Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #24567
| From | Rich <rich@example.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: Sometiomes I really LOVE linux. |
| Date | 2018-09-25 20:22 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <poe5eb$m9$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <pobjat$qtp$1@dont-email.me> <pobkrr02ad5@news4.newsguy.com> <g0tm23F46c0U1@mid.individual.net> <pod7gj$qao$1@dont-email.me> <87h8idk7wl.fsf@LkoBDZeT.terraraq.uk> |
Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote: > Rich <rich@example.invalid> writes: >> Carlos E. R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote: >>> Say... but the program could maintain a pointer to the old file and use >>> it, while the disk lists a new version. >> >> Which is how it works on Linux, and is why Linux will let you delete >> and create a new executable while the running program continues, >> unaware that anything changed. >> >>> Beside requiring a different filesystem design. >> >> And here we have the root cause on windows. The windows filesystem >> design does not allow the feature that Linux's filesystem design does, > > Why do you think that? The WP article on NTFS describes essentially the > same indirection between filenames and contents as found in traditional > Unix filesystems. Even if it was true it would not inherently prevent > running executable being replaced, it would just make it a bit more > complicated. Ok, then reword my statement to: "the subset of capabilities of the NTFS filesystem design exposed by windows to windows programs does not allow on windows of the feature that Linux exposes to Linux executables".
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Sometiomes I really LOVE linux. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-24 19:29 +0100
Re: Sometiomes I really LOVE linux. Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2018-09-24 15:14 -0500
Re: Sometiomes I really LOVE linux. Bobbie Sellers <bliss@mouse-potato.com> - 2018-09-24 14:01 -0700
Re: Sometiomes I really LOVE linux. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2018-09-24 21:27 +0000
Re: Sometiomes I really LOVE linux. "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-09-24 22:49 -0400
Re: Sometiomes I really LOVE linux. Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 09:08 +0100
Re: Sometiomes I really LOVE linux. Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2018-09-25 11:51 +0000
Re: Sometiomes I really LOVE linux. Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 14:45 +0100
Re: Sometiomes I really LOVE linux. Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2018-09-25 20:22 +0000
Re: Sometiomes I really LOVE linux. Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 08:32 +0100
Re: Sometiomes I really LOVE linux. Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2018-09-25 08:34 -0500
Re: Sometiomes I really LOVE linux. Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> - 2018-09-25 15:28 +0000
Re: Sometiomes I really LOVE linux. Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2018-09-25 11:21 -0500
Re: Sometiomes I really LOVE linux. Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> - 2018-09-25 21:26 +0000
Re: Sometiomes I really LOVE linux. Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2018-09-25 19:06 -0500
Re: Sometiomes I really LOVE linux. Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2018-09-25 20:33 +0000
Re: Sometiomes I really LOVE linux. Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> - 2018-09-25 23:41 +0000
Re: Sometiomes I really LOVE linux. Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2018-09-26 00:51 +0000
Re: Sometiomes I really LOVE linux. jrg <jeff.g.group@att.net> - 2018-09-24 14:33 -0700
Re: Sometiomes I really LOVE linux. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2018-09-24 21:59 +0000
csiph-web