Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #12532

Re: time problem

Show all headers | View raw

Nuno J. Silva (aka njsg) wrote on 27. October 2014:
>
> On 2014-10-26, Andreas Kohlbach <oct14.5.ankman@spamgourmet.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Why in the world would you set your system to localtime? That is simply
>>> begging for trouble ( and you get it).
>>
>> That is when you also use Windows. Windows cannot really deal with time
>> zones. If you set it to run in UTC/GMT (and not live in the UK) you will
>> have an offset to your local time. Even if you set a time zone in
>> Windows.
>
> I do not think I've seen this problem. If I set Windows to use UTC in
> the RTC, it will still respect the timezone and make the conversion, but
> it will treat the UTC as RTC. But it won't show any offset to my local
> time (I live in EEST/EET, so we're always off from UTC+0 by 4/3 hours).

IIRC (Windows 2000 knowledge, might be outdated by now) if you are in a
country of continental Europe, say France. And you set your RTC to
UTC. When you then boot Windows and set the timezone for France (CET,
which is UTC +1 or 2 hours in summer) Windows will treat this as the only
time it knows. On shutdown it will set the RTC plus or minus the offset
the timezone you configure has.

> (In order to set Windows to use UTC in the RTC, the DWORD registry key
> HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\TimeZoneInformation\RealTimeIsUniversal
> must exist with the value "1".)

I think there was a menu option "UTC" in Windows 2000.
-- 
Andreas

I wish my grass was emo. Then it would cut itself.

Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

time problem "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-10-25 18:24 -0400
  Re: time problem Grant <omg@grrr.id.au> - 2014-10-26 11:02 +1100
    Re: time problem "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-10-25 20:30 -0400
  Re: time problem Baho Utot <baho-utot@columbus.rr.com> - 2014-10-25 20:06 -0400
  Re: time problem philo  <philo@privacy.net> - 2014-10-25 19:53 -0500
    Re: time problem "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-10-25 21:02 -0400
      Re: time problem Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> - 2014-10-25 18:20 -0700
        Re: time problem JohnF <john@please.see.sig.for.email.com> - 2014-10-26 03:31 +0000
          Re: time problem Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-10-26 05:36 +0000
            Re: time problem JohnF <john@please.see.sig.for.email.com> - 2014-10-26 07:11 +0000
              Re: time problem Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-10-26 15:43 +0000
                Re: time problem JohnF <john@please.see.sig.for.email.com> - 2014-10-27 04:35 +0000
                Re: time problem Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-10-27 10:22 +0000
                Re: time problem JohnF <john@please.see.sig.for.email.com> - 2014-10-27 12:03 +0000
                Re: time problem Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-10-27 12:21 +0000
                Re: time problem William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2014-10-27 13:54 +0000
                Re: time problem JohnF <john@please.see.sig.for.email.com> - 2014-10-27 05:01 +0000
                Re: time problem Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-10-27 10:23 +0000
                Re: time problem JohnF <john@please.see.sig.for.email.com> - 2014-10-27 12:11 +0000
                Re: time problem Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-10-27 12:30 +0000
                Re: time problem William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2014-10-27 13:58 +0000
                Re: time problem Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-10-27 18:04 +0000
              Re: time problem William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2014-10-26 16:13 +0000
                Re: time problem Chick Tower <c.tower@deadspam.com> - 2014-10-31 03:30 +0000
          Re: time problem William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2014-10-26 16:02 +0000
            Re: time problem Andreas Kohlbach <oct14.5.ankman@spamgourmet.com> - 2014-10-26 17:48 -0400
              Re: time problem William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2014-10-26 21:58 +0000
              Re: time problem "Nuno J. Silva (aka njsg)" <njsg@invalid.invalid> - 2014-10-27 08:47 +0000
                Re: time problem Andreas Kohlbach <oct14.5.ankman@spamgourmet.com> - 2014-10-27 17:20 -0400
            Re: time problem JohnF <john@please.see.sig.for.email.com> - 2014-10-27 04:45 +0000
    Re: time problem "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-10-25 21:08 -0400
      Re: time problem philo  <philo@privacy.net> - 2014-10-26 07:15 -0500
  Re: time problem Balwinder S Dheeman <bdheeman.SANSPAM@outlook.com> - 2014-10-26 14:08 +0530
    Re: time problem Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2014-10-27 03:15 +0000
  Re: time problem William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2014-10-26 15:53 +0000
  Re: time problem James Moe <jimoeDESPAM@sohnen-moe.com> - 2014-10-26 14:01 -0700
    Re: time problem Michael Baeuerle <michael.baeuerle@stz-e.de> - 2014-10-27 07:59 +0000
      Re: time problem Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2014-10-27 13:31 +0100
        "iburst" option of ntpd (was: time problem) Michael Baeuerle <michael.baeuerle@stz-e.de> - 2014-10-28 08:23 +0000
          Re: "iburst" option of ntpd (was: time problem) Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2014-10-28 10:14 +0100
            Re: "iburst" option of ntpd (was: time problem) William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2014-10-28 21:10 +0000
          Re: "iburst" option of ntpd Chris Davies <chris-usenet@roaima.co.uk> - 2014-10-28 14:24 +0000

csiph-web