Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #27734

Re: GKrellM question

Path csiph.com!xmission!news.alt.net!not-for-mail
From owl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.misc, alt.os.linux.suse, alt.os.linux
Subject Re: GKrellM question
Date Mon, 29 Jul 2019 00:15:19 +0000 (UTC)
Organization O.W.L.
Lines 29
Message-ID <sub70rt8ga9a.3@rooftop.invalid> (permalink)
References <7dcs0g-fr1.ln1@Telcontar.valinor> <vhqs0g-dsa.ln1@Telcontar.valinor> <pkmu0g-vrl.ln1@Telcontar.valinor> <sibuuqga.ghuio3ta@rooftop.invalid> <obuu0g-s3s.ln1@Telcontar.valinor> <8rn01g-506.ln1@Telcontar.valinor> <sv9z0b803t.ayhu4@rooftop.invalid> <rv711g-9ro.ln1@Telcontar.valinor>
NNTP-Posting-Host boom.rooftop.invalid
X-Face $BHf)vM$6p_?9L`jmOQ54JeNyL+%MZGGRfH8&grb[Y%-jU`MCPAQN=/SVDa{<KrBxl"%XcV >(/67bP(YB}rjV^h><g$kPGE_caHX,aa}4A1~sto7YJo#ob/SgNiMsoaMMXiOX9%DjyJM_-=$`F5b' JM,?/R/;V1RI%|eClL6ymI}LbZERB=q+"pJ)uI{ngj1DRF1;E5[r$f[4mgt9=7Pw@vl8@I%eYs6KWJ e%LU3#U@M[X^YBp2VY]-'1*reGDbk%#n1ve'*RffQ3j,(TCYivjb*M`qmuC5rHgbN)nSsx)697q/vt //''?=gM'C.salgG^f)>cUh
Xref csiph.com comp.os.linux.misc:27734 alt.os.linux.suse:23084 alt.os.linux:57918

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

In alt.os.linux Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
> On 28/07/2019 18.14, owl wrote:
>> In alt.os.linux Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
> 
> 
>>> There is one remaining issue: the window is too high, higher than the
>>> old instance. It is because of the "led", a tiny blob that moves left
>>> and right because of the activity in that monitor. That's one millimetre
>>> at least (with 22 monitors, they add up). I don't see where to remove
>>> them - my old instance doesn't have them.
>>>
>> 
>> If you're talking about the "blip" thing on each monitor, its size
>> appears to be controlled by the Themes->Options->Scale widget.
> 
> No, I want to remove that blip entirely. The gkrelm old instance doesn't
> have them at all.
> 
> However, I noticed that the old instance was scaled to 40. Did the same
> in the new instance and it worked.
> 
> 
> Baffled...
> 
> 

Yeah, I don't see a way to disable it, but setting scale to 40 or below
seems to make it "disappear."

Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

GKrellM question "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-07-27 00:45 +0200
  Re: GKrellM question "David W. Hodgins" <dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org> - 2019-07-26 19:45 -0400
    Re: GKrellM question "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-07-27 04:49 +0200
  Re: GKrellM question "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-07-27 04:46 +0200
    Re: GKrellM question "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-07-27 21:52 +0200
      Re: GKrellM question owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-07-27 21:42 +0000
        Re: GKrellM question "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-07-28 00:04 +0200
          Re: GKrellM question "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-07-28 16:25 +0200
            Re: GKrellM question owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-07-28 16:14 +0000
              Re: GKrellM question "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-07-28 21:00 +0200
                Re: GKrellM question owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2019-07-29 00:15 +0000
                Re: GKrellM question "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-07-29 12:52 +0200
    Re: GKrellM question jrg <jeff.g.group@att.net> - 2019-07-27 17:27 -0700
      Re: GKrellM question "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2019-07-28 02:39 +0200

csiph-web