Groups > comp.programming.threads > #635

Re: Why lock-free implementations are faster than traditional using synchronization? Are they?

From	"Chris M. Thomasson" <cristom@charter.net>
Newsgroups	comp.programming.threads
References	<c98061d5-bfd0-4170-be21-a41348da7420@z19g2000vby.googlegroups.com>
Subject	Re: Why lock-free implementations are faster than traditional using synchronization? Are they?
Message-ID	<2U4mq.74$Xd6.50@newsfe07.iad> (permalink)
Date	2011-10-14 17:57 -0700

Show all headers | View raw

"Michael Podolsky" <michael.podolsky.69@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:c98061d5-bfd0-4170-be21-a41348da7420@z19g2000vby.googlegroups.com...
> Hi All,
>
> I've encountered I have very basic misunderstanding of the topic of
> lock-free algorithms.

Read this first:

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.arch/msg/4f39aeb2a3bf6829

And, take note of the author...

[...]

Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Why lock-free implementations are faster than traditional using synchronization? Are they? Michael Podolsky <michael.podolsky.69@gmail.com> - 2011-10-08 18:08 -0700
  Re: Why lock-free implementations are faster than traditional using synchronization? Are they? Casper H.S. Dik <Casper.Dik@OrSPaMcle.COM> - 2011-10-09 10:45 +0000
  Re: Why lock-free implementations are faster than traditional using synchronization? Are they? Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> - 2011-10-10 13:22 +0200
  Re: Why lock-free implementations are faster than traditional using synchronization? Are they? David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> - 2011-10-12 16:57 -0700
    Re: Why lock-free implementations are faster than traditional using synchronization? Are they? "Chris M. Thomasson" <cristom@charter.net> - 2011-10-14 16:54 -0700
    Re: Why lock-free implementations are faster than traditional using synchronization? Are they? Michael Podolsky <michael.podolsky.69@gmail.com> - 2011-10-26 08:37 -0700
      Re: Why lock-free implementations are faster than traditional using synchronization? Are they? "Chris M. Thomasson" <cristom@charter.net> - 2011-10-26 14:19 -0700
      Re: Why lock-free implementations are faster than traditional using synchronization? Are they? David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> - 2011-10-27 01:00 -0700
  Re: Why lock-free implementations are faster than traditional using synchronization? Are they? "Chris M. Thomasson" <cristom@charter.net> - 2011-10-14 17:57 -0700

csiph-web