Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #684677 > unrolled thread

No More Pearls Before Swine

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

Contents

  No More Pearls Before Swine Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-01-28 23:15 +0000
    Re: No More Pearls Before Swine Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-28 18:23 -0500
    Re: No More Pearls Before Swine DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2025-01-28 22:23 -0500
      Re: No More Pearls Before Swine Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-28 22:32 -0500
        Re: No More Pearls Before Swine DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2025-01-28 22:38 -0500
        Re: No More Pearls Before Swine CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-29 09:28 -0500
          Re: No More Pearls Before Swine Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-29 14:23 -0500
            Re: No More Pearls Before Swine Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-29 13:46 -0600
              Re: No More Pearls Before Swine DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2025-01-30 13:31 -0500
            Re: No More Pearls Before Swine chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-30 06:50 -0600
              Re: No More Pearls Before Swine RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-31 02:28 +0000
                Re: No More Pearls Before Swine chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-31 07:25 -0600
                  Re: No More Pearls Before Swine Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-31 11:54 -0600
                    Re: No More Pearls Before Swine Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-31 12:00 -0600
                Re: No More Pearls Before Swine pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-02-01 00:18 +0000
            Re: No More Pearls Before Swine DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2025-01-30 13:30 -0500
              Re: No More Pearls Before Swine Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-30 17:28 -0500
                Re: No More Pearls Before Swine Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-30 19:17 -0600
                  Re: No More Pearls Before Swine Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-30 20:21 -0500
                    Re: No More Pearls Before Swine DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2025-01-30 22:55 -0500
                      Re: No More Pearls Before Swine Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-31 10:47 -0500
                        Re: No More Pearls Before Swine CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-31 10:52 -0500
                          Re: No More Pearls Before Swine Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-31 10:58 -0500
                            Re: No More Pearls Before Swine pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-02-01 00:15 +0000
                              Re: No More Pearls Before Swine Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-31 19:58 -0500
                                Re: No More Pearls Before Swine Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-02-01 19:16 -0500
                                  Re: No More Pearls Before Swine Rudy Canoza <rudy@phil.hendrie.con> - 2025-02-02 05:12 -0500
    Re: No More Pearls Before Swine rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-29 03:51 +0000
      Re: No More Pearls Before Swine RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-29 08:01 +0000
        Re: No More Pearls Before Swine rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-29 21:12 +0000
          Re: No More Pearls Before Swine Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-29 19:25 -0600
        Re: No More Pearls Before Swine vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-01-30 14:38 +0000
    Re: No More Swine Pretending To Be Pearls Nick Charles - 2025-01-29 00:14 -0500
    Re: No More Pearls Before Swine Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-29 10:31 -0600
      Re: No More Pearls Before Swine Farley Flud <fsquared@fsquared.linux> - 2025-01-30 13:15 +0000
        Re: No More Pearls Before Swine Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-30 12:13 -0600
          Re: No More Pearls Before Swine Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-30 12:43 -0600
        Re: No More Pearls Before Swine DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2025-01-30 13:33 -0500
        Re: No More Pearls Before Swine RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-31 02:31 +0000
    Re: No More Pearls Before Swine candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-01-29 20:20 +0000
    Re: No More Pearls Before Swine Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-01-30 21:11 +0000
      Re: No More Pearls Before Swine rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-31 00:51 +0000
        Re: No More Pearls Before Swine CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-30 20:47 -0500
          Re: No More Pearls Before Swine Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-30 21:17 -0500
            Re: No More Pearls Before Swine vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-01-31 02:25 +0000
            Re: No More Pearls Before Swine CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-30 21:31 -0500
              Re: No More Pearls Before Swine DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2025-01-30 23:04 -0500
          Re: No More Pearls Before Swine chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-31 07:23 -0600
          Re: No More Pearls Before Swine Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-02-01 10:43 +0000
            Re: No More Pearls Before Swine DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2025-02-02 16:04 -0500
              Re: No More Pearls Before Swine CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-02 20:30 -0500
        Re: No More Pearls Before Swine RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-31 02:33 +0000
          Re: No More Pearls Before Swine -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-31 06:29 -0500
      Re: No More Pearls Before Swine Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-30 20:43 -0600
        Re: No More Pearls Before Swine DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2025-01-30 23:01 -0500

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

#684794

DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:
>On 1/30/2025 8:21 PM, Joel wrote:
>> Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> See Joel? "DFS" has understanding of a female mind.
>> 
>> I don't really see your point.
>
>He doesn't have one.  He and Feeb are brokedown, angry, womanless incels.
>
>Feeb in particular was vehemently misogynistic and ignorant about women 
>and STEM.  It all stems (heh) from his failure at life.
>
>I can't tell you how many accomplished female STEM PhDs and professors 
>I've come across on university faculty websites.
>
>ANY of them put these 2 cola clowns to shame.


I had women teaching high math and comp sci in college.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684795

On 2025-01-31 10:47 a.m., Joel wrote:
> DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:
>> On 1/30/2025 8:21 PM, Joel wrote:
>>> Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> See Joel? "DFS" has understanding of a female mind.
>>>
>>> I don't really see your point.
>>
>> He doesn't have one.  He and Feeb are brokedown, angry, womanless incels.
>>
>> Feeb in particular was vehemently misogynistic and ignorant about women
>> and STEM.  It all stems (heh) from his failure at life.
>>
>> I can't tell you how many accomplished female STEM PhDs and professors
>> I've come across on university faculty websites.
>>
>> ANY of them put these 2 cola clowns to shame.
> 
> 
> I had women teaching high math and comp sci in college.

The lack of girl cock must have been troubling for you.

-- 
CrudeSausage
Gab: @CrudeSausage
Telegram: @CrudeSausage
Unapologetic paleoconservative

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684796

CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:

>> I had women teaching high math and comp sci in college.
>
>The lack of girl cock must have been troubling for you.


I like cis women, too.  I'm not even devoid of attraction to cis men.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684811

On 2025-01-31, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
> CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>
>>> I had women teaching high math and comp sci in college.
>>
>>The lack of girl cock must have been troubling for you.
>
>
> I like cis women, too.  I'm not even devoid of attraction to cis men.
>
Judging by the pic you yourself posted I find it difficult to believe a hetero female
would be interested in you.
Maybe a 300lb whale but an attractive lady? No way.


-- 
pothead

Why did Joe Biden pardon his family?
Read below to learn the reason.
The Biden Crime Family Timeline here:
https://oversight.house.gov/the-bidens-influence-peddling-timeline/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684814

pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>On 2025-01-31, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>> CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>
>>>> I had women teaching high math and comp sci in college.
>>>
>>>The lack of girl cock must have been troubling for you.
>>
>> I like cis women, too.  I'm not even devoid of attraction to cis men.
>>
>Judging by the pic you yourself posted I find it difficult to believe a hetero female
>would be interested in you.
>Maybe a 300lb whale but an attractive lady? No way.


Maybe you should judge for yourself and not the billions of other
women, huh?  I get it, you aren't into people like me, so what?  I get
offers, trust me.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684835

Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:

>>> I like cis women, too.  I'm not even devoid of attraction to cis men.
>>>
>>Judging by the pic you yourself posted I find it difficult to believe a hetero female
>>would be interested in you.
>>Maybe a 300lb whale but an attractive lady? No way.
>
>Maybe you should judge for yourself and not the billions of other
>women, huh?  I get it, you aren't into people like me, so what?  I get
>offers, trust me.


<crickets from the fugly-ass dyke bitch>

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684848

Joel wrote:
> <the fugly-ass dyke bitch>
> 
 > https://postimg.cc/t1QbVynN
 >
 >
Y I K E S !

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684696

On Tue, 28 Jan 2025 23:15:05 +0000, Farley Flud wrote:

> I have had it with this stupid group.
> 
> Unless I see a dramatic change in the intellectual quality,
> and a relevant direction to GNU/Linux, then I am fucking out of here.
> 
> I will no longer throw pearls before swine.
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_7:6
> 
> Fucking deadbeat creeps.

Don't let the door hit you on the ass.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684701

On 2025-01-29, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Jan 2025 23:15:05 +0000, Farley Flud wrote:
>
>> I have had it with this stupid group.
>> 
>> Unless I see a dramatic change in the intellectual quality,
>> and a relevant direction to GNU/Linux, then I am fucking out of here.
>> 
>> I will no longer throw pearls before swine.
>> 
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_7:6

To FF...

It's "cast" not "throw" in the "real" Bibles – you cud chewing moron. 
Anybody worth their salt would realize "cast" is a much stronger verb than 
"throw." "Throw" is a weakling verb that has to be supported by an adjective 
to gain any force. It figures you would pick the Bibles that use this 
sniveling verb instead of a strong and decisive verb, like "cast."

Cast...
1. To send or drive by force; ... to fling; ... to
        impel.
     [1913 Webster]

(wimpy) Throw...
1. To fling, ... or hurl with a certain whirling motion of
        the arm, to throw a ball;...
     [1913 Webster]

Oooh... to "fling" with a certain "whirly girly" motion of the arm. It's 
noteworthy that one of its synonyms is "hurl" — as in vomit. I hope you're 
ashamed of using this wimpy verb. It's not suitable for a real man, 
especially not in this context.

Sp, get a frickin' clue, you mouthbreather.

(Geeze, I'm channeling the Flud now... it must be catching.)

Oh, by the way, FF, you can exit at any time. There are doors in every 
direction. They're beckoning to you. Try to find a weakly one that will only 
"hit" you in the ass, instead of a strong one that will "slam" into your 
ass as it "propels" you to the sidewalk.
 
>> Fucking deadbeat creeps.
>
> Don't let the door hit you on the ass.




-- 
“Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy 
what has been invented or made by the forces of good.”  —J.R.R. Tolkien

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684734

On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 08:01:36 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:

> It's "cast" not "throw" in the "real" Bibles – you cud chewing moron.
> Anybody worth their salt would realize "cast" is a much stronger verb
> than "throw." "Throw" is a weakling verb that has to be supported by an
> adjective to gain any force. It figures you would pick the Bibles that
> use this sniveling verb instead of a strong and decisive verb, like
> "cast."

https://www.biblegateway.com/verse/en/Matthew%207%3A6

Personally I use the Jerusalem Bible and it's 'throw'. 'Real' bibles seem 
to be derived from the mangled translation prepared by order of Jimmy 1&6, 
a notable heretic.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684738

On 1/29/25 3:12 PM, rbowman wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 08:01:36 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:
> 
>> It's "cast" not "throw" in the "real" Bibles – you cud chewing moron.
>> Anybody worth their salt would realize "cast" is a much stronger verb
>> than "throw." "Throw" is a weakling verb that has to be supported by an
>> adjective to gain any force. It figures you would pick the Bibles that
>> use this sniveling verb instead of a strong and decisive verb, like
>> "cast."
> 
> https://www.biblegateway.com/verse/en/Matthew%207%3A6
> 
> Personally I use the Jerusalem Bible and it's 'throw'. 'Real' bibles seem
> to be derived from the mangled translation prepared by order of Jimmy 1&6,
> a notable heretic.


Yuukchs..

You two need to ask Ed to help you out with your Penis X matters.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z58HnORpb2E

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684747

On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 08:01:36 -0000 (UTC), RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com>
wrote in <vncn90$29qjk$1@dont-email.me>:

> On 2025-01-29, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, 28 Jan 2025 23:15:05 +0000, Farley Flud wrote:
>>
>>> I have had it with this stupid group.
>>> 
>>> Unless I see a dramatic change in the intellectual quality,
>>> and a relevant direction to GNU/Linux, then I am fucking out of here.
>>> 
>>> I will no longer throw pearls before swine.
>>> 
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_7:6
> 
> To FF...
> 
> It's "cast" not "throw" in the "real" Bibles – you cud chewing moron. 
> Anybody worth their salt would realize "cast" is a much stronger verb than 
> "throw." "Throw" is a weakling verb that has to be supported by an adjective 
> to gain any force. It figures you would pick the Bibles that use this 
> sniveling verb instead of a strong and decisive verb, like "cast."
> 
> Cast...
> 1. To send or drive by force; ... to fling; ... to
>         impel.
>      [1913 Webster]
> 
> (wimpy) Throw...
> 1. To fling, ... or hurl with a certain whirling motion of
>         the arm, to throw a ball;...
>      [1913 Webster]
> 
> Oooh... to "fling" with a certain "whirly girly" motion of the arm. It's 
> noteworthy that one of its synonyms is "hurl" — as in vomit. I hope you're 
> ashamed of using this wimpy verb. It's not suitable for a real man, 
> especially not in this context.
> 
> Sp, get a frickin' clue, you mouthbreather.
> 
> (Geeze, I'm channeling the Flud now... it must be catching.)
> 
> Oh, by the way, FF, you can exit at any time. There are doors in every 
> direction. They're beckoning to you. Try to find a weakly one that will only 
> "hit" you in the ass, instead of a strong one that will "slam" into your 
> ass as it "propels" you to the sidewalk.

Amen!

"Don't let the door hit ya where the good Lord split ya!"

-- 
-v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti
   OS: Linux 6.13.0 Release: Mint 22.1 Mem: 258G
   "Shell to DOS...come in, DOS...do you read...over?"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684698 — Re: No More Swine Pretending To Be Pearls

On 1/28/2025 6:15 PM, Farley Flud wrote:

> I have had it with this stupid group.

Good.   Finally.

> Unless I see a dramatic change in the intellectual quality,
> and a relevant direction to GNU/Linux, then I am fucking
> out of here.

Don't make promises that you can't keep.

> I will no longer throw pearls before swine.

You ARE the swine.

> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_7:6
> 
> Fucking deadbeat creeps.

Yes, you are.

Buh Bye.  Once you are gone, the "intellectual quality" here will be way 
up.   In fact, the "intellectual quality" of Usenet overall will be 
improved.

After you are "out of here", consider killing yourself.  The average IQ 
of the planet will be up a couple percentage points.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684718

On 1/28/25 5:15 PM, Farley Flud wrote:
> I have had it with this stupid group.
> 
> Unless I see a dramatic change in the intellectual quality,
> and a relevant direction to GNU/Linux, then I am fucking
> out of here.
> 
> I will no longer throw pearls before swine.
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_7:6
> 
> Fucking deadbeat creeps.
> 
>   
> 


Hmm.. Well, you can't expect anything from the Sheep. You've not been 
using Usenet the right way. You're downplaying its kill file feature.

The Sheep here, I may add, they know they're inferior in intellect, they 
know they're married to boring maids, and they're longing for nonsense 
blabbering inside this forum like in the public women's bathhouses. 
They're Sheep.

At least eliminate anyone who cannot initiate a thread no matter what he 
looks like or says or knows or lies and/or boasts about. If they cannot 
initiate threads, they're sick poppies. If an active professor of 
computer science appears in this forum and never initiates a thread, 
kill file him. He's a sick poppy, not worth your time.

At least do that.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684745

On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 10:31:10 -0600, Physfitfreak wrote:

> 
> Hmm.. Well, you can't expect anything from the Sheep. You've not been 
> using Usenet the right way. You're downplaying its kill file feature.
> 

A kill file should not ever be necessary.

I just quit a LUG (Linux Users Group) recently.  Even though there were
participants from all over the US the majority of the discussions were
of the "distro lackey" variety.  No one was actually _using_ Linux for
anything.

The group was moribund in the extreme, but then, quite suddenly, terrific
excitement erupted over... guess what... AI.

Yes, it was stupid AI that finally aroused these comatose lackeys and that's
when I pulled the plug.  Only brain-dead idiots will find anything of interest
in AI.

If that group and this group truly represent GNU/Linux users then the free (as
in freedom not beer) software movement is in deep trouble. 

We need to pull people from the ridiculous web forums onto this group.
A few dozen or a few hundred serious and dedicated individuals will quickly
drown out the useless idiots.


-- 
Hail Linux!  Hail FOSS!  Hail Stallman!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684749

On 1/30/25 7:15 AM, Farley Flud wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 10:31:10 -0600, Physfitfreak wrote:
> 
>>
>> Hmm.. Well, you can't expect anything from the Sheep. You've not been
>> using Usenet the right way. You're downplaying its kill file feature.
>>
> 
> A kill file should not ever be necessary.
> 
> I just quit a LUG (Linux Users Group) recently.  Even though there were
> participants from all over the US the majority of the discussions were
> of the "distro lackey" variety.  No one was actually _using_ Linux for
> anything.
> 
> The group was moribund in the extreme, but then, quite suddenly, terrific
> excitement erupted over... guess what... AI.
> 
> Yes, it was stupid AI that finally aroused these comatose lackeys and that's
> when I pulled the plug.  Only brain-dead idiots will find anything of interest
> in AI.
> 
> If that group and this group truly represent GNU/Linux users then the free (as
> in freedom not beer) software movement is in deep trouble.
> 
> We need to pull people from the ridiculous web forums onto this group.
> A few dozen or a few hundred serious and dedicated individuals will quickly
> drown out the useless idiots.
> 
> 


I think you're (again) confusing the usenet with a classroom. The 
classroom stays with you. Inside your home. Unless you take courses or 
formally register as a student in a nice university. Some like-minded 
guys are there.

Usenet is a lounge. For Linux matters it is powerful enough for 
communicating its detail as opposed to in physics forum where it utterly 
lacks the tools cause those forums are packed with "engineers." They 
don't have such need. They're cook-book creatures. So the needed tools 
never developed in them.

So at least you have the element of communicating Linux matters with 
others. The Linux commands don't make use of an nxn matrix or an 
expression that requires 6 lines to be written. But that's the end of 
it. The rest involves others and is of course out of your control cause 
it's not a classroom where you can complain and get any result. These 
"others" are quite often some sick people. For that you _only_ have the 
kill file feature.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684755

On 1/30/25 12:13 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
> These "others" are quite often some sick people. For that you _only_ 
> have the kill file feature.


Kill file the sick, and spit on the rest for fun cause they're all Sheep 
and not worth your time. Don't worry about what you're doing to them. 
The Sheep get their meaningful activities watching Ed Citronnelli 
Ministries videos elsewhere, not by interacting with you.

Pope The Penis X is real! He's formed to spray Holy Water on the Sheep's 
butt holes. He literally does that. See the link I gave to rBowman to 
get that service with.

In short, leave your "dick" in charge of anything that involves them, 
and keep your classroom at home.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684753

On 1/30/2025 8:15 AM, Lameass Larry Piet wrote:


> On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 10:31:10 -0600, Physfitfreak wrote:
> 
>>
>> Hmm.. Well, you can't expect anything from the Sheep. You've not been
>> using Usenet the right way. You're downplaying its kill file feature.
>>
> 
> A kill file should not ever be necessary.
> 
> I just quit a LUG (Linux Users Group) recently.  

They'll never get over that.


> Even though there were
> participants from all over the US the majority of the discussions were
> of the "distro lackey" variety.  


Why do you think you're not a distro lackey?

And why do you think you're not a 100% Python lackey?


> No one was actually _using_ Linux for  anything.

Of course they were, or they wouldn't be participating.



 > The group was moribund in the extreme, but then, quite suddenly,
> terrific excitement erupted over... guess what... AI.
> 
> Yes, it was stupid AI that finally aroused these comatose lackeys and that's
> when I pulled the plug.  Only brain-dead idiots will find anything of interest
> in AI.

Sounds like AI is one of the few areas of computing you're not "heavily 
involved in".   ha!!  What a fraud.

Leave AI to the big brains with the big money.  Stick with writing 
AVX-512 assembly that by your own admission "does nothing".


 > If that group and this group truly represent GNU/Linux users then the
> free (as in freedom not beer) software movement is in deep trouble.

The "movement" isn't in any trouble.  Talented FOSS programmers (ie not 
you) will continue to maintain and create new FOSS software.

And non-developers (ie you) will continue to use distros and FOSS as 
they see fit.

And as sure as the sun will rise, you will continue to post off-topic 
lies and brags to cola.



> We need to pull people from the ridiculous web forums onto this group.
> A few dozen or a few hundred serious and dedicated individuals will quickly
> drown out the useless idiots.


Take a look at your 2025 new threads (qty 32):

Mystery of High Dimensions (NOT OT)
Why Gimp is better than Photoshop
Get Off Github!
Photoshop Bested -- Again -- By FOSS ImageMagick
SANE On GitLab -- Good Boys!
* The Reality Of Microslop
A New Machine Steadily Rolls Along
Can We Get More High Quality People On This NG?
Low Quality People: The Proof
Another Clioent Goes Full Linux
* El Capitan Supercomputer Uses
Anyone Using OpenZFS?
Tax Time Again -- FOSS Is Ready
My Linux Lair -- A Photo Essay
Python GUI Garbage Lunacy
Another Python GUI Mess
To All The Pseudo Engineers
To All The Pseudo Engineers 2
M$ Excel Supreme Stupidity
Fun With Dates -- Need Help
* Ha, Ha! Microslop Can Only Go Back Accurately To 1901.
Tyrone's Talent
Tyrone Strutting His Stuff
If Microslop Dies ...
To All The Micro$oft Fat Mouths
Kerne 6.13 Released
Kernel 6.13 Changes
GNU/Linux Greatness: AVX 512 Assembly
Now Powered By Kernel 6.13.0
My Hate List (Revised)
Challenge For The "Expert" Tyrone
No More Pearls Before Swine


Only the 3 posts with asterisks have content that's on-topic for cola. 
That's 10%.

The remaining 90% (mostly lies, ignorance, narcissism and off-topic 
stupidity) do NOT advocate Linux over other OS's.

So STFU swine

soooooeeeeyyyyy!!!

pwned

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684776

On 2025-01-30, Farley Flud <fsquared@fsquared.linux> wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 10:31:10 -0600, Physfitfreak wrote:
>
>> 
>> Hmm.. Well, you can't expect anything from the Sheep. You've not been 
>> using Usenet the right way. You're downplaying its kill file feature.
>> 
>
> A kill file should not ever be necessary.

Weren't you leaving? It looks like you escaped from my killfile. Must have 
climbed up on top of your bloated ego and jumped across the barrier.  

-- 
“Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy 
what has been invented or made by the forces of good.”  —J.R.R. Tolkien

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684729

Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> wrote at 23:15 this Tuesday (GMT):
> I have had it with this stupid group.
>
> Unless I see a dramatic change in the intellectual quality,
> and a relevant direction to GNU/Linux, then I am fucking
> out of here.
>
> I will no longer throw pearls before swine.
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_7:6
>
> Fucking deadbeat creeps.


IDK if you'll see this, but bye!
-- 
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web