Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming.threads > #493
| From | ittium <ittium@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming.threads |
| Subject | Re: Non-deterministic behavior of multithreaded software |
| Date | 2011-08-09 08:52 +0530 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <4E40A7FA.8080800@gmail.com> (permalink) |
| References | <0dddaf2a-95be-4423-9420-3d4c8bf8c013@y8g2000prd.googlegroups.com> <j1gu7q$1366$1@news.ett.com.ua> |
On 05-08-2011 PM 07:50, Balog Pal wrote: > "itt ium" <ittium@gmail.com> > >> I have recently modified a software from single threaded to >> multithreaded design. In single threaded version, a connection fd was >> read by single thread, so event were always delivered in order. Now >> since multiple threads handle different events (on the same fd), the >> events are sometimes delivered out of order. > > You mean processed. Yes, There is another module that receives the processed data and that data is delivered to the module out of order. > >> Please note, on the >> connection fd, events are received in proper order and this non- >> deterministic behavior is introduced by my software only. >> >> 1. How to handle such a situation > > Go back one square, to your single-threaded design. And only start > threading when you know to what end. We want to increase the message processing capacity per second for the software.with a single threaded design, we have reached the maximum capacity (in terms of message processed per second). Please note we are running the software on a hexacore machine. > >> 2. Is it a bad idea to have multiple threads for the same fd. If yes >> than how to increase capacity of a software that receives large amount >> of data on a single fd only. > > In what you write I see little relevance of the fd. You need processing > of the events one after the other, waiting to start the next until the > previous finishes, right? So you shall not try to run them in parallel. > And a single thread does just that. (If your problem is not like that, > state it clearly.) > > If reading the fd is really a concern, then you can put that in one > thread and processing in another. So you have a simplest 1-1 1-1 is not likely a solution, it will only introduce unnecessary context switch. In our solution, there are multiple worker threads, each can read from fd, when fd is ready. > producer-consumer queue, one thread rads and posts to the queu, the > other processes the events in the queue. If the source of events is > independent, you will have the reading in parallel. >
Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Non-deterministic behavior of multithreaded software itt ium <ittium@gmail.com> - 2011-08-05 02:42 -0700
Re: Non-deterministic behavior of multithreaded software "Balog Pal" <pasa@lib.hu> - 2011-08-05 16:20 +0200
Re: Non-deterministic behavior of multithreaded software ittium <ittium@gmail.com> - 2011-08-09 08:49 +0530
Re: Non-deterministic behavior of multithreaded software ittium <ittium@gmail.com> - 2011-08-09 08:52 +0530
Re: Non-deterministic behavior of multithreaded software Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-08-05 16:17 +0100
Re: Non-deterministic behavior of multithreaded software ittium <ittium@gmail.com> - 2011-08-09 09:19 +0530
Re: Non-deterministic behavior of multithreaded software Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-08-09 14:08 +0100
Re: Non-deterministic behavior of multithreaded software David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> - 2011-08-10 12:37 -0700
csiph-web