Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #681239 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Farley Flud <fflud@gnu.rocks> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2024-12-25 17:48 +0000 |
| Last post | 2024-12-30 18:50 -0500 |
| Articles | 16 on this page of 116 — 20 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
A New Machine Progresses Farley Flud <fflud@gnu.rocks> - 2024-12-25 17:48 +0000
Re: A New Machine Progresses chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2024-12-25 12:22 -0600
Re: A New Machine Progresses Farley Flud <fflud@gnu.rocks> - 2024-12-25 18:42 +0000
Re: A New Machine Progresses pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2024-12-26 02:25 +0000
Re: A New Machine Progresses Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2024-12-26 08:13 +0000
Re: A New Machine Progresses chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2024-12-26 06:58 -0600
Re: A New Machine Progresses pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2024-12-26 15:06 +0000
Re: A New Machine Progresses -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-26 16:21 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2024-12-27 10:13 +0000
Re: A New Machine Progresses Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2024-12-27 07:50 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-27 15:03 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-12-27 14:11 -0600
Re: A New Machine Progresses Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-27 15:18 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-12-27 14:36 -0600
Re: A New Machine Progresses Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-27 15:43 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-12-27 14:56 -0600
Re: A New Machine Progresses Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-27 15:59 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-12-27 15:05 -0600
Re: A New Machine Progresses -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-27 20:55 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-27 21:22 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-27 22:38 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-12-27 20:32 -0600
Re: A New Machine Progresses -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-27 22:38 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-12-27 21:47 -0600
Re: A New Machine Progresses rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 00:13 +0000
Re: A New Machine Progresses Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-27 20:04 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2024-12-28 02:05 +0000
Re: A New Machine Progresses Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-27 21:27 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses brock <brockt@allied_.abc> - 2024-12-28 09:29 +0100
Re: A New Machine Progresses Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-28 08:33 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> - 2024-12-28 07:30 -0700
Re: A New Machine Progresses Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-28 10:45 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> - 2024-12-28 11:45 -0700
Re: A New Machine Progresses Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-28 13:50 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> - 2024-12-29 04:47 -0700
Re: A New Machine Progresses Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-29 14:48 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses Jack Sovalot <hee-cawkforme@jack.sovalot> - 2024-12-31 04:11 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-31 16:08 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-01 04:28 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-01 02:00 -0800
Re: A New Machine Progresses Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-01 11:58 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses Jack Sovalot <hee-cawkforme@jack.sovalot> - 2025-01-01 12:31 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-01 14:22 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses Jack Sovalot <hee-cawkforme@jack.sovalot> - 2025-01-01 14:49 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-01 14:55 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses Jack Sovalot <hee-cawkforme@jack.sovalot> - 2025-01-01 16:49 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2025-01-02 08:06 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-02 18:22 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2025-01-03 08:20 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses Jack Sovalot <hee-cawkforme@jack.sovalot> - 2025-01-01 17:04 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2025-01-02 08:05 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-02 07:25 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-01 04:26 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-01 11:56 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-02 07:27 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-02 10:52 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-02 22:54 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-03 15:24 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-05 14:44 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2025-01-06 07:51 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-01 04:21 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-01 11:55 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses Ted <ted.street@yahoo.net> - 2024-12-28 10:53 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-28 12:41 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses Ted <ted.street@yahoo.net> - 2024-12-28 12:45 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-28 12:56 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses Ted <ted.street@yahoo.net> - 2024-12-28 13:02 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-28 16:58 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2024-12-28 10:58 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-28 16:58 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2024-12-29 02:48 +0000
Re: A New Machine Progresses -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-29 13:59 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2024-12-29 22:37 +0000
Re: A New Machine Progresses -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-29 19:48 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2024-12-30 02:04 +0000
Re: A New Machine Progresses -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-31 10:44 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2024-12-31 21:21 +0000
Re: A New Machine Progresses Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2024-12-31 13:47 -0800
Re: A New Machine Progresses Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-31 16:52 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2024-12-31 22:43 +0000
Re: A New Machine Progresses Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-31 18:29 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�ter.@gmail.com> - 2024-12-31 15:41 -0800
Re: A New Machine Progresses pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2024-12-31 23:44 +0000
Re: A New Machine Progresses Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-31 18:47 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2024-12-31 23:59 +0000
Re: A New Machine Progresses Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-31 19:06 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-01-01 00:18 +0000
Re: A New Machine Progresses Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-31 19:44 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-01-01 00:52 +0000
Re: A New Machine Progresses Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-31 20:24 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2025-01-02 08:04 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2024-12-31 19:19 -0800
Re: A New Machine Progresses "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2025-01-02 08:03 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2025-01-02 08:02 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2025-01-02 08:01 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses Klaus Schadenfreude <katt@gmail.com> - 2025-01-02 13:25 -0800
Re: A New Machine Progresses "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2025-01-03 08:21 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses Klaus Schadenfreude <katt@gmail.com> - 2025-01-03 09:15 -0800
Re: A New Machine Progresses -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-31 17:12 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2024-12-28 01:57 +0000
Re: A New Machine Progresses rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 02:11 +0000
Re: A New Machine Progresses Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2024-12-28 14:02 +0000
Re: A New Machine Progresses Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-28 10:11 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-28 12:22 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-12-28 15:27 -0600
Re: A New Machine Progresses Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2024-12-28 22:01 +0000
Re: A New Machine Progresses Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-12-28 17:07 -0600
Re: A New Machine Progresses Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2024-12-28 23:20 +0000
Re: A New Machine Progresses Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-28 18:24 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-12-28 18:39 -0600
Re: A New Machine Progresses Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2024-12-29 09:23 +0000
Re: A New Machine Progresses DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2024-12-30 19:14 -0500
Re: A New Machine Progresses Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-12-30 19:57 -0600
Re: A New Machine Progresses Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 20:01 -0600
Re: A New Machine Progresses Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 20:03 -0600
Re: A New Machine Progresses DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2024-12-30 18:50 -0500
Page 6 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-28 02:11 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lt952lFej3gU8@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #681421 |
On Sat, 28 Dec 2024 01:57:19 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote: > Biden has always been perceived as somewhat of a goofball. > I go back as far as JFK but IMHO Clinton, Obama, Reagan and JFK were the > most eloquent speakers. > They had charisma and no matter what they said, they inspired confidence > much like FDR and his fireside chats. > And no, I am not THAT old. If Reagan could sell Twenty Mule Team Boraxo he could sell anything. We always had a can of that and it really worked, better than GoJo. I thought it was a step down when he left Death Valley Days to become a mere governor of fruit'n'nut land. I remember I Like Ike but I was high school age for JFK. Okay, I was young and naive but he really seemed like a promise of the future. Then came that corrupt Texas bastard.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-28 14:02 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pan$8662a$c83e823a$fa3f469a$a5cdef56@linux.rocks> |
| In reply to | #681383 |
On Fri, 27 Dec 2024 14:11:47 -0600, Physfitfreak wrote: > > I think he's even composing his usenet posts asking AI to give it an > articulate edge. His English command can't be that precise. > I would seriously be offended, even outraged, if any AI (LLM) ever dared to augment or enhance my work. My work is my work alone. A vigorously creative man does not ever enhance any aspect of his mind or being. It would be like wearing a wig to conceal baldness or using padded shoulders to give the appearance of being more physically imposing. REAL MEN never do such things. It is womanish behavior. AI is for pussies, wusses, and pansies. -- Systemd: solving all the problems that you never knew you had.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-28 10:11 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <v750nj977mjg3qsrq6or5hfgt4uhefhb9m@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #681463 |
Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> wrote: >On Fri, 27 Dec 2024 14:11:47 -0600, Physfitfreak wrote: > >> I think he's even composing his usenet posts asking AI to give it an >> articulate edge. His English command can't be that precise. > >I would seriously be offended, even outraged, if any AI (LLM) ever >dared to augment or enhance my work. > >My work is my work alone. A vigorously creative man does not ever >enhance any aspect of his mind or being. > >It would be like wearing a wig to conceal baldness or using padded >shoulders to give the appearance of being more physically imposing. >REAL MEN never do such things. It is womanish behavior. > >AI is for pussies, wusses, and pansies. You just endorsed it, because you don't like it - it must be a good thing. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-28 12:22 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <KtWbP.111150$%aWb.97853@fx18.iad> |
| In reply to | #681465 |
On 2024-12-28 10:11, Joel wrote: > Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> wrote: >> On Fri, 27 Dec 2024 14:11:47 -0600, Physfitfreak wrote: >> >>> I think he's even composing his usenet posts asking AI to give it an >>> articulate edge. His English command can't be that precise. >> >> I would seriously be offended, even outraged, if any AI (LLM) ever >> dared to augment or enhance my work. >> >> My work is my work alone. A vigorously creative man does not ever >> enhance any aspect of his mind or being. >> >> It would be like wearing a wig to conceal baldness or using padded >> shoulders to give the appearance of being more physically imposing. >> REAL MEN never do such things. It is womanish behavior. >> >> AI is for pussies, wusses, and pansies. > > > You just endorsed it, because you don't like it - it must be a good > thing. I am theoretically against AI, but it definitely saved me a lot of time with searches. Had AI been available to me with my soccer team in 2009, it would have also designed one heck of a logo for us. -- Andrzej (Andre) Matuch Telegram: @AndrzejMatuch
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-28 15:27 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <vkpqgb$1t0j7$2@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #681463 |
On 12/28/2024 8:02 AM, Farley Flud wrote: > REAL MEN never do such things. It is womanish behavior. > > AI is for pussies, wusses, and pansies. Sure, but I think this argument applies only to exact sciences, and even there, only as long as features like "worry", "care", "analogy", ... haven't been fully implemented in it. Right now (i.e. with what I see in ChatGPT) AI is only a superb language machine. I think the use of it in that field is gratifying. It knows many languages (including Persian) quite well. It both knows where a word can be used, and in what contexts, too. No dictionary + thesaurus combo has this service provided to you. An example: Ask chatGPT what the origins of the word "zircon" are. It can list a good amount of information on that. But it stops there. It does not give you even a hint of, say, why zircon suddenly became very important among scientists. To access that, you need to be a scientist too to ask for it :) Then, you'll see that he knows and tells you a lot about why zircon is important in science. The example above shows AI's present productive use as well is its _present_ shortcomings (requiring that you be a scientist in the example above) in telling you more about it. I bet a thing like a much better AI than chatGPT exists but is not accessible by public. THAT machine would also tell you why zircon became important starting around late 1950s :) -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-28 22:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pan$54ab3$ce2dbee3$59c37164$f34c3291@linux.rocks> |
| In reply to | #681502 |
On Sat, 28 Dec 2024 15:27:39 -0600, Physfitfreak wrote: > > I bet a thing like a much better AI than chatGPT exists but is not > accessible by public. THAT machine would also tell you why zircon became > important starting around late 1950s :) > What you are saying is that AI (LLM) is just a cheap shortcut to standard searches. Yep. That's all that it is. Nothing to see here. Just move along. -- Systemd: solving all the problems that you never knew you had.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-28 17:07 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <vkq0bh$1t4qk$2@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #681504 |
On 12/28/2024 4:01 PM, Farley Flud wrote: > On Sat, 28 Dec 2024 15:27:39 -0600, Physfitfreak wrote: > >> >> I bet a thing like a much better AI than chatGPT exists but is not >> accessible by public. THAT machine would also tell you why zircon became >> important starting around late 1950s :) >> > > What you are saying is that AI (LLM) is just a cheap shortcut > to standard searches. > > Yep. That's all that it is. > > Nothing to see here. Just move along. > > Which standard search machine do you know of that does it in various languages simultaneously for you? -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-28 23:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pan$c1538$6c65cf63$f55a03f9$c362cdd@linux.rocks> |
| In reply to | #681519 |
On Sat, 28 Dec 2024 17:07:29 -0600, Physfitfreak wrote: > > Which standard search machine do you know of that does it in various > languages simultaneously for you? > Why would anyone want search results in multiple languages? There are ways of doing this without LLM AI. -- Systemd: solving all the problems that you never knew you had.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-28 18:24 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <i421njd5q73oc1i0ora8edq0kc552vjfc2@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #681522 |
Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> wrote: >On Sat, 28 Dec 2024 17:07:29 -0600, Physfitfreak wrote: > >> Which standard search machine do you know of that does it in various >> languages simultaneously for you? > >Why would anyone want search results in multiple languages? > >There are ways of doing this without LLM AI. There are ways of being sane, none of which you pursue. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-28 18:39 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <vkq5nc$1t7c9$1@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #681522 |
On 12/28/2024 5:20 PM, Farley Flud wrote: > Why would anyone want search results in multiple languages? > > There are ways of doing this without LLM AI. When I forget a word in English, or Persian (or both sometimes), I use chatGPT. I can have it list all words in both languages that's close match to what I explained to the AI. Then zero in on better matches by asking AI to give all usages for them in both languages. Then I'd know what word it was that would give the closest meaning to what I had in mind. -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-29 09:23 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pan$53c42$b70b59d7$3e73a7a4$f0f8386c@linux.rocks> |
| In reply to | #681537 |
On Sat, 28 Dec 2024 18:39:07 -0600, Physfitfreak wrote: > > When I forget a word in English, or Persian (or both sometimes), I use > chatGPT. I can have it list all words in both languages that's close > match to what I explained to the AI. Then zero in on better matches by > asking AI to give all usages for them in both languages. Then I'd know > what word it was that would give the closest meaning to what I had in mind. > There are probably ways to do this without having to invoke the enormous computational resources of LLM AI. Since I am essentially monolingual I can't be more specific but it would seem that bilingual writers/translators would have used similar tools, both digital and non-digital, for a long time. -- Systemd: solving all the problems that you never knew you had.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-30 19:14 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <vkvd1r$1rt3s$8@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #681572 |
On 12/29/2024 4:23 AM, Lying Larry Piet wrote: > I am essentially monolingual Other side of piehole: "I have read Sigmund Freud, in the original German, at the age of sixteen." Were you lying then, or are you lying now?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-30 19:57 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <vkvj20$203r4$1@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #681572 |
On 12/29/2024 3:23 AM, Farley Flud wrote: > On Sat, 28 Dec 2024 18:39:07 -0600, Physfitfreak wrote: > >> >> When I forget a word in English, or Persian (or both sometimes), I use >> chatGPT. I can have it list all words in both languages that's close >> match to what I explained to the AI. Then zero in on better matches by >> asking AI to give all usages for them in both languages. Then I'd know >> what word it was that would give the closest meaning to what I had in mind. >> > > There are probably ways to do this without having to invoke the > enormous computational resources of LLM AI. > > Since I am essentially monolingual I can't be more specific but > it would seem that bilingual writers/translators would have used > similar tools, both digital and non-digital, for a long time. > > > > > Such services are probably not free. -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-26 20:01 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <vkl1pt$1dmd8$1@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #681239 |
On 12/25/2024 11:48 AM, Farley Flud wrote: > Well, Intel does provide "tunnels" through the vanes to accommodate a screwdriver > but an 8-inch screwdriver shaft would be needed. The best I have is a shaft of about > 4 inches. > > I ain't about to purchase a screwdriver with an 8-inch shaft. The very long thin ones are a bout a dollar each in harbor freight. -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-26 20:03 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <vkl1t8$1dmd8$2@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #681239 |
On 12/25/2024 11:48 AM, Farley Flud wrote: > Rome was not built in a day. > > Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha! > But fell in a day. I'm keen to see if your Xeon works with linux. -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-30 18:50 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <vkvbjm$1rt3s$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #681239 |
On 12/25/2024 12:48 PM, Lameass Larry Piet wrote: > I have 1/4" screwdriver sockets with a 12-inch shaft but those will not fit through > the heat sink "tunnels." > > So I have to take my Phillips screwdriver with a 4-inch shaft and angle it about > 30 degrees and then provide additional force to tighten the screws. It works but > it is not the ideal solution. You and your drag-queen drama make everything difficult. You don't have to use a Phillips head screwdriver to tighten Phillips head screws. In a situation like this where you don't need much torque, use a long, thin slot head screwdriver. If you don't have long screwdrivers, go buy them for cheap. Or use the thumb screws on the heat sink. If you put the mobo in the case first and you can't reach the thumb screws from above, slap yourself and start over.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6]
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web