Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.programming > #2999

Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?

Path csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
Newsgroups comp.programming, comp.unix.programmer
Subject Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?
Date Mon, 11 Feb 2013 18:28:32 +0100
Lines 16
Message-ID <anso21Fpkd6U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <anmpeoFegq2U1@mid.individual.net> <87wqug10uh.fsf@sapphire.mobileactivedefense.com> <5118B20E.4070903@web.de> <5118e628$0$22864$91cee783@newsreader03.highway.telekom.at>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Trace individual.net BTCQb0rZtwxV3wLLsg0KngJzdjlmEiegDMhov0rFWT1Lb2vuD6QSMXLSWyQwiPWYUh
Cancel-Lock sha1:wC6XsT9GmEfyaEu9ac6f1/oIgC0=
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130105 Thunderbird/17.0.2
In-Reply-To <5118e628$0$22864$91cee783@newsreader03.highway.telekom.at>
Xref csiph.com comp.programming:2999 comp.unix.programmer:4190

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

> I believe that there may have been changes to the linker or compiler, so the
> order of arguments given does matter now.

Thanks for your suggestion.

I would like to be sure that the adjusted parameter set would be equivalent to
the Autotools generated one which contains duplicate values. I guess that a
shorter parameter list will be easier to read, won't it?


> This is all just guesswork.

I hope that this situation can be improved.

Regards,
Markus

Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test? Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de> - 2013-02-09 12:15 +0100
  Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test? Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2013-02-10 18:27 +0000
    Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test? Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de> - 2013-02-11 09:55 +0100
      Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test? Johann Klammer <klammerj@NOSPAM.a1.net> - 2013-02-11 13:38 +0100
        Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test? Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de> - 2013-02-11 18:28 +0100
          Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test? Johann Klammer <klammerj@NOSPAM.a1.net> - 2013-02-11 19:35 +0100
            Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error   messages for a configuration test? Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de> - 2013-02-11 20:02 +0100
      Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test? Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2013-02-13 11:59 +0000
        Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test? Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de> - 2013-02-13 20:57 +0100

csiph-web