Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming.threads
44786 articles, 6830 threads (numbers 65 – 45828) — flat view
| Advanced| Subject | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Why lock-free implementations are faster than traditional using synchronization? Are they? (8 replies — unroll) | Michael Podolsky <michael.podolsky.69@gmail.com> | 2011-10-08 18:08 -0700 |
| → Re: Why lock-free implementations are faster than traditional using synchronization? Are they? | Casper H.S. Dik <Casper.Dik@OrSPaMcle.COM> | 2011-10-09 10:45 +0000 |
| → Re: Why lock-free implementations are faster than traditional using synchronization? Are they? | Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> | 2011-10-10 13:22 +0200 |
| → Re: Why lock-free implementations are faster than traditional using synchronization? Are they? | David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> | 2011-10-12 16:57 -0700 |
| → Re: Why lock-free implementations are faster than traditional using synchronization? Are they? | "Chris M. Thomasson" <cristom@charter.net> | 2011-10-14 16:54 -0700 |
| → Re: Why lock-free implementations are faster than traditional using synchronization? Are they? | Michael Podolsky <michael.podolsky.69@gmail.com> | 2011-10-26 08:37 -0700 |
| → Re: Why lock-free implementations are faster than traditional using synchronization? Are they? | "Chris M. Thomasson" <cristom@charter.net> | 2011-10-26 14:19 -0700 |
| → Re: Why lock-free implementations are faster than traditional using synchronization? Are they? | David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> | 2011-10-27 01:00 -0700 |
| → Re: Why lock-free implementations are faster than traditional using synchronization? Are they? | "Chris M. Thomasson" <cristom@charter.net> | 2011-10-14 17:57 -0700 |
| A good book on multithreading with examples (3 replies — unroll) | persres <persres@gmail.com> | 2011-10-01 05:13 -0700 |
| → Re: A good book on multithreading with examples | Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> | 2011-10-01 18:41 +0200 |
| → Re: A good book on multithreading with examples | Anton Sharov <ocaml@mail.ru> | 2011-10-02 23:10 -0700 |
| → Re: A good book on multithreading with examples | persres <persres@gmail.com> | 2011-10-21 04:31 -0700 |
| User threads (2 replies — unroll) | divcurl <divcurl@europe.com> | 2011-10-19 18:06 -0700 |
| → Re: User threads | Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> | 2011-10-19 23:16 -0500 |
| → Re: User threads | Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> | 2011-10-20 14:32 +0200 |
| Spinlock + exponential backoff better than lockfree ? | aminer <aminer68@gmail.com> | 2011-10-17 13:54 -0700 |
| A question about those lockfree algorithms... (1 reply — unroll) | aminer <aminer68@gmail.com> | 2011-10-16 19:21 -0700 |
| → Re: A question about those lockfree algorithms... | David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> | 2011-10-17 13:27 -0700 |
| Lockfree flqueue and lockfree_mpmc ... (5 replies — unroll) | aminer <aminer68@gmail.com> | 2011-10-16 12:26 -0700 |
| → Re: Lockfree flqueue and lockfree_mpmc ... | aminer <aminer68@gmail.com> | 2011-10-16 12:50 -0700 |
| → Re: Lockfree flqueue and lockfree_mpmc ... | aminer <aminer68@gmail.com> | 2011-10-16 13:29 -0700 |
| → Re: Lockfree flqueue and lockfree_mpmc ... | aminer <aminer68@gmail.com> | 2011-10-16 17:43 -0700 |
| → Re: Lockfree flqueue and lockfree_mpmc ... | aminer <aminer68@gmail.com> | 2011-10-16 18:35 -0700 |
| → Re: Lockfree flqueue and lockfree_mpmc ... | aminer <aminer68@gmail.com> | 2011-10-16 13:51 -0700 |
| can pthread_mutex_trylock() give up the timeslice? (5 replies — unroll) | Brendon <brendon.j.costa@gmail.com> | 2011-10-13 16:05 -0700 |
| → Re: can pthread_mutex_trylock() give up the timeslice? | Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> | 2011-10-14 11:50 +0200 |
| → Re: can pthread_mutex_trylock() give up the timeslice? | Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> | 2011-10-14 13:43 -0700 |
| → Re: can pthread_mutex_trylock() give up the timeslice? | Brendon <brendon.j.costa@gmail.com> | 2011-10-14 16:56 -0700 |
| → Re: can pthread_mutex_trylock() give up the timeslice? | Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> | 2011-10-15 13:53 +0200 |
| → Re: can pthread_mutex_trylock() give up the timeslice? | David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> | 2011-10-15 21:41 -0700 |
| pthread_rwlock_rdlock hangs | Jaydeep Chovatia <chovatia.jaydeep@gmail.com> | 2011-10-06 13:45 -0700 |
| usage of vyukov's mpsc queue (21 replies — unroll) | Ephi Sinowitz <esinowitz.public@gmail.com> | 2011-09-20 06:55 -0700 |
| → Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue | Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> | 2011-09-20 17:19 -0700 |
| → Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue | Ephi Sinowitz <esinowitz.public@gmail.com> | 2011-09-20 18:35 -0700 |
| → Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue | Ephraim Sinowitz <ephisinowitz@yahoo.com> | 2011-09-21 06:42 -0400 |
| → Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue | Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> | 2011-09-21 00:26 -0700 |
| → Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue | Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> | 2011-09-21 12:19 +0200 |
| → Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue | Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> | 2011-09-21 12:34 +0200 |
| → Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue | Ephi Sinowitz <ephisinowitz@yahoo.com> | 2011-09-21 06:58 -0400 |
| → Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue | Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> | 2011-09-21 14:02 +0200 |
| → Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue | Ephi Sinowitz <esinowitz.public@gmail.com> | 2011-09-21 06:08 -0700 |
| → Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue | Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> | 2011-09-21 15:18 +0200 |
| → Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue | Ephi Sinowitz <esinowitz.public@gmail.com> | 2011-09-21 06:56 -0700 |
| → Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue | Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> | 2011-09-21 17:06 +0200 |
| → Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue | Ephi Sinowitz <esinowitz.public@gmail.com> | 2011-09-21 09:16 -0700 |
| → Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue | Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> | 2011-09-21 18:20 +0200 |
| → Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue | Dmitriy Vyukov <dvyukov@gmail.com> | 2011-09-21 09:58 -0700 |
| → Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue | Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> | 2011-09-21 19:33 +0200 |
| → Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue | dvyukov@google.com | 2011-10-02 04:13 -0700 |
| → Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue | Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> | 2011-10-04 12:15 +0200 |
| → Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue | Ephi Sinowitz <esinowitz.public@gmail.com> | 2011-09-21 11:04 -0700 |
| → Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue | Ephi Sinowitz <esinowitz.public@gmail.com> | 2011-09-21 11:17 -0700 |
| → Re: usage of vyukov's mpsc queue | "Chris M. Thomasson" <cristom@charter.net> | 2011-09-24 22:44 -0700 |
| Webhosting, Domain Name, Data Center Cyprus, Hosting Services | postcy postcy <postcy.postcy17@gmail.com> | 2011-10-04 02:51 -0700 |
| Gtk GUI With Worker Threads Using GTKMM | Chris Gordon-Smith <use.address@my.homepage> | 2011-10-02 19:45 +0000 |
| Non-blocking socket operations (3 replies — unroll) | ittium <ittium@gmail.com> | 2011-09-26 10:39 +0530 |
| → Re: Non-blocking socket operations | Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> | 2011-09-26 13:02 +0100 |
| → Re: Non-blocking socket operations | Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mssgmbh.com> | 2011-09-26 19:10 +0100 |
| → Re: Non-blocking socket operations | William Ahern <william@wilbur.25thandClement.com> | 2011-09-26 13:44 -0700 |
| Design for shared data (4 replies — unroll) | ittium <ittium@gmail.com> | 2011-09-25 12:17 +0530 |
| → Re: Design for shared data | Qi <no@no.com> | 2011-09-25 16:45 +0800 |
| → Re: Design for shared data | Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> | 2011-09-25 15:14 +0200 |
| → Re: Design for shared data | ittium <ittium@gmail.com> | 2011-09-25 20:23 +0530 |
| → Re: Design for shared data | Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> | 2011-09-25 06:05 -0500 |
| Threads and statically allocated buffer (6 replies — unroll) | ittium <ittium@gmail.com> | 2011-09-22 11:47 +0530 |
| → Re: Threads and statically allocated buffer | David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> | 2011-09-22 14:34 -0700 |
| → Re: Threads and statically allocated buffer | ittium <ittium@gmail.com> | 2011-09-24 10:08 +0530 |
| → Re: Threads and statically allocated buffer | David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> | 2011-09-24 12:42 -0700 |
| → Re: Threads and statically allocated buffer | ittium <ittium@gmail.com> | 2011-09-25 11:45 +0530 |
| → Re: Threads and statically allocated buffer | David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> | 2011-09-25 04:15 -0700 |
| → Re: Threads and statically allocated buffer | Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.com> | 2011-09-24 09:16 +0200 |
| Regarding bad performance of shared value spinlock - is it inherent for all cache types? (1 reply — unroll) | Michael Podolsky <michael.podolsky.69@gmail.com> | 2011-09-21 16:04 -0700 |
| → Re: Regarding bad performance of shared value spinlock - is it inherent for all cache types? | David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> | 2011-09-22 14:32 -0700 |
| Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) (30 replies — unroll) | Jef Driesen <jefdriesen@hotmail.com.invalid> | 2011-09-05 20:19 +0200 |
| → Re: Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) | Edek <edek.pienkowski@gmail.com> | 2011-09-05 20:30 +0200 |
| → Re: Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) | Jef Driesen <jefdriesen@hotmail.com.invalid> | 2011-09-06 18:48 +0200 |
| → Re: Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) | Edek <edek.pienkowski@gmail.com> | 2011-09-07 10:34 +0200 |
| → Re: Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) | Jef Driesen <jefdriesen@hotmail.com.invalid> | 2011-09-08 22:00 +0200 |
| → Re: Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) | Edek <edek.pienkowski@gmail.com> | 2011-09-09 18:13 +0200 |
| → Re: Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) | Jef Driesen <jefdriesen@hotmail.com.invalid> | 2011-09-13 17:58 +0200 |
| → Re: Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) | Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> | 2011-09-13 13:18 -0700 |
| → Re: Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) | Jef Driesen <jefdriesen@hotmail.com.invalid> | 2011-09-14 07:16 +0200 |
| → Re: Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) | Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> | 2011-09-14 13:18 -0700 |
| → Re: Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) | Edek <edek.pienkowski@gmail.com> | 2011-09-14 09:33 +0200 |
| → Re: Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) | Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> | 2011-09-14 13:17 +0200 |
| → Re: Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) | Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> | 2011-09-14 13:03 -0700 |
| → Re: Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) | Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> | 2011-09-14 13:19 -0700 |
| → Re: Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) | "James" <no@spam.invalid> | 2011-09-14 19:19 -0700 |
| → Re: Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) | Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> | 2011-09-14 21:03 -0700 |
| → Re: Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) | Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> | 2011-09-15 13:12 +0200 |
| → Re: Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) | Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> | 2011-09-15 12:24 -0700 |
| → Re: Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) | Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> | 2011-09-15 22:22 +0200 |
| → Re: Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) | "James" <no@spam.invalid> | 2011-09-15 13:33 -0700 |
| → Re: Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) | Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> | 2011-09-15 15:36 -0700 |
| → Re: Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) | Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> | 2011-09-15 15:36 -0700 |
| → Re: Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) | Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> | 2011-09-16 16:28 +0200 |
| → Re: Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) | Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> | 2011-09-16 15:06 -0700 |
| → Re: Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) | Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> | 2011-09-17 12:50 +0200 |
| → Re: Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) | Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> | 2011-09-15 12:50 +0200 |
| → Re: Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) | Edek <edek.pienkowski@gmail.com> | 2011-09-14 09:17 +0200 |
| → Re: Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) | Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> | 2011-09-08 16:28 -0700 |
| → Re: Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) | Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> | 2011-09-08 16:33 -0700 |
| → Re: Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) | Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> | 2011-09-08 20:55 -0700 |
| → Re: Thread safe logging (or protecting global variables) | Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> | 2011-09-12 00:45 -0700 |
| Priority-Inversion (8 replies — unroll) | Gerald Breuer <Gerald.Breuer@googlemail.com> | 2011-09-05 22:56 +0200 |
| → Re: Priority-Inversion | Gerald Breuer <Gerald.Breuer@googlemail.com> | 2011-09-06 03:15 +0200 |
| → Re: Priority-Inversion | Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.com> | 2011-09-06 08:30 +0200 |
| → Re: Priority-Inversion | Gerald Breuer <Gerald.Breuer@googlemail.com> | 2011-09-06 16:36 +0200 |
| → Re: Priority-Inversion | Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.com> | 2011-09-06 23:47 +0200 |
| → Re: Priority-Inversion | Gerald Breuer <Gerald.Breuer@googlemail.com> | 2011-09-07 00:37 +0200 |
| → Re: Priority-Inversion | Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.com> | 2011-09-07 12:06 +0200 |
| → Re: Priority-Inversion | Lewis NH2 <lew.nh2@googlemail.com> | 2011-09-09 09:56 -0700 |
| → Re: Priority-Inversion | Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no> | 2011-09-06 12:34 +0200 |
| EE-Times: IBM plants transactional memory in CPU | Gerald Breuer <Gerald.Breuer@googlemail.com> | 2011-09-09 00:14 +0200 |
| [POSIX] Is semaphore the only way to ensure the detached threads are terminated before process exit? (1 reply — unroll) | Nelson <nelson4088@gmail.com> | 2011-09-08 01:33 -0700 |
| → Re: Is semaphore the only way to ensure the detached threads are terminated before process exit? | David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> | 2011-09-08 09:30 -0700 |
| Thread Safety of "this" pointer (4 replies — unroll) | ittium <ittium@gmail.com> | 2011-09-04 22:52 +0530 |
| → Re: Thread Safety of "this" pointer | David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> | 2011-09-04 15:31 -0700 |
| → Re: Thread Safety of "this" pointer | itt ium <ittium@gmail.com> | 2011-09-05 01:43 -0700 |
| → Re: Thread Safety of "this" pointer | ycwang <wangyongcong@gmail.com> | 2011-09-05 03:21 -0700 |
| → Re: Thread Safety of "this" pointer | Sergei Organov <osv@javad.com> | 2011-09-05 21:46 +0400 |
| IT consulting offshore application custom software development outsourcing services from Philadelphia, New Jersey, New York, Boston- Alliance Global Services | "IT consulting offshore application custom software development outsourcing services from Philadelphia, New Jersey, New York, Boston- Alliance Global Services" <allianceglobals@gmail.com> | 2011-09-05 04:56 -0700 |
| IT consulting offshore application custom software development outsourcing services from Philadelphia, New Jersey, New York, Boston- Alliance Global Services | "IT consulting offshore application custom software development outsourcing services from Philadelphia, New Jersey, New York, Boston- Alliance Global Services" <allianceglobals@gmail.com> | 2011-09-05 04:58 -0700 |
| Symmetric threads (4 replies — unroll) | itt ium <ittium@gmail.com> | 2011-08-11 04:14 -0700 |
| → Re: Symmetric threads | David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> | 2011-08-11 22:49 -0700 |
| → Re: Symmetric threads | itt ium <ittium@gmail.com> | 2011-08-12 00:23 -0700 |
| → Re: Symmetric threads | David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> | 2011-08-12 01:48 -0700 |
| → Re: Symmetric threads | itt ium <ittium@gmail.com> | 2011-09-05 02:24 -0700 |
| Comparison of various synchronization mechanisms? (3 replies — unroll) | Papa Stratos <armadillodm@flashmail.com> | 2011-08-16 18:20 -0700 |
| → Re: Comparison of various synchronization mechanisms? | Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> | 2011-08-17 16:09 +0200 |
| → Re: Comparison of various synchronization mechanisms? | Papa Stratos <armadillodm@flashmail.com> | 2011-08-20 17:06 -0700 |
| → Re: Comparison of various synchronization mechanisms? | Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> | 2011-08-24 12:49 +0200 |
| question about lock free queues (1 reply — unroll) | Avik Ghosh <avik.ghosh@gmail.com> | 2011-08-04 20:24 -0700 |
| → Re: question about lock free queues | Anthony Williams <anthony.ajw@gmail.com> | 2011-08-22 02:45 -0700 |
| (context switch + condition variable+ mutex) Vs Few Mutex (2 replies — unroll) | ittium <ittium@gmail.com> | 2011-08-11 11:07 +0530 |
| → Re: (context switch + condition variable+ mutex) Vs Few Mutex | naveen <naveenkumarkaushik@gmail.com> | 2011-08-12 02:48 -0700 |
| → Re: (context switch + condition variable+ mutex) Vs Few Mutex | David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> | 2011-08-20 03:56 -0700 |
| mutex and condition variable implementation using futex (1 reply — unroll) | Sudhanshu Shukla <sudhan345@gmail.com> | 2011-08-09 14:06 -0700 |
| → Re: mutex and condition variable implementation using futex | Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> | 2011-08-15 11:31 +0200 |
| Coroutines and threads (1 reply — unroll) | ittium <ittium@gmail.com> | 2011-08-11 11:20 +0530 |
| → Re: Coroutines and threads | naveen <naveenkumarkaushik@gmail.com> | 2011-08-12 02:40 -0700 |
| Locks for rarely changed data (4 replies — unroll) | itt ium <ittium@gmail.com> | 2011-08-05 02:40 -0700 |
| → Re: Locks for rarely changed data | "Naveen K. Kaushik" <naveenkumarkaushik@gmail.com> | 2011-08-09 11:05 +0530 |
| → Re: Locks for rarely changed data | Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> | 2011-08-09 02:07 -0500 |
| → Re: Locks for rarely changed data | David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> | 2011-08-10 12:34 -0700 |
| → Re: Locks for rarely changed data | itt ium <ittium@gmail.com> | 2011-08-12 00:04 -0700 |
| Non-deterministic behavior of multithreaded software (7 replies — unroll) | itt ium <ittium@gmail.com> | 2011-08-05 02:42 -0700 |
| → Re: Non-deterministic behavior of multithreaded software | "Balog Pal" <pasa@lib.hu> | 2011-08-05 16:20 +0200 |
| → Re: Non-deterministic behavior of multithreaded software | ittium <ittium@gmail.com> | 2011-08-09 08:49 +0530 |
| → Re: Non-deterministic behavior of multithreaded software | ittium <ittium@gmail.com> | 2011-08-09 08:52 +0530 |
| → Re: Non-deterministic behavior of multithreaded software | Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> | 2011-08-05 16:17 +0100 |
| → Re: Non-deterministic behavior of multithreaded software | ittium <ittium@gmail.com> | 2011-08-09 09:19 +0530 |
| → Re: Non-deterministic behavior of multithreaded software | Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> | 2011-08-09 14:08 +0100 |
| → Re: Non-deterministic behavior of multithreaded software | David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> | 2011-08-10 12:37 -0700 |
| communicating sequential process and call processing threads (1 reply — unroll) | itt ium <ittium@gmail.com> | 2011-08-03 02:52 -0700 |
| → Re: communicating sequential process and call processing threads | "Naveen K. Kaushik" <naveenkumarkaushik@gmail.com> | 2011-08-09 10:57 +0530 |
| question about lock free queues | Avik Ghosh <avik.ghosh@gmail.com> | 2011-08-05 07:34 -0700 |
| POSIX threads hard to implement in Windows (was: C is fixed or not ?) (16 replies — unroll) | Noob <root@127.0.0.1> | 2011-07-07 15:17 +0200 |
| → Re: POSIX threads hard to implement in Windows | William Ahern <william@wilbur.25thandClement.com> | 2011-07-07 11:21 -0700 |
| → Re: POSIX threads hard to implement in Windows | Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> | 2011-07-08 08:07 +1200 |
| → Re: POSIX threads hard to implement in Windows | Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> | 2011-07-07 16:01 -0500 |
| → Re: POSIX threads hard to implement in Windows | "MikeP" <mp011011@some.org> | 2011-07-07 21:12 -0500 |
| → Re: POSIX threads hard to implement in Windows | Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> | 2011-07-07 23:33 -0500 |
| → Re: POSIX threads hard to implement in Windows | "MikeP" <mp011011@some.org> | 2011-07-07 23:49 -0500 |
| → Re: POSIX threads hard to implement in Windows | BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> | 2011-08-03 07:32 -0700 |
| → Re: POSIX threads hard to implement in Windows | William Ahern <william@wilbur.25thandClement.com> | 2011-07-07 15:06 -0700 |
| → Re: POSIX threads hard to implement in Windows | lawrence.jones@siemens.com | 2011-07-10 16:08 -0400 |
| → Re: POSIX threads hard to implement in Windows | William Ahern <william@wilbur.25thandClement.com> | 2011-07-10 16:09 -0700 |
| → Re: POSIX threads hard to implement in Windows | James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> | 2011-07-11 06:20 -0400 |
| → Re: POSIX threads hard to implement in Windows | Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> | 2011-07-11 22:36 +1200 |
| → Re: POSIX threads hard to implement in Windows | scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) | 2011-07-11 16:18 +0000 |
| → Re: POSIX threads hard to implement in Windows | Geoff Clare <geoff@clare.See-My-Signature.invalid> | 2011-07-12 13:30 +0100 |
| → Re: POSIX threads hard to implement in Windows (was: C is fixed or not ?) | Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> | 2011-07-07 19:01 -0700 |
| → Re: POSIX threads hard to implement in Windows (was: C is fixed or not ?) | "Ersek, Laszlo" <lacos@caesar.elte.hu> | 2011-07-14 23:05 +0200 |
| Re: The threading specs in the standard... | Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> | 2011-08-03 15:50 +0200 |
| What's the latest state-of-the art for EventCounts? (10 replies — unroll) | Andy Venikov <swojchelowek@gmail.com> | 2011-04-29 18:53 -0400 |
| → Re: What's the latest state-of-the art for EventCounts? | Andy Venikov <swojchelowek@gmail.com> | 2011-05-02 10:47 -0400 |
| → Re: What's the latest state-of-the art for EventCounts? | Andy Venikov <swojchelowek@gmail.com> | 2011-05-05 12:01 -0400 |
| → Re: What's the latest state-of-the art for EventCounts? | "Chris M. Thomasson" <cristom@charter.net> | 2011-05-05 19:29 -0700 |
| → Re: What's the latest state-of-the art for EventCounts? | Andy Venikov <swojchelowek@gmail.com> | 2011-05-06 14:24 -0400 |
| → Re: What's the latest state-of-the art for EventCounts? | "Chris M. Thomasson" <cristom@charter.net> | 2011-05-07 16:49 -0700 |
| → Re: What's the latest state-of-the art for EventCounts? | Andy Venikov <swojchelowek@gmail.com> | 2011-05-09 19:05 -0400 |
| → Re: What's the latest state-of-the art for EventCounts? | "Chris M. Thomasson" <cristom@charter.net> | 2011-05-09 16:28 -0700 |
| → Re: What's the latest state-of-the art for EventCounts? | Andy Venikov <swojchelowek@gmail.com> | 2011-05-11 19:28 -0400 |
| → Re: What's the latest state-of-the art for EventCounts? | "Chris M. Thomasson" <cristom@charter.net> | 2011-06-09 19:09 -0700 |
| → Re: What's the latest state-of-the art for EventCounts? | Keith H Duggar <duggar@alum.mit.edu> | 2011-07-30 19:15 -0700 |
| waitable Vyukov SPSC using futex? | Keith H Duggar <duggar@alum.mit.edu> | 2011-07-29 12:27 -0700 |
| pthread reentrance issue on Visual Studio (2 replies — unroll) | BlackLight <blacklight86@gmail.com> | 2011-07-27 01:42 -0700 |
| → Re: pthread reentrance issue on Visual Studio | Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> | 2011-07-27 12:39 +0200 |
| → Re: pthread reentrance issue on Visual Studio | David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> | 2011-07-27 03:57 -0700 |
| snippet from producer-consumer code (1 reply — unroll) | asit <lipun4u@gmail.com> | 2011-07-23 16:16 -0700 |
| → Re: snippet from producer-consumer code | David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> | 2011-07-25 15:34 -0700 |
← Newer ~Page 683 of ~683 (articles 476–654) Older →
csiph-web