I have just read the following about Intel TSX

From	Ramine <ramine@1.1>
Newsgroups	comp.programming
Subject	I have just read the following about Intel TSX
Date	2014-12-06 17:04 -0800
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<m5vuff$uk6$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

Hello,


I have just read the following about Intel TSX:

"At the moment, TSX is quite slow, even if there's no contention and you 
don't do anything in the block. There's a lot of overhead. Using TSX 
naively may slow down even threaded code. Getting significant 
performance gains from it is non-trivial."


read more here a little bit down the webpage:

http://cbloomrants.blogspot.ca/search?updated-min=2014-01-01T00:00:00-08:00&updated-max=2015-01-01T00:00:00-08:00&max-results=43

So i think my newer scalable distributed sequential lock is
faster than Intel TSX on read-mostly scenarios, also my newer algorithm 
is kind of general synchronization mechanism because it works with both 
memory and hardisk.



Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

I have just read the following about Intel TSX Ramine <ramine@1.1> - 2014-12-06 17:04 -0800

csiph-web