Path: csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
Newsgroups: comp.programming,comp.unix.programmer
Subject: Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test?
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 18:28:32 +0100
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <anso21Fpkd6U1@mid.individual.net>
References: <anmpeoFegq2U1@mid.individual.net> <87wqug10uh.fsf@sapphire.mobileactivedefense.com> <5118B20E.4070903@web.de> <5118e628$0$22864$91cee783@newsreader03.highway.telekom.at>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net BTCQb0rZtwxV3wLLsg0KngJzdjlmEiegDMhov0rFWT1Lb2vuD6QSMXLSWyQwiPWYUh
Cancel-Lock: sha1:wC6XsT9GmEfyaEu9ac6f1/oIgC0=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130105 Thunderbird/17.0.2
In-Reply-To: <5118e628$0$22864$91cee783@newsreader03.highway.telekom.at>
Xref: csiph.com comp.programming:2999 comp.unix.programmer:4190

> I believe that there may have been changes to the linker or compiler, so the
> order of arguments given does matter now.

Thanks for your suggestion.

I would like to be sure that the adjusted parameter set would be equivalent to
the Autotools generated one which contains duplicate values. I guess that a
shorter parameter list will be easier to read, won't it?


> This is all just guesswork.

I hope that this situation can be improved.

Regards,
Markus