Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!storethat.news.telefonica.de!feedme.news.telefonica.de!telefonica.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Markus Elfring Newsgroups: comp.programming,comp.unix.programmer Subject: Re: Should the passed command parameters result into the same error messages for a configuration test? Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 09:55:42 +0100 Lines: 21 Message-ID: <5118B20E.4070903@web.de> References: <87wqug10uh.fsf@sapphire.mobileactivedefense.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net nAncnDCKwVg4ZI9/kuaQewNtrm6ocYpWTRn0beQJs6uyC03t5sAja8oJwldOjrnO86 Cancel-Lock: sha1:axpAKUsoYpHg4spRvcuwKGzlv8M= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130105 Thunderbird/17.0.2 In-Reply-To: <87wqug10uh.fsf@sapphire.mobileactivedefense.com> Xref: csiph.com comp.programming:2996 comp.unix.programmer:4186 > ..., namely "What's your question?". 1. Other software developers generated the affected library successfully. Examples: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/opal.git http://packages.debian.org/experimental/libopal3.10.9 https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?project=openSUSE%3AFactory&package=opal So I wonder why I stumble on "undefined references" for my build configuration variant. I expect that all needed symbols should be available also for the linker. Why can they not be resolved here? 2. The shown configuration test is generated by the Autotools. The command contains duplicate options and preprocessor symbols. I dared to shorten the call a bit. Why are the displayed messages so different after my adjustment? Regards, Markus