Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.programming > #8057

Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory

From David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no>
Newsgroups comp.programming, alt.algebra.help
Subject Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory
Date 2017-09-26 10:12 +0200
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <oqd255$ci6$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <878thaq4ff.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <oq2h9b$bl5$1@dont-email.me> <87shfebi77.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <oqae30$ofl$1@dont-email.me> <87k20m1sn4.fsf@bsb.me.uk>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On 25/09/17 21:32, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
> David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> writes:
> 
>> On 22/09/17 22:18, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
>>> David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> writes:
>>> <snip>
>>>> Out of curiosity, how do you type the S̅?  Is it a combining macron or
>>>> something?
>>>
>>> A macron is usually shorter: S̄.  It's a combining overline (U+0305).
>>>
>>> I use Emacs as my Usenet client so I use that directly because it can
>>> auto-complete (and search) Unicode character names.  When I write the
>>> original, I was not sure what character was the right one (and I did
>>> indeed try a macron first!) so seeing all the completion options was
>>> very helpful.
>>
>> Like this: ̅S ?

> 
> Yes, except that combining marks go after the glyph they combine with.

Interesting - I did not realise there was a difference.  Putting the
combining mark first gives ̅S while putting it last gives S̅.  There is a
noticeable difference in these two glyphs (at least with the fonts I am
using) - putting the combing mark last sets its height to fit the S better.

> Whether Emacs will show the actual combined symbol or not seems to
> depend on the font being used.  Not sure why.  Maybe some fonts don't
> include the right data.
> 
>> I don't use Emacs (I never could feel comfortable with
>> it), so here I am stuck with ctrl+shift+u 0305 and the S.
> 
> That works fine, too.
> 
>> I guess if I
>> needed it often, I could add it as a compose key or an Alt-Gr key.
>> Usually if I am writing maths, it will be in LaTeX anyway, rather than
>> Usenet posts.
> 
> Yup.  Having French and Spanish family I need few accents and so on,
> but they are all compose sequences in this laptop.

With a Norwegian keyboard layout, keys like '`^"~ are all dead keys,
making it easy to type most common Western European accents or letters -
even with Windows.  On Linux there are a lot more on Alt-Gr sequences,
and then the compose key gives another level.

> 
>> But my son often has need of odd symbols, especially IPA symbols for
>> linguistics - I'll suggest he looks at Emacs as a possible convenient
>> way to enter these, as he is always interested in alternative methods.
> 
> Emacs has a few IPA input methods so you can type symbols using plain
> character sequences.  I don't know how easy they are to use for serious
> work.
> 

I will recommend he gives it a shot.  It all comes down to how much you
have to type the symbols.  I don't expect he types whole paragraphs in
IPA - and you have to type a lot before you get used to a new method.  I
believe he does most of his documents in Lyx, which has good toolbars
for IPA (by "good", I mean he finds the ordering and layout logical).
The TeX modes for Emacs could be an alternative.

Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Daniel Bastos <dbastos@toledo.com> - 2017-09-18 12:51 -0300
  Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-09-18 20:40 +0100
    Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory William Elliot <marsh@panix.com> - 2017-09-18 21:39 -0700
      Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-09-19 13:05 +0100
        Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory William Elliot <marsh@panix.com> - 2017-09-19 19:47 -0700
          Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-09-20 14:28 +0100
            Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory William Elliot <marsh@panix.com> - 2017-09-20 21:06 -0700
              Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-09-21 17:03 +0100
                Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Daniel Bastos <dbastos@toledo.com> - 2017-09-21 15:06 -0300
                Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-09-21 21:24 +0100
                Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Daniel Bastos <dbastos@toledo.com> - 2017-09-21 17:57 -0300
                Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-09-21 23:40 +0100
                Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory William Elliot <marsh@panix.com> - 2017-09-21 20:45 -0700
                Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-09-23 02:27 +0100
                Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory William Elliot <marsh@panix.com> - 2017-09-22 19:49 -0700
                Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-09-23 08:04 +0100
                Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Daniel Bastos <dbastos@toledo.com> - 2017-09-23 08:41 -0300
                Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Paul N <gw7rib@aol.com> - 2017-09-24 14:00 -0700
                Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-09-23 14:50 +0100
                Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory William Elliot <marsh@panix.com> - 2017-09-23 22:04 -0700
                Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-09-24 07:39 +0100
                Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory William Elliot <marsh@panix.com> - 2017-09-25 01:13 -0700
                Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-09-25 09:46 +0100
                Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory William Elliot <marsh@panix.com> - 2017-09-25 21:38 -0700
                Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-09-26 10:19 +0100
                Modern Trash William Elliot <marsh@panix.com> - 2017-09-26 03:37 -0700
                Re: Modern Trash David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-09-26 12:52 +0200
                Re: Modern Trash Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-09-26 23:10 +0100
                Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-09-24 22:33 +0100
                Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory William Elliot <marsh@panix.com> - 2017-09-25 01:08 -0700
                Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-09-25 20:44 +0100
                Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory William Elliot <marsh@panix.com> - 2017-09-25 21:36 -0700
                Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-09-26 12:04 +0100
                Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory William Elliot <marsh@panix.com> - 2017-09-26 23:15 -0700
                Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-09-27 12:52 +0100
                Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory William Elliot <marsh@panix.com> - 2017-09-27 19:55 -0700
                Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org> - 2017-09-24 16:55 +0000
        Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-09-22 10:23 +0200
          Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-09-22 21:18 +0100
            Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Daniel Bastos <dbastos@toledo.com> - 2017-09-23 08:48 -0300
            Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-09-25 10:17 +0200
              Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Daniel Bastos <dbastos@toledo.com> - 2017-09-25 07:31 -0300
                Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-09-25 13:30 +0200
              Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-09-25 20:32 +0100
                Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-09-26 10:12 +0200
                Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-09-26 11:53 +0100
                Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-09-26 13:24 +0200
    Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Daniel Bastos <dbastos@toledo.com> - 2017-09-19 16:21 -0300
      Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-09-20 17:43 +0100
        Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Daniel Bastos <dbastos@toledo.com> - 2017-09-21 16:20 -0300
          Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Daniel Bastos <dbastos@toledo.com> - 2017-09-21 17:52 -0300
          Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-09-21 22:02 +0100
            Re: on cut edges and bonds, graph theory Daniel Bastos <dbastos@toledo.com> - 2017-09-23 13:42 -0300

csiph-web