Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #331198 > unrolled thread
| Started by | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-11-06 07:05 +0000 |
| Last post | 2015-11-06 09:13 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 65 — 11 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Poor Anne owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-06 07:05 +0000
Re: Poor Owl Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-06 09:45 +0000
Re: Poor Owl Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-06 11:28 +0100
Re: Poor Owl Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-06 11:33 +0000
Re: Poor Owl Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-06 12:51 +0100
Re: Poor Owl Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-06 12:24 +0000
Re: Poor Owl Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-06 13:31 +0100
Re: Poor Owl Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-06 13:00 +0000
Re: Poor Owl Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-06 14:33 +0100
Re: Poor Owl Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-06 09:12 -0700
Re: Poor Owl Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 07:03 -0800
Re: Poor Owl Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-09 08:53 +0000
Re: Poor Owl Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 06:46 -0800
Re: Poor Owl vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-09 22:58 +0000
Re: Poor Owl Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-10 09:25 +0000
Re: Poor Owl Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 09:30 -0700
Re: Poor Owl Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 08:44 -0800
Re: Poor Owl Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-06 09:09 -0700
Re: Poor Owl Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 08:47 -0800
Re: Poor Owl Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-06 09:11 -0700
Re: Poor Owl Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-06 09:11 -0700
Re: Poor Owl Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-06 09:09 -0700
Re: Poor Owl Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-06 10:50 -0500
Re: Poor Owl Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-06 09:16 -0700
Re: Poor Owl Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-06 09:10 -0700
Re: Poor Desk Rabbit owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-07 06:26 +0000
Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-07 08:49 -0500
Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-07 10:17 -0500
Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-07 10:56 -0700
Re: Poor Desk Rabbit owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-07 18:58 +0000
Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-07 14:10 -0500
Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-07 14:12 -0500
Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-07 09:26 -0800
Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-07 12:46 -0500
Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-07 13:10 -0500
Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-07 11:24 -0700
Snit's Support Of Incest. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-07 13:28 -0500
Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-07 10:58 -0800
Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-07 14:12 -0500
Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-07 13:27 -0500
Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-07 14:05 -0500
Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-07 12:49 -0800
Re: Poor Desk Rabbit owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-07 19:35 +0000
Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-07 11:38 -0800
Re: Poor Desk Rabbit owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-07 20:21 +0000
Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-07 13:38 -0700
Re: Poor Desk Rabbit owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-07 21:42 +0000
Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-07 15:39 -0700
Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2015-11-08 01:46 +0000
Re: Poor Desk Rabbit owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-08 08:11 +0000
Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-10 09:27 +0000
Re: Poor Desk Rabbit owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-10 19:19 +0000
Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 11:33 -0800
Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-10 16:29 -0500
Re: Poor Desk Rabbit GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 17:12 -0700
Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-17 11:20 +0000
Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-17 13:23 -0700
Re: Poor Desk Rabbit owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-18 17:52 +0000
Re: Poor Anne Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-06 07:42 -0500
Re: Poor Anne Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 07:01 -0800
Re: Poor Anne "Dr. John Grubor" <grubor@grubor.org.invalid> - 2015-11-07 01:50 +0000
Re: Poor Anne Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-06 21:03 -0500
Re: Poor Anne Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-06 10:45 -0500
Re: Poor Anne Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-06 10:52 -0500
Re: Poor Anne Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-06 09:13 -0700
Page 2 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 Next page →
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-06 09:11 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Poor Owl |
| Message-ID | <D2621F34.62EB1%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #331213 |
On 11/6/15, 4:51 AM, in article n1i44n$325$2@dont-email.me, "Peter Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: > Desk Rabbit wrote: > >> On 06/11/2015 10:28, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >>> Desk Rabbit wrote: >>> >>>> On 06/11/2015 07:05, owl wrote nothing of consequence: >>>> >>>> Yet another "advocate" who can't advocate so just decides to try and >>>> create a shit storm. >>> >>> What exactly is wrong with Snit Michael Glasser being a parasite who >>> squanders the familiy income earned solely by his wife? >> >> And your evidence for this is???? >> >>> >>> Right. Nothing. He *is* such a irresponsible swine >> >> That's your opinion and you are entitled to it. >> >>> >>> And it it irrelevant who posts the truth. It will not change because of >>> that. If Snit Michael Glasser would /try/ to supply on his own to the >>> income it would be different. Fact is: That imbecile is glued to his >>> computer and trolls usenet 24/7 >>> >> >> And some "advocates" like to constantly poke him with a stick which I'll >> clarify for the feeble minded among you is not advocating Linux and just >> fills this already overflowing cess pit with even more irrelevant >> nonsense. > > SWo tell that imbecile liar Snit Michael Glasser to troll Mac groups. That > is at least where he somehow "belongs". > He has no clue about linux And yet, repeatedly, I show I know a lot more about Linux than you. Heck, you are so ignorant of Linux you *literally* fail to recognize it and insist videos of it are "doctored". -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-06 09:09 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Poor Owl |
| Message-ID | <D2621EC8.62EAE%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #331210 |
On 11/6/15, 4:33 AM, in article n1i31d$ve7$1@deskrabbit.motzarella.org, "Desk Rabbit" <me@example.com> wrote: > On 06/11/2015 10:28, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >> Desk Rabbit wrote: >> >>> On 06/11/2015 07:05, owl wrote nothing of consequence: >>> >>> Yet another "advocate" who can't advocate so just decides to try and >>> create a shit storm. >> >> What exactly is wrong with Snit Michael Glasser being a parasite who >> squanders the familiy income earned solely by his wife? > > And your evidence for this is???? > >> >> Right. Nothing. He *is* such a irresponsible swine > > That's your opinion and you are entitled to it. > >> >> And it it irrelevant who posts the truth. It will not change because of >> that. If Snit Michael Glasser would /try/ to supply on his own to the income >> it would be different. Fact is: That imbecile is glued to his computer and >> trolls usenet 24/7 >> > > And some "advocates" like to constantly poke him with a stick which I'll > clarify for the feeble minded among you is not advocating Linux and just > fills this already overflowing cess pit with even more irrelevant nonsense. > > Peter spews insulting fantasies about my personal and professional life because of his own insecurity. NOTHING more. He is insecure about his technical skills - and as we have seen he has good reason to be. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-06 10:50 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Poor Owl |
| Message-ID | <n1ii33$p2e$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #331204 |
On 2015-11-06 5:28 AM, Peter Köhlmann wrote: > Desk Rabbit wrote: > >> On 06/11/2015 07:05, owl wrote nothing of consequence: >> >> Yet another "advocate" who can't advocate so just decides to try and >> create a shit storm. > > What exactly is wrong with Snit Michael Glasser being a parasite who > squanders the familiy income earned solely by his wife? > > Right. Nothing. He *is* such a irresponsible swine > > And it it irrelevant who posts the truth. It will not change because of > that. If Snit Michael Glasser would /try/ to supply on his own to the income > it would be different. Fact is: That imbecile is glued to his computer and > trolls usenet 24/7 How about, just for one week, you don't talk to or about him? I think that everyone here would find it refreshing. The only way that he'll go away is if everyone stops addressing him, you included. -- Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-06 09:16 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Poor Owl |
| Message-ID | <D2622059.62EB7%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #331273 |
On 11/6/15, 8:50 AM, in article n1ii33$p2e$2@dont-email.me, "Slimer" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > On 2015-11-06 5:28 AM, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >> Desk Rabbit wrote: >> >>> On 06/11/2015 07:05, owl wrote nothing of consequence: >>> >>> Yet another "advocate" who can't advocate so just decides to try and >>> create a shit storm. >> >> What exactly is wrong with Snit Michael Glasser being a parasite who >> squanders the familiy income earned solely by his wife? >> >> Right. Nothing. He *is* such a irresponsible swine >> >> And it it irrelevant who posts the truth. It will not change because of >> that. If Snit Michael Glasser would /try/ to supply on his own to the income >> it would be different. Fact is: That imbecile is glued to his computer and >> trolls usenet 24/7 > > How about, just for one week, you don't talk to or about him? I think > that everyone here would find it refreshing. > > The only way that he'll go away is if everyone stops addressing him, you > included. Clearly many in COLA think I am the most interesting topic on the planet... or at least they act that way to avoid dealing with their own insecurities. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-06 09:10 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Poor Owl |
| Message-ID | <D2621F00.62EB0%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #331204 |
On 11/6/15, 3:28 AM, in article n1hv7g$h5d$1@dont-email.me, "Peter Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: > Desk Rabbit wrote: > >> On 06/11/2015 07:05, owl wrote nothing of consequence: >> >> Yet another "advocate" who can't advocate so just decides to try and >> create a shit storm. > > What exactly is wrong with Snit Michael Glasser being a parasite who > squanders the familiy income earned solely by his wife? > > Right. Nothing. He *is* such a irresponsible swine > > And it it irrelevant who posts the truth. It will not change because of > that. If Snit Michael Glasser would /try/ to supply on his own to the income > it would be different. Fact is: That imbecile is glued to his computer and > trolls usenet 24/7 See: this is you begging for help. Keep in mind that not a word of what you wrote is about me... it is all about your own insecurity. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-07 06:26 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Poor Desk Rabbit |
| Message-ID | <sfhje0.apfae@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #331202 |
Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> wrote: > On 06/11/2015 07:05, owl wrote nothing of consequence: > > Yet another "advocate" who can't advocate so just decides to try and > create a shit storm. > Love is in the air http://i.imgur.com/RM5bu59.gifv
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-07 08:49 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Poor Desk Rabbit |
| Message-ID | <vib7nl0pr2qa.6jfrn4poypbn$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #331455 |
On Sat, 7 Nov 2015 06:26:01 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: > Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> wrote: >> On 06/11/2015 07:05, owl wrote nothing of consequence: >> >> Yet another "advocate" who can't advocate so just decides to try and >> create a shit storm. >> > > Love is in the air > http://i.imgur.com/RM5bu59.gifv Funny stuff! -- You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-07 10:17 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Poor Desk Rabbit |
| Message-ID | <n1l4ib$6cp$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #331455 |
On 2015-11-07 1:26 AM, owl wrote: > Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> wrote: >> On 06/11/2015 07:05, owl wrote nothing of consequence: >> >> Yet another "advocate" who can't advocate so just decides to try and >> create a shit storm. >> > > Love is in the air > http://i.imgur.com/RM5bu59.gifv :D -- Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-07 10:56 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Poor Desk Rabbit |
| Message-ID | <D2638970.63091%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #331490 |
On 11/7/15, 8:17 AM, in article n1l4ib$6cp$5@dont-email.me, "Slimer" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > On 2015-11-07 1:26 AM, owl wrote: >> Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> wrote: >>> On 06/11/2015 07:05, owl wrote nothing of consequence: >>> >>> Yet another "advocate" who can't advocate so just decides to try and >>> create a shit storm. >>> >> >> Love is in the air >> http://i.imgur.com/RM5bu59.gifv > > :D I am almost beginning to feel bad for him. He is clearly majorly bothered by the idiocy of the claims he made in his discussions with me. Wow. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-07 18:58 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Poor Desk Rabbit |
| Message-ID | <fhsue0.3rfa@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #331512 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 11/7/15, 8:17 AM, in article n1l4ib$6cp$5@dont-email.me, "Slimer" > <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > >> On 2015-11-07 1:26 AM, owl wrote: >>> Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> wrote: >>>> On 06/11/2015 07:05, owl wrote nothing of consequence: >>>> >>>> Yet another "advocate" who can't advocate so just decides to try and >>>> create a shit storm. >>>> >>> >>> Love is in the air >>> http://i.imgur.com/RM5bu59.gifv >> >> :D > > I am almost beginning to feel bad for him. He is clearly majorly bothered by > the idiocy of the claims he made in his discussions with me. Wow. > Keep telling yourself that. http://i.imgur.com/znY40Vj.png
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-07 14:10 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Poor Desk Rabbit |
| Message-ID | <n1li7e$sa6$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #331529 |
On 2015-11-07 1:58 PM, owl wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 11/7/15, 8:17 AM, in article n1l4ib$6cp$5@dont-email.me, "Slimer" >> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >> >>> On 2015-11-07 1:26 AM, owl wrote: >>>> Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> wrote: >>>>> On 06/11/2015 07:05, owl wrote nothing of consequence: >>>>> >>>>> Yet another "advocate" who can't advocate so just decides to try and >>>>> create a shit storm. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Love is in the air >>>> http://i.imgur.com/RM5bu59.gifv >>> >>> :D >> >> I am almost beginning to feel bad for him. He is clearly majorly bothered by >> the idiocy of the claims he made in his discussions with me. Wow. >> > > Keep telling yourself that. > http://i.imgur.com/znY40Vj.png ROFL!! -- Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-07 14:12 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Poor Desk Rabbit |
| Message-ID | <otqb0jbe97qe.129fmnj9ftyfc.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #331529 |
On Sat, 7 Nov 2015 18:58:39 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 11/7/15, 8:17 AM, in article n1l4ib$6cp$5@dont-email.me, "Slimer" >> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >> >>> On 2015-11-07 1:26 AM, owl wrote: >>>> Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> wrote: >>>>> On 06/11/2015 07:05, owl wrote nothing of consequence: >>>>> >>>>> Yet another "advocate" who can't advocate so just decides to try and >>>>> create a shit storm. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Love is in the air >>>> http://i.imgur.com/RM5bu59.gifv >>> >>> :D >> >> I am almost beginning to feel bad for him. He is clearly majorly bothered by >> the idiocy of the claims he made in his discussions with me. Wow. >> > > Keep telling yourself that. > http://i.imgur.com/znY40Vj.png Good! -- You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-07 09:26 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Poor Desk Rabbit |
| Message-ID | <823d9761-ced5-42ad-b670-1bce29d3f8ac@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #331455 |
On Friday, November 6, 2015 at 11:26:03 PM UTC-7, owl wrote: > Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> wrote: > > On 06/11/2015 07:05, owl wrote nothing of consequence: > > > > Yet another "advocate" who can't advocate so just decides to try and > > create a shit storm. > > > > Love is in the air > http://i.imgur.com/RM5bu59.gifv You need to create a gallery for them ;) By the way, you're not doing these because Snit tried the sexual version of "psych degree" routine on you (i.e. BS like "repressed homosexual feelings") are you? Pay it no mind, that's just one of the ways Snit "proves" his superiority over "others", he's been doing it for years. Of course Snit will want "proof" of this claim, here's a post from almost a decade ago, I call it - A Tail of two Tim's - (apparent misspelling intentional). A curious little thread where the ever 'politically correct' Snit confronted a black guy named Tim Crowley (who Snit later drove out of the group for co-trolling using a racist remark... but that's another story) and suggested he was ... well, you'll see if you check the link below (Snit seems to have a lot of sex stuff tied up win his "psych degree" usage). <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/F8hOVJr5lvA/2nVssAJOA6wJ> Your art subject was obviously drinking, on drugs or a mixture of the two, as he often appeared to be in CSMA. The other Tim (Adams... a guy Snit continually sought out to replay Snit's incest obsession), summed things up rather nicely with: "And once again snit proves he can't read and follow a thread." -- "I used to have a very high tolerance. Now a lot of meds seems to react oddly with me. Seems I can add alcohol to that list. Damn that was frightening. " - Snit
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-07 12:46 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Poor Desk Rabbit |
| Message-ID | <1n6y0t67ljavc.1i81zyi8ybzkw.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #331504 |
On Sat, 7 Nov 2015 09:26:07 -0800 (PST), Steve Carroll wrote: > On Friday, November 6, 2015 at 11:26:03 PM UTC-7, owl wrote: >> Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> wrote: >>> On 06/11/2015 07:05, owl wrote nothing of consequence: >>> >>> Yet another "advocate" who can't advocate so just decides to try and >>> create a shit storm. >>> >> >> Love is in the air >> http://i.imgur.com/RM5bu59.gifv > > You need to create a gallery for them ;) > > By the way, you're not doing these because Snit tried the sexual version of "psych degree" routine on you (i.e. BS like "repressed homosexual feelings") are you? Pay it no mind, that's just one of the ways Snit "proves" his superiority over "others", he's been doing it for years. Of course Snit will want "proof" of this claim, here's a post from almost a decade ago, I call it - A Tail of two Tim's - (apparent misspelling intentional). > > A curious little thread where the ever 'politically correct' Snit confronted a black guy named Tim Crowley (who Snit later drove out of the group for co-trolling using a racist remark... but that's another story) and suggested he was ... well, you'll see if you check the link below (Snit seems to have a lot of sex stuff tied up win his "psych degree" usage). > > <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/F8hOVJr5lvA/2nVssAJOA6wJ> > > Your art subject was obviously drinking, on drugs or a mixture of the two, as he often appeared to be in CSMA. The other Tim (Adams... a guy Snit continually sought out to replay Snit's incest obsession), summed things up rather nicely with: > > "And once again snit proves he can't read and follow a thread." Tim Crowley, now that's a blast from the past. I remember those exchanges but not the details. I do recall that it did get quite nasty as snit would post while he was all glued up and at some points it was quite bizarre. Snit is obviously a repressed closet queen who has been frustrated since early childhood because he was born with a penis instead of a vagina. He was probably picked on by the other kids because of his effeminate behavior and chances are good his father was quite disappointed that his son turned out to be a girl in a boy's body. Fast forward 30 years and these days snit's therapy if you will, consists of projecting his faults and own disappointments on others. He has created a fantasy world where he believes he is superior to others and that these underlings beg for his attention. Nothing could be farther from the truth. I doubt there is a single person in any of the groups he infects that doesn't want snit to disappear from USENET forever. It looks like he has returned to csma once again so good luck to whomever is still left in that group. -- You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-07 13:10 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Poor Desk Rabbit |
| Message-ID | <n1lem7$fmb$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #331508 |
On 2015-11-07 12:46 PM, Big Fish in a Small Crotch wrote: > On Sat, 7 Nov 2015 09:26:07 -0800 (PST), Steve Carroll wrote: > >> On Friday, November 6, 2015 at 11:26:03 PM UTC-7, owl wrote: >>> Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> wrote: >>>> On 06/11/2015 07:05, owl wrote nothing of consequence: >>>> >>>> Yet another "advocate" who can't advocate so just decides to try and >>>> create a shit storm. >>>> >>> >>> Love is in the air >>> http://i.imgur.com/RM5bu59.gifv >> >> You need to create a gallery for them ;) >> >> By the way, you're not doing these because Snit tried the sexual version of "psych degree" routine on you (i.e. BS like "repressed homosexual feelings") are you? Pay it no mind, that's just one of the ways Snit "proves" his superiority over "others", he's been doing it for years. Of course Snit will want "proof" of this claim, here's a post from almost a decade ago, I call it - A Tail of two Tim's - (apparent misspelling intentional). >> >> A curious little thread where the ever 'politically correct' Snit confronted a black guy named Tim Crowley (who Snit later drove out of the group for co-trolling using a racist remark... but that's another story) and suggested he was ... well, you'll see if you check the link below (Snit seems to have a lot of sex stuff tied up win his "psych degree" usage). >> >> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/F8hOVJr5lvA/2nVssAJOA6wJ> >> >> Your art subject was obviously drinking, on drugs or a mixture of the two, as he often appeared to be in CSMA. The other Tim (Adams... a guy Snit continually sought out to replay Snit's incest obsession), summed things up rather nicely with: >> >> "And once again snit proves he can't read and follow a thread." > > Tim Crowley, now that's a blast from the past. I remember those exchanges > but not the details. I do recall that it did get quite nasty as snit would > post while he was all glued up and at some points it was quite bizarre. > > Snit is obviously a repressed closet queen who has been frustrated since > early childhood because he was born with a penis instead of a vagina. > He was probably picked on by the other kids because of his effeminate > behavior and chances are good his father was quite disappointed that his > son turned out to be a girl in a boy's body. > > Fast forward 30 years and these days snit's therapy if you will, consists > of projecting his faults and own disappointments on others. > > He has created a fantasy world where he believes he is superior to others > and that these underlings beg for his attention. Nothing could be farther > from the truth. I doubt there is a single person in any of the groups he > infects that doesn't want snit to disappear from USENET forever. > > It looks like he has returned to csma once again so good luck to whomever > is still left in that group. I'm pretty sure that the people there have learned their lesson and won't take long before putting him in their killfile. -- Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-07 11:24 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Poor Desk Rabbit |
| Message-ID | <D263900B.6309C%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #331514 |
On 11/7/15, 11:10 AM, in article n1lem7$fmb$2@dont-email.me, "Slimer"
<.m@nsn.s> wrote:
> On 2015-11-07 12:46 PM, Big Fish in a Small Crotch wrote:
>> On Sat, 7 Nov 2015 09:26:07 -0800 (PST), Steve Carroll wrote:
>>
>>> On Friday, November 6, 2015 at 11:26:03 PM UTC-7, owl wrote:
>>>> Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 06/11/2015 07:05, owl wrote nothing of consequence:
>>>>>
>>>>> Yet another "advocate" who can't advocate so just decides to try and
>>>>> create a shit storm.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Love is in the air
>>>> http://i.imgur.com/RM5bu59.gifv
>>>
>>> You need to create a gallery for them ;)
>>>
>>> By the way, you're not doing these because Snit tried the sexual version of
>>> "psych degree" routine on you (i.e. BS like "repressed homosexual feelings")
>>> are you? Pay it no mind, that's just one of the ways Snit "proves" his
>>> superiority over "others", he's been doing it for years. Of course Snit will
>>> want "proof" of this claim, here's a post from almost a decade ago, I call
>>> it - A Tail of two Tim's - (apparent misspelling intentional).
>>>
>>> A curious little thread where the ever 'politically correct' Snit confronted
>>> a black guy named Tim Crowley (who Snit later drove out of the group for
>>> co-trolling using a racist remark... but that's another story) and suggested
>>> he was ... well, you'll see if you check the link below (Snit seems to have
>>> a lot of sex stuff tied up win his "psych degree" usage).
>>>
>>> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/F8hOVJr5lvA/2nV
>>> ssAJOA6wJ>
>>>
>>> Your art subject was obviously drinking, on drugs or a mixture of the two,
>>> as he often appeared to be in CSMA. The other Tim (Adams... a guy Snit
>>> continually sought out to replay Snit's incest obsession), summed things up
>>> rather nicely with:
>>>
>>> "And once again snit proves he can't read and follow a thread."
>>
>> Tim Crowley, now that's a blast from the past. I remember those exchanges
>> but not the details. I do recall that it did get quite nasty as snit would
>> post while he was all glued up and at some points it was quite bizarre.
>>
>> Snit is obviously a repressed closet queen who has been frustrated since
>> early childhood because he was born with a penis instead of a vagina.
>> He was probably picked on by the other kids because of his effeminate
>> behavior and chances are good his father was quite disappointed that his
>> son turned out to be a girl in a boy's body.
>>
>> Fast forward 30 years and these days snit's therapy if you will, consists
>> of projecting his faults and own disappointments on others.
>>
>> He has created a fantasy world where he believes he is superior to others
>> and that these underlings beg for his attention. Nothing could be farther
>> from the truth. I doubt there is a single person in any of the groups he
>> infects that doesn't want snit to disappear from USENET forever.
>>
>> It looks like he has returned to csma once again so good luck to whomever
>> is still left in that group.
>
> I'm pretty sure that the people there have learned their lesson and
> won't take long before putting him in their killfile.
Close to ten years later and Carroll is still obsessed with this:
Tim Adams:
-----
Incest IS sex by the very definition of the words.
Therefore they ARE identical when presented in that order.
-----
Um, no, they are not... and that is gross. And from someone who is no longer
posting and not relevant. Really WTF?
--
* OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-07 13:28 -0500 |
| Subject | Snit's Support Of Incest. |
| Message-ID | <ggz8xle1c3pw.fttfblvhjutk.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #331516 |
On Sat, 07 Nov 2015 11:24:59 -0700, Snit wrote: > On 11/7/15, 11:10 AM, in article n1lem7$fmb$2@dont-email.me, "Slimer" > <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > >> On 2015-11-07 12:46 PM, Big Fish in a Small Crotch wrote: >>> On Sat, 7 Nov 2015 09:26:07 -0800 (PST), Steve Carroll wrote: >>> >>>> On Friday, November 6, 2015 at 11:26:03 PM UTC-7, owl wrote: >>>>> Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 06/11/2015 07:05, owl wrote nothing of consequence: >>>>>> >>>>>> Yet another "advocate" who can't advocate so just decides to try and >>>>>> create a shit storm. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Love is in the air >>>>> http://i.imgur.com/RM5bu59.gifv >>>> >>>> You need to create a gallery for them ;) >>>> >>>> By the way, you're not doing these because Snit tried the sexual version of >>>> "psych degree" routine on you (i.e. BS like "repressed homosexual feelings") >>>> are you? Pay it no mind, that's just one of the ways Snit "proves" his >>>> superiority over "others", he's been doing it for years. Of course Snit will >>>> want "proof" of this claim, here's a post from almost a decade ago, I call >>>> it - A Tail of two Tim's - (apparent misspelling intentional). >>>> >>>> A curious little thread where the ever 'politically correct' Snit confronted >>>> a black guy named Tim Crowley (who Snit later drove out of the group for >>>> co-trolling using a racist remark... but that's another story) and suggested >>>> he was ... well, you'll see if you check the link below (Snit seems to have >>>> a lot of sex stuff tied up win his "psych degree" usage). >>>> >>>> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/F8hOVJr5lvA/2nV >>>> ssAJOA6wJ> >>>> >>>> Your art subject was obviously drinking, on drugs or a mixture of the two, >>>> as he often appeared to be in CSMA. The other Tim (Adams... a guy Snit >>>> continually sought out to replay Snit's incest obsession), summed things up >>>> rather nicely with: >>>> >>>> "And once again snit proves he can't read and follow a thread." >>> >>> Tim Crowley, now that's a blast from the past. I remember those exchanges >>> but not the details. I do recall that it did get quite nasty as snit would >>> post while he was all glued up and at some points it was quite bizarre. >>> >>> Snit is obviously a repressed closet queen who has been frustrated since >>> early childhood because he was born with a penis instead of a vagina. >>> He was probably picked on by the other kids because of his effeminate >>> behavior and chances are good his father was quite disappointed that his >>> son turned out to be a girl in a boy's body. >>> >>> Fast forward 30 years and these days snit's therapy if you will, consists >>> of projecting his faults and own disappointments on others. >>> >>> He has created a fantasy world where he believes he is superior to others >>> and that these underlings beg for his attention. Nothing could be farther >>> from the truth. I doubt there is a single person in any of the groups he >>> infects that doesn't want snit to disappear from USENET forever. >>> >>> It looks like he has returned to csma once again so good luck to whomever >>> is still left in that group. >> >> I'm pretty sure that the people there have learned their lesson and >> won't take long before putting him in their killfile. > > Close to ten years later and Carroll is still obsessed with this: > > Tim Adams: > ----- > Incest IS sex by the very definition of the words. > Therefore they ARE identical when presented in that order. > ----- > > Um, no, they are not... and that is gross. And from someone who is no longer > posting and not relevant. Really WTF? https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.os.linux.advocacy/vYRMtHsupwU "Here's what Snit Michael Glasser, Prescott Computer Guy, from Prescott Arizona has to say about incest. "For example, if someone wanted to push to make it legal for 80 year old siblings to have sex I would not really care." <https://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/218f298abc37e0b7?dmode=source&output=gplain&noredirect> "what is the harm in, say, letting two 80 year old siblings have sex if they want?" <https://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/cda6a0283f0fdbdb?dmode=source&output=gplain&noredirect> "For the record: I am torn on the incest question." <https://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3cad2ece3376567b?dmode=source&output=gplain&noredirect> "I do not see any *logical* reason to disallow incest." <https://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/f2dd521e403e08c?dmode=source&output=gplain&noredirect> "Who is being abused when two consenting adults have sex which cannot lead to procreation (in such a case the potential child would be the victim)? Which sibling is abusing the other?" <http://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/3rQ9_2h8pCo/KNVw0Ajn6GsJ> "But given how common incest is throughout history even in humans I would say it is natural" <https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/3rQ9_2h8pCo/Dt4MAYUxaVIJ> "The concept of two elderly siblings engaging in consensual behavior is a completely rational concept." <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/U__LN6_zWvA/3Ecaj5QXVk4J> "I did say I do not see a victim to it and that, given that, I can see arguments as to why it should not be illegal (it is a "victimless" crime)." <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/U__LN6_zWvA/RNQP2_JqOksJ> " -- You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch. -- You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-07 10:58 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Poor Desk Rabbit |
| Message-ID | <c253bb0d-d662-4609-9bc2-019d93e06b0a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #331516 |
On Saturday, November 7, 2015 at 11:25:06 AM UTC-7, Snit wrote: > On 11/7/15, 11:10 AM, in article n1lem7$fmb$2@dont-email.me, "Slimer" > <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > > > On 2015-11-07 12:46 PM, Big Fish in a Small Crotch wrote: > >> On Sat, 7 Nov 2015 09:26:07 -0800 (PST), Steve Carroll wrote: > >> > >>> On Friday, November 6, 2015 at 11:26:03 PM UTC-7, owl wrote: > >>>> Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> wrote: > >>>>> On 06/11/2015 07:05, owl wrote nothing of consequence: > >>>>> > >>>>> Yet another "advocate" who can't advocate so just decides to try and > >>>>> create a shit storm. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> Love is in the air > >>>> http://i.imgur.com/RM5bu59.gifv > >>> > >>> You need to create a gallery for them ;) > >>> > >>> By the way, you're not doing these because Snit tried the sexual version of > >>> "psych degree" routine on you (i.e. BS like "repressed homosexual feelings") > >>> are you? Pay it no mind, that's just one of the ways Snit "proves" his > >>> superiority over "others", he's been doing it for years. Of course Snit will > >>> want "proof" of this claim, here's a post from almost a decade ago, I call > >>> it - A Tail of two Tim's - (apparent misspelling intentional). > >>> > >>> A curious little thread where the ever 'politically correct' Snit confronted > >>> a black guy named Tim Crowley (who Snit later drove out of the group for > >>> co-trolling using a racist remark... but that's another story) and suggested > >>> he was ... well, you'll see if you check the link below (Snit seems to have > >>> a lot of sex stuff tied up win his "psych degree" usage). > >>> > >>> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/F8hOVJr5lvA/2nV > >>> ssAJOA6wJ> > >>> > >>> Your art subject was obviously drinking, on drugs or a mixture of the two, > >>> as he often appeared to be in CSMA. The other Tim (Adams... a guy Snit > >>> continually sought out to replay Snit's incest obsession), summed things up > >>> rather nicely with: > >>> > >>> "And once again snit proves he can't read and follow a thread." > >> > >> Tim Crowley, now that's a blast from the past. I remember those exchanges > >> but not the details. I do recall that it did get quite nasty as snit would > >> post while he was all glued up and at some points it was quite bizarre. > >> > >> Snit is obviously a repressed closet queen who has been frustrated since > >> early childhood because he was born with a penis instead of a vagina. > >> He was probably picked on by the other kids because of his effeminate > >> behavior and chances are good his father was quite disappointed that his > >> son turned out to be a girl in a boy's body. > >> > >> Fast forward 30 years and these days snit's therapy if you will, consists > >> of projecting his faults and own disappointments on others. > >> > >> He has created a fantasy world where he believes he is superior to others > >> and that these underlings beg for his attention. Nothing could be farther > >> from the truth. I doubt there is a single person in any of the groups he > >> infects that doesn't want snit to disappear from USENET forever. > >> > >> It looks like he has returned to csma once again so good luck to whomever > >> is still left in that group. > > > > I'm pretty sure that the people there have learned their lesson and > > won't take long before putting him in their killfile. > > Close to ten years later and Carroll is still obsessed with this: > > Tim Adams: > ----- > Incest IS sex by the very definition of the words. > Therefore they ARE identical when presented in that order. > ----- > > Um, no, they are not... and that is gross. And from someone who is no longer > posting and not relevant. Really WTF? See what I mean about Snit's obsession with incest? I make it clear that I'm pointing to behavior he's engaged in for a decade, as based on the well known fact that he always demands "proof" when someone claims something about him; Snit then tries to use my having done so as a platform for his jumping back to his beloved topic of incest AND as an attempt to shine the light off his BS "psych degree" usage with owl and Crowley. The really weird part is... he actually seems to believe that no one can see that's what he's trying to do. LOL!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-07 14:12 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Poor Desk Rabbit |
| Message-ID | <1tbdmojd8ek6s.1wctqpnxibhz0$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #331528 |
On Sat, 7 Nov 2015 10:58:14 -0800 (PST), Steve Carroll wrote: > On Saturday, November 7, 2015 at 11:25:06 AM UTC-7, Snit wrote: >> On 11/7/15, 11:10 AM, in article n1lem7$fmb$2@dont-email.me, "Slimer" >> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >> >>> On 2015-11-07 12:46 PM, Big Fish in a Small Crotch wrote: >>>> On Sat, 7 Nov 2015 09:26:07 -0800 (PST), Steve Carroll wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Friday, November 6, 2015 at 11:26:03 PM UTC-7, owl wrote: >>>>>> Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 06/11/2015 07:05, owl wrote nothing of consequence: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yet another "advocate" who can't advocate so just decides to try and >>>>>>> create a shit storm. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Love is in the air >>>>>> http://i.imgur.com/RM5bu59.gifv >>>>> >>>>> You need to create a gallery for them ;) >>>>> >>>>> By the way, you're not doing these because Snit tried the sexual version of >>>>> "psych degree" routine on you (i.e. BS like "repressed homosexual feelings") >>>>> are you? Pay it no mind, that's just one of the ways Snit "proves" his >>>>> superiority over "others", he's been doing it for years. Of course Snit will >>>>> want "proof" of this claim, here's a post from almost a decade ago, I call >>>>> it - A Tail of two Tim's - (apparent misspelling intentional). >>>>> >>>>> A curious little thread where the ever 'politically correct' Snit confronted >>>>> a black guy named Tim Crowley (who Snit later drove out of the group for >>>>> co-trolling using a racist remark... but that's another story) and suggested >>>>> he was ... well, you'll see if you check the link below (Snit seems to have >>>>> a lot of sex stuff tied up win his "psych degree" usage). >>>>> >>>>> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/F8hOVJr5lvA/2nV >>>>> ssAJOA6wJ> >>>>> >>>>> Your art subject was obviously drinking, on drugs or a mixture of the two, >>>>> as he often appeared to be in CSMA. The other Tim (Adams... a guy Snit >>>>> continually sought out to replay Snit's incest obsession), summed things up >>>>> rather nicely with: >>>>> >>>>> "And once again snit proves he can't read and follow a thread." >>>> >>>> Tim Crowley, now that's a blast from the past. I remember those exchanges >>>> but not the details. I do recall that it did get quite nasty as snit would >>>> post while he was all glued up and at some points it was quite bizarre. >>>> >>>> Snit is obviously a repressed closet queen who has been frustrated since >>>> early childhood because he was born with a penis instead of a vagina. >>>> He was probably picked on by the other kids because of his effeminate >>>> behavior and chances are good his father was quite disappointed that his >>>> son turned out to be a girl in a boy's body. >>>> >>>> Fast forward 30 years and these days snit's therapy if you will, consists >>>> of projecting his faults and own disappointments on others. >>>> >>>> He has created a fantasy world where he believes he is superior to others >>>> and that these underlings beg for his attention. Nothing could be farther >>>> from the truth. I doubt there is a single person in any of the groups he >>>> infects that doesn't want snit to disappear from USENET forever. >>>> >>>> It looks like he has returned to csma once again so good luck to whomever >>>> is still left in that group. >>> >>> I'm pretty sure that the people there have learned their lesson and >>> won't take long before putting him in their killfile. >> >> Close to ten years later and Carroll is still obsessed with this: >> >> Tim Adams: >> ----- >> Incest IS sex by the very definition of the words. >> Therefore they ARE identical when presented in that order. >> ----- >> >> Um, no, they are not... and that is gross. And from someone who is no longer >> posting and not relevant. Really WTF? > > See what I mean about Snit's obsession with incest? I make it clear that > I'm pointing to behavior he's engaged in for a decade, as based on the > well known fact that he always demands "proof" when someone claims > something about him; Snit then tries to use my having done so as a > platform for his jumping back to his beloved topic of incest AND as an > attempt to shine the light off his BS "psych degree" usage with owl and > Crowley. The really weird part is... he actually seems to believe that > no one can see that's what he's trying to do. LOL! https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.os.linux.advocacy/vYRMtHsupwU "Here's what Snit Michael Glasser, Prescott Computer Guy, from Prescott Arizona has to say about incest. "For example, if someone wanted to push to make it legal for 80 year old siblings to have sex I would not really care." <https://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/218f298abc37e0b7?dmode=source&output=gplain&noredirect> "what is the harm in, say, letting two 80 year old siblings have sex if they want?" <https://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/cda6a0283f0fdbdb?dmode=source&output=gplain&noredirect> "For the record: I am torn on the incest question." <https://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3cad2ece3376567b?dmode=source&output=gplain&noredirect> "I do not see any *logical* reason to disallow incest." <https://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/f2dd521e403e08c?dmode=source&output=gplain&noredirect> "Who is being abused when two consenting adults have sex which cannot lead to procreation (in such a case the potential child would be the victim)? Which sibling is abusing the other?" <http://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/3rQ9_2h8pCo/KNVw0Ajn6GsJ> "But given how common incest is throughout history even in humans I would say it is natural" <https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/3rQ9_2h8pCo/Dt4MAYUxaVIJ> "The concept of two elderly siblings engaging in consensual behavior is a completely rational concept." <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/U__LN6_zWvA/3Ecaj5QXVk4J> "I did say I do not see a victim to it and that, given that, I can see arguments as to why it should not be illegal (it is a "victimless" crime)." <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/U__LN6_zWvA/RNQP2_JqOksJ> " -- You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch. -- You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-07 13:27 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Poor Desk Rabbit |
| Message-ID | <n1d423gwky4d$.1v3wyu7xpsaty.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #331514 |
On Sat, 7 Nov 2015 13:10:26 -0500, Slimer wrote: > On 2015-11-07 12:46 PM, Big Fish in a Small Crotch wrote: >> On Sat, 7 Nov 2015 09:26:07 -0800 (PST), Steve Carroll wrote: >> >>> On Friday, November 6, 2015 at 11:26:03 PM UTC-7, owl wrote: >>>> Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> wrote: >>>>> On 06/11/2015 07:05, owl wrote nothing of consequence: >>>>> >>>>> Yet another "advocate" who can't advocate so just decides to try and >>>>> create a shit storm. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Love is in the air >>>> http://i.imgur.com/RM5bu59.gifv >>> >>> You need to create a gallery for them ;) >>> >>> By the way, you're not doing these because Snit tried the sexual version of "psych degree" routine on you (i.e. BS like "repressed homosexual feelings") are you? Pay it no mind, that's just one of the ways Snit "proves" his superiority over "others", he's been doing it for years. Of course Snit will want "proof" of this claim, here's a post from almost a decade ago, I call it - A Tail of two Tim's - (apparent misspelling intentional). >>> >>> A curious little thread where the ever 'politically correct' Snit confronted a black guy named Tim Crowley (who Snit later drove out of the group for co-trolling using a racist remark... but that's another story) and suggested he was ... well, you'll see if you check the link below (Snit seems to have a lot of sex stuff tied up win his "psych degree" usage). >>> >>> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/F8hOVJr5lvA/2nVssAJOA6wJ> >>> >>> Your art subject was obviously drinking, on drugs or a mixture of the two, as he often appeared to be in CSMA. The other Tim (Adams... a guy Snit continually sought out to replay Snit's incest obsession), summed things up rather nicely with: >>> >>> "And once again snit proves he can't read and follow a thread." >> >> Tim Crowley, now that's a blast from the past. I remember those exchanges >> but not the details. I do recall that it did get quite nasty as snit would >> post while he was all glued up and at some points it was quite bizarre. >> >> Snit is obviously a repressed closet queen who has been frustrated since >> early childhood because he was born with a penis instead of a vagina. >> He was probably picked on by the other kids because of his effeminate >> behavior and chances are good his father was quite disappointed that his >> son turned out to be a girl in a boy's body. >> >> Fast forward 30 years and these days snit's therapy if you will, consists >> of projecting his faults and own disappointments on others. >> >> He has created a fantasy world where he believes he is superior to others >> and that these underlings beg for his attention. Nothing could be farther >> from the truth. I doubt there is a single person in any of the groups he >> infects that doesn't want snit to disappear from USENET forever. >> >> It looks like he has returned to csma once again so good luck to whomever >> is still left in that group. > > I'm pretty sure that the people there have learned their lesson and > won't take long before putting him in their killfile. Only a couple of regulars remain. Seems to be some new faces over there so snit has some fresh victims. It won't take them long to figure snit out. -- You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web