Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #330005 > unrolled thread

Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-31 18:48 -0500
    Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 02:45 +0000
      Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-11-01 03:10 -0600
        Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 04:17 +0000
          Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 21:34 -0700
          Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-02 10:45 -0600
            Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 21:47 +0000
              Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-02 16:16 -0600
                Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-03 00:53 +0000
                  Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-02 19:48 -0600
                    Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 04:27 +0000
                  Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-03 08:52 +0100
                    Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-03 08:50 +0000
                      Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 15:37 +0000
                        Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 17:55 +0000
                          Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 19:27 +0000
                            Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 17:05 -0500
                        Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-03 15:46 -0700
                      Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-03 13:37 -0600
                        Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 17:04 -0500
                    Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 09:06 -0500
                      Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-03 09:09 -0500
                    Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 04:25 +0000
              Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-03 00:34 +0100
                Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-03 01:09 +0000
                  Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 01:41 +0000
                    Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 20:54 -0500
                      Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 21:51 -0500
                    Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 02:07 +0000
                      Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 02:24 +0000
                        Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 02:38 +0000
                    Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 21:49 -0500
                      Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 08:46 -0500
                        Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-03 10:16 -0800
                  Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 20:51 -0500
                Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-02 19:49 -0600
    Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-02 10:44 -0600
      Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 21:39 +0000
        Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-02 14:49 -0700
        Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-02 16:13 -0600
          Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-03 01:07 +0000
            Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-02 19:52 -0600
              Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 04:27 +0000
            Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-03 07:37 +0000
              @ronb is fucked in the head, big time. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-11-03 03:14 -0800
              Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-03 13:27 -0600
                Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 04:23 +0000
                  Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-04 09:58 -0500
                  Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-04 14:16 -0600
                    Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 22:33 +0000
                      Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-04 19:31 -0600
                        Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-05 22:40 +0000
                          Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-05 17:53 -0500
              Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 04:21 +0000
                Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-04 09:54 -0500
                  Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-04 09:56 -0500
                Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 07:16 -0800
                Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-04 14:14 -0600
                  Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 22:36 +0000
                    Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-04 19:32 -0600
                      Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-05 22:50 +0000
                        Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-06 10:04 -0600
                Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-04 22:24 +0000
                  Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 22:31 +0000
                    Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-05 00:24 +0000
                      Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-04 19:29 -0500
                        Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-04 19:47 -0500
                      Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-05 22:45 +0000
                  Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 15:02 -0800
        Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 17:52 -0500
          Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 19:39 -0500
            Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 19:58 -0500
              Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 20:46 -0500
                Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 21:51 -0500
                  Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 08:39 -0500
                    Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 17:59 +0000
                      Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-03 19:32 +0000
                        Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 17:06 -0500
                    Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 13:39 -0500
                      Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 14:49 -0500
          Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-03 15:53 -0700
            Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-03 19:28 -0700
              Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-04 09:35 -0500
              Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-04 09:44 -0500
                Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 07:02 -0800
                  Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-04 10:50 -0500
                    Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 08:06 -0800
                      Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-04 12:09 -0500
                        Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-04 12:34 -0500
                          Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 10:15 -0800
                        Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-04 09:40 -0800
                          Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-04 12:44 -0500
                          Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-04 13:38 -0500
                    Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-04 09:19 -0700
              Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-04 16:40 -0700
        Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere "vallor" <vallor@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 23:57 +0100
          Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-02 18:15 -0500
          Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-03 00:48 +0000
            Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-03 07:16 +0000
              Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-11-03 06:26 -0500
                Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 04:25 +0000
              Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 04:24 +0000
          Women need choices, not enslavement. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-11-02 17:39 -0800
            Re: Women need choices, not enslavement. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-03 08:56 -0500
          Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-03 07:14 +0000
            Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-03 06:45 -0600
              Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 04:07 +0000
                Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere "JEDIDIAH" <nomad@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-04 06:47 +0100
                  Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-04 06:45 -0600
                    Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 15:01 +0000
                  Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 06:42 -0800
                  Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 15:00 +0000
                    Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-11-04 10:11 -0500
                      Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 22:29 +0000
                        Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-11-04 18:55 -0500
                          Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-05 22:46 +0000
                    Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 07:42 -0800
                    Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-04 14:19 -0600
                      Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-04 15:35 -0500
                      Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 22:34 +0000
                        Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-05 00:26 +0100
                          Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-05 22:35 +0000
                            Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-05 17:53 -0500
                        Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-04 19:34 -0600
                          Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-05 22:51 +0000
                        Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-05 07:17 -0600
                          Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-11-05 09:23 -0500
                    Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-04 22:45 +0000
                      Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-04 19:37 -0600
                        Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-04 21:25 -0500
                          Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-05 12:58 -0700
                            Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-05 17:39 -0500
                        Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-05 22:38 +0000
                      Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-05 22:37 +0000
                        Evolution and the RC church vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-06 00:23 +0000
                          Re: Evolution and the RC church vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-06 00:30 +0000
                            Re: Evolution and the RC church Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-05 19:47 -0500
                          Re: Evolution and the RC church ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 04:15 +0000
                            Re: Evolution and the RC church vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-06 04:36 +0000
                              Re: Evolution and the RC church Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-11-06 06:04 -0500
                                Re: Evolution and the RC church chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-06 07:05 -0600
                                  Re: Evolution and the RC church Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-06 08:14 -0500
                                    Re: Evolution and the RC church Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-06 10:57 -0500
                                      Re: Evolution and the RC church Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-06 11:06 -0500
                              Re: Evolution and the RC church ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-07 01:16 +0000
                            Re: Evolution and the RC church GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-06 16:14 -0700
                              Re: Evolution and the RC church Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-06 16:47 -0700
                                Re: Evolution and the RC church Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 15:53 -0800
                        Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-06 01:34 +0000
                          Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-05 20:37 -0500
                          Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-06 09:13 +0100
                            Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-06 09:39 -0600
                            Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-06 09:19 -0700
                        Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-11-06 06:02 -0500
            Re: Meta: Take your bigotry elsewhere ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-04 04:06 +0000

Page 8 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8]

#331232 — Re: Evolution and the RC church

Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

>And even if so, people have to wade through shitty trolling
>to read the discussion anyway.

They do?  It gets filtered-out, here.  Clearly some decent people
don't mind seeing all the garbage, but I do.

-- 
"Yet you told me to download Arch."  -  some thing, shamelessly lying
about what TomB wrote (but no one can quote it lying)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#331235 — Re: Evolution and the RC church

On Fri, 06 Nov 2015 07:05:25 -0600, chrisv wrote:

> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> 
>>And even if so, people have to wade through shitty trolling
>>to read the discussion anyway.
> 
> They do?  It gets filtered-out, here.  Clearly some decent people
> don't mind seeing all the garbage, but I do.

Yet you keep talking about non stop, chrisv.
Why is that?

P.S. Have you asked Gohde to help you install Linux yet?
-- 
You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#331278 — Re: Evolution and the RC church

On 2015-11-06 8:14 AM, Big Fish in a Small Crotch wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Nov 2015 07:05:25 -0600, chrisv wrote:
> 
>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>
>>> And even if so, people have to wade through shitty trolling
>>> to read the discussion anyway.
>>
>> They do?  It gets filtered-out, here.  Clearly some decent people
>> don't mind seeing all the garbage, but I do.
> 
> Yet you keep talking about non stop, chrisv.
> Why is that?
> 
> P.S. Have you asked Gohde to help you install Linux yet?

GodHesIdiotic is clearly the "Linux expert" most suited to teach chrisv
how to install Linux.

-- 
Slimer

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#331288 — Re: Evolution and the RC church

On Fri, 6 Nov 2015 10:57:28 -0500, Slimer wrote:

> On 2015-11-06 8:14 AM, Big Fish in a Small Crotch wrote:
>> On Fri, 06 Nov 2015 07:05:25 -0600, chrisv wrote:
>> 
>>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>
>>>> And even if so, people have to wade through shitty trolling
>>>> to read the discussion anyway.
>>>
>>> They do?  It gets filtered-out, here.  Clearly some decent people
>>> don't mind seeing all the garbage, but I do.
>> 
>> Yet you keep talking about non stop, chrisv.
>> Why is that?
>> 
>> P.S. Have you asked Gohde to help you install Linux yet?
> 
> GodHesIdiotic is clearly the "Linux expert" most suited to teach chrisv
> how to install Linux.

:)

-- 
You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#331424 — Re: Evolution and the RC church

On Fri, 06 Nov 2015 04:36:13 +0000, vallor wrote:

> Since I've already explained to you that I was raised in the RC church
> --
> and since I most definitely "paid my dues" in that regard -- I've
> determined that we can't have a rational discussion about this matter.

Okay. Sorry I missed that. But, as you are a former Catholic, then you 
obviously know the limitations of Papal Infallibility. It would 
definitely not apply to a pope's opinion on evolution. 

-- 
Zero tolerance for WinDrones and iCultists

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#331375 — Re: Evolution and the RC church

On 11/05/15 21:54, Snit wrote:
> On 11/5/15, 9:15 PM, in article n1h9gl$hib$1@dont-email.me, "ronb"
> <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com>  wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 06 Nov 2015 00:23:23 +0000, vallor wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 05 Nov 2015 22:37:41 +0000, ronb wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 04 Nov 2015 22:45:57 +0000, vallor wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Wait, wait -- the RC church doesn't deny that rabbits evolved.  Why
>>>>> should you?
>>>>
>>>> Because the theory of evolution is stupid and it's not really science.
>>>> It's pure circular "reasoning."
>>>
>>> That's not RC dogma.  And I notice you snipped the articles from the
>>> Catholic Encyclopedia that show that to be the case.
>>>
>>>     http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/05654a.htm
>>>     http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/05655a.htm
>>
>> I know it's not RC dogma -- the Catholic Church doesn't make dogmatic
>> pronouncements on scientific subjects. And I never said it was dogmatic.
>> I was speaking for myself and I stand by what I wrote.
>>
>>> But don't take my word for it -- see what Pope John Paul II wrote in his
>>> encyclical "Truth Cannot Contradict Truth", some of which I have quoted
>>> below.
>>
>> And Pope John Paul II was free to have his OPINION on the subject. As I
>> am free to have my opinion on the subject. Pope Paul II was not speaking
>> _ex cathedra_, nor was he speaking on matters of faith or doctrine --
>> required for infallibility. That's the problem with non-Catholics trying
>> to lecture to Catholics about their Church -- they usually don't know
>> what they're talking about.
>
> Sort of like you when it comes to technology and science. As an outsider who
> does not even care to learn you just make bizarre claims of what is or is
> not a part of, say, science. Just nonsense claims you pull from your rear.
>
>>> Ron, the RC church may have many flaws, but denying evolution isn't one
>>> of them.  It is accepted by the church.  If you're going to use the
>>> argument "The Church has said it, and that settles it", then you need to
>>> defend the things you don't agree with, too -- otherwise, you might be
>>> accused of using your head, and testing, holding fast to those things
>>> you find to be true.
>>
>> I consider the Church's position on evolution to be flawed -- but it's
>> not a flaw in faith or doctrine and, therefore, I'm entitled to my
>> opinion.
>
> You ARE entitled to your opinion... but not your own facts. When you make
> factually incorrect claims, such as saying evolutionary science is not
> science, then you STILL have a right to such a view it is just a factually
> incorrect view.
>
>> It also should be noted that the Church teaches that IF
>> evolution happened, God still created whatever supposedly "evolved" into
>> all things. (Evolution is really too silly for me to take seriously.)
>
> Your lack of understanding does not make it "silly"... it makes YOU silly.
>
> But the more you speak the more it makes sense why you have so many
> imaginary friends. In many ways you are intellectually still a child.
>
>>> ;)  Okay, maybe you saw what I did there, but this is really important:
>>>
>>> Just because you don't understand something, doesn't make it untrue --
>>> that's known as the "argument from incredulity", and seems very
>>> prevalent from people who deny both the observed fact of evolution, as
>>> well as the underlying theory (which describes how the observations came
>>> about).  I strongly suggest you start by reading "Truth Cannot
>>> Contradict Truth", some of which I have quoted below.
>>
>> What makes you think I don't understand "something" (the "just so" theory
>> of evolution, in this case)?
>
> There is no "just so" theory of Evolution. None.
>
>> I understand it, that's why I think it's
>> stupid and not credible.
>
> As with your imaginary friends, you have imaginary science (your "Just So"
> science) which even you find to be stupid.
>
> The fact you create these fictions in your head and find them to be stupid
> speaks volumes about how you see yourself.
>
>> Most people who "understand" evolution, don't have a clue that they just
>> believe on the authority of "scientists" (so- called) and that settles it for
>> them.
>
> Nope... but to the extent that it is true it is true of ALL science. Only
> the experts are, well, experts in it! No different for relativity and
> quantum mechanics (actually likely more since those are less well understood
> by most), or germ theory or the idea that gravity is correlated to the
> square of the distance of a mass. Heck, on that last I admit I have NEVER
> tested it myself. Likely never will.
>
>> It's faith to them, not science.
>
> No more than ANY other are of science and a lot less than your religion.
>
>> Ask someone EXACTLY how a "whatever" turned into a bird or how the first
>> flight feather supposedly "evolved" and they'll give you a blank stare.
>
> I can go into some detail of pre-feathers and the like and even some of the
> evidence for it but I am certainly not an expert in this area. No problem
> admitting it. Does not mean science is faith in the way religion is. That is
> just silly.
>
>> And these are just extremely minor steps in supposed "evolution."
>
> So?
>
>>> And it _is_ an observed fact.  The "theory" is what we call the
>>> scientific method by which we try to describe those observations, which
>>> include the idea of "natural selection".  We know we can affect the
>>> offspring of plants and animals with human-directed artificial selection
>>> -- but because of the order of the universe, _natural_ selection seems
>>> also to work.  (That _does not have to be a materialist idea_, if you
>>> understand what "Logos" -- the divine order -- actually means.)
>>
>> No, evolution -- macro-evolution (which is what people really mean when
>> they say "evolution") is definitely NOT an established fact.
>
> That is not the only think people mean when they speak of evolution. You
> are, again, simply making things up.
>
>> All we have are a few minor adaptations (micro-evolution) that evolutionists
>> gratuitously apply (reduce) to all life. These minor changes apply to color of
>> fur, etc., they don't explain how a seal via evolution (for example)
>> anticipates the need to nurse her young in the water BEFORE ever doing it.
>
> The idea you assume an anticipation of needs is a DEFINITE sign you are
> absolutely, completely clueless about the theory of evolution.
>
>> If she doesn't have the cups it won't work (the pup will drown), don't nurse
>> under water you don't need the "cups." (Whatever they're called.) That's the
>> problem with evolution, it continually has to ANTICIPATE what it will need in
>> the future -- otherwise "evolution" would just be drift.
>
> Your claim of anticipation and planning is completely and utterly contrary
> to what the science. Again, you know NOTHING of the science.
>
>> (There's a reason why Darwin wrote that the eye "made him shudder." -- So many
>> things had to work together yet were supposedly all "evolving" separately. And
>> the eye "evolved" thousands of times. It's just not credible.)
>
> Evolved thousands of times? Huh? Where do you even get this? There are a few
> different forms of eyes that evolved separately but not THOUSANDS! But they
> need to evolve all at the same time... and no planning needed.
>
> Hey, it is sorta like open source. :)
>
>> And, BTW, natural selection "selects" for uniformity, not variety. It's only
>> when intelligence is applied do we get the various breeds of dogs or cows.
>> Left to their own they return to their original state.
>
> Again: you show NO understanding of natural selection. There IS variety in
> nature. Lots of it. The idea that uniformity is what is being selected for
> is just absurd.
>
Well, the only real evolution I see happening today is in regards to the 
huge amounts of Fukushima radiation that is causing plants and fish to 
mutate.  A little bit scary, considering that it is affecting the ocean 
plankton that makes our breathing air.



-- 
When told the reason for daylight savings time the Old
Indian said, "Only the government would believe that you
could cut a foot off the top of a blanket, sew it to the
bottom, and have a longer blanket."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#331398 — Re: Evolution and the RC church

On 11/6/15, 4:14 PM, in article
9d6dnQCTyZbrqaDLnZ2dnUU7-TednZ2d@bresnan.com, "GreyCloud" <cumulus@mist.com>
wrote:

>>> And, BTW, natural selection "selects" for uniformity, not variety. It's only
>>> when intelligence is applied do we get the various breeds of dogs or cows.
>>> Left to their own they return to their original state.
>> 
>> Again: you show NO understanding of natural selection. There IS variety in
>> nature. Lots of it. The idea that uniformity is what is being selected for
>> is just absurd.
>> 
> Well, the only real evolution I see happening today is in regards to the
> huge amounts of Fukushima radiation that is causing plants and fish to
> mutate.  A little bit scary, considering that it is affecting the ocean
> plankton that makes our breathing air.

We see evolution all around us. Last years flu vaccination does not work
largely because of evolution. Antibiotic resistant "superbugs" are from
evolution and some insects now happily eat many pesticides.

Other organisms have evolved to eat nylon... and with you bringing up
radiation they have looked around Chernobyl and found birds and mammals and
plants adapted to live in areas of high radiation. The ecosystem there is
still not suitable for human life, but other life is actually doing quite
well.

These are things in just a few short years. We look at that and hear people
call that "micro-evolution". Well, it happened in a very short span of time.
Keep allowing those changes to happen for a few million years and you get
more changes than you do in 20 or 100 years. Go figure.



-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#331407 — Re: Evolution and the RC church

On Friday, November 6, 2015 at 4:47:59 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote:
> On 11/6/15, 4:14 PM, in article
> 9d6dnQCTyZbrqaDLnZ2dnUU7-TednZ2d@bresnan.com, "GreyCloud" <cumulus@mist.com>
> wrote:
> 
> >>> And, BTW, natural selection "selects" for uniformity, not variety. It's only
> >>> when intelligence is applied do we get the various breeds of dogs or cows.
> >>> Left to their own they return to their original state.
> >> 
> >> Again: you show NO understanding of natural selection. There IS variety in
> >> nature. Lots of it. The idea that uniformity is what is being selected for
> >> is just absurd.
> >> 
> > Well, the only real evolution I see happening today is in regards to the
> > huge amounts of Fukushima radiation that is causing plants and fish to
> > mutate.  A little bit scary, considering that it is affecting the ocean
> > plankton that makes our breathing air.
> 
> We see evolution all around us. Last years flu vaccination does not work
> largely because of evolution. Antibiotic resistant "superbugs" are from
> evolution and some insects now happily eat many pesticides.
> 
> Other organisms have evolved to eat nylon... and with you bringing up
> radiation they have looked around Chernobyl and found birds and mammals and
> plants adapted to live in areas of high radiation. The ecosystem there is
> still not suitable for human life, but other life is actually doing quite
> well.
> 
> These are things in just a few short years. We look at that and hear people
> call that "micro-evolution". Well, it happened in a very short span of time.
> Keep allowing those changes to happen for a few million years and you get
> more changes than you do in 20 or 100 years. Go figure.

That's it, that's the answer! We start stuffing you with nylon and pesticides, radiate the sh*t outta you and then vaccinate the f*ck outta what's left. 20 years, you say? 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#331186

Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> On 11/5/15, 3:37 PM, in article n1glnk$pcg$6@dont-email.me, "ronb"
> <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, 04 Nov 2015 22:45:57 +0000, vallor wrote:
>> 
>>> Wait, wait -- the RC church doesn't deny that rabbits evolved.  Why
>>> should you?
>> 
>> Because the theory of evolution is stupid and it's not really science.
>> It's pure circular "reasoning."
> 
> You have a right to deny science all you want... but where I will disagree
> is if you try to take science out of the schools.
> 

Can you not make a single post without lying?  He is not denying science.
He is pointing out rightly that Evolution Theory is *not* science.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#331187

On Fri, 6 Nov 2015 01:34:45 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote:

> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>> On 11/5/15, 3:37 PM, in article n1glnk$pcg$6@dont-email.me, "ronb"
>> <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Wed, 04 Nov 2015 22:45:57 +0000, vallor wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Wait, wait -- the RC church doesn't deny that rabbits evolved.  Why
>>>> should you?
>>> 
>>> Because the theory of evolution is stupid and it's not really science.
>>> It's pure circular "reasoning."
>> 
>> You have a right to deny science all you want... but where I will disagree
>> is if you try to take science out of the schools.
>> 
> 
> Can you not make a single post without lying?  He is not denying science.
> He is pointing out rightly that Evolution Theory is *not* science.

Classic snit. Twisting and lying.
Snit has very poor reading comprehension skills.
In fact snit has no reading comprehension skills.

-- 
You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#331199

owl wrote:

> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>> On 11/5/15, 3:37 PM, in article n1glnk$pcg$6@dont-email.me, "ronb"
>> <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Wed, 04 Nov 2015 22:45:57 +0000, vallor wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Wait, wait -- the RC church doesn't deny that rabbits evolved.  Why
>>>> should you?
>>> 
>>> Because the theory of evolution is stupid and it's not really science.
>>> It's pure circular "reasoning."
>> 
>> You have a right to deny science all you want... but where I will
>> disagree is if you try to take science out of the schools.
>> 
> 
> Can you not make a single post without lying?  He is not denying science.
> He is pointing out rightly that Evolution Theory is *not* science.

It is. Just because it is still called "theory" does not make it less 
science. All science is called "theory". Just more or less proven.
Evolution is one of the best proven theories of them all

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#331283

On 2015-11-06, Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:
> owl wrote:
>
>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>> On 11/5/15, 3:37 PM, in article n1glnk$pcg$6@dont-email.me, "ronb"
>>> <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On Wed, 04 Nov 2015 22:45:57 +0000, vallor wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Wait, wait -- the RC church doesn't deny that rabbits evolved.  Why
>>>>> should you?
>>>> 
>>>> Because the theory of evolution is stupid and it's not really science.
>>>> It's pure circular "reasoning."
>>> 
>>> You have a right to deny science all you want... but where I will
>>> disagree is if you try to take science out of the schools.
>>> 
>> 
>> Can you not make a single post without lying?  He is not denying science.
>> He is pointing out rightly that Evolution Theory is *not* science.
>
> It is. Just because it is still called "theory" does not make it less 
> science. All science is called "theory". Just more or less proven.
> Evolution is one of the best proven theories of them all

    His rhetoric is really unbecoming of a modern Catholic and that's really
the nicest possible way I could even attempt to put it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#331300

On 11/6/15, 1:13 AM, in article n1hnb6$ndf$1@dont-email.me, "Peter Köhlmann"
<peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:

> owl wrote:
> 
>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>> On 11/5/15, 3:37 PM, in article n1glnk$pcg$6@dont-email.me, "ronb"
>>> <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On Wed, 04 Nov 2015 22:45:57 +0000, vallor wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Wait, wait -- the RC church doesn't deny that rabbits evolved.  Why
>>>>> should you?
>>>> 
>>>> Because the theory of evolution is stupid and it's not really science.
>>>> It's pure circular "reasoning."
>>> 
>>> You have a right to deny science all you want... but where I will
>>> disagree is if you try to take science out of the schools.
>>> 
>> 
>> Can you not make a single post without lying?  He is not denying science.
>> He is pointing out rightly that Evolution Theory is *not* science.
> 
> It is. Just because it is still called "theory" does not make it less
> science. All science is called "theory". Just more or less proven.
> Evolution is one of the best proven theories of them all

Wow. While one must know Peter is using the term "proven" in a colloquial
sense and not a scientific one, he is absolutely correct on this. Good to
see.


-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#331208

ronb wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> On Wed, 04 Nov 2015 22:45:57 +0000, vallor wrote:
>
>> Wait, wait -- the RC church doesn't deny that rabbits evolved.  Why
>> should you?
>
> Because the theory of evolution is stupid and it's not really science. 
> It's pure circular "reasoning." 

No, it isn't.  It's backed by fossil evidence, lab investigation,
and molecular biology.

And it's pretty simple. Take a population.  Split it in two by some barrier
(mountains, water, whatever).  Examine it a few generations later.
You will find that the populations have become different, sometimes
different enough that they will not interbreed, and sometimes different
enough that they cannot interbreed.

-- 
Good news.  Ten weeks from Friday will be a pretty good day.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#330791

On Tue, 03 Nov 2015 07:14:48 +0000, vallor wrote:

> On Mon, 02 Nov 2015 23:57:13 +0100, vallor wrote:
> 
>> "ronb" <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> cried in message
>> news:n18l7d$cl1$7@dont-email.me...
>>> On Mon, 02 Nov 2015 10:44:38 -0600, JEDIDIAH wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> It's "batshit crazy" to defend life? Strangely enough, if a murderer
>>> kills a pregnant woman, he's guilty of two murders. But when the
>>> mother and an abortionist kills the baby, it's perfectly fine and
>>> acceptable.
>>> 
>>> 
>> Your momma should have gotten an abortion after she finished screwing
>> that mangy dog that got her pregnant with you.
>> 
>> This way morons like you who are blinded by religion and don't believe
>> in science wouldn't be ruining it for the rest of us.
> 
> Dizum coward forgery.

I figured. Didn't see the little, "no bullshit," bulls. (Which is 
approriate.)

-- 
Zero tolerance for WinDrones and iCultists

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 8 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8]

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web