Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming.threads > #4294 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-18 21:50 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-05-18 21:50 -0400 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.programming.threads
I think Rust is "restrictive" Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com> - 2018-05-18 21:50 -0400
| From | Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-18 21:50 -0400 |
| Subject | I think Rust is "restrictive" |
| Message-ID | <pdnvsv$9l0$4@dont-email.me> |
Hello... I think Rust is "restrictive" to be able to be more disciplined , so that to be more reliability. This the game of Rust. C++ is more "permissive" by being it more weakly typed etc. and this is not good for reliability. Rust will win, because Rust is much better for reliability and for Safety-critical systems. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Back to top | Article view | comp.programming.threads
csiph-web