Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.programming.threads > #4300 > unrolled thread

Yet read again, i correct..

Back to article view | Back to comp.programming.threads

Contents

  Yet read again, i correct.. Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com> - 2018-05-19 12:20 -0400

#4300 — Yet read again, i correct..

Hello..

Yet read again, i correct..

I think that Delphi and FreePascal like ADA come with range checking and 
Run-time checks that catch conversion from negative signed to unsigned , 
and catch out-of-bounds indices of dynamic and static arrays and catch 
arithmetic overflow etc. and you can also dynamically catch this 
exception of ERangeError etc.

But C++ and C don't have range checking etc. so that's not good in C++ 
and C because it is not good for safety-critical systems.

You can carefully read the following, it is very important:

https://critical.eschertech.com/2010/07/07/run-time-checks-are-they-worth-it/


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.programming.threads

csiph-web