Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.programming.threads > #2499 > unrolled thread

Functional programming and concurreny

Started byRamine <ramine@1.1>
First post2014-06-13 04:52 -0700
Last post2014-06-13 17:30 -0700
Articles 4 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.programming.threads


Contents

  Functional programming and concurreny Ramine <ramine@1.1> - 2014-06-13 04:52 -0700
    Re: Functional programming and concurreny Ramine <ramine@1.1> - 2014-06-13 05:21 -0700
    Re: Functional programming and concurreny Ramine <ramine@1.1> - 2014-06-13 05:24 -0700
    Re: Functional programming and concurreny "Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid> - 2014-06-13 17:30 -0700

#2499 — Functional programming and concurreny

FromRamine <ramine@1.1>
Date2014-06-13 04:52 -0700
SubjectFunctional programming and concurreny
Message-ID<lnfo9u$9d$2@dont-email.me>
Hello,

I have just read an article by Bartosz Milewski about
Object programming and Functional programming and Concurreny,
here it is: http://bartoszmilewski.com/

So he is saying that objects don't compose in the presence
of concurrency and since in functional programming you
can compose immutable objects without using locks,
hence he says that Functional programming must be the way to go..
but i think it is an extremist view..

Cause in Object Pascal for example i have designed an Object
called Parallel archiver that do parallel compression and
that is composable with other parallel objcts, and you can do the same 
for mathematics by designing parallel Objects that compose fine... and i 
think that's the way also to go, is to use Parallel Objects that compose 
fine... so i don't think that functional programming is  mandatory here.



Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.



[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#2500

FromRamine <ramine@1.1>
Date2014-06-13 05:21 -0700
Message-ID<lnfq1h$d29$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#2499
Hello,

My parallel objects called Parallel archiver is not the only Parallel 
object that compose fine, i have implemented other Parallel objects that 
compose fine, such us my Parallel Sort Libray, Parallel Sort library is 
in fact a Parallel Object , my other parallel objects are my efficent 
Parallel Quicksort and my  Parallel Varfiler,and my Parallel compression 
library, and Parallel conjugate gradient solver etc. all  those Parallel 
objects that i have implemented do compose fine, so i don't think 
Functional programming is mandatory here.


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#2501

FromRamine <ramine@1.1>
Date2014-06-13 05:24 -0700
Message-ID<lnfq5u$d29$7@dont-email.me>
In reply to#2499
Hello,

You can download my Parallel objects that compose fine from here:

https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#2503

From"Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid>
Date2014-06-13 17:30 -0700
Message-ID<lng53s$hv0$1@speranza.aioe.org>
In reply to#2499
> "Ramine"  wrote in message news:lnfo9u$9d$2@dont-email.me... 
> I have just read an article by Bartosz Milewski about

Did you isspell your name?

;^)

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.programming.threads


csiph-web