Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #12475 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-10-25 18:24 -0400 |
| Last post | 2014-10-28 14:24 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 42 — 17 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.misc
time problem "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-10-25 18:24 -0400
Re: time problem Grant <omg@grrr.id.au> - 2014-10-26 11:02 +1100
Re: time problem "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-10-25 20:30 -0400
Re: time problem Baho Utot <baho-utot@columbus.rr.com> - 2014-10-25 20:06 -0400
Re: time problem philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2014-10-25 19:53 -0500
Re: time problem "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-10-25 21:02 -0400
Re: time problem Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> - 2014-10-25 18:20 -0700
Re: time problem JohnF <john@please.see.sig.for.email.com> - 2014-10-26 03:31 +0000
Re: time problem Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-10-26 05:36 +0000
Re: time problem JohnF <john@please.see.sig.for.email.com> - 2014-10-26 07:11 +0000
Re: time problem Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-10-26 15:43 +0000
Re: time problem JohnF <john@please.see.sig.for.email.com> - 2014-10-27 04:35 +0000
Re: time problem Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-10-27 10:22 +0000
Re: time problem JohnF <john@please.see.sig.for.email.com> - 2014-10-27 12:03 +0000
Re: time problem Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-10-27 12:21 +0000
Re: time problem William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2014-10-27 13:54 +0000
Re: time problem JohnF <john@please.see.sig.for.email.com> - 2014-10-27 05:01 +0000
Re: time problem Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-10-27 10:23 +0000
Re: time problem JohnF <john@please.see.sig.for.email.com> - 2014-10-27 12:11 +0000
Re: time problem Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-10-27 12:30 +0000
Re: time problem William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2014-10-27 13:58 +0000
Re: time problem Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-10-27 18:04 +0000
Re: time problem William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2014-10-26 16:13 +0000
Re: time problem Chick Tower <c.tower@deadspam.com> - 2014-10-31 03:30 +0000
Re: time problem William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2014-10-26 16:02 +0000
Re: time problem Andreas Kohlbach <oct14.5.ankman@spamgourmet.com> - 2014-10-26 17:48 -0400
Re: time problem William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2014-10-26 21:58 +0000
Re: time problem "Nuno J. Silva (aka njsg)" <njsg@invalid.invalid> - 2014-10-27 08:47 +0000
Re: time problem Andreas Kohlbach <oct14.5.ankman@spamgourmet.com> - 2014-10-27 17:20 -0400
Re: time problem JohnF <john@please.see.sig.for.email.com> - 2014-10-27 04:45 +0000
Re: time problem "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-10-25 21:08 -0400
Re: time problem philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2014-10-26 07:15 -0500
Re: time problem Balwinder S Dheeman <bdheeman.SANSPAM@outlook.com> - 2014-10-26 14:08 +0530
Re: time problem Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2014-10-27 03:15 +0000
Re: time problem William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2014-10-26 15:53 +0000
Re: time problem James Moe <jimoeDESPAM@sohnen-moe.com> - 2014-10-26 14:01 -0700
Re: time problem Michael Baeuerle <michael.baeuerle@stz-e.de> - 2014-10-27 07:59 +0000
Re: time problem Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2014-10-27 13:31 +0100
"iburst" option of ntpd (was: time problem) Michael Baeuerle <michael.baeuerle@stz-e.de> - 2014-10-28 08:23 +0000
Re: "iburst" option of ntpd (was: time problem) Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2014-10-28 10:14 +0100
Re: "iburst" option of ntpd (was: time problem) William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2014-10-28 21:10 +0000
Re: "iburst" option of ntpd Chris Davies <chris-usenet@roaima.co.uk> - 2014-10-28 14:24 +0000
Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 Next page →
| From | William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-10-27 13:58 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <m2lj30$7ls$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #12517 |
On 2014-10-27, Rich <rich@example.invalid> wrote: > JohnF <john@please.see.sig.for.email.com> wrote: >> Rich <rich@example.invalid> wrote: >> > <<big snip>> >> > Or, setup an ntp client to keep your clocks synced with the ntp >> > system on the internet, and just let the Slackware 14.1 rc.d >> > scripts save the system time to the hardware clock when you do >> > shutdown. > >> I think you maybe solved the problem. On a hunch, just noticed that >> rc.ntpd had 755 permissions, and indeed ps ax|grep ntp shows >> 727 ? Ss 0:00 /usr/sbin/ntpd -g -p /var/run/ntpd.pid >> I must have inadvertantly told slackware's setup to run it during >> install (which would also explain why previous releases never >> exhibited the problem), and it's somehow been sporadically messing >> stuff up ever since. Changed permissions (and kill'ed this instance), >> so the problem's hopefully solved. No idea what, exactly, ntpd might >> have been doing, but it'll hopefully stop now. > > That would do it. > > Having an /etc/hardwareclock file set as "localtime" and the ntpd > daemon running would cause exactly what you've been seeing. > > Change /etc/localtime to UTC (as you've done, and leave it that way) > and you can keep ntpd running and always have the correct time. Arrgh. No. SEt /etc/hardwareclock to utc, NOT /etc/localtime. /etc/localtime tells the system how to translate the reading from whatever( which is in utc) to the localtime. You want that if you like in the EST/EDT timezone. >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rich <rich@example.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-10-27 18:04 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <m2m1el$3oh$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #12525 |
William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> wrote: > On 2014-10-27, Rich <rich@example.invalid> wrote: > > JohnF <john@please.see.sig.for.email.com> wrote: > >> Rich <rich@example.invalid> wrote: > >> > <<big snip>> > >> > Or, setup an ntp client to keep your clocks synced with the ntp > >> > system on the internet, and just let the Slackware 14.1 rc.d > >> > scripts save the system time to the hardware clock when you do > >> > shutdown. > > > >> I think you maybe solved the problem. On a hunch, just noticed that > >> rc.ntpd had 755 permissions, and indeed ps ax|grep ntp shows > >> 727 ? Ss 0:00 /usr/sbin/ntpd -g -p /var/run/ntpd.pid > >> I must have inadvertantly told slackware's setup to run it during > >> install (which would also explain why previous releases never > >> exhibited the problem), and it's somehow been sporadically messing > >> stuff up ever since. Changed permissions (and kill'ed this instance), > >> so the problem's hopefully solved. No idea what, exactly, ntpd might > >> have been doing, but it'll hopefully stop now. > > > > That would do it. > > > > Having an /etc/hardwareclock file set as "localtime" and the ntpd > > daemon running would cause exactly what you've been seeing. > > > > Change /etc/localtime to UTC (as you've done, and leave it that way) > > and you can keep ntpd running and always have the correct time. > Arrgh. No. SEt /etc/hardwareclock to utc, NOT /etc/localtime. > /etc/localtime tells the system how to translate the reading from > whatever( which is in utc) to the localtime. You want that if you like > in the EST/EDT timezone. Oops... Good catch. Yes, that should have been two /etc/hardwareclock items above.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-10-26 16:13 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <m2j6j2$tma$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #12487 |
On 2014-10-26, JohnF <john@please.see.sig.for.email.com> wrote: > Rich <rich@example.invalid> wrote: >> JohnF <john@please.see.sig.for.email.com> wrote: >>> Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> wrote: >>> > Bill Cunningham <nospam@nspam.invalid> wrote: >>> >> "philo " <philo@privacy.net> wrote in message >>> >>> >>> >>> Set to local time if it's on UTC (which I think is the default) >>> >> >>> >> I try hwclock with the -w and -s switch. They don't seem to do >>> >> anything. The old Linux's used an ntp server to get the time. >>> > >>> > The new linux distributions use ntp to get the time. The hardware >>> > clock and NTP are two different issues (I think this was posted >>> > recently). >>> > >>> > As many many people have suggested in this thread, either tell your >>> > Windows box to use UTC (preferred if possible) or tell your linux >>> > to use localtime. keith >> >>> I've been having pretty much the same problem with slackware 14.1, >>> and am not running windows in any way, shape, or form on this box. >>> Every couple of days, some app seems to reset the hwclock to UTC. But >>> date show blah-blah EDT 2014, and there's no... >>> diff /etc/localtime /usr/share/zoneinfo/US/Eastern >>> ...differences. I set the date, clock -w it, and it > >> Which "it"? Output from 'date' or the HWclock contents? > Thanks for followup and info, Rich. "It" is from 'date'. > Now that, thanks to your remarks, I'm researching > it (the problem) better, I realize that 'date' isn't > sufficient info. > >>> remains edt for a few days, then suddenly I notice it's utc. >> Which "it"? Output from 'date' or the HWclock contents? > As above, 'date'. > >>> What could be causing that? >> Do you reboot between the time you set the HWclock, >> and the instant you find UTC showing up somewhere? > Well, yes, but "find" is the operative word there. > I'm not sure when it "actually happens" (during boot or > otherwise) because I don't often notice the date. > Mostly when I'm doing something like ls -alt|less > to double-check what I've been working on, and > notice it's screwy. > >> If so, what is the contents of your /etc/hardwareclock file? > That's localtime (and some #comments). > >> Since you say you are not running windows, then quit trying to store >> the hardware clock as localtime, have it set to UTC, and everything >> will be fine. You'll still see localtime everywhere anyway. > Okay, thanks. > >> If /etc/hardwareclock already say UTC, leave it alone. If not, change >> "localtime" to UTC in the file, and quit trying to have the HWclock be >> local. > Okay, done. > Note: I ran timeconfig to make the change (as suggested by > those #comments), and it says about localtime that > "this is how most PCs are set up". But I nevertheless > changed /etc/hardwareclock to UTC as you suggested. They are using "PC" to mean "Windows". Whoever set up that timeconfig program was an idiot. You might want to set a bugreport to your distro, because that certainly is a bug. > >> Then, set the system time if/when you need to adjust things (use the >> date command, it also "sets/changes" the time). And then save the >> result into the hardware clock with: >> hwclock --utc --systohc > Okay, done, but 'date' and 'hwclock -r' both still say the same > numerical time, and both say EDT. I'm guessing I have to kill -HUP > something, but I couldn't guess which pid from ps ax. I'll have to > try a reboot (but that's tough to do in the middle of a reply:). Nope. They read the /etc/localtime and translate the readings from those clocks to whatever that file says you want your time to be. If date says UTC, that means that either /etc/localtime has disappeared or has been corrupted, or was not there on boot. Is /etc/localtime a link or a copy of the file from zoneinfo? If it is a link, instead make it a copy rm /etc/localtime cp /usr/share/zoneinfo/EST5EDT /etc/localtime or whatever you are using for you zoneinfo file. It can be that at bootup, /usr/share is not available, and the time then defaults to UTC. > >> Or, setup an ntp client to keep your clocks synced with the ntp system >> on the internet, and just let the Slackware 14.1 rc.d scripts save the >> system time to the hardware clock when you do shutdown. > Didn't want to do that, but looked at those scripts for some > clue about the process mentioned above. But all I could find was > your preceding instructions hwclock --utc --systohc in rc.0 . hwclock has nothing to do with the timezone issues. > >> Just always give the 'hwclock' command the --utc flag and it will >> translate the time from the hwclock into your local time for you when >> you want to view/reset the hwclock. > Okay, as above, doesn't seem to be doing exactly that now, > but I'll try a reboot and see if some process or other > initializes itself with the new /etc/hardwareclock contents. > Thanks for the help, ??? No, using --utc tells the program that your hardware clock is in utc, and this is the default for that program. hwclock will read the hardware (not system) clock and use /etc/localtime to translate that to local time.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chick Tower <c.tower@deadspam.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-10-31 03:30 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <m2uvp3$184$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #12493 |
On 2014-10-26, William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> wrote:
> They are using "PC" to mean "Windows". Whoever set up that timeconfig
> program was an idiot.
> You might want to set a bugreport to your distro, because that certainly
> is a bug.
I seriously doubt that. It's more likely a configuration error on the
part of the user. I am using the same version of the distro John uses,
and I can see the timeconfig script was last modified in October of
2000, other than updating timezone information, and the last of those
was in December of 2012. Do you really think such an obvious bug in an
installation script would exist that long without being fixed?
--
Chick Tower
For e-mail: colm DOT sent DOT towerboy AT xoxy DOT net
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-10-26 16:02 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <m2j5u1$ot4$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #12485 |
On 2014-10-26, JohnF <john@please.see.sig.for.email.com> wrote: ... > > I've been having pretty much the same problem with > slackware 14.1, and am not running windows in any > way, shape, or form on this box. Every couple of > days, some app seems to reset the hwclock to UTC. > But date show blah-blah EDT 2014, and there's no... > diff /etc/localtime /usr/share/zoneinfo/US/Eastern > ...differences. I set the date, clock -w it, and it > remains edt for a few days, then suddenly I notice > iot's utc. What could be causing that? Why in the world would you set your system to localtime? That is simply begging for trouble ( and you get it). Note the the hardware clock is not used by linux at all except for boot. Do you regularly boot this machine? How do you notice it's UTC?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andreas Kohlbach <oct14.5.ankman@spamgourmet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-10-26 17:48 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <87zjci4i5l.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> |
| In reply to | #12492 |
William Unruh wrote on 26. October 2014: > > On 2014-10-26, JohnF <john@please.see.sig.for.email.com> wrote: > ... >> >> I've been having pretty much the same problem with >> slackware 14.1, and am not running windows in any >> way, shape, or form on this box. Every couple of >> days, some app seems to reset the hwclock to UTC. >> But date show blah-blah EDT 2014, and there's no... >> diff /etc/localtime /usr/share/zoneinfo/US/Eastern >> ...differences. I set the date, clock -w it, and it >> remains edt for a few days, then suddenly I notice >> iot's utc. What could be causing that? > > Why in the world would you set your system to localtime? That is simply > begging for trouble ( and you get it). That is when you also use Windows. Windows cannot really deal with time zones. If you set it to run in UTC/GMT (and not live in the UK) you will have an offset to your local time. Even if you set a time zone in Windows. > Note the the hardware clock is not used by linux at all except for boot. I guess some Linux distributions also write the RTC on shutdown. -- Andreas I wish my grass was emo. Then it would cut itself.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-10-26 21:58 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <m2jqqp$9ov$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #12503 |
On 2014-10-26, Andreas Kohlbach <oct14.5.ankman@spamgourmet.com> wrote: > William Unruh wrote on 26. October 2014: >> >> On 2014-10-26, JohnF <john@please.see.sig.for.email.com> wrote: >> ... >>> >>> I've been having pretty much the same problem with >>> slackware 14.1, and am not running windows in any >>> way, shape, or form on this box. Every couple of >>> days, some app seems to reset the hwclock to UTC. >>> But date show blah-blah EDT 2014, and there's no... >>> diff /etc/localtime /usr/share/zoneinfo/US/Eastern >>> ...differences. I set the date, clock -w it, and it >>> remains edt for a few days, then suddenly I notice >>> iot's utc. What could be causing that? >> >> Why in the world would you set your system to localtime? That is simply >> begging for trouble ( and you get it). > > That is when you also use Windows. Windows cannot really deal with time > zones. If you set it to run in UTC/GMT (and not live in the UK) you will > have an offset to your local time. Even if you set a time zone in > Windows. > >> Note the the hardware clock is not used by linux at all except for boot. > > I guess some Linux distributions also write the RTC on shutdown. Yes. If you run ntpd it will also write the rtc every 11 min.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Nuno J. Silva (aka njsg)" <njsg@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-10-27 08:47 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <m2l0qt$lqk$1@news.datemas.de> |
| In reply to | #12503 |
On 2014-10-26, Andreas Kohlbach <oct14.5.ankman@spamgourmet.com> wrote: > William Unruh wrote on 26. October 2014: >> >> On 2014-10-26, JohnF <john@please.see.sig.for.email.com> wrote: >> ... >>> >>> I've been having pretty much the same problem with >>> slackware 14.1, and am not running windows in any >>> way, shape, or form on this box. Every couple of >>> days, some app seems to reset the hwclock to UTC. >>> But date show blah-blah EDT 2014, and there's no... >>> diff /etc/localtime /usr/share/zoneinfo/US/Eastern >>> ...differences. I set the date, clock -w it, and it >>> remains edt for a few days, then suddenly I notice >>> iot's utc. What could be causing that? >> >> Why in the world would you set your system to localtime? That is simply >> begging for trouble ( and you get it). > > That is when you also use Windows. Windows cannot really deal with time > zones. If you set it to run in UTC/GMT (and not live in the UK) you will > have an offset to your local time. Even if you set a time zone in > Windows. I do not think I've seen this problem. If I set Windows to use UTC in the RTC, it will still respect the timezone and make the conversion, but it will treat the UTC as RTC. But it won't show any offset to my local time (I live in EEST/EET, so we're always off from UTC+0 by 4/3 hours). (In order to set Windows to use UTC in the RTC, the DWORD registry key HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\TimeZoneInformation\RealTimeIsUniversal must exist with the value "1".) > >> Note the the hardware clock is not used by linux at all except for boot. > > I guess some Linux distributions also write the RTC on shutdown. -- Nuno Silva (aka njsg) Helsinki, Finland
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andreas Kohlbach <oct14.5.ankman@spamgourmet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-10-27 17:20 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <87sii96wgo.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> |
| In reply to | #12515 |
Nuno J. Silva (aka njsg) wrote on 27. October 2014: > > On 2014-10-26, Andreas Kohlbach <oct14.5.ankman@spamgourmet.com> wrote: >>> >>> Why in the world would you set your system to localtime? That is simply >>> begging for trouble ( and you get it). >> >> That is when you also use Windows. Windows cannot really deal with time >> zones. If you set it to run in UTC/GMT (and not live in the UK) you will >> have an offset to your local time. Even if you set a time zone in >> Windows. > > I do not think I've seen this problem. If I set Windows to use UTC in > the RTC, it will still respect the timezone and make the conversion, but > it will treat the UTC as RTC. But it won't show any offset to my local > time (I live in EEST/EET, so we're always off from UTC+0 by 4/3 hours). IIRC (Windows 2000 knowledge, might be outdated by now) if you are in a country of continental Europe, say France. And you set your RTC to UTC. When you then boot Windows and set the timezone for France (CET, which is UTC +1 or 2 hours in summer) Windows will treat this as the only time it knows. On shutdown it will set the RTC plus or minus the offset the timezone you configure has. > (In order to set Windows to use UTC in the RTC, the DWORD registry key > HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\TimeZoneInformation\RealTimeIsUniversal > must exist with the value "1".) I think there was a menu option "UTC" in Windows 2000. -- Andreas I wish my grass was emo. Then it would cut itself.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JohnF <john@please.see.sig.for.email.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-10-27 04:45 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <m2kim2$q6b$2@reader1.panix.com> |
| In reply to | #12492 |
William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> wrote: > On 2014-10-26, JohnF <john@please.see.sig.for.email.com> wrote: > ... >> >> I've been having pretty much the same problem with >> slackware 14.1, and am not running windows in any >> way, shape, or form on this box. Every couple of >> days, some app seems to reset the hwclock to UTC. >> But date show blah-blah EDT 2014, and there's no... >> diff /etc/localtime /usr/share/zoneinfo/US/Eastern >> ...differences. I set the date, clock -w it, and it >> remains edt for a few days, then suddenly I notice >> iot's utc. What could be causing that? > > Why in the world would you set your system to localtime? From your other followup, I guess you've already read the answer... the instructions emitted when running timeconfig seem to be recommending that. It's of no specific interest to me either way, except insofar as files get timestamped correctly, and it'd be kind of nice if date displayed the same values as my "standalone clocks". > That is simply begging for trouble ( and you get it). > Note the the hardware clock is not used by linux at all except for boot. > Do you regularly boot this machine? How do you notice it's UTC? Yes, booted every day. I don't notice utc specifically; I notice date is wrong and files are timestamped wrong. And they're both four hours ahead, corresponding to utc/edt difference. -- John Forkosh ( mailto: j@f.com where j=john and f=forkosh )
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-10-25 21:08 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <m2hhit$1c0$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #12480 |
"philo " <philo@privacy.net> wrote in message news:m2hgmc$898$1@dont-email.me... > Set to local time if it's on UTC (which I think is the default) Yes I see now it is the default. Bill
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | philo <philo@privacy.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-10-26 07:15 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <m2iolp$e34$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #12482 |
On 10/25/2014 08:08 PM, Bill Cunningham wrote: > "philo " <philo@privacy.net> wrote in message > news:m2hgmc$898$1@dont-email.me... >> Set to local time if it's on UTC (which I think is the default) > > Yes I see now it is the default. > > Bill > > Yep I had the identical situation on my dual boot machine and that fixed it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Balwinder S Dheeman <bdheeman.SANSPAM@outlook.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-10-26 14:08 +0530 |
| Message-ID | <m2ibur$rrn$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #12475 |
On 10/26/2014 03:54 AM, Bill Cunningham wrote: > Everytime I log onto Fedora 20 I am finding that when I go back to > windows the time is 4 hours ahead. There's something wrong somewhere. It's > not right on linux either. I hope it's not hardware. Please check http://yourmacguy.wordpress.com/2008/08/09/boot-camp-clock-sync/ The Mac OS (FreeBSD indeed) and Unix/Linux systems prefer and work better by setting the RTC (hardware clock) to UTC, whereas almost all variants of Winodws saves the time (usually during shutdown) as local time to RTC :( -- Balwinder S "bdheeman" Dheeman (http://bdheeman.BlogSpot.in/) "Working together, works! The proof is GNU/Linux and F/LOSS Projects; Do you too voluntarily work on or contribute to making any difference?"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-10-27 03:15 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <m2kdcg01o2a@news6.newsguy.com> |
| In reply to | #12488 |
On 2014-10-26, Balwinder S Dheeman <bdheeman.SANSPAM@outlook.com> wrote: > On 10/26/2014 03:54 AM, Bill Cunningham wrote: > >> Everytime I log onto Fedora 20 I am finding that when I go back to >> windows the time is 4 hours ahead. There's something wrong somewhere. It's >> not right on linux either. I hope it's not hardware. > > Please check > http://yourmacguy.wordpress.com/2008/08/09/boot-camp-clock-sync/ > > The Mac OS (FreeBSD indeed) and Unix/Linux systems prefer and work > better by setting the RTC (hardware clock) to UTC, whereas almost all > variants of Winodws saves the time (usually during shutdown) as local > time to RTC :( 'zackly. So if you must run Windoze from time to time, run it under VirtualBox. Then you always have your Linux tools handy, and your hardware clock doesn't get screwed up. (Mind you, I still occasionally dual-boot my laptop into Windows, but only because there isn't a Linux port of The Stanley Parable yet, and it won't run under VirtualBox.) -- /~\ cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid (Charlie Gibbs) \ / I'm really at ac.dekanfrus if you read it the right way. X Top-posted messages will probably be ignored. See RFC1855. / \ HTML will DEFINITELY be ignored. Join the ASCII ribbon campaign!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-10-26 15:53 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <m2j5e4$ot4$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #12475 |
On 2014-10-25, Bill Cunningham <nospam@nspam.invalid> wrote: > Everytime I log onto Fedora 20 I am finding that when I go back to > windows the time is 4 hours ahead. There's something wrong somewhere. It's > not right on linux either. I hope it's not hardware. Sounds like timezone problems. What did you tell Linux your system time was on? Are you running ntpd or some other time program? What time zone are you in? > > Bill > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James Moe <jimoeDESPAM@sohnen-moe.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-10-26 14:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <n7GdnV6cL-Og_NDJnZ2dnUU7-QmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #12475 |
On 10/25/2014 03:24 PM, Bill Cunningham wrote: > Everytime I log onto Fedora 20 I am finding that when I go back to > windows the time is 4 hours ahead. There's something wrong somewhere. It's > not right on linux either. I hope it's not hardware. > Enable NTP on both systems. -- James Moe jmm-list at sohnen-moe dot com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michael Baeuerle <michael.baeuerle@stz-e.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-10-27 07:59 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <AABUTfqTA9sAAAuT.A1.flnews@WStation3.stz-e.de> |
| In reply to | #12500 |
James Moe wrote: > Bill Cunningham wrote: > > > > Everytime I log onto Fedora 20 I am finding that when I go back to > > windows the time is 4 hours ahead. There's something wrong somewhere. It's > > not right on linux either. I hope it's not hardware. > > > Enable NTP on both systems. Don't forget to step the time (using ntpdate or something like that) before starting the NTP daemon in this case. Otherwise the time difference may be too large and the NTP daemon may fail to synchronize with the time server.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-10-27 13:31 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <m2ldvq$dr6$1@news1.tnib.de> |
| In reply to | #12513 |
Michael Baeuerle <michael.baeuerle@stz-e.de> wrote: >James Moe wrote: >> Bill Cunningham wrote: >> > >> > Everytime I log onto Fedora 20 I am finding that when I go back to >> > windows the time is 4 hours ahead. There's something wrong somewhere. It's >> > not right on linux either. I hope it's not hardware. >> > >> Enable NTP on both systems. > >Don't forget to step the time (using ntpdate or something like that) >before starting the NTP daemon in this case. Otherwise the time >difference may be too large and the NTP daemon may fail to synchronize >with the time server. Big myth. see iburst in /etc/ntp.conf. Greetings Marc -- -------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! ----- Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | http://www.zugschlus.de/ Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michael Baeuerle <michael.baeuerle@stz-e.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-10-28 08:23 +0000 |
| Subject | "iburst" option of ntpd (was: time problem) |
| Message-ID | <AABUT0ypgcAAAAnS.A1.flnews@WStation3.stz-e.de> |
| In reply to | #12522 |
Marc Haber wrote: > Michael Baeuerle wrote: > > James Moe wrote: > > > Bill Cunningham wrote: > > > > > > > > Everytime I log onto Fedora 20 I am finding that when I go back to > > > > windows the time is 4 hours ahead. There's something wrong somewhere. It's > > > > not right on linux either. I hope it's not hardware. > > > > > > Enable NTP on both systems. > > > > Don't forget to step the time (using ntpdate or something like that) > > before starting the NTP daemon in this case. Otherwise the time > > difference may be too large and the NTP daemon may fail to synchronize > > with the time server. > > Big myth. see iburst in /etc/ntp.conf. Looks like they are currently integrating the functions of ntpdate into ntpd (-q option). Are you sure that "iburst" alone can replace ntpdate in any case? For me it looks like that the -g and -q options of ntpd are the intended replacements for ntpdate (and "iburst" alone is simply a shorter initial poll interval to speed up the synchronization process).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-10-28 10:14 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: "iburst" option of ntpd (was: time problem) |
| Message-ID | <m2nmpu$dqm$1@news1.tnib.de> |
| In reply to | #12536 |
Michael Baeuerle <michael.baeuerle@stz-e.de> wrote: >Are you sure that "iburst" alone can replace ntpdate in any case? >For me it looks like that the -g and -q options of ntpd are the intended >replacements for ntpdate (and "iburst" alone is simply a shorter initial >poll interval to speed up the synchronization process). Debian starts the ntpd with -g, and has iburst in its server statements in the configuration, has no ntpdate, and everything works just fine. So, I stand corrected, it's the combination of -g and iburst that makes things purr. Greetings Marc -- -------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! ----- Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | http://www.zugschlus.de/ Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.misc
csiph-web