviously Windows isn't a toy OS with toy users, as otherwise MS wouldn't be a company with tens of billions of dollars revenue. But I think you knew that. Meanwhile the OP probably has some Apple or Android OS in mind, and cares nothing for neither Windows nor Linux! -- Bartc
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-18 13:38 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <nmiikd$2r7$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #6733 |
On 18/07/16 13:02, BartC wrote: > On 16/07/2016 16:40, Richard Heathfield wrote: > >> Real programs for real users tend to be written in languages such as C >> or C++. Toy programs for toy users (e.g. Windows users) tend to be >> written in VB.NET or C#. > > Most users, real or otherwise, don't know or care what language is used > to implement their programs. And the OS is what happens to ship with > their chosen device. That's certainly true for most users, yes. > I suspect that by 'real users' you have in mind 'real programmers', who > apparently have to use a hard language such as C++ to be worthy of the > name. Oh and to use Unix too, that goes without saying! No, by "real users" I didn't mean "real programmers". I meant "real users", people who actually use their computers for tasks more complicated than typing a letter or browsing a Web page. Real users need not be programmers at all, let alone 'real' programmers. Of course there was a certain amount of hyperbole mixed into that reply. After all, I consider myself to be a 'real user', and even /I/ use Windows (when no rational alternative presents itself). > Obviously Windows isn't a toy OS with toy users, as otherwise MS > wouldn't be a company with tens of billions of dollars revenue. But I > think you knew that. It is certainly possible to use Windows to get real work done, if that's what you mean. > Meanwhile the OP probably has some Apple or Android OS in mind, and > cares nothing for neither Windows nor Linux! Android is based on the Linux kernel, and iOS is a grand-child of Unix (being based on OS X, which is based on Unix). -- Richard Heathfield Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk "Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999 Sig line 4 vacant - apply within
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BartC <bc@freeuk.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-16 22:38 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <nme9gf$p2p$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #6712 |
On 16/07/2016 15:07, HQM wrote: > I have been looking to much to find a way to make an app (simple app) but I didn't find a way to make it so i just thought that this group will tell me the easiest way to make an app Try google, for example: 'how to create an android app', depending on which platform you want to create it for. It can be quite complicated even for a simple app. -- Bartc
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-17 09:20 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d39b9531-ef4a-4eb5-bc38-b94c166d1f99@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #6712 |
On Saturday, July 16, 2016 at 4:07:22 PM UTC+2, HQM wrote: > Hi my name is Harris, > > I have been looking to much to find a way to make an app (simple app) but I didn't find a way to make it so i just thought that this group will tell me the easiest way to make an app > > Thanks . It very much depends on your programming background, if any... Anyway, not easy but easier than native apps development are so called hybrid apps, i.e. web apps (HTML/CSS/JS)) running in a native container. Try and have a look at Cordova: <https://cordova.apache.org> HTH, Julio
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]
Back to top | Article view | comp.programming
csiph-web