Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #6589
| From | BartC <bc@freeuk.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming |
| Subject | Re: gcc and nasm |
| Date | 2016-05-09 15:37 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <ngq73u$8cp$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <ngoktd$lvj$1@dont-email.me> |
On 09/05/2016 01:20, Bill Cunningham wrote: > Is there a way I can use gcc and instead of using GAS nasm assembly > would be produced? So I don't have to look at that horrific at&t syntax? > Could the compiler read it and compile? I'm sure then the linker would know > what to do. I use: gcc -S -masm=intel -fverbose-asm Or try this: http://gcc.godbolt.org/ where you type in C code on-line and it shows assembly output in either format (and for a compiler and target of your choice). -- Bartc
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
gcc and nasm "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2016-05-08 20:20 -0400 Re: gcc and nasm BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-05-09 15:37 +0100
csiph-web