Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.programming > #1178

Re: the hourglass problem

Path csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.franciliens.net!news.muarf.org!nntpfeed.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!74.125.46.80.MISMATCH!postnews.google.com!news1.google.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.scnresearch.com!news.scnresearch.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date Sun, 01 Jan 2012 21:48:24 -0600
Newsgroups sci.logic, rec.puzzles, sci.math.num-analysis, comp.programming
Date Sun, 1 Jan 2012 19:48:22 -0800
From William Elliot <marsh@rdrop.com>
Subject Re: the hourglass problem
In-Reply-To <1a8e9fec-2719-4053-bcb5-743ef65ef50e@t13g2000yqg.googlegroups.com>
Message-ID <20120101193551.G93055@agora.rdrop.com> (permalink)
References <7f48dfe5-ca54-49ca-8cb9-5ae686e96f92@c42g2000prb.googlegroups.com> <20111231191854.X3968@agora.rdrop.com> <1a8e9fec-2719-4053-bcb5-743ef65ef50e@t13g2000yqg.googlegroups.com>
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="0-1957678004-1325476102=:93055"
Lines 32
X-Usenet-Provider http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host 199.26.172.34
X-AuthenticatedUsername NoAuthUser
X-Trace sv3-3QNS5pg4MQ36FDuTXtH5h5rLWs7GXLF8e6EnL7It9E5wAcluNqliHGH4LYsYeI1t2q9tibLKWldUFS9!GH2wlIhAAk9yX7V5WLGgwRusMQLSCcXlfdSqyA7zzjuNcf35OedDuu4N0nw0LKsgyAsXlAFplGjd!QtsRnDlD
X-Complaints-To abuse@scnresearch.com
X-DMCA-Complaints-To abuse@scnresearch.com
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes 2586
Xref x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.programming:1178

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Sat, 31 Dec 2011, Dave Dodson wrote:
> On Dec 31, 9:21 pm, William Elliot <ma...@rdrop.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, 31 Dec 2011, RichD wrote:

>>> You're given a 7 minute, and a 4 minute, sand
>>> hourglass. Measure a 9 minute interval, in the first
>>> 9 minutes. (no 'setup' period)
>>
>> Can't be done without a setup.
>
> How about this: Start both timers. When the four-minute timer runs out
> (at 4 minutes), turn it over. When the seven-minute timer runs out (at
> 7 minutes), turn it over. When the four-minute timer runs out again
> (at 8 minutes), turn the seven-minute timer over. It will run out at 9
> minutes.

Beside having a set up period, I dispute its correctness.
Here's what I saw.

Set off 7 and 4, reset 4, reset 7, reset 4, reset 4.
Mark end of second 7 as start.  Forth 4 has two minutes
to go.  At end of forth 4, again set off 7.

As that had set up period of 14 minutes, it was discarded.

Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

the hourglass problem RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2011-12-31 18:03 -0800
  Re: the hourglass problem William Elliot <marsh@rdrop.com> - 2011-12-31 19:21 -0800
    Re: the hourglass problem Dave Dodson <dave_and_darla@Juno.com> - 2011-12-31 19:41 -0800
      Re: the hourglass problem William Elliot <marsh@rdrop.com> - 2012-01-01 19:48 -0800
        Re: the hourglass problem Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2012-01-01 20:44 -0800
          Re: the hourglass problem William Elliot <marsh@rdrop.com> - 2012-01-01 23:08 -0800
            Re: the hourglass problem Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2012-01-02 07:55 -0800
              Re: the hourglass problem Dr Nick <3-nospam@temporary-address.org.uk> - 2012-01-02 16:17 +0000
                Re: the hourglass problem Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2012-01-03 03:37 -0600
    Re: the hourglass problem Remysun <remysun2000@yahoo.com> - 2012-01-02 17:10 -0800
      Re: the hourglass problem "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-01-03 01:12 +0000
  Re: the hourglass problem root <NoEMail@home.org> - 2012-01-01 05:51 +0000
    Re: the hourglass problem William Elliot <marsh@rdrop.com> - 2012-01-01 20:04 -0800
      Re: the hourglass problem Duncan Booth <duncan.booth@invalid.invalid> - 2012-01-02 11:42 +0000
    Re: the hourglass problem RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2012-01-03 15:05 -0800
      Re: the hourglass problem Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-01-03 15:19 -0800
        Re: the hourglass problem PT <ptanenbaum@consultant.com> - 2012-01-04 12:28 -0800
          Re: the hourglass problem Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-01-04 13:44 -0800
        Re: the hourglass problem Dave Dodson <dave_and_darla@Juno.com> - 2012-01-04 22:55 -0800
          Re: the hourglass problem Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-01-04 23:55 -0800
            Re: the hourglass problem "Harry Vaderchi" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2012-01-05 10:06 +0000
              Re: the hourglass problem "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-01-05 13:44 +0000
                Re: the hourglass problem Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2012-01-05 08:13 -0800
                Re: the hourglass problem Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-01-05 11:55 -0800
                Re: the hourglass problem JohnF <john@please.see.sig.for.email.com> - 2012-01-06 04:40 +0000
            Re: the hourglass problem Dave <dave_and_darla@Juno.com> - 2012-01-05 15:37 -0800
              Re: the hourglass problem Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-01-05 16:02 -0800
  Re: the hourglass problem Duncan Booth <duncan.booth@invalid.invalid> - 2012-01-02 11:50 +0000
  Re: the hourglass problem Frederick Williams <freddywilliams@btinternet.com> - 2012-01-02 17:18 +0000
    Re: the hourglass problem msb@vex.net (Mark Brader) - 2012-01-02 17:40 -0600
      Re: the hourglass problem RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2012-01-02 17:37 -0800
        Re: the hourglass problem msb@vex.net (Mark Brader) - 2012-01-02 23:45 -0600
        Re: the hourglass problem "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2012-01-03 10:06 +0100
        Re: the hourglass problem Thomas Mlynarczyk <thomas@mlynarczyk-webdesign.de> - 2012-01-03 12:51 +0100
          Re: the hourglass problem Nicolas Neuss <lastname@scipolis.de> - 2012-01-03 18:07 +0100
            Re: the hourglass problem Thomas Mlynarczyk <thomas@mlynarczyk-webdesign.de> - 2012-01-03 21:58 +0100
        Re: the hourglass problem Frederick Williams <freddywilliams@btinternet.com> - 2012-01-03 13:22 +0000
      Re: the hourglass problem "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-01-03 12:59 +0000
    Re: the hourglass problem Thomas Mlynarczyk <thomas@mlynarczyk-webdesign.de> - 2012-01-03 12:47 +0100
  Re: the hourglass problem Frederick Williams <freddywilliams@btinternet.com> - 2012-01-05 14:09 +0000
    Re: the hourglass problem Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2012-01-05 08:17 -0800
      Re: the hourglass problem Frederick Williams <freddywilliams@btinternet.com> - 2012-01-05 16:27 +0000
      Re: the hourglass problem Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-01-05 11:57 -0800
      Re: the hourglass problem JohnF <john@please.see.sig.for.email.com> - 2012-01-06 06:42 +0000

csiph-web