Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #679101 > unrolled thread

Wish me luck

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

Contents

  Wish me luck DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2024-12-06 10:58 -0500
    Re: Wish me luck vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2024-12-06 16:12 +0000
      Re: Wish me luck Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-06 11:22 -0500
      Re: Wish me luck DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2024-12-06 16:56 -0500
        Re: Wish me luck -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-06 18:01 -0500
        Re: Wish me luck rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-07 04:59 +0000
          Re: Wish me luck DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2024-12-07 09:05 -0500
            Re: Wish me luck rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-07 17:43 +0000
            Re: Wish me luck Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-07 16:56 -0500
              Re: Wish me luck DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2024-12-08 19:22 -0500
                Re: Wish me luck Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-08 19:45 -0500
                  Re: Wish me luck Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2024-12-09 08:14 -0500
                    Re: Wish me luck DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2024-12-09 13:38 -0500
                    Re: Wish me luck chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2024-12-09 15:46 -0600
                      Re: Wish me luck Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2024-12-09 22:24 +0000
                        Re: Wish me luck Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 17:17 -0600
                          Re: Wish me luck DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2024-12-15 10:22 -0500
                        Re: Wish me luck DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2024-12-10 18:58 -0500
                          Re: Wish me luck -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-10 19:58 -0500
                            Re: Wish me luck Farley Flud <fflud@gnu.rocks> - 2024-12-11 18:05 +0000
                              Re: Wish me luck Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 13:18 -0500
                                Re: Wish me luck CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-12 10:03 -0500
                                  Re: Wish me luck Farley Flud <fsquared@fsquared.linux> - 2024-12-13 13:09 +0000
                              Re: Wish me luck DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2024-12-12 13:03 -0500
                              Re: Wish me luck Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2024-12-13 21:17 +0000
                            Re: Wish me luck DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2024-12-11 15:23 -0500
                              Re: Wish me luck Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 15:50 -0500
                Re: Wish me luck rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-09 03:04 +0000
                  Re: Wish me luck vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2024-12-09 03:39 +0000
                    Re: Wish me luck Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2024-12-13 21:12 +0000
                  Re: Wish me luck RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 15:12 +0000
                    Re: Wish me luck rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-09 20:55 +0000
                    Re: Wish me luck candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2024-12-09 21:10 +0000
                    Re: Wish me luck Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-10 12:31 -0500
                      Re: Wish me luck DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2024-12-10 18:57 -0500
                        Re: Wish me luck rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-11 02:17 +0000
                          Re: Wish me luck DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2024-12-10 22:20 -0500
                          Re: Wish me luck Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2024-12-11 12:14 -0500
                  Re: Wish me luck DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2024-12-09 13:19 -0500
                  Re: Wish me luck Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 15:57 -0600
                    Re: Wish me luck Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2024-12-09 23:15 +0000
                      Re: Wish me luck Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 18:12 -0600

Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →

#679101 — Wish me luck

https://imgur.com/a/xG2IOJB

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#679104

On Fri, 6 Dec 2024 10:58:55 -0500, DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca>
wrote in <viv6vt$2e0hk$2@dont-email.me>:

> https://imgur.com/a/xG2IOJB

 ...yer gonna need it.

-- 
-v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti
   OS: Linux 6.11.10 Release: Mint 21.3 Mem: 258G
   "I would have made a good Pope. -Richard Nixon"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#679106

vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>On Fri, 6 Dec 2024 10:58:55 -0500, DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca>
>wrote in <viv6vt$2e0hk$2@dont-email.me>:
>
>> https://imgur.com/a/xG2IOJB
>
> ...yer gonna need it.


I bet he finally admits he'd rather be running Linux.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#679130

On 12/6/2024 11:12 AM, vallor wrote:

> On Fri, 6 Dec 2024 10:58:55 -0500, DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca>
> wrote in <viv6vt$2e0hk$2@dont-email.me>:
> 
>> https://imgur.com/a/xG2IOJB
> 
>   ...yer gonna need it.


For now, everything appears to be peachy.

24H2 is significantly faster launching apps and opening files and 
navigating the file system.  Very cool.  That alone makes it a 
worthwhile upgrade for me.

Because it's a full OS swapout, the download and install was slow.  The 
better part of 30 minutes I'd say.


New features
https://www.windowscentral.com/software-apps/windows-11/windows-11-version-24h1-changelog-release-date-features-ai-2024-update

https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/topic/windows-11-version-24h2-update-history-0929c747-1815-4543-8461-0160d16f15e5


A few known issues
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/release-health/status-windows-11-24h2



I haven't played around with sudo for Windows yet.  It's an MIT-licensed 
project written in Rust

https://github.com/microsoft/sudo

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#679133

On 12/6/24 4:56 PM, DFS wrote:
> On 12/6/2024 11:12 AM, vallor wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, 6 Dec 2024 10:58:55 -0500, DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca>
>> wrote in <viv6vt$2e0hk$2@dont-email.me>:
>>
>>> https://imgur.com/a/xG2IOJB
>>
>>   ...yer gonna need it.
> 
> 
> For now, everything appears to be peachy.

I'm currently on 22H2; will have to keep an eye out for it.

-hh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#679154

On Fri, 6 Dec 2024 16:56:36 -0500, DFS wrote:


> 24H2 is significantly faster launching apps and opening files and
> navigating the file system.  Very cool.  That alone makes it a
> worthwhile upgrade for me.

 Interesting. I just checked the laptop. It says it is up to date with 
23H2 and didn't offer 24H2.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#679161

On 12/6/2024 11:59 PM, rbowman wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Dec 2024 16:56:36 -0500, DFS wrote:
> 
> 
>> 24H2 is significantly faster launching apps and opening files and
>> navigating the file system.  Very cool.  That alone makes it a
>> worthwhile upgrade for me.
> 
>   Interesting. I just checked the laptop. It says it is up to date with
> 23H2 and didn't offer 24H2.


That's what my system said for the past couple months.  24H2 general 
release has been around since Oct 1 2024, but I turned off 'Get the 
latest updates as soon as they're available' and waited for it to come 
to me.

This article describes how MS is rolling it out in phases:

https://www.windowscentral.com/software-apps/windows-11/is-your-pc-getting-the-windows-11-version-24h2-in-june-or-september-2024


MS haters in Montana are put at the back of the line.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#679166

On Sat, 7 Dec 2024 09:05:52 -0500, DFS wrote:

> MS haters in Montana are put at the back of the line.

Fine by me. I'll make sure I don't check any boxes by mistake. 23H2 works 
fine.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#679176

DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:
>On 12/6/2024 11:59 PM, rbowman wrote:
>> On Fri, 6 Dec 2024 16:56:36 -0500, DFS wrote:
>> 
>>> [Windows 11] 24H2 is significantly faster launching apps and opening files and
>>> navigating the file system.  Very cool.  That alone makes it a
>>> worthwhile upgrade for me.
>> 
>>   Interesting. I just checked the laptop. It says it is up to date with
>> 23H2 and didn't offer 24H2.
>
>That's what my system said for the past couple months.  24H2 general 
>release has been around since Oct 1 2024, but I turned off 'Get the 
>latest updates as soon as they're available' and waited for it to come 
>to me.
>
>This article describes how MS is rolling it out in phases:
>
>https://www.windowscentral.com/software-apps/windows-11/is-your-pc-getting-the-windows-11-version-24h2-in-june-or-september-2024
>
>
>MS haters in Montana are put at the back of the line.


I would have already installed it, even if I were concerned about
bugs, if they would build on the bloat of 23H2 with buggy general
releases (how many times now?), why should I not switch to Linux,
which I'm starting to wonder how you can not wish to?

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#679276

On 12/7/2024 4:56 PM, Joel wrote:
> DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:
>> On 12/6/2024 11:59 PM, rbowman wrote:
>>> On Fri, 6 Dec 2024 16:56:36 -0500, DFS wrote:
>>>
>>>> [Windows 11] 24H2 is significantly faster launching apps and opening files and
>>>> navigating the file system.  Very cool.  That alone makes it a
>>>> worthwhile upgrade for me.
>>>
>>>    Interesting. I just checked the laptop. It says it is up to date with
>>> 23H2 and didn't offer 24H2.
>>
>> That's what my system said for the past couple months.  24H2 general
>> release has been around since Oct 1 2024, but I turned off 'Get the
>> latest updates as soon as they're available' and waited for it to come
>> to me.
>>
>> This article describes how MS is rolling it out in phases:
>>
>> https://www.windowscentral.com/software-apps/windows-11/is-your-pc-getting-the-windows-11-version-24h2-in-june-or-september-2024
>>
>>
>> MS haters in Montana are put at the back of the line.
> 
> 
> I would have already installed it, even if I were concerned about
> bugs, if they would build on the bloat of 23H2 with buggy general
> releases (how many times now?), 

What you just said makes no sense.



> why should I not switch to Linux,

Considering you spend most of your computing time running Windows apps, 
you haven't actually switched to Linux and suffered with the poor choice 
you made.



> which I'm starting to wonder how you can not wish to?

Running Linux means giving up MS Office (never unless something just as 
good is available on Linux) and Notepad++ (difficult but not impossible 
to give up), and maybe a few games.

I assume my Canon MG 5220 printer will work under Linux.  I don't have 
any Windows-only hardware (is that even a thing any more?).

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#679282

DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:

>>> That's what my system said for the past couple months.  24H2 general
>>> release has been around since Oct 1 2024, but I turned off 'Get the
>>> latest updates as soon as they're available' and waited for it to come
>>> to me.
>>>
>>> This article describes how MS is rolling it out in phases:
>>>
>>> https://www.windowscentral.com/software-apps/windows-11/is-your-pc-getting-the-windows-11-version-24h2-in-june-or-september-2024
>>>
>>>
>>> MS haters in Montana are put at the back of the line.
>> 
>> I would have already installed it, even if I were concerned about
>> bugs, if they would build on the bloat of 23H2 with buggy general
>> releases (how many times now?), 
>
>What you just said makes no sense.


Incorrect, an OS judge updates immediately.


>> why should I not switch to Linux,
>
>Considering you spend most of your computing time running Windows apps, 
>you haven't actually switched to Linux and suffered with the poor choice 
>you made.


Considering that I *DON'T* "spend most of my computing time running
Windows apps", your comment is evasive.


>> which I'm starting to wonder how you can not wish to?
>
>Running Linux means giving up MS Office (never unless something just as 
>good is available on Linux) and Notepad++ (difficult but not impossible 
>to give up), and maybe a few games.
>
>I assume my Canon MG 5220 printer will work under Linux.  I don't have 
>any Windows-only hardware (is that even a thing any more?).


Office is one thing.  But you have to get tired of bloatware.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#679323

Joel wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:

> DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:
>
>> <snip>
>>
>>Running Linux means giving up MS Office (never unless something just as 
>>good is available on Linux)

Funny, I have no need of MS Office. Or Teams. Or Visual Studio.

>>and Notepad++ (difficult but not impossible 
>>to give up), and maybe a few games.

Hey, if you need Windows for something, you can have it, and still
run Linux most of the time.

>>I assume my Canon MG 5220 printer will work under Linux.  I don't have 
>>any Windows-only hardware (is that even a thing any more?).
>
> Office is one thing.  But you have to get tired of bloatware.

You have to get tired of DFS's obsessive yammering.

-- 
I was at this restaurant.  The sign said "Breakfast Anytime."  So I
ordered French Toast in the Rennaissance.
		-- Steven Wright

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#679386

On 12/9/2024 8:14 AM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:


> You have to get tired of DFS's obsessive yammering.


wtf Creepy?

You've made on the order of 20% more cola posts than I have.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#679425

Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

>You have to get tired of DFS's obsessive yammering.

As long as his assholery is rewarded with a response...

-- 
"-highhorse is indeed a dazed follower...
 ... and dumb as a stump."
                                          - Chris Ahlstrom

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#679434

On Mon, 09 Dec 2024 15:46:21 -0600, chrisv wrote:

> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> 
>>You have to get tired of DFS's obsessive yammering.
> 
> As long as his assholery is rewarded with a response...
>

The guy(?) reminds me of some low-life autograph hound,
that spends his waking hours in pursuit of the signature
or other token of his favorite movie star.

Indeed, Physfitfreak has likened him to a "groupie," and
that is very accurate description.

But underneath it all looms the concept of "queer."

My guess is that his IQ is about 85.


-- 
Systemd: solving all the problems that you never knew you had.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#679442

On 12/9/24 4:24 PM, Farley Flud wrote:
> Indeed, Physfitfreak has likened him to a "groupie," and
> that is very accurate description.
> 
> But underneath it all looms the concept of "queer."


Hahhahhahh :-))

Dont' forget that I addressed that aspect of him also. I really think he 
is a man's body with a female brain, so symbiotically continuing life 
together that the brain has not noticed it.

This has nothing to do with concept of health of course. A woman's brain 
can be healthy. A man's body can be healthy. I think his brain is 
healthy at the core, much in contrast with that of Relf whose brain is 
rotten inside out.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#680327

On 12/9/2024 6:17 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
> On 12/9/24 4:24 PM, Farley Flud wrote:
>> Indeed, Physfitfreak has likened him to a "groupie," and
>> that is very accurate description.
>>
>> But underneath it all looms the concept of "queer."
> 
> 
> Hahhahhahh :-))


You and Feeb have a 2-man circle jerk going.  It's funny to watch him 
kiss your chimp ass.  You praised him a long time ago, and ever since 
he's been putty in your hands.  He hates - and is hated by - everyone 
else on the planet.


> Dont' forget that I addressed that aspect of him also. I really think he 
> is a man's body with a female brain, so symbiotically continuing life 
> together that the brain has not noticed it.


Earlier this month I couldn't help myself: my "female brain" took 
control and I downloaded some computer science course materials from 
Wellesley College and Smith College (highly-ranked women's colleges).

https://www.wellesley.edu
https://www.smith.edu

Hint: as financial failures, you and Feeb could NEVER afford to send 
your daughter to either school.  Annual cost at both is around $90,000 
without financial aid.



> This has nothing to do with concept of health of course. A woman's brain 
> can be healthy. A man's body can be healthy. I think his brain is 
> healthy at the core, much in contrast with that of Relf whose brain is 
> rotten inside out.

I'm worried about Relf.  He's on a slow suicide mission, laying in bed 
and smoking and overeating and getting no exercise.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#679649

On 12/9/2024 5:24 PM, Lameass Larry Piet wrote:


> My guess is that his [DFS's] IQ is about 85.


My certainty is you're a bust at life.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#679653

On 12/10/24 6:58 PM, DFS wrote:
> On 12/9/2024 5:24 PM, Lameass Larry Piet wrote:
> 
> 
>> My guess is that his [DFS's] IQ is about 85.
> 
> 
> My certainty is you're a bust at life.
> 

He's jealous of even those who he thinks have just an 85 IQ.


Sorry, no "/s" tag applies.


-hh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#679726

On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 19:58:52 -0500, -hh wrote:


> 
> He's jealous of even those who he thinks have just an 85 IQ.
> 

I'd rather be a total "loser" than a brain-compromised retard.

Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha. ha. ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!

Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha. ha. ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!

Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha. ha. ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web