Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #694894 > unrolled thread

Fedora broke

Started by"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com>
First post2025-08-15 22:30 -0400
Last post2025-08-18 11:05 +0000
Articles 17 on this page of 37 — 11 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy


Contents

  Fedora broke "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-08-15 22:30 -0400
    Re: Fedora broke ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑJacek Marcin Jaworski๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ <jaworski1978@adres.pl> - 2025-08-16 06:22 +0200
    Re: Fedora broke Lawrence Dโ€™Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-16 04:30 +0000
      Re: Fedora broke "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-08-16 00:50 -0400
        Re: Fedora broke vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-08-16 06:14 +0000
          Re: Fedora broke "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-08-16 02:38 -0400
          Re: Fedora broke rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-16 07:12 +0000
          Re: ๐Ÿณ๏ธโ€๐ŸŒˆFedora broke๐Ÿณ๏ธโ€๐ŸŒˆ ๐ŸŒˆ๐Ÿ’๐ŸŒป๐ŸŒบ๐ŸŒน๐ŸŒป๐Ÿ’๐ŸŒท๐ŸŒบ๐ŸŒˆJen๐ŸŒˆ๐Ÿ’๐ŸŒป๐ŸŒบ๐ŸŒน๐ŸŒป๐Ÿ’๐ŸŒท๐ŸŒบ๐ŸŒˆ Dershmenderdenden...den-den *jazz hands*๐Ÿ’๐ŸŒป๐ŸŒบ๐ŸŒน๐ŸŒป๐Ÿ’๐ŸŒท๐ŸŒบ๐Ÿถ็ฌ›๐ŸŒˆ๐Ÿ’๐ŸŒป๐ŸŒบ๐ŸŒน๐ŸŒป๐Ÿ’๐ŸŒท๐ŸŒบ๐ŸŒˆ <root@127.0.0.1>  - 2025-08-16 14:32 +0000
            Re: Fedora broke vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-08-17 09:28 +0000
              Re: ๐Ÿณ๏ธโ€๐ŸŒˆFedora broke๐Ÿณ๏ธโ€๐ŸŒˆ ๐ŸŒˆ๐Ÿ’๐ŸŒป๐ŸŒบ๐ŸŒน๐ŸŒป๐Ÿ’๐ŸŒท๐ŸŒบ๐ŸŒˆJen๐ŸŒˆ๐Ÿ’๐ŸŒป๐ŸŒบ๐ŸŒน๐ŸŒป๐Ÿ’๐ŸŒท๐ŸŒบ๐ŸŒˆ Dershmenderdenden...den-den *jazz hands*๐Ÿ’๐ŸŒป๐ŸŒบ๐ŸŒน๐ŸŒป๐Ÿ’๐ŸŒท๐ŸŒบ๐Ÿถ็ฌ›๐ŸŒˆ๐Ÿ’๐ŸŒป๐ŸŒบ๐ŸŒน๐ŸŒป๐Ÿ’๐ŸŒท๐ŸŒบ๐ŸŒˆ <root@127.0.0.1>  - 2025-08-17 20:43 +0000
        Re: Fedora broke CtrlAltDel <Altie@BHam.com> - 2025-08-16 08:26 +0000
          Re: Fedora broke "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-08-16 04:32 -0400
            Re: Fedora broke CtrlAltDel <Altie@BHam.com> - 2025-08-16 08:46 +0000
              Re: Fedora broke "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-08-16 04:56 -0400
                Re: Fedora broke CtrlAltDel <Altie@BHam.com> - 2025-08-16 09:21 +0000
                  Re: Fedora broke "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-08-16 05:26 -0400
                    Re: Fedora broke CtrlAltDel <Altie@BHam.com> - 2025-08-16 09:32 +0000
                      Re: Fedora broke "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-08-16 05:37 -0400
                        Re: Fedora broke CtrlAltDel <Altie@BHam.com> - 2025-08-16 09:48 +0000
                          Re: Fedora broke "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-08-16 06:17 -0400
                  Re: Fedora broke rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-16 23:09 +0000
                Re: Fedora broke rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-16 23:07 +0000
              Re: Fedora broke rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-16 22:56 +0000
                Re: Fedora broke CtrlAltDel <Altie@BHam.com> - 2025-08-16 23:16 +0000
                Re: Fedora broke vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-08-17 09:49 +0000
                  Re: Fedora broke rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-17 19:23 +0000
          Re: Fedora broke Lawrence Dโ€™Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-08-17 00:30 +0000
            Re: Fedora broke CtrlAltDel <Altie@BHam.com> - 2025-08-17 00:40 +0000
        Re: Fedora broke Stรฉphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-08-16 08:42 +0000
          Re: Fedora broke "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-08-16 04:49 -0400
            Re: Fedora broke pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-08-16 19:49 +0000
              Re: Fedora broke "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-08-16 16:15 -0400
                Re: Fedora broke rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-16 22:52 +0000
              Re: Fedora broke CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-17 08:47 -0400
                Re: Fedora broke rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-17 19:26 +0000
                  Re: Fedora broke CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-08-17 15:33 -0400
                  Re: Fedora broke RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-08-18 11:05 +0000

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]


#694992

Fromrbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Date2025-08-16 23:09 +0000
Message-ID<mgchduFitriU7@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#694937
On Sat, 16 Aug 2025 09:21:56 -0000 (UTC), CtrlAltDel wrote:

> On Sat, 16 Aug 2025 04:56:39 -0400, Joel W. Crump wrote:
> 
>> Suffice to say, I'm back to Debian, and that happens to have a new
>> release, so I have the latest stable version, and have put Fedora
>> behind me.
> 
> That's cool, Joel.  I hope it works for you. Just don't ever update,
> bro,
> or they will know.

If Trixie is like Bookworm he'll be updating if he wants a working system. 
Out of the frying pan...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#694991

Fromrbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Date2025-08-16 23:07 +0000
Message-ID<mgcha7FitriU6@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#694935
On Sat, 16 Aug 2025 04:56:39 -0400, Joel W. Crump wrote:

> On 8/16/25 4:46 AM, CtrlAltDel wrote:
> 
>>> It was just simple software updates that were offered, not a reinstall
>>> or something.
>> 
>> Regardless of that fact, they still may think you need to slow down
>> even on the software updates. If I were you, I would shoot a message to
>> the Fedora team and ask them if they are monitoring your usage habits.
>> 
>> Sounds like they are.
> 
> 
> Suffice to say, I'm back to Debian, and that happens to have a new
> release, so I have the latest stable version, and have put Fedora behind
> me.

Best of luck. Bookworm wasn't exactly stable when it was released. Maybe 
Trixie will be better. I think I'll avoid that. 'Trixie' is too close to 
the word used in my family to refer to the tail of a roast turkey. 
Probably some dimly remembered Swabian term. There were a few of those. I 
was pretty old before I figured out most people call Schnittlauch chives. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#694990

Fromrbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Date2025-08-16 22:56 +0000
Message-ID<mgcgliFitriU5@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#694933
On Sat, 16 Aug 2025 08:46:09 -0000 (UTC), CtrlAltDel wrote:

> On Sat, 16 Aug 2025 04:32:54 -0400, Joel W. Crump wrote:
> 
> 
>> It was just simple software updates that were offered, not a reinstall
>> or something.
> 
> Regardless of that fact, they still may think you need to slow down even
> on the software updates. If I were you, I would shoot a message to the
> Fedora team and ask them if they are monitoring your usage habits.
> 
> Sounds like they are.

It's Fedora. I updated 485 packages on Tuesday and 306 today. It's not a 
distro for people who don't want to update every few days. However doing 
the updates hasn't killed my system. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#694994

FromCtrlAltDel <Altie@BHam.com>
Date2025-08-16 23:16 +0000
Message-ID<107r3hb$1vt2b$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#694990
On 16 Aug 2025 22:56:50 GMT, rbowman wrote:

> It's Fedora. I updated 485 packages on Tuesday and 306 today. It's not a
> distro for people who don't want to update every few days. However doing
> the updates hasn't killed my system.

I understand that, rbowman.  The thing is, it's different for Joel as he 
has been earmarked as a serial updater.  He updated Mint when it really 
wasn't even needed and they have prevented him from using it.

Then he jumped to Fedora and started updating like a wild animal with no 
control whatsoever, and they cut him off too.  I guess he imagined his 
previous history with Mint wouldn't follow him to Fedora and he could just 
do what he wanted when he wanted.

They are watching him though.  He is literally out of his mind if he 
somehow thinks that Debian isn't aware of his proclivities.  They will 
give him one or two chances but, he's on a short rope for sure.

I've recommended that he no longer needs to update anything, ever, if he 
wants to keep using mainstream distros.



-- 
All of Usenet is in a psychological, emotional, and antisocial free fall
into an abyss and fully immersed in a drowning pool of mental illness.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#695041

Fromvallor <vallor@cultnix.org>
Date2025-08-17 09:49 +0000
Message-ID<mgdmtqFneacU4@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#694990
On 16 Aug 2025 22:56:50 GMT, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote in
<mgcgliFitriU5@mid.individual.net>:

> On Sat, 16 Aug 2025 08:46:09 -0000 (UTC), CtrlAltDel wrote:
> 
>> On Sat, 16 Aug 2025 04:32:54 -0400, Joel W. Crump wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> It was just simple software updates that were offered, not a reinstall
>>> or something.
>> 
>> Regardless of that fact, they still may think you need to slow down
>> even on the software updates. If I were you, I would shoot a message to
>> the Fedora team and ask them if they are monitoring your usage habits.
>> 
>> Sounds like they are.
> 
> It's Fedora. I updated 485 packages on Tuesday and 306 today. It's not a
> distro for people who don't want to update every few days. However doing
> the updates hasn't killed my system.

The frequent updates didn't bother me very much, it was the
bi-yearly upgrades that always ended up with sessions of
rpm-surgery.  I got pretty good at it.

That was with yum though, not sure how much better dnf is.

-- 
-v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 NVIDIA RTX 3090Ti 24G
   OS: Linux 6.16.1 D: Mint 22.1 DE: Xfce 4.18 
   NVIDIA: 580.76.05 Mem: 258G
   "Smile... people will wonder what you've been up to."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#695085

Fromrbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Date2025-08-17 19:23 +0000
Message-ID<mgeoi2Fts0dU5@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#695041
On 17 Aug 2025 09:49:46 GMT, vallor wrote:

> On 16 Aug 2025 22:56:50 GMT, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote in
> <mgcgliFitriU5@mid.individual.net>:
> 
>> On Sat, 16 Aug 2025 08:46:09 -0000 (UTC), CtrlAltDel wrote:
>> 
>>> On Sat, 16 Aug 2025 04:32:54 -0400, Joel W. Crump wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> It was just simple software updates that were offered, not a
>>>> reinstall or something.
>>> 
>>> Regardless of that fact, they still may think you need to slow down
>>> even on the software updates. If I were you, I would shoot a message
>>> to the Fedora team and ask them if they are monitoring your usage
>>> habits.
>>> 
>>> Sounds like they are.
>> 
>> It's Fedora. I updated 485 packages on Tuesday and 306 today. It's not
>> a distro for people who don't want to update every few days. However
>> doing the updates hasn't killed my system.
> 
> The frequent updates didn't bother me very much, it was the bi-yearly
> upgrades that always ended up with sessions of rpm-surgery.  I got
> pretty good at it.
> 
> That was with yum though, not sure how much better dnf is.

I missed yum. At first I thought about yast. I had not used any Red Hat 
distro since Red Hat Linux 7.0 in 2000 with the infamous gcc 2.96. That 
release also had a homegrown Python and other surprises.

I put Fedora on a old Windows box I had been running OpenSUSE 13.2 on with 
a certain degree of skepticism. I figured if it sucked I would put the 
current Leap on instead.

Except for a very brief rocky time when KDE, Plasma, and Qt were being 
sorted I've liked it, I forget the versions but I do know whatever I 
started with was upgraded to dnf5 but that was seamless. I was amused at 
first. In my mind dnf is 'did not finish' or in geocaching logs 'did not 
find (the cache)'

I don't think it's as confusing as apt. 'apt update' doesn't and the first 
few times 'apt upgrade' sounded like something I didn't want to do. 'dnf 
update' shows you the new packages and asks if you want to continue 
instead of two extra steps for 'list --upgradeable' and 'upgrade'

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#695006

FromLawrence Dโ€™Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid>
Date2025-08-17 00:30 +0000
Message-ID<107r7qk$20k71$4@dont-email.me>
In reply to#694925
On Sat, 16 Aug 2025 08:26:25 -0000 (UTC), CtrlAltDel wrote:

> Personally, you may have arrived at a juncture in your Linux journey
> where you just need to completely reformat your entire drive, install a
> distro, and never, ever update for any reason whatsoever.

Spoken like a true Dimdows user.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#695009

FromCtrlAltDel <Altie@BHam.com>
Date2025-08-17 00:40 +0000
Message-ID<107r8dm$1vt2b$6@dont-email.me>
In reply to#695006
On Sun, 17 Aug 2025 00:30:12 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence Dโ€™Oliveiro wrote:

> On Sat, 16 Aug 2025 08:26:25 -0000 (UTC), CtrlAltDel wrote:
> 
>> Personally, you may have arrived at a juncture in your Linux journey
>> where you just need to completely reformat your entire drive, install a
>> distro, and never, ever update for any reason whatsoever.
> 
> Spoken like a true Dimdows user.

I haven't used Windows since I switched over to Linux with Mint Elyssa 
back in 2008.

Once again, I have to explain things to users in this group.  I've never 
seen anything like it; none of seem to catch on very quick and don't know 
how to read a thread.  

It's like each of you read the post you are responding to and have 
absolutely no recollection of any other posts in the entire thread.

The advice I gave to Joel was specifically for Joel, as maintainers of 
several distros have, by his own admission and adamant declarations, 
blackballed him for updating.  Therefore, he has been advised, very 
wisely, to no longer update.

-- 
All of Usenet is in a psychological, emotional, and antisocial free fall
into an abyss and fully immersed in a drowning pool of mental illness.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#694931

FromStรฉphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr>
Date2025-08-16 08:42 +0000
Message-ID<68a04491$0$24825$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
In reply to#694900
Le 16-08-2025, Joel W. Crump <joelcrump@gmail.com> a รฉcritย :
> On 8/16/25 12:30 AM, Lawrence Dโ€™Oliveiro wrote:
>
>>> I really don't get it.  It said there were updates, I tried to install
>>> them, it just rebooted without going into the special update mode.
>>> Couldn't make it happen, so I decided to download the recently released
>>> Debian 13 "trixie".  So far it's been fine.

If you change your distro each time something goes wrong, you'll never
improve. If you really are the tech guy you pretend to be, you should be
able to fix it.

>> To be fair, you canโ€™t compare a distro which brings out a major new
>> version every six months with one that makes a point of keeping version
>> upheavals down to one every couple of years.
>
>
> True, but I really wanted to be with Fedora, they just apparently don't 
> want to be with me.

It looks like I've read something like that about another distro not so
long ago. Do you believe all the maintainers want you out?

-- 
Si vous avez du temps ร  perdre :
https://scarpet42.gitlab.io

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#694934

From"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com>
Date2025-08-16 04:49 -0400
Message-ID<1CXnQ.38505$hYw5.16697@fx11.iad>
In reply to#694931
On 8/16/25 4:42 AM, Stรฉphane CARPENTIER wrote:
> Le 16-08-2025, Joel W. Crump <joelcrump@gmail.com> a รฉcritย :
>> On 8/16/25 12:30 AM, Lawrence Dโ€™Oliveiro wrote:
>>
>>>> I really don't get it.  It said there were updates, I tried to install
>>>> them, it just rebooted without going into the special update mode.
>>>> Couldn't make it happen, so I decided to download the recently released
>>>> Debian 13 "trixie".  So far it's been fine.
> 
> If you change your distro each time something goes wrong, you'll never
> improve. If you really are the tech guy you pretend to be, you should be
> able to fix it.
> 
>>> To be fair, you canโ€™t compare a distro which brings out a major new
>>> version every six months with one that makes a point of keeping version
>>> upheavals down to one every couple of years.
>>
>> True, but I really wanted to be with Fedora, they just apparently don't
>> want to be with me.
> 
> It looks like I've read something like that about another distro not so
> long ago. Do you believe all the maintainers want you out?


It may be buggy software, it may be sabotage, it's hard to know. 
Suffice to say I won't use Fedora again.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#694979

Frompothead <pothead@snakebite.com>
Date2025-08-16 19:49 +0000
Message-ID<107qnci$1t3dc$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#694934
On 2025-08-16, Joel W. Crump <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 8/16/25 4:42 AM, Stรฉphane CARPENTIER wrote:
>> Le 16-08-2025, Joel W. Crump <joelcrump@gmail.com> a รฉcritย :
>>> On 8/16/25 12:30 AM, Lawrence Dโ€™Oliveiro wrote:
>>>
>>>>> I really don't get it.  It said there were updates, I tried to install
>>>>> them, it just rebooted without going into the special update mode.
>>>>> Couldn't make it happen, so I decided to download the recently released
>>>>> Debian 13 "trixie".  So far it's been fine.
>> 
>> If you change your distro each time something goes wrong, you'll never
>> improve. If you really are the tech guy you pretend to be, you should be
>> able to fix it.
>> 
>>>> To be fair, you canโ€™t compare a distro which brings out a major new
>>>> version every six months with one that makes a point of keeping version
>>>> upheavals down to one every couple of years.
>>>
>>> True, but I really wanted to be with Fedora, they just apparently don't
>>> want to be with me.
>> 
>> It looks like I've read something like that about another distro not so
>> long ago. Do you believe all the maintainers want you out?
>
>
> It may be buggy software, it may be sabotage, it's hard to know. 
> Suffice to say I won't use Fedora again.
>
Aren't you the same person who was claiming that Microsoft somehow sabotaged your
Windows install?


-- 
pothead

"Our lives are fashioned by our choices. First we make our choices.
 Then our choices make us."
-- Anne Frank

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#694982

From"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com>
Date2025-08-16 16:15 -0400
Message-ID<jF5oQ.100332$4dS5.51461@fx16.iad>
In reply to#694979
On 8/16/25 3:49 PM, pothead wrote:

>> It may be buggy software, it may be sabotage, it's hard to know.
>> Suffice to say I won't use Fedora again.
>>
> Aren't you the same person who was claiming that Microsoft somehow sabotaged your
> Windows install?


That was in a different era.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#694987

Fromrbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Date2025-08-16 22:52 +0000
Message-ID<mgcgchFitriU4@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#694982
On Sat, 16 Aug 2025 16:15:11 -0400, Joel W. Crump wrote:

> On 8/16/25 3:49 PM, pothead wrote:
> 
>>> It may be buggy software, it may be sabotage, it's hard to know.
>>> Suffice to say I won't use Fedora again.
>>>
>> Aren't you the same person who was claiming that Microsoft somehow
>> sabotaged your Windows install?
> 
> 
> That was in a different era.

SSDD

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#695057

FromCrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge>
Date2025-08-17 08:47 -0400
Message-ID<fbkoQ.206092$Bui1.122259@fx10.iad>
In reply to#694979
On 2025-08-16 3:49 p.m., pothead wrote:
> On 2025-08-16, Joel W. Crump <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 8/16/25 4:42 AM, Stรฉphane CARPENTIER wrote:
>>> Le 16-08-2025, Joel W. Crump <joelcrump@gmail.com> a รฉcritย :
>>>> On 8/16/25 12:30 AM, Lawrence Dโ€™Oliveiro wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> I really don't get it.  It said there were updates, I tried to install
>>>>>> them, it just rebooted without going into the special update mode.
>>>>>> Couldn't make it happen, so I decided to download the recently released
>>>>>> Debian 13 "trixie".  So far it's been fine.
>>>
>>> If you change your distro each time something goes wrong, you'll never
>>> improve. If you really are the tech guy you pretend to be, you should be
>>> able to fix it.
>>>
>>>>> To be fair, you canโ€™t compare a distro which brings out a major new
>>>>> version every six months with one that makes a point of keeping version
>>>>> upheavals down to one every couple of years.
>>>>
>>>> True, but I really wanted to be with Fedora, they just apparently don't
>>>> want to be with me.
>>>
>>> It looks like I've read something like that about another distro not so
>>> long ago. Do you believe all the maintainers want you out?
>>
>>
>> It may be buggy software, it may be sabotage, it's hard to know.
>> Suffice to say I won't use Fedora again.
>>
> Aren't you the same person who was claiming that Microsoft somehow sabotaged your
> Windows install?

I'm surprised that Joel didn't accuse Microsoft of being transphobic.

-- 
God be with you,

CrudeSausage
Islam is the enemy
John 14:6

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#695086

Fromrbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Date2025-08-17 19:26 +0000
Message-ID<mgeon0F32aU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#695057
On Sun, 17 Aug 2025 08:47:05 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:

> I'm surprised that Joel didn't accuse Microsoft of being transphobic.

Microsoft, despite its many faults, seems to be focused on making money 
rather than political statements. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#695088

FromCrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge>
Date2025-08-17 15:33 -0400
Message-ID<18qoQ.218612$Bui1.184116@fx10.iad>
In reply to#695086
On 2025-08-17 3:26 p.m., rbowman wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Aug 2025 08:47:05 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
> 
>> I'm surprised that Joel didn't accuse Microsoft of being transphobic.
> 
> Microsoft, despite its many faults, seems to be focused on making money
> rather than political statements.

Not entirely. They routinely promote diversity, even in the Bing 
wallpaper app. I got a fag flag one day which prompted me from 
completely removing the app responsible. The company also encourages its 
employees to seek out transitions for their children, as if they had 
some demonic agenda to promote. In light of the fact that the 
alternative isn't much better, I'm forced to just use what works best. 
Despite its many flaws, Windows works better on this machine.

-- 
God be with you,

CrudeSausage
Islam is the enemy
John 14:6

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#695123

FromRonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com>
Date2025-08-18 11:05 +0000
Message-ID<107v1dc$2vqpe$7@dont-email.me>
In reply to#695086
On 2025-08-17, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Aug 2025 08:47:05 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
>
>> I'm surprised that Joel didn't accuse Microsoft of being transphobic.
>
> Microsoft, despite its many faults, seems to be focused on making money 
> rather than political statements. 

Too bad you can't say the same for its co-founder, Gates. 

-- 
Definition of Insanity: Thinking you can 
beat the Bear on his own territory.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy


csiph-web