Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #1182
| From | Duncan Booth <duncan.booth@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.logic, rec.puzzles, sci.math.num-analysis, comp.programming |
| Subject | Re: the hourglass problem |
| Followup-To | rec.puzzles |
| Date | 2012-01-02 11:42 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <Xns9FCE772F82F21duncanbooth@127.0.0.1> (permalink) |
| References | <7f48dfe5-ca54-49ca-8cb9-5ae686e96f92@c42g2000prb.googlegroups.com> <jdos8s$ov8$1@dont-email.me> <20120101200139.B93055@agora.rdrop.com> |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
Followups directed to: rec.puzzles
William Elliot <marsh@rdrop.com> wrote: > On Sun, 1 Jan 2012, root wrote: >> RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> wrote: > >>> You're given a 7 minute, and a 4 minute, sand >>> hourglass. Measure a 9 minute interval, in the first >>> 9 minutes. (no 'setup' period) >>> >>> ok, this is trivial. But as computer nerds, we're >>> interested in general solutions. So, given hourglasses >>> of n and m minutes: >>> >>> 1) Can you devise a formula which generates a list of >>> all possible intervals produced by them? > >> This problem is very interesting. After you realize >> how to get 9 minutes, you then realize you are >> able to get 4 minutes, 7 minutes, and then every >> integer minute thereafter. So the numbers realizable >> without delay are: >> 4,7,8,9,10,11,12........ >> > How did you realize 9, 10 and 11 without any delay? The solution for 9 has already been posted multiple times. 10 and 11 are simple extensions of the solution for 9: start both timers (t=0) turn over the 4 minute timer when it expires (t=4) turn over the 7 minute timer when it expires (t=7) turn over both timers when the 4 minute timer expires (t=8) turn over both timers when the 7 minute timer expires (t=9) turn over both timers when the 4 minute timer expires (t=10) turn over both timers when the 7 minute timer expires (t=11) ... and keep on marking every minute from 7 until you get bored. > >> Then, clearly, with a 7 minute delay you can generate >> every integer minute. > > How can you generate 2 and 9 with only a 7 minute delay? Same way you generate 9 and 16 with no delay. -- Duncan Booth
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
the hourglass problem RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2011-12-31 18:03 -0800
Re: the hourglass problem William Elliot <marsh@rdrop.com> - 2011-12-31 19:21 -0800
Re: the hourglass problem Dave Dodson <dave_and_darla@Juno.com> - 2011-12-31 19:41 -0800
Re: the hourglass problem William Elliot <marsh@rdrop.com> - 2012-01-01 19:48 -0800
Re: the hourglass problem Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2012-01-01 20:44 -0800
Re: the hourglass problem William Elliot <marsh@rdrop.com> - 2012-01-01 23:08 -0800
Re: the hourglass problem Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2012-01-02 07:55 -0800
Re: the hourglass problem Dr Nick <3-nospam@temporary-address.org.uk> - 2012-01-02 16:17 +0000
Re: the hourglass problem Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2012-01-03 03:37 -0600
Re: the hourglass problem Remysun <remysun2000@yahoo.com> - 2012-01-02 17:10 -0800
Re: the hourglass problem "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-01-03 01:12 +0000
Re: the hourglass problem root <NoEMail@home.org> - 2012-01-01 05:51 +0000
Re: the hourglass problem William Elliot <marsh@rdrop.com> - 2012-01-01 20:04 -0800
Re: the hourglass problem Duncan Booth <duncan.booth@invalid.invalid> - 2012-01-02 11:42 +0000
Re: the hourglass problem RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2012-01-03 15:05 -0800
Re: the hourglass problem Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-01-03 15:19 -0800
Re: the hourglass problem PT <ptanenbaum@consultant.com> - 2012-01-04 12:28 -0800
Re: the hourglass problem Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-01-04 13:44 -0800
Re: the hourglass problem Dave Dodson <dave_and_darla@Juno.com> - 2012-01-04 22:55 -0800
Re: the hourglass problem Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-01-04 23:55 -0800
Re: the hourglass problem "Harry Vaderchi" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2012-01-05 10:06 +0000
Re: the hourglass problem "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-01-05 13:44 +0000
Re: the hourglass problem Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2012-01-05 08:13 -0800
Re: the hourglass problem Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-01-05 11:55 -0800
Re: the hourglass problem JohnF <john@please.see.sig.for.email.com> - 2012-01-06 04:40 +0000
Re: the hourglass problem Dave <dave_and_darla@Juno.com> - 2012-01-05 15:37 -0800
Re: the hourglass problem Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-01-05 16:02 -0800
Re: the hourglass problem Duncan Booth <duncan.booth@invalid.invalid> - 2012-01-02 11:50 +0000
Re: the hourglass problem Frederick Williams <freddywilliams@btinternet.com> - 2012-01-02 17:18 +0000
Re: the hourglass problem msb@vex.net (Mark Brader) - 2012-01-02 17:40 -0600
Re: the hourglass problem RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2012-01-02 17:37 -0800
Re: the hourglass problem msb@vex.net (Mark Brader) - 2012-01-02 23:45 -0600
Re: the hourglass problem "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2012-01-03 10:06 +0100
Re: the hourglass problem Thomas Mlynarczyk <thomas@mlynarczyk-webdesign.de> - 2012-01-03 12:51 +0100
Re: the hourglass problem Nicolas Neuss <lastname@scipolis.de> - 2012-01-03 18:07 +0100
Re: the hourglass problem Thomas Mlynarczyk <thomas@mlynarczyk-webdesign.de> - 2012-01-03 21:58 +0100
Re: the hourglass problem Frederick Williams <freddywilliams@btinternet.com> - 2012-01-03 13:22 +0000
Re: the hourglass problem "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-01-03 12:59 +0000
Re: the hourglass problem Thomas Mlynarczyk <thomas@mlynarczyk-webdesign.de> - 2012-01-03 12:47 +0100
Re: the hourglass problem Frederick Williams <freddywilliams@btinternet.com> - 2012-01-05 14:09 +0000
Re: the hourglass problem Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2012-01-05 08:17 -0800
Re: the hourglass problem Frederick Williams <freddywilliams@btinternet.com> - 2012-01-05 16:27 +0000
Re: the hourglass problem Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-01-05 11:57 -0800
Re: the hourglass problem JohnF <john@please.see.sig.for.email.com> - 2012-01-06 06:42 +0000
csiph-web