Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #467242 > unrolled thread

a little bit closer

Started byowl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
First post2018-09-15 16:12 +0000
Last post2018-09-15 18:36 -0700
Articles 20 on this page of 207 — 16 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

Contents

  a little bit closer owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-09-15 16:12 +0000
    Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-15 12:04 -0700
    Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-15 18:02 -0400
      Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-15 18:11 -0400
        Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-15 19:22 -0700
        Re: a little bit closer owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-09-16 11:24 +0000
          Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-16 13:00 -0400
            Re: a little bit closer "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-09-16 20:39 +0000
              Re: a little bit closer Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-16 21:04 +0000
                Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 14:33 -0700
                Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 08:55 -0700
                  Re: a little bit closer fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-09-17 09:09 -0700
                    Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 10:03 -0700
                    Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-17 13:01 -0400
                      Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 10:20 -0700
                Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-17 13:55 -0400
                  Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 11:02 -0700
                    Re: a little bit closer Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-17 11:48 -0700
                    Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-17 16:29 -0400
                      Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 13:49 -0700
                        Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 14:15 -0700
                        Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-17 17:14 -0400
                          Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 14:28 -0700
                            Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-17 19:26 -0400
                              Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 16:46 -0700
                                Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-17 21:43 -0400
                                  Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-17 22:03 -0400
                                    Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 19:11 -0700
                                    (Sub)Threads drift, big time. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-17 20:23 -0700
                                  (Sub)Threads are ReConstructed using _ parents (!GrandParents). Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-17 19:29 -0700
                                    Re: (Sub)Threads are ReConstructed using _ parents (!GrandParents). DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-17 23:12 -0400
                                      Re: (Sub)Threads are ReConstructed using _ parents (!GrandParents). Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 20:29 -0700
                                      20 years hard labor, sans food. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-17 21:58 -0700
                          Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 14:46 -0700
                        Re: a little bit closer Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-17 19:45 -0700
                      Re: a little bit closer Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-17 19:46 -0700
                  Re: a little bit closer Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-17 11:48 -0700
                  Re: a little bit closer SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-17 21:47 +0000
                    Re: a little bit closer "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-09-17 22:53 +0000
                      Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 15:57 -0700
                      Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-19 09:47 -0400
              Re: a little bit closer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2018-09-16 23:19 +0200
                Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 14:48 -0700
              Re: a little bit closer chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-17 11:42 -0500
                Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-17 16:37 -0400
                  Re: a little bit closer SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-17 23:37 +0000
                    Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-17 21:24 -0400
                      Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 18:55 -0700
              Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-17 13:19 -0400
                Re: a little bit closer fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-09-17 10:35 -0700
                  Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-17 16:31 -0400
                    Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 13:59 -0700
                Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 10:52 -0700
                Re: a little bit closer fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-09-17 12:03 -0700
                Re: a little bit closer fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-09-17 12:26 -0700
                  Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-17 16:20 -0400
                    Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 13:42 -0700
                      Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-17 22:10 -0400
                        Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 19:26 -0700
            Re: a little bit closer fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-09-17 06:58 -0700
              Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-17 07:28 -0700
              Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-18 22:11 -0400
                Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 19:33 -0700
                Re: a little bit closer fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-09-19 05:53 -0700
                  Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-19 09:33 -0400
                    Re: a little bit closer fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-09-19 06:52 -0700
                      Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-19 11:19 -0400
                        Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 08:36 -0700
                          Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 12:29 -0700
                        Re: a little bit closer fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-09-19 08:39 -0700
                          Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 09:08 -0700
                          Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 13:32 -0700
                          Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-22 09:27 -0400
                            Re: a little bit closer owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-09-22 15:01 +0000
                              Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-22 20:47 -0400
                            Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 11:01 -0700
                              Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 11:18 -0700
                                Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 11:41 -0700
                                Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 11:47 -0700
                                  Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 12:12 -0700
                                Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-23 00:21 -0400
                                  Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 10:02 -0700
                                    Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 10:59 -0700
                                      Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 11:21 -0700
                                    Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-23 14:43 -0400
                                      Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 12:28 -0700
                                        Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 12:56 -0700
                                        Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 16:04 -0700
                                          Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 17:07 -0700
                                        Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-24 09:20 -0400
                                          Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 06:43 -0700
                                      Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 14:18 -0700
                                        Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-23 19:30 -0400
                                          Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 16:51 -0700
                                            Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 20:15 -0700
                                          Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 17:04 -0700
                                            Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-24 09:26 -0400
                                              Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 06:58 -0700
                                              Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 08:56 -0700
                                                Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-24 12:33 -0400
                                                  Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-24 12:44 -0400
                                                  Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 10:54 -0700
                                                    Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 11:39 -0700
                                                    Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-25 13:13 -0400
                                                      Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-25 14:26 -0400
                                                      Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 09:00 -0700
                                                        Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-26 19:40 -0400
                                                          Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:40 -0700
                                                  Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 11:13 -0700
                                                    Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-25 13:11 -0400
                                    Re: a little bit closer fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-09-24 07:53 -0700
                                      Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 09:03 -0700
                                        Re: a little bit closer "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-09-24 22:32 +0000
                                          Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-25 12:04 -0400
                              Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 11:25 -0700
                              Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-22 21:05 -0400
                                Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 10:00 -0700
                                  Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 10:34 -0700
                  Re: a little bit closer owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-09-19 22:04 +0000
                    Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 15:22 -0700
                    Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-20 23:55 -0400
                      Re: a little bit closer Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-21 04:02 +0000
                        Re: a little bit closer Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-21 06:54 -0400
                          Re: a little bit closer Mel <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-21 13:31 +0200
                            Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 04:52 -0700
                            Re: a little bit closer owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-09-21 16:07 +0000
                              Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 10:53 -0700
                          Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 04:37 -0700
                          Re: a little bit closer chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 07:24 -0500
                            Re: a little bit closer SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-21 12:45 +0000
                              Re: a little bit closer Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 07:47 -0700
                            Re: a little bit closer Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 07:51 -0700
                            Re: a little bit closer RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 16:47 +0000
                              Re: a little bit closer SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-22 20:13 +0000
                                Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 13:30 -0700
                                  Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 16:06 -0700
                                Re: a little bit closer Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-22 17:02 -0700
                              Re: a little bit closer Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-22 17:01 -0700
                              Re: a little bit closer chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 07:33 -0500
                                Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 06:11 -0700
                                Re: a little bit closer Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 07:54 -0700
                          Re: a little bit closer SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-21 12:41 +0000
                            Re: a little bit closer Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 07:48 -0700
                            Re: a little bit closer Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-22 07:08 -0400
                              Re: a little bit closer SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-22 14:36 +0000
                                Re: a little bit closer Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-23 08:35 -0400
                                  Re: a little bit closer SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-23 13:58 +0000
                                    Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 07:41 -0700
                                    Re: a little bit closer Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-23 07:47 -0700
                                  Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-23 10:34 -0400
                                  Re: a little bit closer Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-23 07:44 -0700
                                    Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 08:13 -0700
                              Re: a little bit closer owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-09-22 14:51 +0000
                                Re: a little bit closer Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-23 08:39 -0400
                              Re: a little bit closer Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-22 13:43 -0700
                                Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 14:01 -0700
                            Re: a little bit closer RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 16:51 +0000
                              Re: a little bit closer SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-22 20:13 +0000
                                Re: a little bit closer chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 07:45 -0500
                                  Re: a little bit closer SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-24 20:51 +0000
                                    Re: a little bit closer Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 13:55 -0700
                                    Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 14:16 -0700
                      Re: a little bit closer SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-21 12:31 +0000
                        Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 06:41 -0700
                        Re: a little bit closer Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 07:50 -0700
                        Re: a little bit closer owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-09-21 16:01 +0000
                          Re: a little bit closer Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 10:45 -0700
                            Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:09 -0700
                              Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 22:56 -0700
                        Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-22 08:55 -0400
                          Re: a little bit closer owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-09-22 14:51 +0000
                            Re: a little bit closer Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-23 08:42 -0400
                      Re: a little bit closer owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-09-21 14:03 +0000
                        Re: a little bit closer Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 07:38 -0700
                          Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 07:44 -0700
                        Re: a little bit closer owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-09-22 03:04 +0000
                          Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 20:20 -0700
                          Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 01:01 -0700
                          Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-22 09:54 -0400
                  Re: a little bit closer Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-20 14:58 -0400
                    Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 12:41 -0700
              Re: a little bit closer chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-19 07:09 -0500
                Re: a little bit closer fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-09-19 05:58 -0700
                  Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 06:14 -0700
            Re: a little bit closer owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-09-18 05:31 +0000
              Re: a little bit closer owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-09-18 17:12 +0000
                Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 10:44 -0700
                Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 14:06 -0700
                Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-18 23:05 -0400
                  Re: a little bit closer owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-09-19 04:17 +0000
                    Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 21:54 -0700
                    Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-19 09:02 -0400
                      Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 06:30 -0700
                      Re: a little bit closer owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-09-19 22:08 +0000
                        Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 15:37 -0700
                        Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-20 23:59 -0400
                          Re: a little bit closer Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-21 04:03 +0000
                            Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-21 00:50 -0400
                              Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 22:03 -0700
                              Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 22:19 -0700
                  Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 22:42 -0700
              Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 12:34 -0700
      Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-15 15:28 -0700
      Re: a little bit closer DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-15 19:24 -0400
        Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-15 16:32 -0700
        Re: a little bit closer Special Edd <shortbus1963me@mail.com> - 2018-09-15 19:48 -0400
        Re: a little bit closer Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-15 18:36 -0700

Page 7 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 5 6 [7] 8 9 … 11  Next page →

#468084

FromDFS <nospam@nospam.com>
Date2018-09-20 23:55 -0400
Message-ID<x_ZoD.56987$vJ1.52302@fx05.iad>
In reply to#467933
On 9/19/2018 6:04 PM, owl wrote:

> A personalized GUI tool can tie things together just the way you want.
> https://imgur.com/a/2SRPnyi


Helloooo 1982!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#468087

FromMelzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com>
Date2018-09-21 04:02 +0000
Message-ID<43_oD.264748$cw.207599@fx42.am4>
In reply to#468084
On 2018-09-21, DFS <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
> On 9/19/2018 6:04 PM, owl wrote:
>
>> A personalized GUI tool can tie things together just the way you want.
>> https://imgur.com/a/2SRPnyi
>
>
> Helloooo 1982!
>
Naaah, it's more lake late 80es and early 90es ;)

-- 
press any key to continue or any other to quit...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#468119

FromChris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us>
Date2018-09-21 06:54 -0400
Message-ID<po2jqe$2g6$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#468087
Melzzzzz wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> On 2018-09-21, DFS <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
>> On 9/19/2018 6:04 PM, owl wrote:
>>
>>> A personalized GUI tool can tie things together just the way you want.
>>> https://imgur.com/a/2SRPnyi
>>
>> Helloooo 1982!
>>
> Naaah, it's more lake late 80es and early 90es ;)

The look depends on the window manager.  Pick a different window manager.

Almost any Linux window manager will work better and often look better
than Windows 10.  The Win 10 desktop has a fair number of bugs and
annoyances.  Give me my fully-configured Fluxbox setup any day.
Far faster and total compliant to my fingerstips.

-- 
Wrinkles should merely indicate where smiles have been.
		-- Mark Twain

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#468121

FromMel <mel@zzzzz.com>
Date2018-09-21 13:31 +0200
Message-ID<almarsoft.222662698504891704@news.albasani.net>
In reply to#468119
On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 06:54:15 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom 
<OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
> Melzzzzz wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:


> > On 2018-09-21, DFS <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
> >> On 9/19/2018 6:04 PM, owl wrote:
> >>
> >>> A personalized GUI tool can tie things together just the way 
you want.
> >>> https://imgur.com/a/2SRPnyi
> >>
> >> Helloooo 1982!
> >>
> > Naaah, it's more lake late 80es and early 90es ;)


> The look depends on the window manager.  Pick a different window 
manager.


> Almost any Linux window manager will work better and often look 
better
> than Windows 10.  The Win 10 desktop has a fair number of bugs and
> annoyances.  Give me my fully-configured Fluxbox setup any day.
> Far faster and total compliant to my fingerstips.

That looks like motif, I don't think Window manager can help :)

-- 
Press any key to continue or any other to quit

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#468123

FromSteve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-21 04:52 -0700
Message-ID<ed970282-b2a2-4a4e-9cfe-30338f4bda63@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#468121
On Friday, September 21, 2018 at 4:31:19 AM UTC-7, Mel wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 06:54:15 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom 
> <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
> > Melzzzzz wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
> 
> 
> > > On 2018-09-21, DFS <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
> > >> On 9/19/2018 6:04 PM, owl wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> A personalized GUI tool can tie things together just the way 
> you want.
> > >>> https://imgur.com/a/2SRPnyi
> > >>
> > >> Helloooo 1982!
> > >>
> > > Naaah, it's more lake late 80es and early 90es ;)
> 
> 
> > The look depends on the window manager.  Pick a different window 
> manager.
> 
> 
> > Almost any Linux window manager will work better and often look 
> better
> > than Windows 10.  The Win 10 desktop has a fair number of bugs and
> > annoyances.  Give me my fully-configured Fluxbox setup any day.
> > Far faster and total compliant to my fingerstips.
> 
> That looks like motif, I don't think Window manager can help :)
> 
> -- 
> Press any key to continue or any other to quit



I have a custom setup I use as well, but it's a bit different. In fact Klaus Schadenfreude's lies were quoted time and time again. So obviously I regret not attacking Klaus Schadenfreude. While I am sure the trolls appreciated it, being nice to him made things worse. Spending effort likely researching a problem isn't wasted time. Believing you know all and attempting to 'prove' others that it is true, as Klaus Schadenfreude tries to do? *That* is a waste ;) 

I could answer Klaus Schadenfreude directly but he's a fool who plays trolling games to realize his aspiration to call everyone a liar. I am working on a script which will be more than anything Klaus Schadenfreude can do! Are you being stupid on purpose? It was Klaus Schadenfreude who was openly asking how better to obscure his forgeries. When I was being honest, I wanted to be fair and unbiased. I gave Klaus Schadenfreude more than a rational person should. 



--
This Trick Gets Women Hot For You!!
http://www.5z8.info/yourdick_v1o3ww_manhunter
Jonas Eklundh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#468180

Fromowl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Date2018-09-21 16:07 +0000
Message-ID<t0a8b0a.by@rooftop.invalid>
In reply to#468121
Mel <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 06:54:15 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom 
> <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
>> Melzzzzz wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
> 
> 
>> > On 2018-09-21, DFS <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
>> >> On 9/19/2018 6:04 PM, owl wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> A personalized GUI tool can tie things together just the way 
> you want.
>> >>> https://imgur.com/a/2SRPnyi
>> >>
>> >> Helloooo 1982!
>> >>
>> > Naaah, it's more lake late 80es and early 90es ;)
> 
> 
>> The look depends on the window manager.  Pick a different window 
> manager.
> 
> 
>> Almost any Linux window manager will work better and often look 
> better
>> than Windows 10.  The Win 10 desktop has a fair number of bugs and
>> annoyances.  Give me my fully-configured Fluxbox setup any day.
>> Far faster and total compliant to my fingerstips.
> 
> That looks like motif, I don't think Window manager can help :)
> 

Nothing wrong with motif look.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#468195

FromSteve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-21 10:53 -0700
Message-ID<e14e5f59-9323-4a1e-a8fe-b8c280f70a2d@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#468180
On Friday, September 21, 2018 at 9:08:00 AM UTC-7, owl wrote:
> Mel <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 06:54:15 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom 
> > <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
> >> Melzzzzz wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
> > 
> > 
> >> > On 2018-09-21, DFS <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
> >> >> On 9/19/2018 6:04 PM, owl wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> A personalized GUI tool can tie things together just the way 
> > you want.
> >> >>> https://imgur.com/a/2SRPnyi
> >> >>
> >> >> Helloooo 1982!
> >> >>
> >> > Naaah, it's more lake late 80es and early 90es ;)
> > 
> > 
> >> The look depends on the window manager.  Pick a different window 
> > manager.
> > 
> > 
> >> Almost any Linux window manager will work better and often look 
> > better
> >> than Windows 10.  The Win 10 desktop has a fair number of bugs and
> >> annoyances.  Give me my fully-configured Fluxbox setup any day.
> >> Far faster and total compliant to my fingerstips.
> > 
> > That looks like motif, I don't think Window manager can help :)
> > 
> 
> Nothing wrong with motif look.



Sigmond shows that all of them are not automated because some of them tap into what William Poaster said in very specific ways that underscore they are a response, so not from a computer auto-generator. Seriously, those of you who troll are not able to check William Poaster anymore. Enlightenment is probably my second favorite DE and the only one I advocate to Linux users. Primary interface is KDE, though. A good toolchain is all you require after Sigmond messes things up. 

I don't know if there is a encumbered open sores solution. How is LibreOffice on Linux doing anything above the lowest common denominator? 

Undeniably, the top thing that matters to Sigmond is thinking he is "the winner", and if he can not have that he will create socks to effectively slap William Poaster down, which only serves to destroy discussion. 



--
Live on Kickstarter!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4xD43Khhkw
https://youtu.be/D_so1dvjeyI
Jonas Eklundh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#468122

FromSteve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-21 04:37 -0700
Message-ID<0f36c135-92b9-40c1-b6ae-d8af34572abe@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#468119
On Friday, September 21, 2018 at 4:14:24 AM UTC-7, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> Melzzzzz wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
> 
> > On 2018-09-21, DFS <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
> >> On 9/19/2018 6:04 PM, owl wrote:
> >>
> >>> A personalized GUI tool can tie things together just the way you want.
> >>> https://imgur.com/a/2SRPnyi
> >>
> >> Helloooo 1982!
> >>
> > Naaah, it's more lake late 80es and early 90es ;)
> 
> The look depends on the window manager.  Pick a different window manager.
> 
> Almost any Linux window manager will work better and often look better
> than Windows 10.  The Win 10 desktop has a fair number of bugs and
> annoyances.  Give me my fully-configured Fluxbox setup any day.
> Far faster and total compliant to my fingerstips.
> 
> -- 
> Wrinkles should merely indicate where smiles have been.
> 		-- Mark Twain



The text of the post is a bunch of gibbering flatfish+++-like crap. Only glue sniffing would lead to that. This is merely a joy of flatfish+++'s. Linux offers the least choice. Contrary to flatfish+++'s claim that he has "no skill in making a flood bot" (a lie as illustrated by the fact that he destroyed CSMA with his crap) he was seen asking support staff how they would install a virus remotely. Already moved on from that. Keep up! 

Turns out flatfish+++'s constant mentioning of vallor met his own definition of trolling, so he pretended he never said that. 



- 
One Smart Penny!
https://youtu.be/48_DdtLGR9s
Jonas Eklundh Communication

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#468127

Fromchrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
Date2018-09-21 07:24 -0500
Message-ID<bgo9qdhn3rqc8rvdqur4vm304ii0ktsqmf@4ax.com>
In reply to#468119
Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

>The look depends on the window manager.  Pick a different window manager.
>
>Almost any Linux window manager will work better and often look better
>than Windows 10.  The Win 10 desktop has a fair number of bugs and
>annoyances.  Give me my fully-configured Fluxbox setup any day.
>Far faster and total compliant to my fingerstips.

Don't you know that the desktop Linux community should be mocked and
ridiculed, because they cannot agree on one "best" desktop environment
for all?

Those "deep thinkers" are *so* much smarter than everyone else, you
see.  If only *they* could dictate and control, everyone would be
better-off!

-- 
"I think the multi-distro thing is a total waste of potential
Linux/OSS resources who are all pulling in different directions."
-  "Hadron"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#468135

FromSilverSlimer <silver@slim.er>
Date2018-09-21 12:45 +0000
Message-ID<vJ5pD.138923$4S3.43650@fx47.iad>
In reply to#468127
On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 07:24:38 -0500, chrisv wrote:

> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> 
>>The look depends on the window manager.  Pick a different window
>>manager.
>>
>>Almost any Linux window manager will work better and often look better
>>than Windows 10.  The Win 10 desktop has a fair number of bugs and
>>annoyances.  Give me my fully-configured Fluxbox setup any day.
>>Far faster and total compliant to my fingerstips.
> 
> Don't you know that the desktop Linux community should be mocked and
> ridiculed, because they cannot agree on one "best" desktop environment
> for all?
> 
> Those "deep thinkers" are *so* much smarter than everyone else, you see.
>  If only *they* could dictate and control, everyone would be better-off!

I vote that we abandon all desktops other than whatever a committee 
headed by Snit chooses. For increased productivity and error-reduction, 
of course. 

-- 
SilverSlimer
FSF Contributor / EFF Member / Free speech advocate
Absolute centrist, proud Catholic

"Given the nasty lies that Alex Jones tells, I am not going to go
to bat for him in particular." - "Wretched" Richard Stallman, who also 
believes Brett Kavanaugh to be guilty despite the lack of proof and Keith 
Ellison to be innocent despite the abundance of it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#468151

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2018-09-21 07:47 -0700
Message-ID<g0kej6F765mU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#468135
On 9/21/18 5:45 AM, SilverSlimer wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 07:24:38 -0500, chrisv wrote:
> 
>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>
>>> The look depends on the window manager.  Pick a different window
>>> manager.
>>>
>>> Almost any Linux window manager will work better and often look better
>>> than Windows 10.  The Win 10 desktop has a fair number of bugs and
>>> annoyances.  Give me my fully-configured Fluxbox setup any day.
>>> Far faster and total compliant to my fingerstips.
>>
>> Don't you know that the desktop Linux community should be mocked and
>> ridiculed, because they cannot agree on one "best" desktop environment
>> for all?
>>
>> Those "deep thinkers" are *so* much smarter than everyone else, you see.
>>   If only *they* could dictate and control, everyone would be better-off!
> 
> I vote that we abandon all desktops other than whatever a committee
> headed by Snit chooses. For increased productivity and error-reduction,
> of course.
> 

Another example of not only obsessing over me but also getting my views 
completely wrong. Remember, I am the one who pushes for MORE choice... I 
want the desktop Linux ecosystem to grow so that the distro managers, or 
YOU, the end user, can fairly easily set up YOUR system the way you like it.

Maybe you like simple Open dialogs... sparse and focused. Maybe you like 
them feature-packed, allowing you to rename and move files and get 
previews and more. YOU decide. And YOU get to have it work on the system 
as a whole... on (pretty much) every program.

Maybe you like a simple color selector, say a list of crayons or a color 
wheel. Fine. You have it and it applies to ALL programs on your system 
which use a color selector. Or maybe you want it web focused where it 
gives all sorts of options for RGB, RGBA, HSL, HSLA and shows it in 
values 0 to 255 as well as percentages. Cool. YOU decide.

And, of course, if you want it to be a simple color selector for most 
programs but a web based on (or whatever) for another you can do that.

No reason to not allow the USER to have such choice for colors, open, 
save, print, fonts, sharing, and more. Yes, the examples I use are ones 
I am familiar with from macOS, but there is NO REASON to limit it to 
what macOS does (and macOS does not have the type of flexibility I am 
describing).

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#468156

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2018-09-21 07:51 -0700
Message-ID<g0kereF765mU6@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#468127
On 9/21/18 5:24 AM, chrisv wrote:
> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> 
>> The look depends on the window manager.  Pick a different window manager.
>>
>> Almost any Linux window manager will work better and often look better
>> than Windows 10.  The Win 10 desktop has a fair number of bugs and
>> annoyances.  Give me my fully-configured Fluxbox setup any day.
>> Far faster and total compliant to my fingerstips.
> 
> Don't you know that the desktop Linux community should be mocked and
> ridiculed, because they cannot agree on one "best" desktop environment
> for all?
> 
> Those "deep thinkers" are *so* much smarter than everyone else, you
> see.  If only *they* could dictate and control, everyone would be
> better-off!

I would love to see more choice on the Linux desktop... I do not like 
how limiting it is.


-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#468353

FromRonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-22 16:47 +0000
Message-ID<po5rnj$ur5$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#468127
On 2018-09-21, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>>The look depends on the window manager.  Pick a different window manager.
>>
>>Almost any Linux window manager will work better and often look better
>>than Windows 10.  The Win 10 desktop has a fair number of bugs and
>>annoyances.  Give me my fully-configured Fluxbox setup any day.
>>Far faster and total compliant to my fingerstips.
>
> Don't you know that the desktop Linux community should be mocked and
> ridiculed, because they cannot agree on one "best" desktop environment
> for all?
>
> Those "deep thinkers" are *so* much smarter than everyone else, you
> see.  If only *they* could dictate and control, everyone would be
> better-off!

I don't know who wrote the original post, or what it said, but I'm guessing 
it's "Snit" and he's rambling on about his "consistent UI" horse crap again. 
I think Mac users are fundamentally control freaks and cranks.

-- 
The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#468383

FromSilverSlimer <silver@slim.er>
Date2018-09-22 20:13 +0000
Message-ID<nnxpD.31749$xo2.10327@fx31.iad>
In reply to#468353
On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 16:47:47 +0000, RonB wrote:

> On 2018-09-21, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>
>>>The look depends on the window manager.  Pick a different window
>>>manager.
>>>
>>>Almost any Linux window manager will work better and often look better
>>>than Windows 10.  The Win 10 desktop has a fair number of bugs and
>>>annoyances.  Give me my fully-configured Fluxbox setup any day.
>>>Far faster and total compliant to my fingerstips.
>>
>> Don't you know that the desktop Linux community should be mocked and
>> ridiculed, because they cannot agree on one "best" desktop environment
>> for all?
>>
>> Those "deep thinkers" are *so* much smarter than everyone else, you
>> see.  If only *they* could dictate and control, everyone would be
>> better-off!
> 
> I don't know who wrote the original post, or what it said, but I'm
> guessing it's "Snit" and he's rambling on about his "consistent UI"
> horse crap again.
> I think Mac users are fundamentally control freaks and cranks.

Which is why Apple, MacOS and Communism work so well together.

<http://dailycaller.com/2017/08/13/power-and-billion-of-dollars-apples-
deal-with-communist-china-and-why-they-did-it/>

-- 
SilverSlimer
FSF Contributor / EFF Member / Free speech advocate
Absolute centrist, proud Catholic

"Given the nasty lies that Alex Jones tells, I am not going to go
to bat for him in particular." - "Wretched" Richard Stallman, who also 
believes Brett Kavanaugh to be guilty despite the lack of proof and Keith 
Ellison to be innocent despite the abundance of it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#468385

FromSteve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-22 13:30 -0700
Message-ID<7dab610a-638d-420d-af43-20b98b7b3f9c@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#468383
On Saturday, September 22, 2018 at 1:13:10 PM UTC-7, SilverSlimer wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 16:47:47 +0000, RonB wrote:
> 
> > On 2018-09-21, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> >> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> >>
> >>>The look depends on the window manager.  Pick a different window
> >>>manager.
> >>>
> >>>Almost any Linux window manager will work better and often look better
> >>>than Windows 10.  The Win 10 desktop has a fair number of bugs and
> >>>annoyances.  Give me my fully-configured Fluxbox setup any day.
> >>>Far faster and total compliant to my fingerstips.
> >>
> >> Don't you know that the desktop Linux community should be mocked and
> >> ridiculed, because they cannot agree on one "best" desktop environment
> >> for all?
> >>
> >> Those "deep thinkers" are *so* much smarter than everyone else, you
> >> see.  If only *they* could dictate and control, everyone would be
> >> better-off!
> > 
> > I don't know who wrote the original post, or what it said, but I'm
> > guessing it's "Snit" and he's rambling on about his "consistent UI"
> > horse crap again.
> > I think Mac users are fundamentally control freaks and cranks.
> 
> Which is why Apple, MacOS and Communism work so well together.
> 
> <http://dailycaller.com/2017/08/13/power-and-billion-of-dollars-apples-
> deal-with-communist-china-and-why-they-did-it/>
> 
> -- 
> SilverSlimer
> FSF Contributor / EFF Member / Free speech advocate
> Absolute centrist, proud Catholic
> 
> "Given the nasty lies that Alex Jones tells, I am not going to go
> to bat for him in particular." - "Wretched" Richard Stallman, who also 
> believes Brett Kavanaugh to be guilty despite the lack of proof and Keith 
> Ellison to be innocent despite the abundance of it.



Good grief, just recently he was declaring himself the only "true Linux advocate", and claiming that "advocates" (in scare-quotes just to annoy people) are insisting desktop Linux is perfect as is. 

Klaus Schadenfreude asked to be rated according to direct statistical evidence, which Steven Petruzzellis obliged him with. Technologies change. Maybe the idea of a website is getting a little dated. 

--
Curious how these posts are made? www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ZNxaaKD7-c

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#468402

FromSteve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-22 16:06 -0700
Message-ID<dd50a6c6-dc9a-461a-8706-b355af10338c@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#468385
On Saturday, September 22, 2018 at 1:31:01 PM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Saturday, September 22, 2018 at 1:13:10 PM UTC-7, SilverSlimer wrote:
> > On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 16:47:47 +0000, RonB wrote:
> > 
> > > On 2018-09-21, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> > >> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> > >>
> > >>>The look depends on the window manager.  Pick a different window
> > >>>manager.
> > >>>
> > >>>Almost any Linux window manager will work better and often look better
> > >>>than Windows 10.  The Win 10 desktop has a fair number of bugs and
> > >>>annoyances.  Give me my fully-configured Fluxbox setup any day.
> > >>>Far faster and total compliant to my fingerstips.
> > >>
> > >> Don't you know that the desktop Linux community should be mocked and
> > >> ridiculed, because they cannot agree on one "best" desktop environment
> > >> for all?
> > >>
> > >> Those "deep thinkers" are *so* much smarter than everyone else, you
> > >> see.  If only *they* could dictate and control, everyone would be
> > >> better-off!
> > > 
> > > I don't know who wrote the original post, or what it said, but I'm
> > > guessing it's "Snit" and he's rambling on about his "consistent UI"
> > > horse crap again.
> > > I think Mac users are fundamentally control freaks and cranks.
> > 
> > Which is why Apple, MacOS and Communism work so well together.
> > 
> > <http://dailycaller.com/2017/08/13/power-and-billion-of-dollars-apples-
> > deal-with-communist-china-and-why-they-did-it/>
> > 
> > -- 
> > SilverSlimer
> > FSF Contributor / EFF Member / Free speech advocate
> > Absolute centrist, proud Catholic
> > 
> > "Given the nasty lies that Alex Jones tells, I am not going to go
> > to bat for him in particular." - "Wretched" Richard Stallman, who also 
> > believes Brett Kavanaugh to be guilty despite the lack of proof and Keith 
> > Ellison to be innocent despite the abundance of it.
> 
> 
> 
> Good grief, just recently he was declaring himself the only "true Linux advocate", and claiming that "advocates" (in scare-quotes just to annoy people) are insisting desktop Linux is perfect as is. 
> 
> Klaus Schadenfreude asked to be rated according to direct statistical evidence, which Steven Petruzzellis obliged him with. Technologies change. Maybe the idea of a website is getting a little dated. 
> 
> --
> Curious how these posts are made? www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ZNxaaKD7-c



F. Russell asked to be rated according to objective trolling criteria, which I indulged. Lines of text containing blips and bloops. Do not get too confident, F. Russell, sometimes "cigars" are just that. 

F. Russell-like idiots are still babbling about the GNU/Linux "UI" as if they think it even potentially is something we would want. 

Just some names Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll has used
    "Evil" John *
    "Evil" Snit *
    Big Crotch on a Small Fish
    Cornelius Munshower
    CSMA Moderator
    Edward Stanfield
    Fretwiz *
    Hitman Hero
    Measles
    Petruzzellis Kids
    Sigmond
    Slaveen
    Smit
    Steve C *
    Steve Camoll *
    Steve Carroll <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx> *
    Steve Carroll <stevecarroll@xxxxxxxxxxx> *
    Steve Carroll <trollkiller@xxxxxx> *
    Steve Carroll's Dog *
    Steve Carrolll *
    Steve Carrroll *
    Yevette Owens
    Yobo_Obyo


--
Live on Kickstarter!
https://youtu.be/TETJEkaUoY4
Jonas Eklundh Communication AB

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#468407

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2018-09-22 17:02 -0700
Message-ID<g0o3gqFubq8U2@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#468383
On 9/22/18 1:13 PM, SilverSlimer wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 16:47:47 +0000, RonB wrote:
> 
>> On 2018-09-21, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>
>>>> The look depends on the window manager.  Pick a different window
>>>> manager.
>>>>
>>>> Almost any Linux window manager will work better and often look better
>>>> than Windows 10.  The Win 10 desktop has a fair number of bugs and
>>>> annoyances.  Give me my fully-configured Fluxbox setup any day.
>>>> Far faster and total compliant to my fingerstips.
>>>
>>> Don't you know that the desktop Linux community should be mocked and
>>> ridiculed, because they cannot agree on one "best" desktop environment
>>> for all?
>>>
>>> Those "deep thinkers" are *so* much smarter than everyone else, you
>>> see.  If only *they* could dictate and control, everyone would be
>>> better-off!
>>
>> I don't know who wrote the original post, or what it said, but I'm
>> guessing it's "Snit" and he's rambling on about his "consistent UI"
>> horse crap again.
>> I think Mac users are fundamentally control freaks and cranks.
> 
> Which is why Apple, MacOS and Communism work so well together.
> 
> <http://dailycaller.com/2017/08/13/power-and-billion-of-dollars-apples-
> deal-with-communist-china-and-why-they-did-it/>
> 

RonB's delusions make you get deluded about Apple.

Oy.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#468406

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2018-09-22 17:01 -0700
Message-ID<g0o3e5Fubq8U1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#468353
On 9/22/18 9:47 AM, RonB wrote:
> On 2018-09-21, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>
>>> The look depends on the window manager.  Pick a different window manager.
>>>
>>> Almost any Linux window manager will work better and often look better
>>> than Windows 10.  The Win 10 desktop has a fair number of bugs and
>>> annoyances.  Give me my fully-configured Fluxbox setup any day.
>>> Far faster and total compliant to my fingerstips.
>>
>> Don't you know that the desktop Linux community should be mocked and
>> ridiculed, because they cannot agree on one "best" desktop environment
>> for all?
>>
>> Those "deep thinkers" are *so* much smarter than everyone else, you
>> see.  If only *they* could dictate and control, everyone would be
>> better-off!
> 
> I don't know who wrote the original post, or what it said, but I'm guessing
> it's "Snit" and he's rambling on about his "consistent UI" horse crap again.
> I think Mac users are fundamentally control freaks and cranks.
> 

Why do you fantasize about me so much? It is creepy and weird.

I say use what you like and my issue with the Linux ecosystem is the 
LACK of choice. I want MORE. I wrote about this (again) a couple days 
ago -- I think in this thread.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#468580

Fromchrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
Date2018-09-24 07:33 -0500
Message-ID<qjlhqdlcaunnks60lg50bnrfhjthhnma10@4ax.com>
In reply to#468353
RonB wrote:

> chrisv wrote:
>>
>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>
>>>The look depends on the window manager.  Pick a different window manager.
>>>
>>>Almost any Linux window manager will work better and often look better
>>>than Windows 10.  The Win 10 desktop has a fair number of bugs and
>>>annoyances.  Give me my fully-configured Fluxbox setup any day.
>>>Far faster and total compliant to my fingerstips.
>>
>> Don't you know that the desktop Linux community should be mocked and
>> ridiculed, because they cannot agree on one "best" desktop environment
>> for all?
>>
>> Those "deep thinkers" are *so* much smarter than everyone else, you
>> see.  If only *they* could dictate and control, everyone would be
>> better-off!
>
>I don't know who wrote the original post, or what it said, but I'm guessing 
>it's "Snit" and he's rambling on about his "consistent UI" horse crap again. 
>I think Mac users are fundamentally control freaks and cranks.

Nah, I just felt like trolling a bit.  Not that there's anyone left to
troll, in here.  I think the last asshole that I got to flame good was
"Wolf K", who insisted that GNU/Linux users not "standardizing" on a
single desktop environment could only be explained by "ego".

Fscking mental midgets, they are, yet they attack and ridicule those
who actually do "get it".

-- 
"choice : for the brain dead."  -  "True Linux advocate" Hadron Quark

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#468585

FromSteve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-24 06:11 -0700
Message-ID<dce32a5b-dfc7-4786-a218-ef0748813a05@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#468580
On Monday, September 24, 2018 at 5:33:41 AM UTC-7, chrisv wrote:
> RonB wrote:
> 
> > chrisv wrote:
> >>
> >> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> >>>
> >>>The look depends on the window manager.  Pick a different window manager.
> >>>
> >>>Almost any Linux window manager will work better and often look better
> >>>than Windows 10.  The Win 10 desktop has a fair number of bugs and
> >>>annoyances.  Give me my fully-configured Fluxbox setup any day.
> >>>Far faster and total compliant to my fingerstips.
> >>
> >> Don't you know that the desktop Linux community should be mocked and
> >> ridiculed, because they cannot agree on one "best" desktop environment
> >> for all?
> >>
> >> Those "deep thinkers" are *so* much smarter than everyone else, you
> >> see.  If only *they* could dictate and control, everyone would be
> >> better-off!
> >
> >I don't know who wrote the original post, or what it said, but I'm guessing 
> >it's "Snit" and he's rambling on about his "consistent UI" horse crap again. 
> >I think Mac users are fundamentally control freaks and cranks.
> 
> Nah, I just felt like trolling a bit.  Not that there's anyone left to
> troll, in here.  I think the last asshole that I got to flame good was
> "Wolf K", who insisted that GNU/Linux users not "standardizing" on a
> single desktop environment could only be explained by "ego".
> 
> Fscking mental midgets, they are, yet they attack and ridicule those
> who actually do "get it".
> 
> -- 
> "choice : for the brain dead."  -  "True Linux advocate" Hadron Quark



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

One thing that I have never seen spoofed is the Google acct. number so perhaps you can use it as a filtering criteria, too. Here's mine:

posting-account=qzPusQoAAADVdKNEKE-jqIVbecHp7oZ7 

My gmail posts go back to 2009 (that I've seen, crackhead's forgeries using gmail only go back to 2012). Notice the posting acct. number on this response matches this post from 2009:

<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/C9FwjiytRoA/ftc2GG7-37AJ>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
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=sC4v
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

- 
Top Six Ways Flooder Steve Carroll Trolls
https://youtu.be/IhOfBmWwCVY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AglvCo3dJ38&feature=youtu.be
Jonas Eklundh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 7 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 5 6 [7] 8 9 … 11  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web