Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #4794
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news.albasani.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.programming |
| Subject | Re: Two object oriented methods, which is better? |
| Date | Thu, 18 Sep 2014 20:46:16 +0200 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Lines | 35 |
| Message-ID | <20140918204616.7a953d26@maxa-pc> (permalink) |
| References | <lvf8uf$o09$2@speranza.aioe.org> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=US-ASCII |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Trace | news.albasani.net FCJZUXCRT6Tvtal9UlRjWiUpAdeOD9bs0BfxYxqv7xPhx/soYxQX5mmESAZe6yPkAJoDoEzHtkBjUfhasUWWMpIDT/zgwtaNHAvEhL6vzO5oa89YjoBUwLzECfTzIQuk |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Thu, 18 Sep 2014 18:46:16 +0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | news.albasani.net; logging-data="uH7yUDZ14Tas2+zilLFgBSCF5bjEFLSZQMZAVKu64ur9qtC2/WgH1Rgz7YH4V/q8tV5mFFUuhtCsetB16W+MuFpgkCRKcwRtWqtsk93ZbUl1qn/8g5zxqOlrpQLVvr+B"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@albasani.net" |
| X-Newsreader | Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.24; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:BxtMy1vWgMN6B4Sdi9sJcReT/3k= |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.programming:4794 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 21:40:19 +0300
Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru> wrote:
> [Sorry for multiple postings, but traffic of comp.object is so low
> (as I found after my posting there), that almost nobody will suffer
> of my multiple posting.]
>
> If I want to push a specific (for a given subclass) value into an
> array argument of a method, should I just pass the value of the
> argument to a method which would modify it, or should I create a
> method which just returns
> the list of additional values (and use it in the first mentioned
> method)?
>
> Pseudocode (with "#" starting comments) for a method f:
>
> # modify_array is a dynamic method
> function f(object, array) {
> object->modify_array(array);
> }
>
> or
>
> # common_array_members is a dynamic method
> function f(object, array) {
> array = concat(array, object->common_array_members());
> }
>
> What is more object oriented? Which is better?
First can do whatever with array, while second shows clear
intent.
I'll go with second since it is clearer what function does.
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Two object oriented methods, which is better? Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru> - 2014-09-18 21:40 +0300
Re: Two object oriented methods, which is better? Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-09-18 20:46 +0200
Re: Two object oriented methods, which is better? Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-09-18 18:59 +0000
Re: Two object oriented methods, which is better? Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-09-18 21:08 +0200
Re: Two object oriented methods, which is better? Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-09-18 19:26 +0000
Re: Two object oriented methods, which is better? Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-09-18 19:24 +0000
csiph-web