Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.programming > #10187

Re: What is the current state-of-the-art?

Path csiph.com!aioe.org!.POSTED.njEUZDpERlFkQgEkTVJOLQ.user.gioia.aioe.org!not-for-mail
From Louis Valence <lvalence@example.com>
Newsgroups comp.programming
Subject Re: What is the current state-of-the-art?
Date Sun, 08 Sep 2019 23:54:14 -0300
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines 27
Message-ID <86r24qdvs9.fsf@example.com> (permalink)
References <3a72a169-3ce4-498f-a5e3-dd21cc318b1a@googlegroups.com> <86r24rv5mi.fsf@example.com> <36e07578-b7ae-4755-b7d7-ed054066b9e5@googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host njEUZDpERlFkQgEkTVJOLQ.user.gioia.aioe.org
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain
X-Complaints-To abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (windows-nt)
X-Notice Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
Cancel-Lock sha1:mnAI9h5LerSMHCc/0YXpKfl8Y5U=
Xref csiph.com comp.programming:10187

Show key headers only | View raw


Mark Rosenblitt-Janssen <dreamingforward@gmail.com> writes:

>> > What happened to the internet I used to know?  
>> 
>> The Internet we used to know was built by and populated by a much more
>> coherent community, but, as it turned out, the Internet is great for
>> commerce and consumption, so now the Internet is full of consumers.  The
>> typical consumer is not very skilled; the older generation, that built
>> this Internet, is probably a bit old by now too.  Many are dead.  We're
>> probably the ones left.
>
> Don't you think the Free software community was built for this, too?

Sorry.  Built for what?

[...]

>> You talk to a computer science student nowadays and they ``surely
>> learned their c programming language'', but never heard of Dennis
>> Ritchie or Brian Kernighan, nor have read the book.  They prefer to
>> learn from badly written essays and poorly crafted paragraphs.  It makes
>> no sense.
>
> For sure, ask a Javascripter:  What is the binary digit for one?  They
> think it's a trick question.

We should not underestimate cluelessness.

Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

What is the current state-of-the-art? Mark Rosenblitt-Janssen <dreamingforward@gmail.com> - 2019-09-07 09:23 -0700
  Re: What is the current state-of-the-art? Pankaj Jangid <pankaj.jangid@gmail.com> - 2019-09-07 23:16 +0530
  Re: What is the current state-of-the-art? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2019-09-07 17:51 +0000
    Re: What is the current state-of-the-art? Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2019-09-08 06:31 -0700
    Re: What is the current state-of-the-art? fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2019-09-13 07:42 -0700
  Re: What is the current state-of-the-art? Louis Valence <lvalence@example.com> - 2019-09-08 00:17 -0300
    Re: What is the current state-of-the-art? Mark Rosenblitt-Janssen <dreamingforward@gmail.com> - 2019-09-08 13:56 -0700
      Re: What is the current state-of-the-art? Louis Valence <lvalence@example.com> - 2019-09-08 23:54 -0300
      Re: What is the current state-of-the-art? Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2019-09-11 06:12 -0700
        Re: What is the current state-of-the-art? Louis Valence <lvalence@example.com> - 2019-09-11 21:25 -0300
          Re: What is the current state-of-the-art? Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2019-09-13 10:25 -0700
            Re: What is the current state-of-the-art? Louis Valence <lvalence@example.com> - 2019-09-13 17:11 -0300
  Re: What is the current state-of-the-art? fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2019-09-13 07:47 -0700

csiph-web