Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming.threads > #2499 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ramine <ramine@1.1> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-06-13 04:52 -0700 |
| Last post | 2014-06-13 17:30 -0700 |
| Articles | 4 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.programming.threads
Functional programming and concurreny Ramine <ramine@1.1> - 2014-06-13 04:52 -0700
Re: Functional programming and concurreny Ramine <ramine@1.1> - 2014-06-13 05:21 -0700
Re: Functional programming and concurreny Ramine <ramine@1.1> - 2014-06-13 05:24 -0700
Re: Functional programming and concurreny "Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid> - 2014-06-13 17:30 -0700
| From | Ramine <ramine@1.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-06-13 04:52 -0700 |
| Subject | Functional programming and concurreny |
| Message-ID | <lnfo9u$9d$2@dont-email.me> |
Hello, I have just read an article by Bartosz Milewski about Object programming and Functional programming and Concurreny, here it is: http://bartoszmilewski.com/ So he is saying that objects don't compose in the presence of concurrency and since in functional programming you can compose immutable objects without using locks, hence he says that Functional programming must be the way to go.. but i think it is an extremist view.. Cause in Object Pascal for example i have designed an Object called Parallel archiver that do parallel compression and that is composable with other parallel objcts, and you can do the same for mathematics by designing parallel Objects that compose fine... and i think that's the way also to go, is to use Parallel Objects that compose fine... so i don't think that functional programming is mandatory here. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ramine <ramine@1.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-06-13 05:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <lnfq1h$d29$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #2499 |
Hello, My parallel objects called Parallel archiver is not the only Parallel object that compose fine, i have implemented other Parallel objects that compose fine, such us my Parallel Sort Libray, Parallel Sort library is in fact a Parallel Object , my other parallel objects are my efficent Parallel Quicksort and my Parallel Varfiler,and my Parallel compression library, and Parallel conjugate gradient solver etc. all those Parallel objects that i have implemented do compose fine, so i don't think Functional programming is mandatory here. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ramine <ramine@1.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-06-13 05:24 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <lnfq5u$d29$7@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #2499 |
Hello, You can download my Parallel objects that compose fine from here: https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/ Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-06-13 17:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <lng53s$hv0$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #2499 |
> "Ramine" wrote in message news:lnfo9u$9d$2@dont-email.me... > I have just read an article by Bartosz Milewski about Did you isspell your name? ;^)
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.programming.threads
csiph-web