Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #5644
| From | Ivan Shmakov <oneingray@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.windows.x, comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: remote access with gui. |
| Date | 2012-07-09 14:07 +0700 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <86sjd15s6d.fsf@gray.siamics.net> (permalink) |
| References | <2e7acc64-fead-4c39-bbaa-b63f7d3955e4@l32g2000yqc.googlegroups.com> <jsee3e$4hm$1@news.xmission.com> <jsf74v$sf9$2@reader1.panix.com> <pqOdnbhEE6XU9HbSnZ2dnUVZ_vGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
>>>>> Aaron W Hsu <arcfide@sacrideo.us> writes: >>>>> Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> writes: [Cross-posting to news:comp.windows.x.] >> Using X forwarding over something like a 3Mb DSL link just doesn't >> work these days for anything fancier than xterm: Things like Gnome >> or KDE apps are completely out of the question in my experience. > I have ranted on this before. Modern toolkits and their use largely > ignore and duplicate functionality that is in the core X or common > libraries, and this results in massive amounts of rendering waste, > easily detectable on a X-forwarded connection. I still remember playing some X games over a 14400 bit/s modem connection. [...] > I find that to be my preferred solution instead of going VNC unless I > need to share a screen with others. Though, ISTR, there were (are?) solutions for "screen sharing" based on the X protocol. [...] > I recommend looking for applications written in toolkits like Motif, > (install OpenMotif instead of using lesstif, though), ... Or vice versa, for those preferring free software. (Open Motif is /not/ free software, according to either the FSF definition or DFSG. It's part of "non-Debian" non-free, for instance.) > Xlib, Xt, or some of the other lesser known toolkits. By default > they look dated due to the default theming, but it is fairly > straightforward to get them looking clean and modern. It's my guess that it's up to /us/, the ones interested in Xt, to create such themes. > Once you have that, your experiences in remote GUI use will be much > improved, IMO. My guess is that there're quite a few "broken" Xt applications, including those performing needless refreshes. -- FSF associate member #7257
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
remote access with gui. "john@wexfordpress.com" <john@wexfordpress.com> - 2012-06-18 17:40 -0700
Re: remote access with gui. Lew Pitcher <lpitcher@teksavvy.com> - 2012-06-18 21:01 -0400
Re: remote access with gui. Bob Tennent <BobT@cs.queensu.ca> - 2012-06-19 02:30 +0000
Re: remote access with gui. J G Miller <miller@yoyo.ORG> - 2012-06-19 13:45 +0000
Re: remote access with gui. Bob Tennent <BobT@cs.queensu.ca> - 2012-06-19 17:08 +0000
Re: remote access with gui. Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201206.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2012-06-20 08:35 +0200
Re: remote access with gui. Balwinder S Dheeman <bsd.SANSPAM@anu.homelinux.net> - 2012-06-20 13:26 +0530
Re: remote access with gui. Stan Bischof <stan@worldbadminton.com> - 2012-06-20 15:05 +0000
Re: remote access with gui. Douglas Mayne <none@invalid.com> - 2012-06-27 07:52 +0000
Re: remote access with gui. Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2012-06-27 14:59 +0000
Re: remote access with gui. Aaron W. Hsu <arcfide@sacrideo.us> - 2012-06-27 15:12 -0500
Re: remote access with gui. Ivan Shmakov <oneingray@gmail.com> - 2012-07-09 14:07 +0700
csiph-web