Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #88525 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2026-06-30 01:44 +0800 |
| Last post | 2026-07-03 03:19 +0000 |
| Articles | 11 — 6 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.misc
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: What does "libre" refer to in the context of a software license? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2026-06-30 01:44 +0800
Re: What does "libre" refer to in the context of a software license? german newsgroups <usualsuspectrider@gmail.com> - 2026-06-30 06:51 +0200
Re: What does "libre" refer to in the context of a software license? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2026-06-30 16:04 +0800
Re: What does "libre" refer to in the context of a software license? Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-06-30 20:05 +1000
Re: What does "libre" refer to in the context of a software license? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-06-30 18:51 +0000
Re: What does "libre" refer to in the context of a software license? Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-07-01 20:28 +1000
Re: What does "libre" refer to in the context of a software license? "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-07-01 13:20 +0100
Re: What does "libre" refer to in the context of a software license? Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-07-02 22:11 +1000
Re: What does "libre" refer to in the context of a software license? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-07-02 21:07 +0000
Re: What does "libre" refer to in the context of a software license? Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2026-07-03 20:46 +1000
Re: What does "libre" refer to in the context of a software license? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-07-03 03:19 +0000
| From | "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-06-30 01:44 +0800 |
| Subject | Re: What does "libre" refer to in the context of a software license? |
| Message-ID | <111uauo$h505$1@toylet.eternal-september.org> |
On 6/29/2026 8:59 PM, John C. wrote:
>
> In software licensing, "libre" refers to freedom, not price. Borrowed
> from Romance languages, it is used to specifically distinguish ...
LibreOffice - Wikipedia
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LibreOffice>
LibreOffice vs OpenOffice — LibreOffice
<https://www.libreoffice.org/libreoffice-vs-openoffice/>
--
@~@ Simplicity is Beauty! Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch!
/ v \ May the Force and farces be with you! Live long and prosper!!
/( _ )\ https://sites.google.com/site/changmw/
^ ^ https://github.com/changmw/changmw
The game is afoot... Meow...
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | german newsgroups <usualsuspectrider@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-06-30 06:51 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <111vi0f$3q9aa$1@news.usenet.ovh> |
| In reply to | #88525 |
Le 29/06/2026 à 19:44, Mr. Man-wai Chang a écrit : > On 6/29/2026 8:59 PM, John C. wrote: >> >> In software licensing, "libre" refers to freedom, not price. Borrowed >> from Romance languages, it is used to specifically distinguish ... > > LibreOffice - Wikipedia > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LibreOffice> > > LibreOffice vs OpenOffice — LibreOffice > <https://www.libreoffice.org/libreoffice-vs-openoffice/> > free means if you want, you could get the source, rewrite it et do a another version of the software ! may be the name will be "caca version" because, a team is 10000 peoples ! -- Amicalement, Frenchy Friendly, & French touch ! german
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-06-30 16:04 +0800 |
| Message-ID | <111vtba$tv11$2@toylet.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #88528 |
On 6/30/2026 12:51 PM, german newsgroups wrote:
>
> free means if you want, you could get the source, rewrite it
> et do a another version of the software !
> may be the name will be "caca version" because, a team is
> 10000 peoples !
Let me introduce you an english word that's
very hard to spell and remember:
ESPIONAGE中文(繁體)翻譯:劍橋詞典
<https://dictionary.cambridge.org/zht/%E8%A9%9E%E5%85%B8/%E8%8B%B1%E8%AA%9E-%E6%BC%A2%E8%AA%9E-%E7%B9%81%E9%AB%94/espionage>
Espionage - Wikipedia
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Espionage>
Meow.... The game is afoot!! :)
--
@~@ Simplicity is Beauty! Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch!
/ v \ May the Force and farces be with you! Live long and prosper!!
/( _ )\ https://sites.google.com/site/changmw/
^ ^ https://github.com/changmw/changmw
The game is afoot... Meow...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-06-30 20:05 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <11204e4$109lo$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #88528 |
On 30/06/2026 2:51 pm, german newsgroups wrote: > Le 29/06/2026 à 19:44, Mr. Man-wai Chang a écrit : >> On 6/29/2026 8:59 PM, John C. wrote: >>> >>> In software licensing, "libre" refers to freedom, not price. Borrowed >>> from Romance languages, it is used to specifically distinguish ... >> >> LibreOffice - Wikipedia >> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LibreOffice> >> >> LibreOffice vs OpenOffice — LibreOffice >> <https://www.libreoffice.org/libreoffice-vs-openoffice/> >> > > free means if you want, you could get the source, rewrite it > et do a another version of the software ! > may be the name will be "caca version" because, a team is > 10000 peoples ! > Does caca really mean 10,000 (i.e. 100 x 100)?? I thought 'caca' might have meant what you might find in a Baby's nappy!! ;-P .... so a 'caca version' might have been pretty sh%$ -- Daniel70
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-06-30 18:51 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <seU0S.4$kfzb.1@fx35.iad> |
| In reply to | #88528 |
On 2026-06-30, german newsgroups <usualsuspectrider@gmail.com> wrote: > Le 29/06/2026 à 19:44, Mr. Man-wai Chang a écrit : > >> On 6/29/2026 8:59 PM, John C. wrote: >> >>> In software licensing, "libre" refers to freedom, not price. Borrowed >>> from Romance languages, it is used to specifically distinguish ... >> >> LibreOffice - Wikipedia >> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LibreOffice> >> >> LibreOffice vs OpenOffice — LibreOffice >> <https://www.libreoffice.org/libreoffice-vs-openoffice/> > > free means if you want, you could get the source, rewrite it > et do a another version of the software ! > may be the name will be "caca version" because, a team is > 10000 peoples ! Compare "free as in speech" with "free as in beer". -- /~\ Charlie Gibbs | No artificial \ / <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> | intelligence was X I'm really at ac.dekanfrus | used in the creation / \ if you read it the right way. | of this post.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-07-01 20:28 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <1122q54$1posb$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #88542 |
On 1/07/2026 4:51 am, Charlie Gibbs wrote: > On 2026-06-30, german newsgroups <usualsuspectrider@gmail.com> wrote: >> Le 29/06/2026 à 19:44, Mr. Man-wai Chang a écrit : >>> On 6/29/2026 8:59 PM, John C. wrote: >>> >>>> In software licensing, "libre" refers to freedom, not price. Borrowed >>>> from Romance languages, it is used to specifically distinguish ... >>> >>> LibreOffice - Wikipedia >>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LibreOffice> >>> >>> LibreOffice vs OpenOffice — LibreOffice >>> <https://www.libreoffice.org/libreoffice-vs-openoffice/> >> >> free means if you want, you could get the source, rewrite it >> et do a another version of the software ! >> may be the name will be "caca version" because, a team is >> 10000 peoples ! > > Compare "free as in speech" with "free as in beer". > To me, "free as in speech" is ME being able to say whatever I want .... whereas with "free as in beer" that's someone wanting to get my attention to SELL me something (maybe a brand of beer!!). Am I wrong?? -- Daniel70
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-07-01 13:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <11230m8$16vs9$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #88579 |
On 2026/7/1 11:28:50, Daniel70 wrote: > On 1/07/2026 4:51 am, Charlie Gibbs wrote: >> On 2026-06-30, german newsgroups <usualsuspectrider@gmail.com> wrote: [] >>> free means if you want, you could get the source, rewrite it >>> et do a another version of the software ! >>> may be the name will be "caca version" because, a team is >>> 10000 peoples ! >> >> Compare "free as in speech" with "free as in beer". >> > To me, "free as in speech" is ME being able to say whatever I want .... > whereas with "free as in beer" that's someone wanting to get my > attention to SELL me something (maybe a brand of beer!!). > > Am I wrong?? In practice, yes. The two "free"s are usually brought up in the context of software; that which is "free as in speech", usually applied to open source, means you are free to do whatever you want with it, including changing all sorts of settings; it usually doesn't cost anything either, though sometimes (e. g. some Linux distributions, AIUI) there is a minor charge for the convenience; the point usually being made when the two "free"s are brought up is that it's not cost that is the main freedom being considered. Free as in beer would be software that's free to download and use, but over which you may have little choice about how it works (including settings), or even information on how it works - it usually _isn't_ source-code available, for example. A _good_ (IMO) example of free-as-in-beer software is IrfanView (for private use - though Irfan does accept donations); there are plenty of bad examples, such as those that include malware or at least ad.s and information-grathering (I think many "app"s, and browser add-ons, are such). I'll leave others to give examples of good (and bad - there must be some!) free-as-in-speech softwares. -- J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()ALIS-Ch++(p)Ar++T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf Never be led astray onto the path of virtue.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-07-02 22:11 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <1125khe$2iucq$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #88580 |
On 1/07/2026 10:20 pm, J. P. Gilliver wrote: > On 2026/7/1 11:28:50, Daniel70 wrote: >> On 1/07/2026 4:51 am, Charlie Gibbs wrote: >>> On 2026-06-30, german newsgroups <usualsuspectrider@gmail.com> wrote: > [] >>>> free means if you want, you could get the source, rewrite it >>>> et do a another version of the software ! >>>> may be the name will be "caca version" because, a team is >>>> 10000 peoples ! >>> >>> Compare "free as in speech" with "free as in beer". >>> >> To me, "free as in speech" is ME being able to say whatever I want .... >> whereas with "free as in beer" that's someone wanting to get my >> attention to SELL me something (maybe a brand of beer!!). >> >> Am I wrong?? > > In practice, yes. > > The two "free"s are usually brought up in the context of software; that > which is "free as in speech", usually applied to open source, means you > are free to do whatever you want with it, including changing all sorts > of settings; it usually doesn't cost anything either, though sometimes > (e. g. some Linux distributions, AIUI) there is a minor charge for the > convenience; the point usually being made when the two "free"s are > brought up is that it's not cost that is the main freedom being > considered. Free as in beer would be software that's free to download > and use, but over which you may have little choice about how it works > (including settings), or even information on how it works - it usually > _isn't_ source-code available, for example. A _good_ (IMO) example of > free-as-in-beer software is IrfanView (for private use - though Irfan > does accept donations); there are plenty of bad examples, such as those > that include malware or at least ad.s and information-grathering (I > think many "app"s, and browser add-ons, are such). I'll leave others to > give examples of good (and bad - there must be some!) free-as-in-speech > softwares. > Gee Whiz!! Didn't I just type that?? More succinct, or explicit, maybe, but the same. ;-P -- Daniel70
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-07-02 21:07 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1126juv$2ucc5$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #88594 |
On Thu, 2 Jul 2026 22:11:23 +1000, Daniel70 wrote: > Gee Whiz!! Didn't I just type that?? More succinct, or explicit, maybe, > but the same. ;-P The Four Freedoms: <https://www.fsf.org/blogs/gnu-press/limited-time-only-get-our-new-four-freedoms-shirt-with-an-fsf-membership>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-07-03 20:46 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <11283u3$3b4k9$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #88597 |
On 3/07/2026 7:07 am, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: > On Thu, 2 Jul 2026 22:11:23 +1000, Daniel70 wrote: > >> Gee Whiz!! Didn't I just type that?? More succinct, or explicit, maybe, >> but the same. ;-P > > The Four Freedoms: > <https://www.fsf.org/blogs/gnu-press/limited-time-only-get-our-new-four-freedoms-shirt-with-an-fsf-membership> > Hmm! Lawrence, did you notice that that link is from Dec, 2017?? Our Freedoms ARE Gone, Man, GONE!! ;-P -- Daniel70
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-07-03 03:19 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <11279n4$347sd$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #88594 |
On Thu, 2 Jul 2026 22:11:23 +1000, Daniel70 wrote: > Gee Whiz!! Didn't I just type that?? More succinct, or explicit, > maybe, but the same. ;-P The Four Freedoms: <https://fsfe.org/freesoftware/freesoftware.en.html>.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.misc
csiph-web