Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #681462 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2024-12-28 08:54 -0500 |
| Last post | 2024-12-31 08:39 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 89 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
How quickly a bug gets fixed... Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-28 08:54 -0500
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 19:40 +0000
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-28 15:09 -0500
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-29 00:58 +0000
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-29 07:48 +0000
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2024-12-30 19:10 -0500
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-30 20:50 -0500
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-31 07:25 +0000
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-31 08:46 -0500
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2024-12-31 17:40 -0500
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-01 02:29 +0000
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-31 21:51 -0500
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-01-01 06:42 +0000
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2025-01-02 13:14 -0500
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-02 14:57 -0500
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-03 08:11 +0000
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-03 08:37 -0500
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-03 20:41 +0000
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-03 14:50 -0600
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-04 07:34 +0000
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-03 17:01 -0500
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-04 07:37 +0000
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-01-04 07:58 +0000
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-06 20:08 -0500
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-04 10:11 -0500
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-05 13:42 +0000
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-05 09:41 -0500
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-06 10:08 +0000
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-06 13:53 -0500
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-06 19:23 +0000
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-07 07:49 +0000
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-07 09:07 -0500
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-08 08:42 +0000
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2025-01-07 21:58 -0500
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-08 09:02 -0500
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-01-10 02:13 +0000
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-10 07:02 -0600
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-10 10:03 -0500
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 09:22 +0000
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-11 07:27 -0500
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 07:46 -0500
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-11 08:18 -0500
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-11 07:35 -0600
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-11 09:36 -0500
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-12 08:22 +0000
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-12 08:18 +0000
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-12 08:26 -0500
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-13 12:25 +0000
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-13 09:57 -0500
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-14 11:00 +0000
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-14 11:06 +0000
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-12 08:21 +0000
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-12 09:32 -0500
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-13 12:29 +0000
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-13 09:58 -0500
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-14 11:01 +0000
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-11 20:25 +0000
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 09:19 +0000
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-05 22:10 +0000
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-05 16:27 -0600
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-04 09:29 +0000
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-03 18:47 -0600
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2025-01-03 20:02 -0500
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-03 20:08 -0500
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2025-01-05 10:42 -0500
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-05 13:25 -0500
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-05 20:50 -0500
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-06 10:23 -0500
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-06 10:56 -0500
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... Jack Sovalot <hee-cawkforme@jack.sovalot> - 2025-01-06 12:29 -0500
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-06 14:19 -0500
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-06 14:12 -0500
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-06 14:21 -0500
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-06 14:38 -0500
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-06 15:00 -0500
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-06 15:53 -0500
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-06 19:58 -0500
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2025-01-06 12:29 -0500
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-06 12:37 -0500
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-06 14:27 -0500
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-06 14:42 -0500
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... Beavis <beavis@corn.holio> - 2025-01-06 14:50 -0500
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... Beavis <beavis@corn.holio> - 2025-01-06 14:45 -0500
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-06 14:51 -0500
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2025-01-06 15:35 -0500
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-06 14:19 -0500
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-04 07:29 +0000
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-31 02:32 +0000
Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed... Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-31 08:39 -0500
Page 2 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 Next page →
| From | Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-03 17:01 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <_6ZdP.418575$bYV2.357477@fx17.iad> |
| In reply to | #682574 |
On 2025-01-03 15:41, rbowman wrote: > On Fri, 3 Jan 2025 08:37:19 -0500, Andrzej Matuch wrote: > >> They didn't resist the vaccine, they >> didn't resist the mask, they didn't resist the pronoun garbage; why >> would they resist the Mark? > > I skipped the vaccine and had my useless, Chinese made, N0 muzzle to get > me into CostCo, but how do you 'resist' the pronoun garbage? By refusing to address people who believe they are the opposite gender by the pronouns associated with that gender. Also, by refusing to use made-up pronouns like ze and zir. > What amuses me is the 'White non-Hispanic' category. Are they trying to > imply Hispanics aren't white? Since Hispanics include people who have no European characteristics whatsoever, I can imagine why they are not considered White. -- Andrzej (Andre) Matuch Telegram: @AndrzejMatuch Zephyrus G14 GA401QM on Fedora 41 KDE supporting member
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-04 07:37 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vlaogf$c5ch$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #682600 |
On 2025-01-03, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote: > On 2025-01-03 15:41, rbowman wrote: >> On Fri, 3 Jan 2025 08:37:19 -0500, Andrzej Matuch wrote: >> >>> They didn't resist the vaccine, they >>> didn't resist the mask, they didn't resist the pronoun garbage; why >>> would they resist the Mark? >> >> I skipped the vaccine and had my useless, Chinese made, N0 muzzle to get >> me into CostCo, but how do you 'resist' the pronoun garbage? > > By refusing to address people who believe they are the opposite gender > by the pronouns associated with that gender. Also, by refusing to use > made-up pronouns like ze and zir. > >> What amuses me is the 'White non-Hispanic' category. Are they trying to >> imply Hispanics aren't white? > > Since Hispanics include people who have no European characteristics > whatsoever, I can imagine why they are not considered White. I consider white Latinos white. "Hispanic" is a language group, not a racial group. -- “Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy what has been invented or made by the forces of good.” —J.R.R. Tolkien
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-04 07:58 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lts80kFgj1cU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #682722 |
On Sat, 4 Jan 2025 07:37:51 -0000 (UTC), RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote in <vlaogf$c5ch$4@dont-email.me>: > On 2025-01-03, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote: >> On 2025-01-03 15:41, rbowman wrote: >>> On Fri, 3 Jan 2025 08:37:19 -0500, Andrzej Matuch wrote: >>> >>>> They didn't resist the vaccine, they >>>> didn't resist the mask, they didn't resist the pronoun garbage; why >>>> would they resist the Mark? >>> >>> I skipped the vaccine and had my useless, Chinese made, N0 muzzle to get >>> me into CostCo, but how do you 'resist' the pronoun garbage? >> >> By refusing to address people who believe they are the opposite gender >> by the pronouns associated with that gender. Also, by refusing to use >> made-up pronouns like ze and zir. >> >>> What amuses me is the 'White non-Hispanic' category. Are they trying to >>> imply Hispanics aren't white? >> >> Since Hispanics include people who have no European characteristics >> whatsoever, I can imagine why they are not considered White. > > I consider white Latinos white. "Hispanic" is a language group, not a racial > group. And they are Spanish/Indigenous descendants. (I guess Spain isn't in Europe anymore? Learn something every day!) ObLinux: Linux 6.12.8 was released yesterday. $ uname -a Linux lm 6.12.8 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Thu Jan 2 18:36:24 PST 2025 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux -- -v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti OS: Linux 6.12.8 Release: Mint 21.3 Mem: 258G ""Generalissimo Francisco Franco is still dead!"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-06 20:08 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <vlhuqo$1skbu$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #682727 |
On 1/4/25 2:58 AM, vallor wrote: > On Sat, 4 Jan 2025 07:37:51 -0000 (UTC), RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> > wrote in <vlaogf$c5ch$4@dont-email.me>: > >> On 2025-01-03, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote: >>> On 2025-01-03 15:41, rbowman wrote: >>>> ... >>> >>>> What amuses me is the 'White non-Hispanic' category. Are they trying >>>> to imply Hispanics aren't white? >>> >>> Since Hispanics include people who have no European characteristics >>> whatsoever, I can imagine why they are not considered White. >> >> I consider white Latinos white. "Hispanic" is a language group, not a >> racial group. > > And they are Spanish/Indigenous descendants. > > (I guess Spain isn't in Europe anymore? Learn something > every day!) Yup. Fun fact: the 1930 Census added the category of "Mexican". Prior to that, they were classified as either "White", "Indian", or "Other". "Mexican" disappeared for the 1940, 50 & 60 Censuses; 1970 had "Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, Central/South America, Other Spanish" category: <https://www.census.gov/data-tools/demo/race/MREAD_1790_2010.html> -hh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-04 10:11 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <BcceP.257217$ZAue.170667@fx12.iad> |
| In reply to | #682722 |
On 2025-01-04 02:37, RonB wrote: > On 2025-01-03, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote: >> On 2025-01-03 15:41, rbowman wrote: >>> On Fri, 3 Jan 2025 08:37:19 -0500, Andrzej Matuch wrote: >>> >>>> They didn't resist the vaccine, they >>>> didn't resist the mask, they didn't resist the pronoun garbage; why >>>> would they resist the Mark? >>> >>> I skipped the vaccine and had my useless, Chinese made, N0 muzzle to get >>> me into CostCo, but how do you 'resist' the pronoun garbage? >> >> By refusing to address people who believe they are the opposite gender >> by the pronouns associated with that gender. Also, by refusing to use >> made-up pronouns like ze and zir. >> >>> What amuses me is the 'White non-Hispanic' category. Are they trying to >>> imply Hispanics aren't white? >> >> Since Hispanics include people who have no European characteristics >> whatsoever, I can imagine why they are not considered White. > > I consider white Latinos white. "Hispanic" is a language group, not a racial > group. Until they forced me to notice that they looked different in my 30s or so, I never cared what ethnicity someone was. They were either friends or they weren't. However, Obama and the media of the time were very good at separating us by sex and religion and I can no longer be as blind as I used to be. I guess that was the HOPE he kept referring to. -- Andrzej (Andre) Matuch Telegram: @AndrzejMatuch Zephyrus G14 GA401QM on Fedora 41 KDE supporting member
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-05 13:42 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vle28m$1212k$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #682774 |
On 2025-01-04, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote: > On 2025-01-04 02:37, RonB wrote: >> On 2025-01-03, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote: >>> On 2025-01-03 15:41, rbowman wrote: >>>> On Fri, 3 Jan 2025 08:37:19 -0500, Andrzej Matuch wrote: >>>> >>>>> They didn't resist the vaccine, they >>>>> didn't resist the mask, they didn't resist the pronoun garbage; why >>>>> would they resist the Mark? >>>> >>>> I skipped the vaccine and had my useless, Chinese made, N0 muzzle to get >>>> me into CostCo, but how do you 'resist' the pronoun garbage? >>> >>> By refusing to address people who believe they are the opposite gender >>> by the pronouns associated with that gender. Also, by refusing to use >>> made-up pronouns like ze and zir. >>> >>>> What amuses me is the 'White non-Hispanic' category. Are they trying to >>>> imply Hispanics aren't white? >>> >>> Since Hispanics include people who have no European characteristics >>> whatsoever, I can imagine why they are not considered White. >> >> I consider white Latinos white. "Hispanic" is a language group, not a racial >> group. > > Until they forced me to notice that they looked different in my 30s or > so, I never cared what ethnicity someone was. They were either friends > or they weren't. However, Obama and the media of the time were very good > at separating us by sex and religion and I can no longer be as blind as > I used to be. I guess that was the HOPE he kept referring to. When I was a kid in school they taught us about the "melting pot" and how there are no differences in the races. (Not true, but I got the point. People are people.) Now it's "racist" not to "recognize" the differences in race. And the "melting pot" mixing of cultures has become "appropriation." But all this only seems to work only in one direction. There's no issues with other races "appropriating" stuff from the white culture. I think it's all stupid. People are people — we're basically all mutts. As my grandmother used to say, "There's good and there's bad in all of us." By "us" she meant the various races. -- “Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy what has been invented or made by the forces of good.” —J.R.R. Tolkien
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-05 09:41 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <HSweP.41334$vfee.1545@fx45.iad> |
| In reply to | #682939 |
On 2025-01-05 08:42, RonB wrote: > On 2025-01-04, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote: >> On 2025-01-04 02:37, RonB wrote: >>> On 2025-01-03, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote: >>>> On 2025-01-03 15:41, rbowman wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 3 Jan 2025 08:37:19 -0500, Andrzej Matuch wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> They didn't resist the vaccine, they >>>>>> didn't resist the mask, they didn't resist the pronoun garbage; why >>>>>> would they resist the Mark? >>>>> >>>>> I skipped the vaccine and had my useless, Chinese made, N0 muzzle to get >>>>> me into CostCo, but how do you 'resist' the pronoun garbage? >>>> >>>> By refusing to address people who believe they are the opposite gender >>>> by the pronouns associated with that gender. Also, by refusing to use >>>> made-up pronouns like ze and zir. >>>> >>>>> What amuses me is the 'White non-Hispanic' category. Are they trying to >>>>> imply Hispanics aren't white? >>>> >>>> Since Hispanics include people who have no European characteristics >>>> whatsoever, I can imagine why they are not considered White. >>> >>> I consider white Latinos white. "Hispanic" is a language group, not a racial >>> group. >> >> Until they forced me to notice that they looked different in my 30s or >> so, I never cared what ethnicity someone was. They were either friends >> or they weren't. However, Obama and the media of the time were very good >> at separating us by sex and religion and I can no longer be as blind as >> I used to be. I guess that was the HOPE he kept referring to. > > When I was a kid in school they taught us about the "melting pot" and how > there are no differences in the races. (Not true, but I got the point. > People are people.) Now it's "racist" not to "recognize" the differences in > race. And the "melting pot" mixing of cultures has become "appropriation." > But all this only seems to work only in one direction. There's no issues > with other races "appropriating" stuff from the white culture. I think it's > all stupid. People are people — we're basically all mutts. As my grandmother > used to say, "There's good and there's bad in all of us." By "us" she meant > the various races. I don't mind the other races appropriating the White culture because it's their only hope of ever becoming civilized. However, I am entirely against Whites appropriating anything from inferior cultures like black ones. Their nutrition is terrible, their music does little other than corrupt minds and their languages are always a lazy creole of something that already exists. If Whites want to appropriate the excellent nutrition of the Japanese or Indians, that's fine because they've actually accomplished something in their respective existences. Blacks, however, have done little more than destroy something that already existed. If anyone needs an excellent example of _how_ Whites are superior to other civilizations, consider the creation of Venice in Italy <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=77omYd0JOeA&pp=ygUSY3JlYXRpb24gb2YgdmVuaWNl> Meanwhile, the civilizations that we apparently stole from and which take credit for building everything for us can't even erect a house. -- Andrzej (Andre) Matuch Telegram: @AndrzejMatuch Zephyrus G14 GA401QM on Fedora 41 KDE supporting member
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-06 10:08 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vlga23$1idfd$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #682945 |
On 2025-01-05, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote: > On 2025-01-05 08:42, RonB wrote: >> On 2025-01-04, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote: >>> On 2025-01-04 02:37, RonB wrote: >>>> On 2025-01-03, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote: >>>>> On 2025-01-03 15:41, rbowman wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, 3 Jan 2025 08:37:19 -0500, Andrzej Matuch wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> They didn't resist the vaccine, they >>>>>>> didn't resist the mask, they didn't resist the pronoun garbage; why >>>>>>> would they resist the Mark? >>>>>> >>>>>> I skipped the vaccine and had my useless, Chinese made, N0 muzzle to get >>>>>> me into CostCo, but how do you 'resist' the pronoun garbage? >>>>> >>>>> By refusing to address people who believe they are the opposite gender >>>>> by the pronouns associated with that gender. Also, by refusing to use >>>>> made-up pronouns like ze and zir. >>>>> >>>>>> What amuses me is the 'White non-Hispanic' category. Are they trying to >>>>>> imply Hispanics aren't white? >>>>> >>>>> Since Hispanics include people who have no European characteristics >>>>> whatsoever, I can imagine why they are not considered White. >>>> >>>> I consider white Latinos white. "Hispanic" is a language group, not a racial >>>> group. >>> >>> Until they forced me to notice that they looked different in my 30s or >>> so, I never cared what ethnicity someone was. They were either friends >>> or they weren't. However, Obama and the media of the time were very good >>> at separating us by sex and religion and I can no longer be as blind as >>> I used to be. I guess that was the HOPE he kept referring to. >> >> When I was a kid in school they taught us about the "melting pot" and how >> there are no differences in the races. (Not true, but I got the point. >> People are people.) Now it's "racist" not to "recognize" the differences in >> race. And the "melting pot" mixing of cultures has become "appropriation." >> But all this only seems to work only in one direction. There's no issues >> with other races "appropriating" stuff from the white culture. I think it's >> all stupid. People are people — we're basically all mutts. As my grandmother >> used to say, "There's good and there's bad in all of us." By "us" she meant >> the various races. > > I don't mind the other races appropriating the White culture because > it's their only hope of ever becoming civilized. However, I am entirely > against Whites appropriating anything from inferior cultures like black > ones. Their nutrition is terrible, their music does little other than > corrupt minds and their languages are always a lazy creole of something > that already exists. If Whites want to appropriate the excellent > nutrition of the Japanese or Indians, that's fine because they've > actually accomplished something in their respective existences. Blacks, > however, have done little more than destroy something that already existed. > > If anyone needs an excellent example of _how_ Whites are superior to > other civilizations, consider the creation of Venice in Italy ><https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=77omYd0JOeA&pp=ygUSY3JlYXRpb24gb2YgdmVuaWNl> > Meanwhile, the civilizations that we apparently stole from and which > take credit for building everything for us can't even erect a house. When they talk about "cultural appropriation" they're usually talking about food and Halloween customs. Really stupid stuff that only vapid morons would worry about. -- “Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy what has been invented or made by the forces of good.” —J.R.R. Tolkien
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-06 13:53 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <JEVeP.280102$aTp4.106605@fx09.iad> |
| In reply to | #683096 |
On 2025-01-06 05:08, RonB wrote: > On 2025-01-05, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote: >> On 2025-01-05 08:42, RonB wrote: >>> On 2025-01-04, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote: >>>> On 2025-01-04 02:37, RonB wrote: >>>>> On 2025-01-03, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote: >>>>>> On 2025-01-03 15:41, rbowman wrote: >>>>>>> On Fri, 3 Jan 2025 08:37:19 -0500, Andrzej Matuch wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> They didn't resist the vaccine, they >>>>>>>> didn't resist the mask, they didn't resist the pronoun garbage; why >>>>>>>> would they resist the Mark? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I skipped the vaccine and had my useless, Chinese made, N0 muzzle to get >>>>>>> me into CostCo, but how do you 'resist' the pronoun garbage? >>>>>> >>>>>> By refusing to address people who believe they are the opposite gender >>>>>> by the pronouns associated with that gender. Also, by refusing to use >>>>>> made-up pronouns like ze and zir. >>>>>> >>>>>>> What amuses me is the 'White non-Hispanic' category. Are they trying to >>>>>>> imply Hispanics aren't white? >>>>>> >>>>>> Since Hispanics include people who have no European characteristics >>>>>> whatsoever, I can imagine why they are not considered White. >>>>> >>>>> I consider white Latinos white. "Hispanic" is a language group, not a racial >>>>> group. >>>> >>>> Until they forced me to notice that they looked different in my 30s or >>>> so, I never cared what ethnicity someone was. They were either friends >>>> or they weren't. However, Obama and the media of the time were very good >>>> at separating us by sex and religion and I can no longer be as blind as >>>> I used to be. I guess that was the HOPE he kept referring to. >>> >>> When I was a kid in school they taught us about the "melting pot" and how >>> there are no differences in the races. (Not true, but I got the point. >>> People are people.) Now it's "racist" not to "recognize" the differences in >>> race. And the "melting pot" mixing of cultures has become "appropriation." >>> But all this only seems to work only in one direction. There's no issues >>> with other races "appropriating" stuff from the white culture. I think it's >>> all stupid. People are people — we're basically all mutts. As my grandmother >>> used to say, "There's good and there's bad in all of us." By "us" she meant >>> the various races. >> >> I don't mind the other races appropriating the White culture because >> it's their only hope of ever becoming civilized. However, I am entirely >> against Whites appropriating anything from inferior cultures like black >> ones. Their nutrition is terrible, their music does little other than >> corrupt minds and their languages are always a lazy creole of something >> that already exists. If Whites want to appropriate the excellent >> nutrition of the Japanese or Indians, that's fine because they've >> actually accomplished something in their respective existences. Blacks, >> however, have done little more than destroy something that already existed. >> >> If anyone needs an excellent example of _how_ Whites are superior to >> other civilizations, consider the creation of Venice in Italy >> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=77omYd0JOeA&pp=ygUSY3JlYXRpb24gb2YgdmVuaWNl> >> Meanwhile, the civilizations that we apparently stole from and which >> take credit for building everything for us can't even erect a house. > > When they talk about "cultural appropriation" they're usually talking about > food and Halloween customs. Really stupid stuff that only vapid morons would > worry about. As it relates to food, they should be happy that someone out there is willing to trade money for what is often something that can barely be called sustenance. Japanese food is splendid, but why the Hell would I want to eat Haitian cuisine? As for Halloween, they can whine all they want. If Whites are discouraged from celebrating what can be considered to be a Satanic holiday, that's all good with me. -- Andrzej (Andre) Matuch Telegram: @AndrzejMatuch Zephyrus G14 GA401QM on Fedora 41 KDE supporting member
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-06 19:23 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lu2ou7Fkn5jU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #683096 |
On Mon, 6 Jan 2025 10:08:03 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote: > When they talk about "cultural appropriation" they're usually talking > about food and Halloween customs. Really stupid stuff that only vapid > morons would worry about. https://www.florabelletheband.com/about-6 The local vapid morons are in a dither about this band. I don't care for their genre but that's neither here nor there. The original name of the band was 'War Pony' and the posters had an Indian motif. After much bitching about cultural appropriation Schulz changed the name to Florabelle. However she didn't grovel enough to satisfy the morons https://nbcmontana.com/news/local/zacc-changes-lineup-after-music- festival-artist-backlash fwiw, I did see Florabelle perform at a festival last summer but I've never heard of Running Crane.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-07 07:49 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vlima3$23rjm$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #683168 |
On 2025-01-06, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: > On Mon, 6 Jan 2025 10:08:03 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote: > >> When they talk about "cultural appropriation" they're usually talking >> about food and Halloween customs. Really stupid stuff that only vapid >> morons would worry about. > > https://www.florabelletheband.com/about-6 > > The local vapid morons are in a dither about this band. I don't care for > their genre but that's neither here nor there. The original name of the > band was 'War Pony' and the posters had an Indian motif. After much > bitching about cultural appropriation Schulz changed the name to > Florabelle. However she didn't grovel enough to satisfy the morons You can never grovel enough to satisfy these Woke morons. I remember when Mel Gibson released Braveheart. They were whining about the homosexual prince being too stereotyped (or something). Gibson just told them it "his movie" and he would make it how he wanted to make it, and if they didn't like it they could make their own movie. That was the last I heard about it. Had he caved, they would probably still be pushing for more and more apologies. > https://nbcmontana.com/news/local/zacc-changes-lineup-after-music- > festival-artist-backlash > > fwiw, I did see Florabelle perform at a festival last summer but I've > never heard of Running Crane. -- “Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy what has been invented or made by the forces of good.” —J.R.R. Tolkien
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-07 09:07 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <tyafP.258830$Uup4.55944@fx10.iad> |
| In reply to | #683254 |
On 2025-01-07 02:49, RonB wrote: > On 2025-01-06, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: >> On Mon, 6 Jan 2025 10:08:03 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote: >> >>> When they talk about "cultural appropriation" they're usually talking >>> about food and Halloween customs. Really stupid stuff that only vapid >>> morons would worry about. >> >> https://www.florabelletheband.com/about-6 >> >> The local vapid morons are in a dither about this band. I don't care for >> their genre but that's neither here nor there. The original name of the >> band was 'War Pony' and the posters had an Indian motif. After much >> bitching about cultural appropriation Schulz changed the name to >> Florabelle. However she didn't grovel enough to satisfy the morons > > You can never grovel enough to satisfy these Woke morons. I remember when > Mel Gibson released Braveheart. They were whining about the homosexual > prince being too stereotyped (or something). Gibson just told them it "his > movie" and he would make it how he wanted to make it, and if they didn't > like it they could make their own movie. That was the last I heard about it. > Had he caved, they would probably still be pushing for more and more > apologies. For what it's worth, Braveheart is one of the best movies ever made. Additionally, the homosexual nature of the prince in that movie is a theme stolen in "Those About To Die" on Amazon about the Roman Empire. Vespasian's son Domitian is such a faggot that you're just anticipating his spontaneous combustion. -- Andrzej (Andre) Matuch Telegram: @AndrzejMatuch Zephyrus G14 GA401QM on Fedora 41 KDE supporting member
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-08 08:42 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vlldp1$2mvfh$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #683267 |
On 2025-01-07, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote: > On 2025-01-07 02:49, RonB wrote: >> On 2025-01-06, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: >>> On Mon, 6 Jan 2025 10:08:03 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote: >>> >>>> When they talk about "cultural appropriation" they're usually talking >>>> about food and Halloween customs. Really stupid stuff that only vapid >>>> morons would worry about. >>> >>> https://www.florabelletheband.com/about-6 >>> >>> The local vapid morons are in a dither about this band. I don't care for >>> their genre but that's neither here nor there. The original name of the >>> band was 'War Pony' and the posters had an Indian motif. After much >>> bitching about cultural appropriation Schulz changed the name to >>> Florabelle. However she didn't grovel enough to satisfy the morons >> >> You can never grovel enough to satisfy these Woke morons. I remember when >> Mel Gibson released Braveheart. They were whining about the homosexual >> prince being too stereotyped (or something). Gibson just told them it "his >> movie" and he would make it how he wanted to make it, and if they didn't >> like it they could make their own movie. That was the last I heard about it. >> Had he caved, they would probably still be pushing for more and more >> apologies. > > For what it's worth, Braveheart is one of the best movies ever made. > Additionally, the homosexual nature of the prince in that movie is a > theme stolen in "Those About To Die" on Amazon about the Roman Empire. > Vespasian's son Domitian is such a faggot that you're just anticipating > his spontaneous combustion. I think this was true with the real-life prince character in Braveheart as well. -- “Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy what has been invented or made by the forces of good.” —J.R.R. Tolkien
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-07 21:58 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <vlkpkl$2g1iq$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #683254 |
On 1/7/2025 2:49 AM, RonB wrote: > You can never grovel enough to satisfy these Woke morons. I remember when > Mel Gibson released Braveheart. They were whining about the homosexual > prince being too stereotyped (or something). Gibson just told them it "his > movie" and he would make it how he wanted to make it, and if they didn't > like it they could make their own movie. That was the last I heard about it. > Had he caved, they would probably still be pushing for more and more > apologies. I saw Braveheart in the theater on opening weekend, and when King Richard shoved a gayboy (his gay son's lover) out a high window to his death, most of the audience - including me - laughed out loud. The queer "community" was outraged that everyone laughed at that scene. But I didn't laugh because he was gay - it happened so fast and he screamed on the way down... you have to see it to understand. Gibson's a masterful movie director who loves bloodletting on screen. Apocalypto is one of his best.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-08 09:02 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <wzvfP.776849$%aWb.534234@fx18.iad> |
| In reply to | #683314 |
On 2025-01-07 21:58, DFS wrote: > On 1/7/2025 2:49 AM, RonB wrote: > >> You can never grovel enough to satisfy these Woke morons. I remember when >> Mel Gibson released Braveheart. They were whining about the homosexual >> prince being too stereotyped (or something). Gibson just told them it >> "his >> movie" and he would make it how he wanted to make it, and if they didn't >> like it they could make their own movie. That was the last I heard >> about it. >> Had he caved, they would probably still be pushing for more and more >> apologies. > > > I saw Braveheart in the theater on opening weekend, and when King > Richard shoved a gayboy (his gay son's lover) out a high window to his > death, most of the audience - including me - laughed out loud. > > The queer "community" was outraged that everyone laughed at that scene. > But I didn't laugh because he was gay - it happened so fast and he > screamed on the way down... you have to see it to understand. > > Gibson's a masterful movie director who loves bloodletting on screen. > Apocalypto is one of his best. I love just about eerything Mel Gibson produced, to be honest. As for the scene with a faggot, I laughed too. In fact, everyone should because it is very well done, as it the prince's pathetic response to the death. -- CrudeSausage Unapologetic paleoconservative
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-10 02:13 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vlpvo0$3ksfc$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #683314 |
On 2025-01-08, DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote: > On 1/7/2025 2:49 AM, RonB wrote: > >> You can never grovel enough to satisfy these Woke morons. I remember when >> Mel Gibson released Braveheart. They were whining about the homosexual >> prince being too stereotyped (or something). Gibson just told them it "his >> movie" and he would make it how he wanted to make it, and if they didn't >> like it they could make their own movie. That was the last I heard about it. >> Had he caved, they would probably still be pushing for more and more >> apologies. > > > I saw Braveheart in the theater on opening weekend, and when King > Richard shoved a gayboy (his gay son's lover) out a high window to his > death, most of the audience - including me - laughed out loud. > > The queer "community" was outraged that everyone laughed at that scene. > But I didn't laugh because he was gay - it happened so fast and he > screamed on the way down... you have to see it to understand. > > Gibson's a masterful movie director who loves bloodletting on screen. > Apocalypto is one of his best. Queers for Palestine. Trannys for Gaza. Are these people idiots? They wouldn't last 10 minutes in Gaza before they are castrated and tossed off the highest rooftop. Despite what the LBGTQ+ community wants you to believe, they are a minuscule portion of the population but they are very loud vocally. -- pothead "Give a man a fish and you turn him into a Democrat for life" "Teach a man to fish and he might become a self-sufficient conservative Republican" "Don't underestimate Joe's ability to fuck things up," --- Barack H. Obama
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-10 07:02 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <9g62oj9frmbk647s8dfurngii47pi14et5@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #683565 |
pothead wrote: >Queers for Palestine. >Trannys for Gaza. > >Are these people idiots? > >They wouldn't last 10 minutes in Gaza before they are castrated and tossed off the highest rooftop. > >Despite what the LBGTQ+ community wants you to believe, they are a minuscule portion >of the population but they are very loud vocally. Well, fully half of the population (females) are suppressed by the Muslims. Yet leftists here support them over the *far* more enlightened Israelis. Incredible.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-10 10:03 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <aFagP.371536$aTp4.204086@fx09.iad> |
| In reply to | #683594 |
On 2025-01-10 08:02, chrisv wrote: > pothead wrote: > >> Queers for Palestine. >> Trannys for Gaza. >> >> Are these people idiots? >> >> They wouldn't last 10 minutes in Gaza before they are castrated and tossed off the highest rooftop. >> >> Despite what the LBGTQ+ community wants you to believe, they are a minuscule portion >> of the population but they are very loud vocally. > > Well, fully half of the population (females) are suppressed by the > Muslims. Yet leftists here support them over the *far* more > enlightened Israelis. Incredible. The funny part is that the leftists believe they can make allies of Muslims by convincing them that they are being "oppressed" by the White man. Muslims have already spent most of their history oppressing the world all the while complaining that they are being oppressed. As such, both parties are seeing the other as being a pack of useful idiots. Leftists are so dumb that they believe that Muslims will conveniently ignore the fact that everything they are pushing is contrary to Islamic law like homosexuality, free sex, an empowered woman and a secular society. Even if these hippies were to become the authority (with the assumed help of the Muslims), Muslims would either be a constant threat to their power or would hang every last one of them. Unlike what happened during Soviet times though, whichever "progressives" aren't already lying in a pool of their own blood or hanging would be calling anyone who fears that they are going to be the next to be raped or killed an islamophobe. -- CrudeSausage Gab: @CrudeSausage Unapologetic paleoconservative
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-11 09:22 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vltd9g$hnde$7@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #683604 |
On 2025-01-10, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: > On 2025-01-10 08:02, chrisv wrote: >> pothead wrote: >> >>> Queers for Palestine. >>> Trannys for Gaza. >>> >>> Are these people idiots? >>> >>> They wouldn't last 10 minutes in Gaza before they are castrated and tossed off the highest rooftop. >>> >>> Despite what the LBGTQ+ community wants you to believe, they are a minuscule portion >>> of the population but they are very loud vocally. >> >> Well, fully half of the population (females) are suppressed by the >> Muslims. Yet leftists here support them over the *far* more >> enlightened Israelis. Incredible. > > The funny part is that the leftists believe they can make allies of > Muslims by convincing them that they are being "oppressed" by the White > man. Muslims have already spent most of their history oppressing the > world all the while complaining that they are being oppressed. As such, > both parties are seeing the other as being a pack of useful idiots. > Leftists are so dumb that they believe that Muslims will conveniently > ignore the fact that everything they are pushing is contrary to Islamic > law like homosexuality, free sex, an empowered woman and a secular > society. Even if these hippies were to become the authority (with the > assumed help of the Muslims), Muslims would either be a constant threat > to their power or would hang every last one of them. Unlike what > happened during Soviet times though, whichever "progressives" aren't > already lying in a pool of their own blood or hanging would be calling > anyone who fears that they are going to be the next to be raped or > killed an islamophobe. The "enemy of my enemy" is not always my friend. Sometimes there is no good side. But if I had to pick one over the other, bombing and starving children (as the Israelis are doing) makes them the more detestable of the two sides. At one point there was a large Christian population in Palestine. The Muslims aren't the only ones oppressed by the Israeli terrorists. -- “Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy what has been invented or made by the forces of good.” —J.R.R. Tolkien
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-11 07:27 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <KstgP.479486$DPl.419019@fx13.iad> |
| In reply to | #683696 |
On 2025-01-11 04:22, RonB wrote: > On 2025-01-10, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >> On 2025-01-10 08:02, chrisv wrote: >>> pothead wrote: >>> >>>> Queers for Palestine. >>>> Trannys for Gaza. >>>> >>>> Are these people idiots? >>>> >>>> They wouldn't last 10 minutes in Gaza before they are castrated and tossed off the highest rooftop. >>>> >>>> Despite what the LBGTQ+ community wants you to believe, they are a minuscule portion >>>> of the population but they are very loud vocally. >>> >>> Well, fully half of the population (females) are suppressed by the >>> Muslims. Yet leftists here support them over the *far* more >>> enlightened Israelis. Incredible. >> >> The funny part is that the leftists believe they can make allies of >> Muslims by convincing them that they are being "oppressed" by the White >> man. Muslims have already spent most of their history oppressing the >> world all the while complaining that they are being oppressed. As such, >> both parties are seeing the other as being a pack of useful idiots. >> Leftists are so dumb that they believe that Muslims will conveniently >> ignore the fact that everything they are pushing is contrary to Islamic >> law like homosexuality, free sex, an empowered woman and a secular >> society. Even if these hippies were to become the authority (with the >> assumed help of the Muslims), Muslims would either be a constant threat >> to their power or would hang every last one of them. Unlike what >> happened during Soviet times though, whichever "progressives" aren't >> already lying in a pool of their own blood or hanging would be calling >> anyone who fears that they are going to be the next to be raped or >> killed an islamophobe. > > The "enemy of my enemy" is not always my friend. Sometimes there is no good > side. But if I had to pick one over the other, bombing and starving children > (as the Israelis are doing) makes them the more detestable of the two sides. > > At one point there was a large Christian population in Palestine. The > Muslims aren't the only ones oppressed by the Israeli terrorists. In the conflict between Muslims and Jews, the only side to pick is the Christians. As I told anyone who's asked me in the past which side I'm on, one side will spit on me for being a Christian and the other will behead me. -- CrudeSausage Gab: @CrudeSausage Unapologetic paleoconservative
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web