Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #679184 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Sales <sales@drpepper.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2024-12-07 15:08 -0800 |
| Last post | 2024-12-09 10:26 -0600 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 362 — 13 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Sales <sales@drpepper.com> - 2024-12-07 15:08 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-07 18:47 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-07 15:51 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-07 19:12 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-07 16:46 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-07 19:59 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-07 17:04 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-07 20:18 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-07 17:27 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-07 20:33 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-07 17:49 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-07 21:01 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-07 18:13 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-07 22:45 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-07 20:08 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-07 23:24 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-07 22:47 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-08 08:15 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-08 10:37 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-08 15:37 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-08 15:34 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-08 18:57 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-08 16:13 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-08 19:19 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-08 16:25 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-08 19:49 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-08 16:52 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-08 20:05 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-08 17:14 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-09 07:38 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 08:23 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 10:40 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-09 13:52 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 14:05 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-10 09:13 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-09 10:39 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-10 09:21 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-10 11:28 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-10 10:20 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 10:39 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 10:37 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-08 00:26 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-07 22:47 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 10:41 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 10:34 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 10:30 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-07 21:14 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-07 22:45 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2024-12-08 03:54 +0000
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-08 07:42 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-08 08:21 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-08 10:39 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-08 15:41 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-08 15:32 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-08 18:59 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-08 16:24 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-08 19:47 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-08 16:53 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-08 20:06 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-08 17:16 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-08 20:20 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-08 18:02 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 10:31 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-09 10:44 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 14:09 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-09 11:21 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 14:31 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-09 11:33 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 14:52 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-09 12:28 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 15:49 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-09 14:29 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-10 10:05 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-10 10:18 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-10 13:37 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-10 10:42 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-10 13:53 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-10 13:06 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-10 11:19 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-10 14:24 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-10 12:04 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-10 15:13 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-10 12:14 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-10 15:51 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-10 13:02 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-10 16:17 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-10 13:23 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-10 17:14 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-10 14:19 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-10 17:34 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-10 14:57 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-10 18:10 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-10 15:13 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-11 13:26 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-11 13:26 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-11 13:24 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2024-12-11 20:42 +0000
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Howie Feltersnatch <a@apple.sux> - 2024-12-14 20:53 +0100
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-14 12:06 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2024-12-10 23:06 +0000
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-10 18:33 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-10 15:36 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 09:54 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 09:16 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 12:31 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 10:19 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 13:36 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-11 13:33 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-11 13:30 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-11 13:29 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-11 13:28 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-11 13:28 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-10 15:41 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2024-12-11 00:27 +0000
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 09:57 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 09:18 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 12:31 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 10:21 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 13:38 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 10:45 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-11 13:37 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-11 13:36 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-11 13:35 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-11 13:17 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-11 13:15 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Howie Feltersnatch <a@apple.sux> - 2024-12-14 20:18 +0100
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-14 11:33 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-11 13:14 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-11 13:12 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-10 12:55 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-10 09:27 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-10 09:27 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-10 09:25 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-10 09:24 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-10 09:23 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 10:47 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-08 14:45 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-08 15:47 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-08 17:34 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-08 17:46 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-08 15:33 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-08 19:04 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-08 16:25 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-08 19:48 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-08 16:53 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-08 16:54 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-08 20:07 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-08 17:16 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-08 20:24 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-08 18:03 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-08 23:51 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-08 23:20 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 02:32 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-08 23:47 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 02:51 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-09 00:08 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 03:14 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-09 00:16 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 03:29 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 11:40 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-09 10:43 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-10 11:01 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-10 12:31 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-10 12:46 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-10 10:15 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-10 15:42 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-10 16:00 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-10 13:04 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-10 16:23 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-10 13:28 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-10 17:31 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-10 14:46 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-10 18:00 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-10 15:09 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-10 20:02 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-11 14:07 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-11 13:58 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-11 13:56 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-10 19:55 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-11 13:54 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-11 13:54 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-10 10:24 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-10 13:40 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-10 10:44 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-10 13:57 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-10 11:21 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-10 14:27 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-10 12:05 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-10 15:15 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-10 12:22 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-10 15:53 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-10 13:02 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-10 16:21 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-10 13:26 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-10 17:24 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-10 14:55 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-10 18:03 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-10 15:07 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 10:30 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 09:19 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 12:29 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 10:19 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2024-12-11 18:27 +0000
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 10:38 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-11 15:14 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 13:34 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 10:44 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 13:56 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 11:07 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 14:19 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 11:22 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 14:38 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-11 15:42 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 13:33 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 18:03 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 15:22 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 18:34 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 15:44 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 19:13 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 16:20 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 19:31 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 16:38 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 19:57 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 17:00 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 20:21 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 17:23 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 20:39 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 17:45 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 21:02 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 18:08 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 21:18 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 18:57 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 22:48 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 19:51 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 21:49 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 18:58 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 22:37 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 19:43 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 22:49 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 19:53 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-12 12:51 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-12 10:44 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-12 14:22 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-12 11:33 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-12 14:49 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-12 12:10 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-12 15:20 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-12 12:27 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-12 15:38 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 13:26 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 17:24 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 15:18 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 18:30 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 15:42 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 18:47 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 15:50 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-11 13:52 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-02 14:40 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-02 12:58 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-02 17:05 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-02 16:43 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-02 19:51 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-02 17:54 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-02 21:23 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-02 18:35 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-02 21:40 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-02 20:13 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-03 15:05 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-03 14:55 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-03 18:45 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-03 16:19 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-03 19:30 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-03 17:11 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-03 20:25 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-03 17:41 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-03 21:01 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-03 19:39 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. paranoia <mixmaster@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2025-01-03 22:23 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-03 23:52 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-05 20:36 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-05 18:19 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-05 14:48 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-05 13:00 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-05 16:43 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-05 18:18 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-05 21:27 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. AlphaHeater <AlphaHeater21@6959.concepte.store> - 2025-01-06 02:52 +0000
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-05 19:03 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-05 19:47 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel Crump <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-05 22:58 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-05 23:33 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-06 06:31 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-06 09:42 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-06 13:03 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-06 10:19 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-06 13:23 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-06 10:53 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-06 14:17 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-06 11:23 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-06 14:36 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-06 15:49 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-06 19:01 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-06 16:20 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-06 19:35 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-06 16:41 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-06 19:54 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-06 16:56 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-06 20:09 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-06 17:12 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-06 20:23 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-06 17:27 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-06 20:37 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-06 17:49 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-06 20:55 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-06 18:05 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-06 21:11 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-06 18:58 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-06 22:08 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2025-01-06 20:42 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. ron <ronbarnes@linuxmail.org> - 2025-01-12 22:59 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2025-01-07 22:02 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2025-01-06 13:56 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel Crump <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-06 14:25 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2025-01-06 13:55 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2025-01-06 13:53 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2025-01-06 13:31 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-06 13:47 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2025-01-06 08:21 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2025-01-03 09:49 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2025-01-03 09:46 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2025-01-03 09:45 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2025-01-03 09:42 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-11 13:47 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-11 13:44 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-11 13:44 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-11 13:42 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-11 13:41 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-02 14:43 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-11 13:39 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-10 13:17 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 10:52 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 14:13 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-11 11:15 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-11 14:06 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-11 14:05 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-10 13:02 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-10 12:09 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-09 09:53 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 10:31 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-09 10:39 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 14:07 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-09 11:25 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 14:34 -0500
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2024-12-09 11:36 -0800
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-10 09:17 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 11:39 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 11:38 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 11:36 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 11:34 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 10:46 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 10:27 -0600
Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it. "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-09 10:26 -0600
Page 16 of 19 — ← Prev page 1 … 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 Next page →
| From | Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-06 15:49 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <vlhq6u$1s08m$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #683171 |
On 2025-01-06 11:36, Joel wrote: > Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: > >>>>> MS would've eventually prevailed, but at what cost? >>>> >>>> So they paid $100 million to avoid... ...nothing? >>> >>> It's definitely not nothing, it's a drag. >> >> Look. >> >> Learn to admit when you're wrong. > > > Take that advice, yourself. > > >> People who actually know about operating systems have pointed out... >> >> ...IN DETAIL... >> >> ...how Windows NT copied the design and architecture of VMS. > > > That's not a contradiction of my claim. They didn't copy code. It's > unlikely DEC would prove anything infringing, in fact impossible. > Not copying CODE doesn't mean not copying ANYTHING.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-06 19:01 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <h8ronjlu6an93e6vh5ebk2om0m49kdbouv@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #683206 |
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>> Windows NT copied the design and architecture of VMS. >> >> That's not a contradiction of my claim. They didn't copy code. It's >> unlikely DEC would prove anything infringing, in fact impossible. > >Not copying CODE doesn't mean not copying ANYTHING. What, tangibly, was copied? An idea? It's a typical case of claiming ownership of something intangible. MS did settle but not *lose* the case. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-06 16:20 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <vlhs0h$1s6j2$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #683207 |
On 2025-01-06 16:01, Joel wrote: > Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: > >>>> Windows NT copied the design and architecture of VMS. >>> >>> That's not a contradiction of my claim. They didn't copy code. It's >>> unlikely DEC would prove anything infringing, in fact impossible. >> >> Not copying CODE doesn't mean not copying ANYTHING. > > > What, tangibly, was copied? An idea? It's a typical case of claiming > ownership of something intangible. MS did settle but not *lose* the > case. Code isn't tangible, you idiot. And Microsoft settled for 7% of the annual net income at the time. You don't spend 9 figures to avoid a lawsuit you'd win.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-06 19:35 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <4jtonjl0hlc8u0pcfhphftgp0mrv320rdp@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #683210 |
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>> Windows NT copied the design and architecture of VMS. >>>> >>>> That's not a contradiction of my claim. They didn't copy code. It's >>>> unlikely DEC would prove anything infringing, in fact impossible. >>> >>> Not copying CODE doesn't mean not copying ANYTHING. >> >> What, tangibly, was copied? An idea? It's a typical case of claiming >> ownership of something intangible. MS did settle but not *lose* the >> case. >Code isn't tangible, you idiot. Uh, it is. >And Microsoft settled for 7% of the annual net income at the time. > >You don't spend 9 figures to avoid a lawsuit you'd win. Sure you do if winning would be a distraction/PITA. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-06 16:41 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <vlht7h$1sfg9$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #683216 |
On 2025-01-06 16:35, Joel wrote: > Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: > >>>>>> Windows NT copied the design and architecture of VMS. >>>>> >>>>> That's not a contradiction of my claim. They didn't copy code. It's >>>>> unlikely DEC would prove anything infringing, in fact impossible. >>>> >>>> Not copying CODE doesn't mean not copying ANYTHING. >>> >>> What, tangibly, was copied? An idea? It's a typical case of claiming >>> ownership of something intangible. MS did settle but not *lose* the >>> case. >> Code isn't tangible, you idiot. > > > Uh, it is. No. It is not: 'tangible | ˈtanjəb(ə)l | adjective perceptible by touch: the atmosphere of neglect and abandonment was almost tangible.' > > >> And Microsoft settled for 7% of the annual net income at the time. >> >> You don't spend 9 figures to avoid a lawsuit you'd win. > > > Sure you do if winning would be a distraction/PITA. No. You really don't. One hundred MILLION dollars.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-06 19:54 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <rluonjpc86nueeusbm099rmtcp4tnvbet0@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #683219 |
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>> Windows NT copied the design and architecture of VMS. >>>>>> >>>>>> That's not a contradiction of my claim. They didn't copy code. It's >>>>>> unlikely DEC would prove anything infringing, in fact impossible. >>>>> >>>>> Not copying CODE doesn't mean not copying ANYTHING. >>>> >>>> What, tangibly, was copied? An idea? It's a typical case of claiming >>>> ownership of something intangible. MS did settle but not *lose* the >>>> case. >>> Code isn't tangible, you idiot. >> >> Uh, it is. > >No. It is not: > >'tangible | ?tanj?b(?)l | >adjective >perceptible by touch: the atmosphere of neglect and abandonment was >almost tangible.' https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/tangible 2: capable of being precisely identified or realized by the mind >>> And Microsoft settled for 7% of the annual net income at the time. >>> >>> You don't spend 9 figures to avoid a lawsuit you'd win. >> >> Sure you do if winning would be a distraction/PITA. > >No. You really don't. > >One hundred MILLION dollars. They could afford it. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-06 16:56 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <vlhu4o$1sju4$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #683225 |
On 2025-01-06 16:54, Joel wrote: > Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>> Windows NT copied the design and architecture of VMS. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That's not a contradiction of my claim. They didn't copy code. It's >>>>>>> unlikely DEC would prove anything infringing, in fact impossible. >>>>>> >>>>>> Not copying CODE doesn't mean not copying ANYTHING. >>>>> >>>>> What, tangibly, was copied? An idea? It's a typical case of claiming >>>>> ownership of something intangible. MS did settle but not *lose* the >>>>> case. >>>> Code isn't tangible, you idiot. >>> >>> Uh, it is. >> >> No. It is not: >> >> 'tangible | ?tanj?b(?)l | >> adjective >> perceptible by touch: the atmosphere of neglect and abandonment was >> almost tangible.' > > > https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/tangible > > 2: capable of being precisely identified or realized by the mind Good! And you're claiming that architectures and designs and protocols can't be "precisely identifed"? > > >>>> And Microsoft settled for 7% of the annual net income at the time. >>>> >>>> You don't spend 9 figures to avoid a lawsuit you'd win. >>> >>> Sure you do if winning would be a distraction/PITA. >> >> No. You really don't. >> >> One hundred MILLION dollars. > > > They could afford it. And they could have afforded the lawyers more easily.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-06 20:09 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <bivonjpth3b5veva8j6hrfr3glm2jnlato@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #683226 |
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> Windows NT copied the design and architecture of VMS. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That's not a contradiction of my claim. They didn't copy code. It's >>>>>>>> unlikely DEC would prove anything infringing, in fact impossible. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Not copying CODE doesn't mean not copying ANYTHING. >>>>>> >>>>>> What, tangibly, was copied? An idea? It's a typical case of claiming >>>>>> ownership of something intangible. MS did settle but not *lose* the >>>>>> case. >>>>> Code isn't tangible, you idiot. >>>> >>>> Uh, it is. >>> >>> No. It is not: >>> >>> 'tangible | ?tanj?b(?)l | >>> adjective >>> perceptible by touch: the atmosphere of neglect and abandonment was >>> almost tangible.' >> >> https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/tangible >> >> 2: capable of being precisely identified or realized by the mind > >Good! > >And you're claiming that architectures and designs and protocols can't >be "precisely identifed"? They never were in this case. >>>>> And Microsoft settled for 7% of the annual net income at the time. >>>>> >>>>> You don't spend 9 figures to avoid a lawsuit you'd win. >>>> >>>> Sure you do if winning would be a distraction/PITA. >>> >>> No. You really don't. >>> >>> One hundred MILLION dollars. >> >> They could afford it. >And they could have afforded the lawyers more easily. How is that easier? -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-06 17:12 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <vlhv2l$1sk15$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #683230 |
On 2025-01-06 17:09, Joel wrote: > Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> Windows NT copied the design and architecture of VMS. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> That's not a contradiction of my claim. They didn't copy code. It's >>>>>>>>> unlikely DEC would prove anything infringing, in fact impossible. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Not copying CODE doesn't mean not copying ANYTHING. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What, tangibly, was copied? An idea? It's a typical case of claiming >>>>>>> ownership of something intangible. MS did settle but not *lose* the >>>>>>> case. >>>>>> Code isn't tangible, you idiot. >>>>> >>>>> Uh, it is. >>>> >>>> No. It is not: >>>> >>>> 'tangible | ?tanj?b(?)l | >>>> adjective >>>> perceptible by touch: the atmosphere of neglect and abandonment was >>>> almost tangible.' >>> >>> https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/tangible >>> >>> 2: capable of being precisely identified or realized by the mind >> >> Good! >> >> And you're claiming that architectures and designs and protocols can't >> be "precisely identifed"? > > > They never were in this case. You were present for this, were you? You think that the architecture--the data structures, the communication protocols, etc.... ...you think that all was written down? You think that they just sat down and started coding?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-06 20:23 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <jc0pnj1kqv3ikka8nf2or2nmviq8cu97bl@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #683231 |
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Windows NT copied the design and architecture of VMS. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> That's not a contradiction of my claim. They didn't copy code. It's >>>>>>>>>> unlikely DEC would prove anything infringing, in fact impossible. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Not copying CODE doesn't mean not copying ANYTHING. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What, tangibly, was copied? An idea? It's a typical case of claiming >>>>>>>> ownership of something intangible. MS did settle but not *lose* the >>>>>>>> case. >>>>>>> Code isn't tangible, you idiot. >>>>>> >>>>>> Uh, it is. >>>>> >>>>> No. It is not: >>>>> >>>>> 'tangible | ?tanj?b(?)l | >>>>> adjective >>>>> perceptible by touch: the atmosphere of neglect and abandonment was >>>>> almost tangible.' >>>> >>>> https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/tangible >>>> >>>> 2: capable of being precisely identified or realized by the mind >>> >>> Good! >>> >>> And you're claiming that architectures and designs and protocols can't >>> be "precisely identifed"? >> >> They never were in this case. > >You were present for this, were you? > >You think that the architecture--the data structures, the communication >protocols, etc.... > >...you think that all was written down? > >You think that they just sat down and started coding? Cutler knew how to approach the project, it's simple, it resembled what he'd done before, but that's not *copying* in an IP context. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-06 17:27 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <vlhvuo$1ssma$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #683232 |
On 2025-01-06 17:23, Joel wrote: > Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> Windows NT copied the design and architecture of VMS. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> That's not a contradiction of my claim. They didn't copy code. It's >>>>>>>>>>> unlikely DEC would prove anything infringing, in fact impossible. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Not copying CODE doesn't mean not copying ANYTHING. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> What, tangibly, was copied? An idea? It's a typical case of claiming >>>>>>>>> ownership of something intangible. MS did settle but not *lose* the >>>>>>>>> case. >>>>>>>> Code isn't tangible, you idiot. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Uh, it is. >>>>>> >>>>>> No. It is not: >>>>>> >>>>>> 'tangible | ?tanj?b(?)l | >>>>>> adjective >>>>>> perceptible by touch: the atmosphere of neglect and abandonment was >>>>>> almost tangible.' >>>>> >>>>> https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/tangible >>>>> >>>>> 2: capable of being precisely identified or realized by the mind >>>> >>>> Good! >>>> >>>> And you're claiming that architectures and designs and protocols can't >>>> be "precisely identifed"? >>> >>> They never were in this case. >> >> You were present for this, were you? >> >> You think that the architecture--the data structures, the communication >> protocols, etc.... >> >> ...you think that all was written down? >> >> You think that they just sat down and started coding? > > > Cutler knew how to approach the project, it's simple, it resembled > what he'd done before, but that's not *copying* in an IP context. And yet, Microsoft paid $100 MILLION dollars to avoid a lawsuit. And many people have described all the ways that NT copied VMS. >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-06 20:37 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <551pnjl9k6fh62br80j5fmn8j3gipg7tsl@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #683233 |
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>> you're claiming that architectures and designs and protocols can't >>>>> be "precisely identifed"? >>>> >>>> They never were in this case. >>> >>> You were present for this, were you? >>> >>> You think that the architecture--the data structures, the communication >>> protocols, etc.... >>> >>> ...you think that all was written down? >>> >>> You think that they just sat down and started coding? >> >> Cutler knew how to approach the project, it's simple, it resembled >> what he'd done before, but that's not *copying* in an IP context. > >And yet, Microsoft paid $100 MILLION dollars to avoid a lawsuit. > >And many people have described all the ways that NT copied VMS. They wanted the suit to go away, they settled, it's not capitulation to the suit's real claim, they could've defeated that. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-06 17:49 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <vli170$1t2ml$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #683234 |
On 2025-01-06 17:37, Joel wrote: > Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: > >>>>>> you're claiming that architectures and designs and protocols can't >>>>>> be "precisely identifed"? >>>>> >>>>> They never were in this case. >>>> >>>> You were present for this, were you? >>>> >>>> You think that the architecture--the data structures, the communication >>>> protocols, etc.... >>>> >>>> ...you think that all was written down? >>>> >>>> You think that they just sat down and started coding? >>> >>> Cutler knew how to approach the project, it's simple, it resembled >>> what he'd done before, but that's not *copying* in an IP context. >> >> And yet, Microsoft paid $100 MILLION dollars to avoid a lawsuit. >> >> And many people have described all the ways that NT copied VMS. > > > They wanted the suit to go away, they settled, it's not capitulation > to the suit's real claim, they could've defeated that. > I provided you with a source that says that structures from VMS were copied almost verbatim.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-06 20:55 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <aa2pnj5sn95ilgrri31vnlemllajkee61r@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #683235 |
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>> you're claiming that architectures and designs and protocols can't >>>>>>> be "precisely identifed"? >>>>>> >>>>>> They never were in this case. >>>>> >>>>> You were present for this, were you? >>>>> >>>>> You think that the architecture--the data structures, the communication >>>>> protocols, etc.... >>>>> >>>>> ...you think that all was written down? >>>>> >>>>> You think that they just sat down and started coding? >>>> >>>> Cutler knew how to approach the project, it's simple, it resembled >>>> what he'd done before, but that's not *copying* in an IP context. >>> >>> And yet, Microsoft paid $100 MILLION dollars to avoid a lawsuit. >>> >>> And many people have described all the ways that NT copied VMS. >> >> They wanted the suit to go away, they settled, it's not capitulation >> to the suit's real claim, they could've defeated that. > >I provided you with a source that says that structures from VMS were >copied almost verbatim. And that is infringement? We can copyright abstract layouts? -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-06 18:05 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <vli24h$1t2mm$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #683236 |
On 2025-01-06 17:55, Joel wrote: > Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>> you're claiming that architectures and designs and protocols can't >>>>>>>> be "precisely identifed"? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> They never were in this case. >>>>>> >>>>>> You were present for this, were you? >>>>>> >>>>>> You think that the architecture--the data structures, the communication >>>>>> protocols, etc.... >>>>>> >>>>>> ...you think that all was written down? >>>>>> >>>>>> You think that they just sat down and started coding? >>>>> >>>>> Cutler knew how to approach the project, it's simple, it resembled >>>>> what he'd done before, but that's not *copying* in an IP context. >>>> >>>> And yet, Microsoft paid $100 MILLION dollars to avoid a lawsuit. >>>> >>>> And many people have described all the ways that NT copied VMS. >>> >>> They wanted the suit to go away, they settled, it's not capitulation >>> to the suit's real claim, they could've defeated that. >> >> I provided you with a source that says that structures from VMS were >> copied almost verbatim. > > > And that is infringement? We can copyright abstract layouts? You're dragging the goalposts. Whether or not it is "infringment", it was COPYING. 'The similarities between VMS and NT are striking. The VMS Interrupt Priority Level became the Interrupt Request Level in NT, the Asynchronous System Trap became the Asynchronous Procedure Call, a Fork Procedure became the Deferred Procedure Call, while some other terminology was copied verbatim.' <https://www.abortretry.fail/p/the-history-of-windows-nt-31> 'copied verbatim' Got it yet? No? Okay! 'Those similarities could fill a book. In fact, you can read sections of VAX/VMS Internals and Data Structures (Digital Press) as an accurate description of NT internals simply by translating VMS terms to NT terms. Table 1 lists a few VMS terms and their NT translations.' <https://www.itprotoday.com/server-virtualization/windows-nt-and-vms-the-rest-of-the-story> That last one was authored by: "Mark Eugene Russinovich (born December 22, 1966) is a Spanish-born American software engineer and author who serves as CTO of Microsoft Azure." <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Russinovich> But what would the guy who wrote a product to "manage, diagnose, troubleshoot, and monitor a Microsoft Windows environment." know about Windows NT. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-06 21:11 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <i43pnj5s4fl3u72iu4tddtmh2kg6vmdifu@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #683237 |
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> you're claiming that architectures and designs and protocols can't >>>>>>>>> be "precisely identifed"? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> They never were in this case. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You were present for this, were you? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You think that the architecture--the data structures, the communication >>>>>>> protocols, etc.... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ...you think that all was written down? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You think that they just sat down and started coding? >>>>>> >>>>>> Cutler knew how to approach the project, it's simple, it resembled >>>>>> what he'd done before, but that's not *copying* in an IP context. >>>>> >>>>> And yet, Microsoft paid $100 MILLION dollars to avoid a lawsuit. >>>>> >>>>> And many people have described all the ways that NT copied VMS. >>>> >>>> They wanted the suit to go away, they settled, it's not capitulation >>>> to the suit's real claim, they could've defeated that. >>> >>> I provided you with a source that says that structures from VMS were >>> copied almost verbatim. >> >> And that is infringement? We can copyright abstract layouts? >You're dragging the goalposts. > >Whether or not it is "infringment", it was COPYING. > >'The similarities between VMS and NT are striking. The VMS Interrupt >Priority Level became the Interrupt Request Level in NT, the >Asynchronous System Trap became the Asynchronous Procedure Call, a Fork >Procedure became the Deferred Procedure Call, while some other >terminology was copied verbatim.' > ><https://www.abortretry.fail/p/the-history-of-windows-nt-31> > >'copied verbatim' > >Got it yet? No? > >Okay! > >'Those similarities could fill a book. In fact, you can read sections of >VAX/VMS Internals and Data Structures (Digital Press) as an accurate >description of NT internals simply by translating VMS terms to NT terms. >Table 1 lists a few VMS terms and their NT translations.' > ><https://www.itprotoday.com/server-virtualization/windows-nt-and-vms-the-rest-of-the-story> > >That last one was authored by: > >"Mark Eugene Russinovich (born December 22, 1966) is a Spanish-born >American software engineer and author who serves as CTO of Microsoft Azure." > ><https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Russinovich> > >But what would the guy who wrote a product to "manage, diagnose, >troubleshoot, and monitor a Microsoft Windows environment." know about >Windows NT. > >LOL Russinovich is *God*, first of all. Hail him, like Linus and Richard. Great programmer for all time. But he's not suggesting that actual VMS code was "copied" by MS, it's ideas, more abstract. It's not infringement. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-06 18:58 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <vli586$1t2mm$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #683241 |
On 2025-01-06 18:11, Joel wrote: > Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> you're claiming that architectures and designs and protocols can't >>>>>>>>>> be "precisely identifed"? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> They never were in this case. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You were present for this, were you? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You think that the architecture--the data structures, the communication >>>>>>>> protocols, etc.... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ...you think that all was written down? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You think that they just sat down and started coding? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cutler knew how to approach the project, it's simple, it resembled >>>>>>> what he'd done before, but that's not *copying* in an IP context. >>>>>> >>>>>> And yet, Microsoft paid $100 MILLION dollars to avoid a lawsuit. >>>>>> >>>>>> And many people have described all the ways that NT copied VMS. >>>>> >>>>> They wanted the suit to go away, they settled, it's not capitulation >>>>> to the suit's real claim, they could've defeated that. >>>> >>>> I provided you with a source that says that structures from VMS were >>>> copied almost verbatim. >>> >>> And that is infringement? We can copyright abstract layouts? >> You're dragging the goalposts. >> >> Whether or not it is "infringment", it was COPYING. >> >> 'The similarities between VMS and NT are striking. The VMS Interrupt >> Priority Level became the Interrupt Request Level in NT, the >> Asynchronous System Trap became the Asynchronous Procedure Call, a Fork >> Procedure became the Deferred Procedure Call, while some other >> terminology was copied verbatim.' >> >> <https://www.abortretry.fail/p/the-history-of-windows-nt-31> >> >> 'copied verbatim' >> >> Got it yet? No? >> >> Okay! >> >> 'Those similarities could fill a book. In fact, you can read sections of >> VAX/VMS Internals and Data Structures (Digital Press) as an accurate >> description of NT internals simply by translating VMS terms to NT terms. >> Table 1 lists a few VMS terms and their NT translations.' >> >> <https://www.itprotoday.com/server-virtualization/windows-nt-and-vms-the-rest-of-the-story> >> >> That last one was authored by: >> >> "Mark Eugene Russinovich (born December 22, 1966) is a Spanish-born >> American software engineer and author who serves as CTO of Microsoft Azure." >> >> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Russinovich> >> >> But what would the guy who wrote a product to "manage, diagnose, >> troubleshoot, and monitor a Microsoft Windows environment." know about >> Windows NT. >> >> LOL > > > Russinovich is *God*, first of all. Hail him, like Linus and Richard. > Great programmer for all time. But he's not suggesting that actual > VMS code was "copied" by MS, it's ideas, more abstract. It's not > infringement. But the threshold was NEVER infringement, dickhead. You claimed that nothing was "copied". The IDEAS were copied. VERBATIM.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-06 22:08 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <5g6pnjhjedc4coet4ndhdpqq0lcu5aunjj@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #683245 |
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> you're claiming that architectures and designs and protocols can't >>>>>>>>>>> be "precisely identifed"? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> They never were in this case. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You were present for this, were you? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You think that the architecture--the data structures, the communication >>>>>>>>> protocols, etc.... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ...you think that all was written down? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You think that they just sat down and started coding? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cutler knew how to approach the project, it's simple, it resembled >>>>>>>> what he'd done before, but that's not *copying* in an IP context. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And yet, Microsoft paid $100 MILLION dollars to avoid a lawsuit. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And many people have described all the ways that NT copied VMS. >>>>>> >>>>>> They wanted the suit to go away, they settled, it's not capitulation >>>>>> to the suit's real claim, they could've defeated that. >>>>> >>>>> I provided you with a source that says that structures from VMS were >>>>> copied almost verbatim. >>>> >>>> And that is infringement? We can copyright abstract layouts? >>> You're dragging the goalposts. >>> >>> Whether or not it is "infringment", it was COPYING. >>> >>> 'The similarities between VMS and NT are striking. The VMS Interrupt >>> Priority Level became the Interrupt Request Level in NT, the >>> Asynchronous System Trap became the Asynchronous Procedure Call, a Fork >>> Procedure became the Deferred Procedure Call, while some other >>> terminology was copied verbatim.' >>> >>> <https://www.abortretry.fail/p/the-history-of-windows-nt-31> >>> >>> 'copied verbatim' >>> >>> Got it yet? No? >>> >>> Okay! >>> >>> 'Those similarities could fill a book. In fact, you can read sections of >>> VAX/VMS Internals and Data Structures (Digital Press) as an accurate >>> description of NT internals simply by translating VMS terms to NT terms. >>> Table 1 lists a few VMS terms and their NT translations.' >>> >>> <https://www.itprotoday.com/server-virtualization/windows-nt-and-vms-the-rest-of-the-story> >>> >>> That last one was authored by: >>> >>> "Mark Eugene Russinovich (born December 22, 1966) is a Spanish-born >>> American software engineer and author who serves as CTO of Microsoft Azure." >>> >>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Russinovich> >>> >>> But what would the guy who wrote a product to "manage, diagnose, >>> troubleshoot, and monitor a Microsoft Windows environment." know about >>> Windows NT. >>> >>> LOL >> >> Russinovich is *God*, first of all. Hail him, like Linus and Richard. >> Great programmer for all time. But he's not suggesting that actual >> VMS code was "copied" by MS, it's ideas, more abstract. It's not >> infringement. > >But the threshold was NEVER infringement, dickhead. > >You claimed that nothing was "copied". > >The IDEAS were copied. > >VERBATIM. How would infringement not be the threshold? Software patenting is discredited. DEC was just flaunting legal muscle, MS wisely got them off their back. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-06 20:42 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <vlibbj$22a36$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #683247 |
On 2025-01-06 19:08, Joel wrote: > Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> you're claiming that architectures and designs and protocols can't >>>>>>>>>>>> be "precisely identifed"? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> They never were in this case. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You were present for this, were you? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You think that the architecture--the data structures, the communication >>>>>>>>>> protocols, etc.... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ...you think that all was written down? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You think that they just sat down and started coding? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cutler knew how to approach the project, it's simple, it resembled >>>>>>>>> what he'd done before, but that's not *copying* in an IP context. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And yet, Microsoft paid $100 MILLION dollars to avoid a lawsuit. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And many people have described all the ways that NT copied VMS. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> They wanted the suit to go away, they settled, it's not capitulation >>>>>>> to the suit's real claim, they could've defeated that. >>>>>> >>>>>> I provided you with a source that says that structures from VMS were >>>>>> copied almost verbatim. >>>>> >>>>> And that is infringement? We can copyright abstract layouts? >>>> You're dragging the goalposts. >>>> >>>> Whether or not it is "infringment", it was COPYING. >>>> >>>> 'The similarities between VMS and NT are striking. The VMS Interrupt >>>> Priority Level became the Interrupt Request Level in NT, the >>>> Asynchronous System Trap became the Asynchronous Procedure Call, a Fork >>>> Procedure became the Deferred Procedure Call, while some other >>>> terminology was copied verbatim.' >>>> >>>> <https://www.abortretry.fail/p/the-history-of-windows-nt-31> >>>> >>>> 'copied verbatim' >>>> >>>> Got it yet? No? >>>> >>>> Okay! >>>> >>>> 'Those similarities could fill a book. In fact, you can read sections of >>>> VAX/VMS Internals and Data Structures (Digital Press) as an accurate >>>> description of NT internals simply by translating VMS terms to NT terms. >>>> Table 1 lists a few VMS terms and their NT translations.' >>>> >>>> <https://www.itprotoday.com/server-virtualization/windows-nt-and-vms-the-rest-of-the-story> >>>> >>>> That last one was authored by: >>>> >>>> "Mark Eugene Russinovich (born December 22, 1966) is a Spanish-born >>>> American software engineer and author who serves as CTO of Microsoft Azure." >>>> >>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Russinovich> >>>> >>>> But what would the guy who wrote a product to "manage, diagnose, >>>> troubleshoot, and monitor a Microsoft Windows environment." know about >>>> Windows NT. >>>> >>>> LOL >>> >>> Russinovich is *God*, first of all. Hail him, like Linus and Richard. >>> Great programmer for all time. But he's not suggesting that actual >>> VMS code was "copied" by MS, it's ideas, more abstract. It's not >>> infringement. >> >> But the threshold was NEVER infringement, dickhead. >> >> You claimed that nothing was "copied". >> >> The IDEAS were copied. >> >> VERBATIM. > > > How would infringement not be the threshold? Software patenting is > discredited. DEC was just flaunting legal muscle, MS wisely got them > off their back. Because a legal standard isn't the measure of whether or not something was copied. Windows NT copied the design and architecture of VMS. Period.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | ron <ronbarnes@linuxmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-12 22:59 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <vm2dkv$7r9$1@toxic.dizum.net> |
| In reply to | #683247 |
On 1/6/2025 7:08 PM, Joel wrote: > Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> you're claiming that architectures and designs and protocols can't >>>>>>>>>>>> be "precisely identifed"? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> They never were in this case. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You were present for this, were you? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You think that the architecture--the data structures, the communication >>>>>>>>>> protocols, etc.... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ...you think that all was written down? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You think that they just sat down and started coding? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cutler knew how to approach the project, it's simple, it resembled >>>>>>>>> what he'd done before, but that's not *copying* in an IP context. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And yet, Microsoft paid $100 MILLION dollars to avoid a lawsuit. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And many people have described all the ways that NT copied VMS. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> They wanted the suit to go away, they settled, it's not capitulation >>>>>>> to the suit's real claim, they could've defeated that. >>>>>> >>>>>> I provided you with a source that says that structures from VMS were >>>>>> copied almost verbatim. >>>>> >>>>> And that is infringement? We can copyright abstract layouts? >>>> You're dragging the goalposts. >>>> >>>> Whether or not it is "infringment", it was COPYING. >>>> >>>> 'The similarities between VMS and NT are striking. The VMS Interrupt >>>> Priority Level became the Interrupt Request Level in NT, the >>>> Asynchronous System Trap became the Asynchronous Procedure Call, a Fork >>>> Procedure became the Deferred Procedure Call, while some other >>>> terminology was copied verbatim.' >>>> >>>> <https://www.abortretry.fail/p/the-history-of-windows-nt-31> >>>> >>>> 'copied verbatim' >>>> >>>> Got it yet? No? >>>> >>>> Okay! >>>> >>>> 'Those similarities could fill a book. In fact, you can read sections of >>>> VAX/VMS Internals and Data Structures (Digital Press) as an accurate >>>> description of NT internals simply by translating VMS terms to NT terms. >>>> Table 1 lists a few VMS terms and their NT translations.' >>>> >>>> <https://www.itprotoday.com/server-virtualization/windows-nt-and-vms-the-rest-of-the-story> >>>> >>>> That last one was authored by: >>>> >>>> "Mark Eugene Russinovich (born December 22, 1966) is a Spanish-born >>>> American software engineer and author who serves as CTO of Microsoft Azure." >>>> >>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Russinovich> >>>> >>>> But what would the guy who wrote a product to "manage, diagnose, >>>> troubleshoot, and monitor a Microsoft Windows environment." know about >>>> Windows NT. >>>> >>>> LOL >>> >>> Russinovich is *God*, first of all. Hail him, like Linus and Richard. >>> Great programmer for all time. But he's not suggesting that actual >>> VMS code was "copied" by MS, it's ideas, more abstract. It's not >>> infringement. >> >> But the threshold was NEVER infringement, dickhead. >> >> You claimed that nothing was "copied". >> >> The IDEAS were copied. >> >> VERBATIM. > > > How would infringement not be the threshold? Software patenting is > discredited. DEC was just flaunting legal muscle, MS wisely got them > off their back. What about DECWindows? Was DEC robbed twice?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 16 of 19 — ← Prev page 1 … 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web