Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming.threads > #2499
| From | Ramine <ramine@1.1> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming.threads |
| Subject | Functional programming and concurreny |
| Date | 2014-06-13 04:52 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <lnfo9u$9d$2@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
Hello, I have just read an article by Bartosz Milewski about Object programming and Functional programming and Concurreny, here it is: http://bartoszmilewski.com/ So he is saying that objects don't compose in the presence of concurrency and since in functional programming you can compose immutable objects without using locks, hence he says that Functional programming must be the way to go.. but i think it is an extremist view.. Cause in Object Pascal for example i have designed an Object called Parallel archiver that do parallel compression and that is composable with other parallel objcts, and you can do the same for mathematics by designing parallel Objects that compose fine... and i think that's the way also to go, is to use Parallel Objects that compose fine... so i don't think that functional programming is mandatory here. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Functional programming and concurreny Ramine <ramine@1.1> - 2014-06-13 04:52 -0700 Re: Functional programming and concurreny Ramine <ramine@1.1> - 2014-06-13 05:21 -0700 Re: Functional programming and concurreny Ramine <ramine@1.1> - 2014-06-13 05:24 -0700 Re: Functional programming and concurreny "Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid> - 2014-06-13 17:30 -0700
csiph-web