Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.hardware > #1310
| From | Ivan Shmakov <oneingray@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.hardware, comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Gooseberry Board |
| Date | 2012-07-09 13:53 +0700 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <86wr2d5sst.fsf@gray.siamics.net> (permalink) |
| References | <jsh949$kfm$2@speranza.aioe.org> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
>>>>> Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> writes:
[Cross-posting to news:comp.os.linux.hardware.]
> Gooseberry Board http://gooseberry.atspace.co.uk/
[...]
> Has anyone tested this toy? If you did, how was your experience?
My primary concern with both Raspberry Pi and Gooseberry is
their reliance on HDMI, which is known for its DRM-friendly
features, though Raspberry Pi also supports composite video,
while Gooseberry is claimed to support LVDS.
Raspberry Pi go as far as to label VGA as "end of life
technology" [1] (though I understand that the D-sub connector is
probably way too bulky to be used on such a small board), while
it's still widely used, and is pretty much the only widespread
"open" serial video standard. (FWIW, many 17" displays are
still VGA-only.)
Another issue is that both boards' GPU's are not yet well
supported by free software, though Gooseberry is seemingly
closer to have proper free software support:
--cut: http://gooseberry.atspace.co.uk/?page_id=108 --
[...] A Mali 400 GPU is also shipped with the board which is
expected to have open source driver support in the near future (see
http://limadriver.org/).
--cut: http://gooseberry.atspace.co.uk/?page_id=108 --
[1] http://raspberrypi.org/faqs
--
FSF associate member #7257
Back to comp.os.linux.hardware | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Gooseberry Board Ivan Shmakov <oneingray@gmail.com> - 2012-07-09 13:53 +0700 Re: Gooseberry Board raisingtech123@gmail.com - 2012-09-05 23:13 -0700
csiph-web