Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.programming.threads

comp.programming.threads

44786 articles, 6830 threads (numbers 65 – 45828) — flat view

| Advanced

Subject Author Date
Threadpool example in C under Linux ram <ramprasad.ap@gmail.com> 2011-11-30 23:42 -0800
 
Toughest Microsoft Interview Puzzle / Question divya bisht <bisht88.divya@gmail.com> 2011-11-28 20:39 -0800
 
Is pthread_create( id, 0, f, &something_on_my_stack ); safe? (12 replies — unroll) Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@2ndquadrant.com> 2011-11-21 03:29 +0000
   → Re: Is pthread_create( id, 0, f, &something_on_my_stack ); safe? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> 2011-11-21 20:00 +1300
     → Re: Is pthread_create( id, 0, f, &something_on_my_stack ); safe? Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.com> 2011-11-21 08:48 +0100
     → Re: Is pthread_create( id, 0, f, &something_on_my_stack ); safe? Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@2ndquadrant.com> 2011-11-21 07:56 +0000
       → Re: Is pthread_create( id, 0, f, &something_on_my_stack ); safe? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> 2011-11-21 21:01 +1300
       → Re: Is pthread_create( id, 0, f, &something_on_my_stack ); safe? David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> 2011-11-21 12:06 -0800
         → Re: Is pthread_create( id, 0, f, &something_on_my_stack ); safe? Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@2ndquadrant.com> 2011-11-21 20:30 +0000
           → Re: Is pthread_create( id, 0, f, &something_on_my_stack ); safe? Casper H.S. Dik <Casper.Dik@OrSPaMcle.COM> 2011-11-21 23:07 +0000
             → Re: Is pthread_create( id, 0, f, &something_on_my_stack ); safe? Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson <johann@2ndquadrant.com> 2011-11-22 05:31 +0000
             → Re: Is pthread_create( id, 0, f, &something_on_my_stack ); safe? blmblm@myrealbox.com <blmblm.myrealbox@gmail.com> 2011-11-25 17:49 +0000
           → Re: Is pthread_create( id, 0, f, &something_on_my_stack ); safe? David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> 2011-11-23 12:53 -0800
   → Re: Is pthread_create( id, 0, f, &something_on_my_stack ); safe? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> 2011-11-21 02:28 -0600
   → Re: Is pthread_create( id, 0, f, &something_on_my_stack ); safe? "Ersek, Laszlo" <lacos@caesar.elte.hu> 2011-11-22 21:06 +0100
 
State of OpenCL on Linux? (1 reply — unroll) Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> 2011-11-18 11:52 +0000
   → Re: State of OpenCL on Linux? Ralf Fassel <ralfixx@gmx.de> 2011-11-18 13:48 +0100
 
Locking primitives in userspace (4 replies — unroll) Steve Thompson <thomps2048@yahoo.ca> 2011-10-30 16:26 -0400
   → Re: Locking primitives in userspace Steve Thompson <thomps2048@yahoo.ca> 2011-11-06 06:54 -0500
     → Re: Locking primitives in userspace Mark <i@dontgetlotsofspamanymore.invalid> 2011-11-07 11:42 +0000
       → Re: Locking primitives in userspace Steve Thompson <thomps2048@yahoo.ca> 2011-11-10 09:42 -0500
   → Re: Locking primitives in userspace Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> 2011-11-08 08:30 +0100
 
PThreads or Pthreads (1 reply — unroll) John <john@roREMOVEIT.ru> 2011-10-30 20:47 +0100
   → Re: PThreads or Pthreads Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> 2011-11-08 08:43 +0100
 
Hints for lock free signal slot implementation (3 replies — unroll) Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> 2011-10-30 10:20 +0100
   → Re: Hints for lock free signal slot implementation "Chris M. Thomasson" <cristom@charter.net> 2011-11-04 14:41 -0700
     → Re: Hints for lock free signal slot implementation Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.com> 2011-11-04 23:14 +0100
   → Re: Hints for lock free signal slot implementation frege <gottlobfrege@gmail.com> 2011-11-04 19:23 -0700
 
Proactor cpisz <christopherpisz@gmail.com> 2011-11-03 13:34 -0700
 
an experimental bounded mpmc-queue algorithm... "Chris M. Thomasson" <cristom@charter.net> 2011-10-30 14:52 -0700
 
Thread problem - race condition on startup? (2 replies — unroll) nroberts <roberts.noah@gmail.com> 2011-10-27 13:20 -0700
   → Re: Thread problem - race condition on startup? nroberts <roberts.noah@gmail.com> 2011-10-27 15:12 -0700
   → Re: Thread problem - race condition on startup? Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> 2011-10-27 15:13 -0700
 
Why lock-free implementations are faster than traditional using synchronization? Are they? (8 replies — unroll) Michael Podolsky <michael.podolsky.69@gmail.com> 2011-10-08 18:08 -0700
   → Re: Why lock-free implementations are faster than traditional using synchronization? Are they? Casper H.S. Dik <Casper.Dik@OrSPaMcle.COM> 2011-10-09 10:45 +0000
   → Re: Why lock-free implementations are faster than traditional using synchronization? Are they? Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> 2011-10-10 13:22 +0200
   → Re: Why lock-free implementations are faster than traditional using synchronization? Are they? David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> 2011-10-12 16:57 -0700
     → Re: Why lock-free implementations are faster than traditional using synchronization? Are they? "Chris M. Thomasson" <cristom@charter.net> 2011-10-14 16:54 -0700
     → Re: Why lock-free implementations are faster than traditional using synchronization? Are they? Michael Podolsky <michael.podolsky.69@gmail.com> 2011-10-26 08:37 -0700
       → Re: Why lock-free implementations are faster than traditional using synchronization? Are they? "Chris M. Thomasson" <cristom@charter.net> 2011-10-26 14:19 -0700
       → Re: Why lock-free implementations are faster than traditional using synchronization? Are they? David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> 2011-10-27 01:00 -0700
   → Re: Why lock-free implementations are faster than traditional using synchronization? Are they? "Chris M. Thomasson" <cristom@charter.net> 2011-10-14 17:57 -0700
 
A good book on multithreading with examples (3 replies — unroll) persres <persres@gmail.com> 2011-10-01 05:13 -0700
   → Re: A good book on multithreading with examples Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> 2011-10-01 18:41 +0200
   → Re: A good book on multithreading with examples Anton Sharov <ocaml@mail.ru> 2011-10-02 23:10 -0700
     → Re: A good book on multithreading with examples persres <persres@gmail.com> 2011-10-21 04:31 -0700
 
User threads (2 replies — unroll) divcurl <divcurl@europe.com> 2011-10-19 18:06 -0700
   → Re: User threads Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> 2011-10-19 23:16 -0500
     → Re: User threads Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> 2011-10-20 14:32 +0200
 
Spinlock + exponential backoff better than lockfree ? aminer <aminer68@gmail.com> 2011-10-17 13:54 -0700
 
A question about those lockfree algorithms... (1 reply — unroll) aminer <aminer68@gmail.com> 2011-10-16 19:21 -0700
   → Re: A question about those lockfree algorithms... David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> 2011-10-17 13:27 -0700
 
Lockfree flqueue and lockfree_mpmc ... (5 replies — unroll) aminer <aminer68@gmail.com> 2011-10-16 12:26 -0700
   → Re: Lockfree flqueue and lockfree_mpmc ... aminer <aminer68@gmail.com> 2011-10-16 12:50 -0700
     → Re: Lockfree flqueue and lockfree_mpmc ... aminer <aminer68@gmail.com> 2011-10-16 13:29 -0700
       → Re: Lockfree flqueue and lockfree_mpmc ... aminer <aminer68@gmail.com> 2011-10-16 17:43 -0700
         → Re: Lockfree flqueue and lockfree_mpmc ... aminer <aminer68@gmail.com> 2011-10-16 18:35 -0700
   → Re: Lockfree flqueue and lockfree_mpmc ... aminer <aminer68@gmail.com> 2011-10-16 13:51 -0700
 
can pthread_mutex_trylock() give up the timeslice? (5 replies — unroll) Brendon <brendon.j.costa@gmail.com> 2011-10-13 16:05 -0700
   → Re: can pthread_mutex_trylock() give up the timeslice? Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> 2011-10-14 11:50 +0200
   → Re: can pthread_mutex_trylock() give up the timeslice? Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> 2011-10-14 13:43 -0700
     → Re: can pthread_mutex_trylock() give up the timeslice? Brendon <brendon.j.costa@gmail.com> 2011-10-14 16:56 -0700
       → Re: can pthread_mutex_trylock() give up the timeslice? Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> 2011-10-15 13:53 +0200
   → Re: can pthread_mutex_trylock() give up the timeslice? David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> 2011-10-15 21:41 -0700
 
pthread_rwlock_rdlock hangs Jaydeep Chovatia <chovatia.jaydeep@gmail.com> 2011-10-06 13:45 -0700
 
usage of vyukov's mpsc queue (21 replies — unroll) Ephi Sinowitz <esinowitz.public@gmail.com> 2011-09-20 06:55 -0700
   → Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> 2011-09-20 17:19 -0700
     → Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue Ephi Sinowitz <esinowitz.public@gmail.com> 2011-09-20 18:35 -0700
       → Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue Ephraim Sinowitz <ephisinowitz@yahoo.com> 2011-09-21 06:42 -0400
   → Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> 2011-09-21 00:26 -0700
   → Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> 2011-09-21 12:19 +0200
     → Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> 2011-09-21 12:34 +0200
     → Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue Ephi Sinowitz <ephisinowitz@yahoo.com> 2011-09-21 06:58 -0400
       → Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> 2011-09-21 14:02 +0200
         → Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue Ephi Sinowitz <esinowitz.public@gmail.com> 2011-09-21 06:08 -0700
           → Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> 2011-09-21 15:18 +0200
             → Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue Ephi Sinowitz <esinowitz.public@gmail.com> 2011-09-21 06:56 -0700
               → Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> 2011-09-21 17:06 +0200
                 → Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue Ephi Sinowitz <esinowitz.public@gmail.com> 2011-09-21 09:16 -0700
                 → Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> 2011-09-21 18:20 +0200
   → Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue Dmitriy Vyukov <dvyukov@gmail.com> 2011-09-21 09:58 -0700
     → Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> 2011-09-21 19:33 +0200
       → Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue dvyukov@google.com 2011-10-02 04:13 -0700
         → Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> 2011-10-04 12:15 +0200
     → Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue Ephi Sinowitz <esinowitz.public@gmail.com> 2011-09-21 11:04 -0700
       → Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue Ephi Sinowitz <esinowitz.public@gmail.com> 2011-09-21 11:17 -0700
       → Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue "Chris M. Thomasson" <cristom@charter.net> 2011-09-24 22:44 -0700
 
Webhosting, Domain Name, Data Center Cyprus, Hosting Services postcy postcy <postcy.postcy17@gmail.com> 2011-10-04 02:51 -0700
 
Gtk GUI With Worker Threads Using GTKMM Chris Gordon-Smith <use.address@my.homepage> 2011-10-02 19:45 +0000
 
Non-blocking socket operations (3 replies — unroll) ittium <ittium@gmail.com> 2011-09-26 10:39 +0530
   → Re: Non-blocking socket operations Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> 2011-09-26 13:02 +0100
   → Re: Non-blocking socket operations Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> 2011-09-26 19:10 +0100
   → Re: Non-blocking socket operations William Ahern <william@wilbur.25thandClement.com> 2011-09-26 13:44 -0700
 
Design for shared data (4 replies — unroll) ittium <ittium@gmail.com> 2011-09-25 12:17 +0530
   → Re: Design for shared data Qi <no@no.com> 2011-09-25 16:45 +0800
     → Re: Design for shared data Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> 2011-09-25 15:14 +0200
       → Re: Design for shared data ittium <ittium@gmail.com> 2011-09-25 20:23 +0530
   → Re: Design for shared data Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> 2011-09-25 06:05 -0500
 
Threads and statically allocated buffer (6 replies — unroll) ittium <ittium@gmail.com> 2011-09-22 11:47 +0530
   → Re: Threads and statically allocated buffer David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> 2011-09-22 14:34 -0700
     → Re: Threads and statically allocated buffer ittium <ittium@gmail.com> 2011-09-24 10:08 +0530
       → Re: Threads and statically allocated buffer David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> 2011-09-24 12:42 -0700
         → Re: Threads and statically allocated buffer ittium <ittium@gmail.com> 2011-09-25 11:45 +0530
           → Re: Threads and statically allocated buffer David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> 2011-09-25 04:15 -0700
   → Re: Threads and statically allocated buffer Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.com> 2011-09-24 09:16 +0200
 
Regarding bad performance of shared value spinlock - is it inherent for all cache types? (1 reply — unroll) Michael Podolsky <michael.podolsky.69@gmail.com> 2011-09-21 16:04 -0700
   → Re: Regarding bad performance of shared value spinlock - is it inherent for all cache types? David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> 2011-09-22 14:32 -0700
 
Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) (30 replies — unroll) Jef Driesen <jefdriesen@hotmail.com.invalid> 2011-09-05 20:19 +0200
   → Re: Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) Edek <edek.pienkowski@gmail.com> 2011-09-05 20:30 +0200
     → Re: Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) Jef Driesen <jefdriesen@hotmail.com.invalid> 2011-09-06 18:48 +0200
       → Re: Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) Edek <edek.pienkowski@gmail.com> 2011-09-07 10:34 +0200
         → Re: Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) Jef Driesen <jefdriesen@hotmail.com.invalid> 2011-09-08 22:00 +0200
           → Re: Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) Edek <edek.pienkowski@gmail.com> 2011-09-09 18:13 +0200
             → Re: Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) Jef Driesen <jefdriesen@hotmail.com.invalid> 2011-09-13 17:58 +0200
               → Re: Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> 2011-09-13 13:18 -0700
                 → Re: Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) Jef Driesen <jefdriesen@hotmail.com.invalid> 2011-09-14 07:16 +0200
                 → Re: Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> 2011-09-14 13:18 -0700
                 → Re: Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) Edek <edek.pienkowski@gmail.com> 2011-09-14 09:33 +0200
                 → Re: Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> 2011-09-14 13:17 +0200
                 → Re: Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> 2011-09-14 13:03 -0700
                 → Re: Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> 2011-09-14 13:19 -0700
                 → Re: Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) "James" <no@spam.invalid> 2011-09-14 19:19 -0700
                 → Re: Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> 2011-09-14 21:03 -0700
                 → Re: Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> 2011-09-15 13:12 +0200
                 → Re: Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> 2011-09-15 12:24 -0700
                 → Re: Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> 2011-09-15 22:22 +0200
                 → Re: Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) "James" <no@spam.invalid> 2011-09-15 13:33 -0700
                 → Re: Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> 2011-09-15 15:36 -0700
                 → Re: Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> 2011-09-15 15:36 -0700
                 → Re: Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> 2011-09-16 16:28 +0200
                 → Re: Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> 2011-09-16 15:06 -0700
                 → Re: Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> 2011-09-17 12:50 +0200
                 → Re: Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> 2011-09-15 12:50 +0200
               → Re: Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) Edek <edek.pienkowski@gmail.com> 2011-09-14 09:17 +0200
   → Re: Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> 2011-09-08 16:28 -0700
     → Re: Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> 2011-09-08 16:33 -0700
       → Re: Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> 2011-09-08 20:55 -0700
     → Re: Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> 2011-09-12 00:45 -0700
 
Priority-Inversion (8 replies — unroll) Gerald Breuer <Gerald.Breuer@googlemail.com> 2011-09-05 22:56 +0200
   → Re: Priority-Inversion Gerald Breuer <Gerald.Breuer@googlemail.com> 2011-09-06 03:15 +0200
   → Re: Priority-Inversion Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.com> 2011-09-06 08:30 +0200
     → Re: Priority-Inversion Gerald Breuer <Gerald.Breuer@googlemail.com> 2011-09-06 16:36 +0200
       → Re: Priority-Inversion Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.com> 2011-09-06 23:47 +0200
         → Re: Priority-Inversion Gerald Breuer <Gerald.Breuer@googlemail.com> 2011-09-07 00:37 +0200
           → Re: Priority-Inversion Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.com> 2011-09-07 12:06 +0200
       → Re: Priority-Inversion Lewis NH2 <lew.nh2@googlemail.com> 2011-09-09 09:56 -0700
   → Re: Priority-Inversion Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no> 2011-09-06 12:34 +0200
 
EE-Times: IBM plants transactional memory in CPU Gerald Breuer <Gerald.Breuer@googlemail.com> 2011-09-09 00:14 +0200
 
[POSIX] Is semaphore the only way to ensure the detached threads are terminated before process exit? (1 reply — unroll) Nelson <nelson4088@gmail.com> 2011-09-08 01:33 -0700
   → Re: Is semaphore the only way to ensure the detached threads are terminated before process exit? David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> 2011-09-08 09:30 -0700
 
Thread Safety of "this" pointer (4 replies — unroll) ittium <ittium@gmail.com> 2011-09-04 22:52 +0530
   → Re: Thread Safety of "this" pointer David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> 2011-09-04 15:31 -0700
     → Re: Thread Safety of "this" pointer itt ium <ittium@gmail.com> 2011-09-05 01:43 -0700
       → Re: Thread Safety of "this" pointer ycwang <wangyongcong@gmail.com> 2011-09-05 03:21 -0700
   → Re: Thread Safety of "this" pointer Sergei Organov <osv@javad.com> 2011-09-05 21:46 +0400
 
IT consulting offshore application custom software development outsourcing services from Philadelphia, New Jersey, New York, Boston- Alliance Global Services "IT consulting offshore application custom software development outsourcing services from Philadelphia, New Jersey, New York, Boston- Alliance Global Services" <allianceglobals@gmail.com> 2011-09-05 04:56 -0700
 
IT consulting offshore application custom software development outsourcing services from Philadelphia, New Jersey, New York, Boston- Alliance Global Services "IT consulting offshore application custom software development outsourcing services from Philadelphia, New Jersey, New York, Boston- Alliance Global Services" <allianceglobals@gmail.com> 2011-09-05 04:58 -0700
 
Symmetric threads (4 replies — unroll) itt ium <ittium@gmail.com> 2011-08-11 04:14 -0700
   → Re: Symmetric threads David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> 2011-08-11 22:49 -0700
     → Re: Symmetric threads itt ium <ittium@gmail.com> 2011-08-12 00:23 -0700
       → Re: Symmetric threads David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> 2011-08-12 01:48 -0700
         → Re: Symmetric threads itt ium <ittium@gmail.com> 2011-09-05 02:24 -0700
 
Comparison of various synchronization mechanisms? (3 replies — unroll) Papa Stratos <armadillodm@flashmail.com> 2011-08-16 18:20 -0700
   → Re: Comparison of various synchronization mechanisms? Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> 2011-08-17 16:09 +0200
     → Re: Comparison of various synchronization mechanisms? Papa Stratos <armadillodm@flashmail.com> 2011-08-20 17:06 -0700
       → Re: Comparison of various synchronization mechanisms? Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> 2011-08-24 12:49 +0200
 
question about lock free queues (1 reply — unroll) Avik Ghosh <avik.ghosh@gmail.com> 2011-08-04 20:24 -0700
   → Re: question about lock free queues Anthony Williams <anthony.ajw@gmail.com> 2011-08-22 02:45 -0700
 
(context switch + condition variable+ mutex) Vs Few Mutex (2 replies — unroll) ittium <ittium@gmail.com> 2011-08-11 11:07 +0530
   → Re: (context switch + condition variable+ mutex) Vs Few Mutex naveen <naveenkumarkaushik@gmail.com> 2011-08-12 02:48 -0700
   → Re: (context switch + condition variable+ mutex) Vs Few Mutex David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> 2011-08-20 03:56 -0700
 
mutex and condition variable implementation using futex (1 reply — unroll) Sudhanshu Shukla <sudhan345@gmail.com> 2011-08-09 14:06 -0700
   → Re: mutex and condition variable implementation using futex Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> 2011-08-15 11:31 +0200
 
Coroutines and threads (1 reply — unroll) ittium <ittium@gmail.com> 2011-08-11 11:20 +0530
   → Re: Coroutines and threads naveen <naveenkumarkaushik@gmail.com> 2011-08-12 02:40 -0700
 
Locks for rarely changed data (4 replies — unroll) itt ium <ittium@gmail.com> 2011-08-05 02:40 -0700
   → Re: Locks for rarely changed data "Naveen K. Kaushik" <naveenkumarkaushik@gmail.com> 2011-08-09 11:05 +0530
   → Re: Locks for rarely changed data Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> 2011-08-09 02:07 -0500
   → Re: Locks for rarely changed data David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> 2011-08-10 12:34 -0700
     → Re: Locks for rarely changed data itt ium <ittium@gmail.com> 2011-08-12 00:04 -0700
 
Non-deterministic behavior of multithreaded software (7 replies — unroll) itt ium <ittium@gmail.com> 2011-08-05 02:42 -0700
   → Re: Non-deterministic behavior of multithreaded software "Balog Pal" <pasa@lib.hu> 2011-08-05 16:20 +0200
     → Re: Non-deterministic behavior of multithreaded software ittium <ittium@gmail.com> 2011-08-09 08:49 +0530
     → Re: Non-deterministic behavior of multithreaded software ittium <ittium@gmail.com> 2011-08-09 08:52 +0530
   → Re: Non-deterministic behavior of multithreaded software Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> 2011-08-05 16:17 +0100
     → Re: Non-deterministic behavior of multithreaded software ittium <ittium@gmail.com> 2011-08-09 09:19 +0530
       → Re: Non-deterministic behavior of multithreaded software Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> 2011-08-09 14:08 +0100
   → Re: Non-deterministic behavior of multithreaded software David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> 2011-08-10 12:37 -0700
 
communicating sequential process and call processing threads (1 reply — unroll) itt ium <ittium@gmail.com> 2011-08-03 02:52 -0700
   → Re: communicating sequential process and call processing threads "Naveen K. Kaushik" <naveenkumarkaushik@gmail.com> 2011-08-09 10:57 +0530
 
question about lock free queues Avik Ghosh <avik.ghosh@gmail.com> 2011-08-05 07:34 -0700

← Newer ~Page 683 of ~683 (articles 490–692) Older →


csiph-web