Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #709819 > unrolled thread

SystemD adds age verification

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

Contents

  SystemD adds age verification CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2026-03-19 19:35 -0400
    Re: SystemD adds age verification DL <dl@lackey.com> - 2026-03-20 02:19 +0000
      Re: Systéme D adds age verification Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-03-20 02:35 +0000
        Re: Systéme D adds age verification DL <dl@lackey.com> - 2026-03-20 02:50 +0000
          Re: Systéme D adds age verification Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-03-20 06:33 +0000
            Re: Systéme D adds age verification DL <dl@lackey.com> - 2026-03-20 10:38 +0000
              Re: Système D adds age verification Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-03-20 20:56 +0000
                Re: Système D adds age verification Distro Lackey <dl@lackey.com> - 2026-03-20 21:18 +0000
                  Re: Système D adds age verification "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-03-20 17:26 -0400
                    Re: Système D adds age verification DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2026-03-21 12:10 -0400
                      Re: Système D adds age verification "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-03-21 17:36 -0400
                        Re: Système D adds age verification (was: Système D adds age verification) Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2026-03-21 21:51 +0000
                          Re: Système D adds age verification "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-03-21 18:03 -0400
                            Re: Système D adds age verification (was: Système D adds age verification) Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2026-03-21 22:37 +0000
                  Re: Système D adds age verification Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-03-20 22:27 +0000
                    Re: Système D adds age verification "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-03-20 18:45 -0400
                    Re: Système D adds age verification Distro Lackey <dl@lackey.com> - 2026-03-21 02:13 +0000
                      Re: Système D adds age verification "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-03-20 22:44 -0400
                      Re: Système D adds age verification vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2026-03-21 09:58 +0000
                      Re: Système D adds age verification Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2026-03-21 12:04 +0000
                        Re: Système D adds age verification "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-03-21 08:25 -0400
                        Re: Système D adds age verification Distro Lackey <dl@lackey.com> - 2026-03-21 13:38 +0000
    Re: SystemD adds age verification rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-03-20 03:38 +0000
    Re: SystemD adds age verification DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2026-03-21 12:10 -0400
      Re: SystemD adds age verification Adison Vohn Caterson <Adison@Caterson.invalid> - 2026-03-21 17:33 +0000
        Re: SystemD adds age verification DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2026-03-21 18:44 -0400
    Re: SystemD adds age verification chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2026-03-21 15:51 -0500
      Re: SystemD adds age verification Distro Lackey <dl@lackey.com> - 2026-03-21 21:18 +0000
        Re: SystemD adds age verification "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-03-21 17:42 -0400
        Re: SystemD adds age verification Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2026-03-21 22:25 +0000
          Re: SystemD adds age verification Distro Lackey <dl@lackey.com> - 2026-03-21 23:00 +0000
            Re: SystemD adds age verification "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2026-03-21 19:05 -0400
            Re: SystemD adds age verification DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2026-03-22 14:50 -0400
            Re: SystemD adds age verification Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2026-03-22 19:07 +0000
              Re: SystemD adds age verification L Thorpe <lt666@sixsixsix.net> - 2026-03-22 19:46 +0000
      Re: SystemD adds age verification rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-03-22 04:26 +0000
      Re: SystemD adds age verification CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2026-03-22 07:39 -0400

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#709912 — Re: Système D adds age verification

On 3/21/2026 8:04 AM, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
> Le 21-03-2026, Distro Lackey <dl@lackey.com> a écrit :
>> On Fri, 20 Mar 2026 22:27:17 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:
>>
>>> Says someone who has never written a systemd unit file in their life.
>>
>> True.  I never have and I never will.
> 
> Of course, you are too limited for that.
> 
>> But I have created my own personal GNU/Linux distro and that is something
>> that you could never do in a million billion years.
> 
> No. You didn't create Gentoo and LFS. You only personalized them a
> little bit (a little bit like a Windows user would personalize Windows
> in changing the background picture).


ROFL!

-- 
Joel W. Crump

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#709914 — Re: Système D adds age verification

On 21 Mar 2026 12:04:51 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:

>>
>> True.  I never have and I never will.
> 
> Of course, you are too limited for that.
> 

Unlike you, I have no limits.

How does refusing to adopt an alternative method imply
a limitation?  Answer: it does not.

I have never designed a rocket engine and I never will.

You are an IDIOT.

> 
> No. You didn't create Gentoo and LFS. You only personalized them a
> little bit
>

That is very far from being true.

I have described my use of Gentoo Portage many times 
in the past.  But you are too stupid to remember.

For the benefit of your stupid self, I use Gentoo Portage
only for automated building.  The distro itself is my own
creation.

Gentoo is very flexible (far more flexible than your
stupid self).  Gentoo has defaults that allow a user
to produce a standard distro, but those defaults can
be overridden to allow the creation of a totally unique
and personal distro.

Pay attention and learn from the master (that's me).

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#709843

On Thu, 19 Mar 2026 19:35:01 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:

> Well, this should wake up the people who hate SystemD.
> 
> <https://lunduke.substack.com/p/systemd-adds-age-verification-and>

https://agelesslinux.org/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#709921

On 3/19/2026 7:35 PM, CrudeSausage wrote:
> Well, this should wake up the people who hate SystemD.
> 
> <https://lunduke.substack.com/p/systemd-adds-age-verification-and>


You know what feels weird?  When inputting a birth year online, I have 
to scroll WAY up or down to find 1962.

It came quick!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#709924

On 2026-03-21, DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
> On 3/19/2026 7:35 PM, CrudeSausage wrote:
>> Well, this should wake up the people who hate SystemD.
>> 
>> <https://lunduke.substack.com/p/systemd-adds-age-verification-and>
>
>
> You know what feels weird?  When inputting a birth year online, I have 
> to scroll WAY up or down to find 1962.
>
> It came quick!
>

As long as your birth year *makes the list*, your good 

-- 
End Transmission

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#709947

On 3/21/2026 1:33 PM, Adison Vohn Caterson wrote:
> On 2026-03-21, DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>> On 3/19/2026 7:35 PM, CrudeSausage wrote:
>>> Well, this should wake up the people who hate SystemD.
>>>
>>> <https://lunduke.substack.com/p/systemd-adds-age-verification-and>
>>
>>
>> You know what feels weird?  When inputting a birth year online, I have
>> to scroll WAY up or down to find 1962.
>>
>> It came quick!
>>
> 
> As long as your birth year *makes the list*, your good

Yes!


At Steam they're optimistic about being able to game in your dotage:

https://store.steampowered.com/agecheck/app/22380/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#709931

CrudeSausage wrote:

>Well, this should wake up the people who hate SystemD.
>
><https://lunduke.substack.com/p/systemd-adds-age-verification-and>

Stop the planet.  I want to get off.  GD communist bastards.  Between
them and the Muslims, I don't know who is worse.

Fsck the distros to cave-in to this.  And the horses they rode in on.

-- 
"So sentient human beings should have their freedom restricted so that
some bits on a disk somewhere (source code) can have freedom instead."
-  trolling fsckwit "Ezekiel", attacking the GPL

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#709936

On Sat, 21 Mar 2026 15:51:05 -0500, chrisv wrote:

> 
> Fsck the distros to cave-in to this.
>

That is brave, but totally empty, talk.

Are you willing to abandon the mainstream GNU/Linux
distros?

Answer: No, you are not.

As with the typical Microslop user, you will moan, groan,
and curse but you will not ever give up your Ubuntu, Debian,
Fedora, etc.

Your bluster serves only to fool and pacify yourself.
How pitiful.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#709942

On 3/21/2026 5:18 PM, Distro Lackey wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Mar 2026 15:51:05 -0500, chrisv wrote:
> 
>> Fsck the distros to cave-in to this.
> 
> That is brave, but totally empty, talk.
> 
> Are you willing to abandon the mainstream GNU/Linux
> distros?
> 
> Answer: No, you are not.
> 
> As with the typical Microslop user, you will moan, groan,
> and curse but you will not ever give up your Ubuntu, Debian,
> Fedora, etc.
> 
> Your bluster serves only to fool and pacify yourself.
> How pitiful.


You actually named Debian in your condemnation of distros?  It rules. 
It's where Linux actually confronts the dominance of Windows.  I miss 
it, sometimes, now that I'm back on Win11.  But chances are one day I'll 
be back to Linux.  The next MS OS (Win12/whatever) is gonna be garbage.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#709945

Le 21-03-2026, Distro Lackey <dl@lackey.com> a écrit :
>
> That is brave, but totally empty, talk.

Like you: you won't feel alone.

> Are you willing to abandon the mainstream GNU/Linux
> distros?

Which is the smart thing to avoid. People work hard for us to be able to
focus on using our distros instead of spending our time to create it.

> As with the typical Microslop user, you will moan, groan,
> and curse but you will not ever give up your Ubuntu, Debian,
> Fedora, etc.

Well, anyone of those distros is more useful than your useless distro.
You can't buy food on Internet for a start. Once you explained you can't
install LaTeX on your computer because it's too difficult. You are so
limited you need a Microsoft Windows VM. What a joke.

> Your bluster serves only to fool and pacify yourself.
> How pitiful.

It looks like you are staring at a mirror.

-- 
Si vous avez du temps à perdre :
https://scarpet42.gitlab.io

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#709948

On 21 Mar 2026 22:25:57 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:

> 
> People work hard for us to be able to
> focus on using our distros instead of spending our time to create it.
> 

Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!  Who would want to work hard for an idiot
like you?

Distros are maintained by those who seek glory (i.e. they cannot
be Linus Torvalds or Dr. Richard M. Stallman but they can at least
package the creations of same).  They don't work for you.  They
work for themselves.

The same applies to me.  I have created my own personal distro
and I am very proud of myself.  You cannot do it but I can because
I am technically superior to your sorry ass.

In contrast, you can only beg.  You beg and you accept what the
distros give you because you cannot give to yourself.

You are a pathetic loser.

> 
> You can't buy food on Internet for a start.
>

Certain websites work but others don't work and it is also
a function of the browser.  The same applies to M$ Winblows.
The fault is with the site developers who are incompetent (like you).

I can get no help from this group because most everyone here,
including you, is technically illiterate.


>
> Once you explained you can't
> install LaTeX on your computer because it's too difficult.
>

I can install LaTex (TeX actually) with one single command:

emerge texlive

But I choose not to do so because I do not use it currently.

So stop making things up in your feeble attempts to discredit
me.

Do not ever forget: I am master.  You are lackey.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#709949

On 3/21/2026 7:00 PM, Distro Lackey wrote:
> On 21 Mar 2026 22:25:57 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
> 
>> People work hard for us to be able to
>> focus on using our distros instead of spending our time to create it.
> 
> Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!  Who would want to work hard for an idiot
> like you?


Is that supposed to be relevant?  Moron.


> Distros are maintained by those who seek glory (i.e. they cannot
> be Linus Torvalds or Dr. Richard M. Stallman but they can at least
> package the creations of same).  They don't work for you.  They
> work for themselves.


Preposterous.


> The same applies to me.  I have created my own personal distro
> and I am very proud of myself.  You cannot do it but I can because
> I am technically superior to your sorry ass.


You're proud of booting to a black screen, we know, heh.


> In contrast, you can only beg.  You beg and you accept what the
> distros give you because you cannot give to yourself.
> 
> You are a pathetic loser.


No, Stéphane is one of the best posters we have.


>> You can't buy food on Internet for a start.
> 
> Certain websites work but others don't work and it is also
> a function of the browser.  The same applies to M$ Winblows.
> The fault is with the site developers who are incompetent (like you).
> 
> I can get no help from this group because most everyone here,
> including you, is technically illiterate.


I had no problems with browsers under Windows or Linux.


>> Once you explained you can't
>> install LaTeX on your computer because it's too difficult.
> 
> I can install LaTex (TeX actually) with one single command:
> 
> emerge texlive
> 
> But I choose not to do so because I do not use it currently.
> 
> So stop making things up in your feeble attempts to discredit
> me.
> 
> Do not ever forget: I am master.  You are lackey.


You're delusional, we know.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#709975

On 3/21/2026 7:00 PM, Lameass Larry Piet (aka Package Manager Lackey) wrote:

> On 21 Mar 2026 22:25:57 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
> 
>>
>> People work hard for us to be able to
>> focus on using our distros instead of spending our time to create it.
>>
> 
> Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!  Who would want to work hard for an idiot
> like you?

You should thank the distro makers - without them Linux would NEVER have 
been adopted by anyone but the most dedicated and technical.


> Distros are maintained by those who seek glory (i.e. they cannot
> be Linus Torvalds or Dr. Richard M. Stallman but they can at least
> package the creations of same).  They don't work for you.  They
> work for themselves.

And for others.  They spend lots of unpaid time building and developing 
and doing tech support.

Unlike you, who "couldn't care less about the community."

Maybe you could so some Gentoo tech support on the forums.  It might be 
impossible, but try not to be a total dick.


> The same applies to me.  I have created my own personal distro
> and I am very proud of myself.  


We know, bozo.  You've been telling us (but not showing us) how great 
you are for literally 10 years.

Don't you get sick of inane lying and bragging to Usenet, to people you 
don't respect and that have no respect for you?



> You cannot do it but I can because
> I am technically superior to your sorry ass.


No you're not.  You've shown technical idiocy MANY times, on and off Usenet.

Stephane has shown himself to be an extremely competent Linux user.




 > In contrast, you can only beg.  You beg and you accept what the
> distros give you because you cannot give to yourself.
> 
> You are a pathetic loser.


I see it's another Solitary Saturday Night at Mom's house.

Why so miserable all the time, lameass?

You probably need a good cry.

And it's past time for you to follow my 3-prong approach to bettering 
your life:
1 a drug
2 a woman
3 a Microsoft Windows


>> You can't buy food on Internet for a start.
>>
> 
> Certain websites work but others don't work and it is also
> a function of the browser.  The same applies to M$ Winblows.
> The fault is with the site developers who are incompetent (like you).
> 
> I can get no help from this group because most everyone here,
> including you, is technically illiterate.

So why do you continually ask for help from cola?



>> Once you explained you can't
>> install LaTeX on your computer because it's too difficult.
>>
> 
> I can install LaTex (TeX actually) with one single command:
> 
> emerge texlive


The Package Manager lackey wants someone to do all the work for him.

What a wimp.



> But I choose not to do so because I do not use it currently.
> 
> So stop making things up in your feeble attempts to discredit
> me.
> 
> Do not ever forget: I am master.  You are lackey.


babble babble

Go get some exercise.  I recently did 45 minutes of walking up and down 
hills.  ah!  Good sweat and legs/lungs workout.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#709976

Le 21-03-2026, Distro Lackey <dl@lackey.com> a écrit :
> On 21 Mar 2026 22:25:57 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
>
>> 
>> People work hard for us to be able to
>> focus on using our distros instead of spending our time to create it.
>> 
>
> Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!  Who would want to work hard for an idiot
> like you?

No one. But they are not working hard for me. They are working hard for
millions of people. And I can use their work.

> Distros are maintained by those who seek glory (i.e. they cannot
> be Linus Torvalds or Dr. Richard M. Stallman but they can at least
> package the creations of same).  They don't work for you.  They
> work for themselves.

It's not a surprise, you are just confirming how limited you are. There
are lots of reasons for working in open source. Some are the ones you
described, but it's only a tiny part of the story.

> The same applies to me.

The same what? You are working for glory? You have to improve a lot for
that to happen.

> I have created my own personal distro

Well, you believe that. It doesn't make it true.

> and I am very proud of myself.

You shouldn't.

> You cannot do it but I can because

You don't know what I can do and what I can't do. Unlike you, I'm
not sharing my failures pretending it's greatness here. 

> I am technically superior to your sorry ass.

Well, there are a lot of people technically superior to me. You are not
among them. Far from that, your messages and videos proved that each
time you are trying to show your greatness. You show you don't
understand what you are doing, you are doing things and sometimes it
works. But it's pure luck.

> In contrast, you can only beg.

Unlike you, I never asked for help here. So you are the one begging.

> You beg and you accept what the
> distros give you because you cannot give to yourself.

I chose the distro which is closer to my requirement. And then I adapt
to have exactly what I want. Which you can't understand because you
don't understand how a distro works.

> You are a pathetic loser.

Well, I managed to get what I want. You are the one begging for help
here from time to time.

>> You can't buy food on Internet for a start.
>>
>
> Certain websites work but others don't work and it is also
> a function of the browser.

They all work. You were proved wrong by someone here. What about the
pathetic loser?

More than twenty years ago, you would have been right. A lot of websites
were very difficult or impossible to access from Linux. But unlike you
who are still stuck in the past, websites and browsers evolved and
everything is fine now.

The only thing that prevents you to access some websites is you lack of
technical skill.

> The same applies to M$ Winblows.

No. If Linux is everywhere on the server side, Microsoft Windows is
everywhere on the end user side. So if a website was unable to be
accessed from Windows, it would never survive.

> The fault is with the site developers who are incompetent (like you).

The pathetic loser is the one that blames his own failures on others.
You are not alone here, the far right and far left extremists are
spreading everywhere.

> I can get no help from this group because most everyone here,
> including you, is technically illiterate.

I gave you help before and then you pretended that never happened. So
you can just go fuck yourself: I won't help you anymore.

>> Once you explained you can't
>> install LaTeX on your computer because it's too difficult.
>>
>
> I can install LaTex (TeX actually) with one single command:
>
> emerge texlive
>
> But I choose not to do so because I do not use it currently.

I believe you choose not to because it won't work.

> So stop making things up in your feeble attempts to discredit
> me.

You asked for help here once because it was to difficult for you to do.

> Do not ever forget: I am master.

The only thing in which you can pretend to be a master is in bullshit.

-- 
Si vous avez du temps à perdre :
https://scarpet42.gitlab.io

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#709978

On 22 Mar 2026 19:07:22 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:

>>
>> Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!  Who would want to work hard for an idiot
>> like you?
> 
> No one. But they are not working hard for me. They are working hard for
> millions of people. And I can use their work.
> 

You really are a total idiot.  You do not understand human motivation.

If people do not demand monetary compensation, then they will demand,
for them, an equivalent.  Altruism does not exist.

For FOSS developers, the equivalent is recognition and glory.

You cannot realize this because you contribute nothing to FOSS.
Nothing.


> 
> You don't know what I can do and what I can't do.
>

Yes, I most certainly can know.

If you were indeed a technically competent person then you would
not withhold your expertise.

But you have no expertise.  Therefore, your refusal is just a cover
to protect your self esteem (ego).

> 
> Well, there are a lot of people technically superior to me. You are not
> among them. 
>

Yes, I most certainly am among them.


>
> Far from that, your messages and videos proved that each
> time you are trying to show your greatness. You show you don't
> understand what you are doing, you are doing things and sometimes it
> works. But it's pure luck.
> 

As the great poet Wolfgang Goethe once said: "We can know only what we
are."

You are an ignorant idiot.  Therefore, you can only know ignorant idiocy.

My supreme greatness is forever beyond your meager perception.

> 
> I chose the distro which is closer to my requirement. And then I adapt
> to have exactly what I want. Which you can't understand because you
> don't understand how a distro works.
> 

Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!

All distros are virtually identical.  There is no difference in capabilities.

The fact that you somehow perceive a difference further proves that you
are a deluded idiot.


>>
>> Certain websites work but others don't work and it is also
>> a function of the browser.
> 
> They all work. You were proved wrong by someone here. What about the
> pathetic loser?
> 

No.  You are, as usual, totally wrong.

Furthermore, this is a very serious problem and someone should investigate.

Websites should not fail on GNU/Linux, but they do.

You, and the other lackeys on this NG, obviously have limited experience.
We need an investigation by highly competent people and that does not
include you.

I have spoken.

The case is closed.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#709954

On Sat, 21 Mar 2026 15:51:05 -0500, chrisv wrote:

> CrudeSausage wrote:
> 
>>Well, this should wake up the people who hate SystemD.
>>
>><https://lunduke.substack.com/p/systemd-adds-age-verification-and>
> 
> Stop the planet.  I want to get off.  GD communist bastards.  Between
> them and the Muslims, I don't know who is worse.
> 
> Fsck the distros to cave-in to this.  And the horses they rode in on.

I installed antiX on a eeePC 700 as an experiment. That isn't a fair test 
because of the hardware constraints but it does not use systemd.

https://forum.artixlinux.org/index.php/topic,9304.msg55607.html#msg55607

"We'll NEVER require any verification or identification from the user."

https://github.com/BryanLunduke/DoesItAgeVerify?tab=readme-ov-file

That's the current list. Note that Arch Linux 32 is a separate project 
from Arch Linux. 

Supposedly geoblocking a region is a violation of the GPL so that will be 
another fight.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#709963

On 2026-03-21 4:51 p.m., chrisv wrote:
> CrudeSausage wrote:
> 
>> Well, this should wake up the people who hate SystemD.
>>
>> <https://lunduke.substack.com/p/systemd-adds-age-verification-and>
> 
> Stop the planet.  I want to get off.  GD communist bastards.  Between
> them and the Muslims, I don't know who is worse.

They're allies. If the left becomes the government, they plan on 
stripping the Muslims of their right to worship as they please; if the 
Muslims win, they plan to slaughter the left. Both sides worship the Devil.

-- 
CrudeSausage
Islam is poison, leftism is retardation.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web