Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #8057
| From | David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming, alt.algebra.help |
| Subject | Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory |
| Date | 2017-09-26 10:12 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <oqd255$ci6$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <878thaq4ff.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <oq2h9b$bl5$1@dont-email.me> <87shfebi77.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <oqae30$ofl$1@dont-email.me> <87k20m1sn4.fsf@bsb.me.uk> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 25/09/17 21:32, Ben Bacarisse wrote: > David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> writes: > >> On 22/09/17 22:18, Ben Bacarisse wrote: >>> David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> writes: >>> <snip> >>>> Out of curiosity, how do you type the S̅? Is it a combining macron or >>>> something? >>> >>> A macron is usually shorter: S̄. It's a combining overline (U+0305). >>> >>> I use Emacs as my Usenet client so I use that directly because it can >>> auto-complete (and search) Unicode character names. When I write the >>> original, I was not sure what character was the right one (and I did >>> indeed try a macron first!) so seeing all the completion options was >>> very helpful. >> >> Like this: ̅S ? > > Yes, except that combining marks go after the glyph they combine with. Interesting - I did not realise there was a difference. Putting the combining mark first gives ̅S while putting it last gives S̅. There is a noticeable difference in these two glyphs (at least with the fonts I am using) - putting the combing mark last sets its height to fit the S better. > Whether Emacs will show the actual combined symbol or not seems to > depend on the font being used. Not sure why. Maybe some fonts don't > include the right data. > >> I don't use Emacs (I never could feel comfortable with >> it), so here I am stuck with ctrl+shift+u 0305 and the S. > > That works fine, too. > >> I guess if I >> needed it often, I could add it as a compose key or an Alt-Gr key. >> Usually if I am writing maths, it will be in LaTeX anyway, rather than >> Usenet posts. > > Yup. Having French and Spanish family I need few accents and so on, > but they are all compose sequences in this laptop. With a Norwegian keyboard layout, keys like '`^"~ are all dead keys, making it easy to type most common Western European accents or letters - even with Windows. On Linux there are a lot more on Alt-Gr sequences, and then the compose key gives another level. > >> But my son often has need of odd symbols, especially IPA symbols for >> linguistics - I'll suggest he looks at Emacs as a possible convenient >> way to enter these, as he is always interested in alternative methods. > > Emacs has a few IPA input methods so you can type symbols using plain > character sequences. I don't know how easy they are to use for serious > work. > I will recommend he gives it a shot. It all comes down to how much you have to type the symbols. I don't expect he types whole paragraphs in IPA - and you have to type a lot before you get used to a new method. I believe he does most of his documents in Lyx, which has good toolbars for IPA (by "good", I mean he finds the ordering and layout logical). The TeX modes for Emacs could be an alternative.
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Daniel Bastos <dbastos@toledo.com> - 2017-09-18 12:51 -0300
Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-09-18 20:40 +0100
Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory William Elliot <marsh@panix.com> - 2017-09-18 21:39 -0700
Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-09-19 13:05 +0100
Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory William Elliot <marsh@panix.com> - 2017-09-19 19:47 -0700
Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-09-20 14:28 +0100
Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory William Elliot <marsh@panix.com> - 2017-09-20 21:06 -0700
Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-09-21 17:03 +0100
Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Daniel Bastos <dbastos@toledo.com> - 2017-09-21 15:06 -0300
Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-09-21 21:24 +0100
Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Daniel Bastos <dbastos@toledo.com> - 2017-09-21 17:57 -0300
Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-09-21 23:40 +0100
Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory William Elliot <marsh@panix.com> - 2017-09-21 20:45 -0700
Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-09-23 02:27 +0100
Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory William Elliot <marsh@panix.com> - 2017-09-22 19:49 -0700
Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-09-23 08:04 +0100
Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Daniel Bastos <dbastos@toledo.com> - 2017-09-23 08:41 -0300
Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Paul N <gw7rib@aol.com> - 2017-09-24 14:00 -0700
Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-09-23 14:50 +0100
Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory William Elliot <marsh@panix.com> - 2017-09-23 22:04 -0700
Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-09-24 07:39 +0100
Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory William Elliot <marsh@panix.com> - 2017-09-25 01:13 -0700
Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-09-25 09:46 +0100
Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory William Elliot <marsh@panix.com> - 2017-09-25 21:38 -0700
Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-09-26 10:19 +0100
Modern Trash William Elliot <marsh@panix.com> - 2017-09-26 03:37 -0700
Re: Modern Trash David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-09-26 12:52 +0200
Re: Modern Trash Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-09-26 23:10 +0100
Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-09-24 22:33 +0100
Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory William Elliot <marsh@panix.com> - 2017-09-25 01:08 -0700
Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-09-25 20:44 +0100
Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory William Elliot <marsh@panix.com> - 2017-09-25 21:36 -0700
Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-09-26 12:04 +0100
Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory William Elliot <marsh@panix.com> - 2017-09-26 23:15 -0700
Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-09-27 12:52 +0100
Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory William Elliot <marsh@panix.com> - 2017-09-27 19:55 -0700
Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org> - 2017-09-24 16:55 +0000
Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-09-22 10:23 +0200
Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-09-22 21:18 +0100
Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Daniel Bastos <dbastos@toledo.com> - 2017-09-23 08:48 -0300
Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-09-25 10:17 +0200
Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Daniel Bastos <dbastos@toledo.com> - 2017-09-25 07:31 -0300
Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-09-25 13:30 +0200
Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-09-25 20:32 +0100
Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-09-26 10:12 +0200
Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-09-26 11:53 +0100
Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-09-26 13:24 +0200
Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Daniel Bastos <dbastos@toledo.com> - 2017-09-19 16:21 -0300
Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-09-20 17:43 +0100
Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Daniel Bastos <dbastos@toledo.com> - 2017-09-21 16:20 -0300
Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Daniel Bastos <dbastos@toledo.com> - 2017-09-21 17:52 -0300
Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-09-21 22:02 +0100
Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Daniel Bastos <dbastos@toledo.com> - 2017-09-23 13:42 -0300
csiph-web