Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #331514

Re: Poor Desk Rabbit

From Slimer <.m@nsn.s>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: Poor Desk Rabbit
Date 2015-11-07 13:10 -0500
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <n1lem7$fmb$2@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <fueia9.3ra@rooftop.invalid> <n1hsmv$7nr$3@deskrabbit.motzarella.org> <sfhje0.apfae@rooftop.invalid> <823d9761-ced5-42ad-b670-1bce29d3f8ac@googlegroups.com> <1n6y0t67ljavc.1i81zyi8ybzkw.dlg@40tude.net>

Show all headers | View raw


On 2015-11-07 12:46 PM, Big Fish in a Small Crotch wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Nov 2015 09:26:07 -0800 (PST), Steve Carroll wrote:
> 
>> On Friday, November 6, 2015 at 11:26:03 PM UTC-7, owl wrote:
>>> Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> wrote:
>>>> On 06/11/2015 07:05, owl wrote nothing of consequence:
>>>>
>>>> Yet another "advocate" who can't advocate so just decides to try and 
>>>> create a shit storm.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Love is in the air
>>> http://i.imgur.com/RM5bu59.gifv
>>
>> You need to create  a gallery for them ;)
>>
>> By the way, you're not doing these because Snit tried the sexual version of "psych degree" routine on you (i.e. BS like "repressed homosexual feelings") are you?  Pay it no mind, that's just one of the ways Snit "proves" his superiority over "others", he's been doing it for years. Of course Snit will want "proof" of this claim, here's a post from almost a decade ago, I call it - A Tail of two Tim's - (apparent misspelling intentional).
>>
>> A curious little thread where the ever 'politically correct' Snit confronted a black guy named Tim Crowley (who Snit later drove out of the group for co-trolling using a racist remark... but that's another story) and suggested he was ... well, you'll see if you check the link below (Snit seems to have a lot of sex stuff tied up win his "psych degree" usage).
>>
>> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/F8hOVJr5lvA/2nVssAJOA6wJ>
>>
>> Your art subject was obviously drinking, on drugs or a mixture of the two, as he often appeared to be in CSMA. The other Tim (Adams... a guy Snit continually sought out to replay Snit's incest obsession), summed things up rather nicely with:
>>
>> "And once again snit proves he can't read and follow a thread."
> 
> Tim Crowley, now that's a blast from the past. I remember those exchanges
> but not the details. I do recall that it did get quite nasty as snit would
> post while he was all glued up and at some points it was quite bizarre.
> 
> Snit is obviously a repressed closet queen who has been frustrated since
> early childhood because he was born with a penis instead of a vagina.
> He was probably picked on by the other kids because of his effeminate
> behavior and chances are good his father was quite disappointed that his
> son turned out to be a girl in a boy's body.
> 
> Fast forward 30 years and these days snit's therapy if you will, consists
> of projecting his faults and own disappointments on others.
> 
> He has created a fantasy world where he believes he is superior to others
> and that these underlings beg for his attention. Nothing could be farther
> from the truth. I doubt there is a single person in any of the groups he
> infects that doesn't want snit to disappear from USENET forever.
> 
> It looks like he has returned to csma once again so good luck to whomever
> is still left in that group.

I'm pretty sure that the people there have learned their lesson and
won't take long before putting him in their killfile.

-- 
Slimer

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Poor Anne owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-06 07:05 +0000
  Re: Poor Owl Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-06 09:45 +0000
    Re: Poor Owl Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-06 11:28 +0100
      Re: Poor Owl Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-06 11:33 +0000
        Re: Poor Owl Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-06 12:51 +0100
          Re: Poor Owl Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-06 12:24 +0000
            Re: Poor Owl Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-06 13:31 +0100
              Re: Poor Owl Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-06 13:00 +0000
                Re: Poor Owl Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-06 14:33 +0100
                Re: Poor Owl Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-06 09:12 -0700
                Re: Poor Owl Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 07:03 -0800
                Re: Poor Owl Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-09 08:53 +0000
                Re: Poor Owl Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 06:46 -0800
                Re: Poor Owl vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-09 22:58 +0000
                Re: Poor Owl Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-10 09:25 +0000
                Re: Poor Owl Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 09:30 -0700
                Re: Poor Owl Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 08:44 -0800
                Re: Poor Owl Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-06 09:09 -0700
                Re: Poor Owl Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 08:47 -0800
              Re: Poor Owl Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-06 09:11 -0700
          Re: Poor Owl Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-06 09:11 -0700
        Re: Poor Owl Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-06 09:09 -0700
      Re: Poor Owl Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-06 10:50 -0500
        Re: Poor Owl Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-06 09:16 -0700
      Re: Poor Owl Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-06 09:10 -0700
    Re: Poor Desk Rabbit owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-07 06:26 +0000
      Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-07 08:49 -0500
      Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-07 10:17 -0500
        Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-07 10:56 -0700
          Re: Poor Desk Rabbit owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-07 18:58 +0000
            Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-07 14:10 -0500
            Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-07 14:12 -0500
      Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-07 09:26 -0800
        Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-07 12:46 -0500
          Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-07 13:10 -0500
            Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-07 11:24 -0700
              Snit's Support Of Incest. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-07 13:28 -0500
              Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-07 10:58 -0800
                Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-07 14:12 -0500
            Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-07 13:27 -0500
              Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-07 14:05 -0500
          Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-07 12:49 -0800
        Re: Poor Desk Rabbit owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-07 19:35 +0000
          Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-07 11:38 -0800
            Re: Poor Desk Rabbit owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-07 20:21 +0000
              Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-07 13:38 -0700
                Re: Poor Desk Rabbit owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-07 21:42 +0000
                Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-07 15:39 -0700
            Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2015-11-08 01:46 +0000
              Re: Poor Desk Rabbit owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-08 08:11 +0000
      Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-10 09:27 +0000
        Re: Poor Desk Rabbit owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-10 19:19 +0000
          Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 11:33 -0800
            Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-10 16:29 -0500
            Re: Poor Desk Rabbit GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 17:12 -0700
          Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-17 11:20 +0000
            Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-17 13:23 -0700
            Re: Poor Desk Rabbit owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-18 17:52 +0000
  Re: Poor Anne Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-06 07:42 -0500
  Re: Poor Anne Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 07:01 -0800
    Re: Poor Anne "Dr. John Grubor" <grubor@grubor.org.invalid> - 2015-11-07 01:50 +0000
      Re: Poor Anne Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-06 21:03 -0500
  Re: Poor Anne Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-06 10:45 -0500
    Re: Poor Anne Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-06 10:52 -0500
    Re: Poor Anne Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-06 09:13 -0700

csiph-web