Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #6585 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-05-08 20:20 -0400 |
| Last post | 2016-05-09 15:37 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.programming
gcc and nasm "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2016-05-08 20:20 -0400
Re: gcc and nasm BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-05-09 15:37 +0100
| From | "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-08 20:20 -0400 |
| Subject | gcc and nasm |
| Message-ID | <ngoktd$lvj$1@dont-email.me> |
Is there a way I can use gcc and instead of using GAS nasm assembly would be produced? So I don't have to look at that horrific at&t syntax? Could the compiler read it and compile? I'm sure then the linker would know what to do. Bill
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BartC <bc@freeuk.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-09 15:37 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <ngq73u$8cp$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #6585 |
On 09/05/2016 01:20, Bill Cunningham wrote: > Is there a way I can use gcc and instead of using GAS nasm assembly > would be produced? So I don't have to look at that horrific at&t syntax? > Could the compiler read it and compile? I'm sure then the linker would know > what to do. I use: gcc -S -masm=intel -fverbose-asm Or try this: http://gcc.godbolt.org/ where you type in C code on-line and it shows assembly output in either format (and for a compiler and target of your choice). -- Bartc
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.programming
csiph-web