Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #2996
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!storethat.news.telefonica.de!feedme.news.telefonica.de!telefonica.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de> |
| Newsgroups | comp.programming, comp.unix.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test? |
| Date | Mon, 11 Feb 2013 09:55:42 +0100 |
| Lines | 21 |
| Message-ID | <5118B20E.4070903@web.de> (permalink) |
| References | <anmpeoFegq2U1@mid.individual.net> <87wqug10uh.fsf@sapphire.mobileactivedefense.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Trace | individual.net nAncnDCKwVg4ZI9/kuaQewNtrm6ocYpWTRn0beQJs6uyC03t5sAja8oJwldOjrnO86 |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:axpAKUsoYpHg4spRvcuwKGzlv8M= |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130105 Thunderbird/17.0.2 |
| In-Reply-To | <87wqug10uh.fsf@sapphire.mobileactivedefense.com> |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.programming:2996 comp.unix.programmer:4186 |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
> ..., namely "What's your question?". 1. Other software developers generated the affected library successfully. Examples: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/opal.git http://packages.debian.org/experimental/libopal3.10.9 https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?project=openSUSE%3AFactory&package=opal So I wonder why I stumble on "undefined references" for my build configuration variant. I expect that all needed symbols should be available also for the linker. Why can they not be resolved here? 2. The shown configuration test is generated by the Autotools. The command contains duplicate options and preprocessor symbols. I dared to shorten the call a bit. Why are the displayed messages so different after my adjustment? Regards, Markus
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test? Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de> - 2013-02-09 12:15 +0100
Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test? Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2013-02-10 18:27 +0000
Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test? Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de> - 2013-02-11 09:55 +0100
Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test? Johann Klammer <klammerj@NOSPAM.a1.net> - 2013-02-11 13:38 +0100
Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test? Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de> - 2013-02-11 18:28 +0100
Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test? Johann Klammer <klammerj@NOSPAM.a1.net> - 2013-02-11 19:35 +0100
Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test? Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de> - 2013-02-11 20:02 +0100
Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test? Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> - 2013-02-13 11:59 +0000
Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test? Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de> - 2013-02-13 20:57 +0100
csiph-web