Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.programming > #4983 > unrolled thread

I have just read the following about Intel TSX

Started byRamine <ramine@1.1>
First post2014-12-06 17:04 -0800
Last post2014-12-06 17:04 -0800
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.programming


Contents

  I have just read the following about Intel TSX Ramine <ramine@1.1> - 2014-12-06 17:04 -0800

#4983 — I have just read the following about Intel TSX

FromRamine <ramine@1.1>
Date2014-12-06 17:04 -0800
SubjectI have just read the following about Intel TSX
Message-ID<m5vuff$uk6$1@dont-email.me>
Hello,


I have just read the following about Intel TSX:

"At the moment, TSX is quite slow, even if there's no contention and you 
don't do anything in the block. There's a lot of overhead. Using TSX 
naively may slow down even threaded code. Getting significant 
performance gains from it is non-trivial."


read more here a little bit down the webpage:

http://cbloomrants.blogspot.ca/search?updated-min=2014-01-01T00:00:00-08:00&updated-max=2015-01-01T00:00:00-08:00&max-results=43

So i think my newer scalable distributed sequential lock is
faster than Intel TSX on read-mostly scenarios, also my newer algorithm 
is kind of general synchronization mechanism because it works with both 
memory and hardisk.



Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.programming


csiph-web