Groups > comp.programming.threads > #4294

I think Rust is "restrictive"

Path	csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>
Newsgroups	comp.programming.threads
Subject	I think Rust is "restrictive"
Date	Fri, 18 May 2018 21:50:23 -0400
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Lines	15
Message-ID	<pdnvsv$9l0$4@dont-email.me> (permalink)
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
Injection-Date	Sat, 19 May 2018 01:50:23 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info	h2725194.stratoserver.net; posting-host="6f94b6e509dff52dedc1c2c93682a33f"; logging-data="9888"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18y+liEDoogwQQx1mGqFAfq"
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0
Cancel-Lock	sha1:JEHEjlH/5hyC+/+LfNtOB+FBvWE=
Content-Language	en-US
X-Mozilla-News-Host	news://news.eternal-september.org:119
Xref	csiph.com comp.programming.threads:4294

Show key headers only | View raw

Hello...


I think Rust is "restrictive" to be able to be more disciplined , so
that to be more reliability. This the game of Rust.

C++ is more "permissive" by being it more weakly typed etc.
and this is not good for reliability.

Rust will win, because Rust is much better for reliability and
for Safety-critical systems.


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

I think Rust is "restrictive" Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com> - 2018-05-18 21:50 -0400

csiph-web