Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #375164 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Bozzo Rink <bozzo@graduate.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-10-06 04:33 +0000 |
| Last post | 2016-10-07 11:11 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 138 — 18 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Linux Fails Because Bozzo Rink <bozzo@graduate.org> - 2016-10-06 04:33 +0000
Re: Linux Fails Because Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-06 09:49 +0200
Re: Linux Fails Because Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-01 10:08 -0700
Linux Trolls Fail Because Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-06 06:30 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-06 10:04 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-06 10:15 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-06 10:29 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-06 12:16 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-07 13:51 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-07 14:13 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-07 15:24 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-07 19:30 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-07 20:13 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-08 00:53 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-08 05:35 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-08 13:34 +0100
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-10-08 08:44 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-08 08:57 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-08 15:16 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-08 15:39 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-08 22:35 +0100
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-08 21:52 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-08 20:40 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-09 01:07 +0000
Linux Trolls Succeed when you help them bypass filters Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-09 08:12 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-09 13:16 +0100
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-08 10:16 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-08 10:23 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-10-08 10:36 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-08 15:38 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-08 21:12 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-08 17:27 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-08 21:37 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-08 20:38 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-10 18:02 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-11 00:04 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-11 15:10 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-11 15:21 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-11 11:31 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-11 11:22 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-11 11:26 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-11 15:31 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-11 11:40 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-11 16:38 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-11 09:42 -0700
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-11 18:54 +0200
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-11 16:56 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-11 11:33 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-11 17:56 +0200
Linux Trolls Fail Because They Are Satire-Impaired Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-11 19:11 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because They Are Satire-Impaired Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-10-11 19:32 -0400
Linux Trolls Fail Because They Are MAD Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-12 06:13 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because They Are Satire-Impaired chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-12 07:14 -0500
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-11 16:04 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-11 12:18 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-11 16:55 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-11 13:04 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-11 19:10 +0200
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-11 13:19 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-11 17:18 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-11 19:19 +0200
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-11 12:25 -0500
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-11 17:28 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-11 18:02 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-11 18:00 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-11 20:57 +0200
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-11 15:12 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-11 19:49 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-11 19:18 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-11 13:24 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-11 18:42 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-11 15:09 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-11 16:29 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-11 14:08 -0700
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-11 17:38 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-11 14:45 -0700
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-11 19:01 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-22 10:05 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-25 10:03 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-28 08:28 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because deplorable owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-10-28 14:56 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-29 09:02 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-20 12:01 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-10-11 18:00 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-12 06:05 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 20:28 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-12 20:32 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-13 12:49 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-13 15:01 +0200
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-13 13:23 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-13 15:51 +0200
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-13 14:19 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-13 16:32 +0200
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-13 14:42 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-13 17:12 +0200
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-13 10:45 -0500
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-13 15:51 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-17 11:34 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-13 15:49 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-10-14 03:07 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-14 12:22 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-14 14:43 +0200
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-14 12:52 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-13 09:40 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-13 15:07 +0100
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-13 16:16 +0200
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-13 09:30 -0500
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-10-14 03:06 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-14 06:59 -0500
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-10-14 07:31 -0700
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-22 09:17 -0700
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-13 08:59 -0500
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-13 16:05 +0200
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-14 20:18 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-10-14 03:05 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-20 20:19 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-08 17:40 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-08 22:41 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-08 18:49 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-08 23:04 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-08 19:13 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-08 20:39 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-08 10:42 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-08 15:47 +0100
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-08 12:13 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-08 20:49 +0200
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-08 15:17 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-08 15:21 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-08 16:43 +0100
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-08 15:50 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-08 15:10 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-08 19:49 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-09 10:13 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-09 10:19 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-09 15:22 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-09 15:20 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-07 17:19 -0400
Re: Linux Fails Because Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 11:11 -0700
Page 6 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 Next page →
| From | Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-14 12:22 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because |
| Message-ID | <e6c0vnFt3puU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #376333 |
On 2016-10-14, ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, 13 Oct 2016 17:12:20 +0200, Peter Köhlmann wrote: > >> Do you really think I give a rats ass if you are "disappointed"? >> I don't need to be defended by scum like you > > So now "Jim" has morphed into a "concern" troll. Isn't that precious. I haven't morphed into anything. I was attacked first, by someone named Chris Ahlstrom. I am simply defending myself and tossing the same mud back into the the attackers house. Think of me as the Donald Trump of COLA. Unlike others, I don't lay down and take it. I bite back. How about a piece of factual data for you. Since you enjoy talking about trolls so much, please find where I attacked anyone prior to Ahlstrom's unfair attack on me. You can't, because there is none. For some very strange reason he seems to expect me to fight his battles with Slimer for him. Sorry but I'm a loner and I call a spade a spade. If that bothers you or anyone else too bad. And you guys question why outsiders think of Linux users, at least in COLA, as a herd? Your actions define what you are. I prefer the term Cabal because it also implies the religious aspect of Linux advocacy. Not that there is any Linux advocacy in COLA.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-14 14:43 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because |
| Message-ID | <ntqjtq$luo$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #376362 |
Jim Polaski babbled: > On 2016-10-14, ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, 13 Oct 2016 17:12:20 +0200, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >> >>> Do you really think I give a rats ass if you are "disappointed"? >>> I don't need to be defended by scum like you >> >> So now "Jim" has morphed into a "concern" troll. Isn't that precious. > > I haven't morphed into anything. I was attacked first, by someone named > Chris Ahlstrom. I am simply defending myself Oh, that old lie again. > and tossing the same mud > back into the the attackers house. Think of me as the Donald Trump of > COLA. Unlike others, I don't lay down and take it. I bite back. You do nothing of that sort. All you are doing is showing your dishonesty and stupidity > How about a piece of factual data for you. Since you enjoy talking about > trolls so much, please find where I attacked anyone prior to Ahlstrom's > unfair attack on me. He has not "unfair attacked you" Quit lying, "Jim"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-14 12:52 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because |
| Message-ID | <e6c2ogFtnreU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #376367 |
On 2016-10-14, Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: > Jim Polaski babbled: > >> On 2016-10-14, ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Thu, 13 Oct 2016 17:12:20 +0200, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >>> >>>> Do you really think I give a rats ass if you are "disappointed"? >>>> I don't need to be defended by scum like you >>> >>> So now "Jim" has morphed into a "concern" troll. Isn't that precious. >> >> I haven't morphed into anything. I was attacked first, by someone named >> Chris Ahlstrom. I am simply defending myself > > Oh, that old lie again. It's a fact. You claiming otherwise however /is/ a lie. >> and tossing the same mud >> back into the the attackers house. Think of me as the Donald Trump of >> COLA. Unlike others, I don't lay down and take it. I bite back. > > You do nothing of that sort. All you are doing is showing your dishonesty > and stupidity Nope. The facts support my statements. >> How about a piece of factual data for you. Since you enjoy talking about >> trolls so much, please find where I attacked anyone prior to Ahlstrom's >> unfair attack on me. > > He has not "unfair attacked you" > Quit lying, "Jim" Yes he did. Go look for yourself. Oh, I know, you never do any research. Something that is quite obvious based upon your lack of comprehension and incorrect conclusions. Look at it this way, it's 100 percent impossible to have a reasonable, adult conversation with you k00ks. You expect people to remain silent when you bait, attack and antagonize people and when then defend themselves you boldly complain "see that, the troll has revealed himself". It's a no win situation and it's at least partially responsible for the obvious observation which is there are about 4 people total, that's /four people/ who claim to be Linux advocates. That is pitiful especially considering this is an open group and appears in Google Groups. And looking at older posts in Google it has been like this for years. You so called Linux advocates can blame yourselves for that one.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-13 09:40 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because |
| Message-ID | <nto33h$uft$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #376272 |
Peter Köhlmann wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > Jim Polaski wrote: > >> On 2016-10-13, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >>> >>> Now, the Onion, on the other hand, I enjoy regularly. And some of their >>> "articles" are quite mordant; some border on "sick". >> >> Mordant? >> Is that another word you picked up reading Mad Magazine? > > Learn some english. "mordant" is an english and french word, having the same > meaning in both languages. > > Strange that trolls have so little knowledge in all kinds of things. Not strange is that I plonked "Jim". Turned out to be a good stratagem on my part. Just another needling fsckwit. -- You will be the victim of a bizarre joke.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | William Poaster <wp@dev.null> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-13 15:07 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because |
| Message-ID | <t1h4dd-t98.ln1@debian.machineone.org> |
| In reply to | #376276 |
On 13/10/2016 14:40 in comp.os.linux.advocacy, Chris Ahlstrom posted: > Peter Köhlmann wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> Jim Polaski wrote: >> >>> On 2016-10-13, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >>>> >>>> Now, the Onion, on the other hand, I enjoy regularly. And some of their >>>> "articles" are quite mordant; some border on "sick". >>> >>> Mordant? >>> Is that another word you picked up reading Mad Magazine? >> >> Learn some english. "mordant" is an english and french word, having the same >> meaning in both languages. >> >> Strange that trolls have so little knowledge in all kinds of things. > > Not strange is that I plonked "Jim". Turned out to be a good stratagem on > my part. Just another needling fsckwit. Yes, the troll's apparently showing his *true* colors now. -- What IS remarkable, is that a well developed ape has come to realise that he lives on a planet, circling a sun, in a planetary system, within a galaxy, within a universe. - Professor Michio Kaku - Theoretical Physicist -
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-13 16:16 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because |
| Message-ID | <nto4uq$6cf$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #376282 |
William Poaster wrote: > On 13/10/2016 14:40 in comp.os.linux.advocacy, Chris Ahlstrom posted: > >> Peter Köhlmann wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >> >>> Jim Polaski wrote: >>> >>>> On 2016-10-13, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Now, the Onion, on the other hand, I enjoy regularly. And some of >>>>> their "articles" are quite mordant; some border on "sick". >>>> >>>> Mordant? >>>> Is that another word you picked up reading Mad Magazine? >>> >>> Learn some english. "mordant" is an english and french word, having the >>> same meaning in both languages. >>> >>> Strange that trolls have so little knowledge in all kinds of things. >> >> Not strange is that I plonked "Jim". Turned out to be a good stratagem >> on >> my part. Just another needling fsckwit. > > Yes, the troll's apparently showing his *true* colors now. > Oh, he has for some time already. He used the "flatfish strategy" but could not keep it up for a longer time. Interestingly, the slimy one did so, too. I just knew that he would soon revert to being an outright lying bastard. And he did
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-13 09:30 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because |
| Message-ID | <g06vvbd5r2bu230rsoqiqvmbshckj4vivd@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #376283 |
Peter Köhlmann wrote: > William Poaster wrote: >> >> Yes, the troll's apparently showing his *true* colors now. > >Oh, he has for some time already. He used the "flatfish strategy" but could >not keep it up for a longer time. >Interestingly, the slimy one did so, too. I just knew that he would soon >revert to being an outright lying bastard. And he did What a "surprise", eh? Of course, even though slime has been attacking us with *lies*, he will claim that he is called a troll because he doesn't "blindly love Linux", or because he doesn't "speak positively about Linux CONSTANTLY". We are "intolerant" and "hypocritical". According to some lying asshole trolls, anyway. -- "Any good news about Android is a credit to Linux; any bad news means that it's no longer Linux." - "Slimer", lying shamelessly
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-14 03:06 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because |
| Message-ID | <ntpi2r$ji4$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #376282 |
On Thu, 13 Oct 2016 15:07:25 +0100, William Poaster wrote: > On 13/10/2016 14:40 in comp.os.linux.advocacy, Chris Ahlstrom posted: > >> Peter Köhlmann wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >> >>> Jim Polaski wrote: >>> >>>> On 2016-10-13, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Now, the Onion, on the other hand, I enjoy regularly. And some of >>>>> their "articles" are quite mordant; some border on "sick". >>>> >>>> Mordant? >>>> Is that another word you picked up reading Mad Magazine? >>> >>> Learn some english. "mordant" is an english and french word, having >>> the same meaning in both languages. >>> >>> Strange that trolls have so little knowledge in all kinds of things. >> >> Not strange is that I plonked "Jim". Turned out to be a good stratagem >> on my part. Just another needling fsckwit. > > Yes, the troll's apparently showing his *true* colors now. Forgot to stay in character. It must be hard keeping tract of so many nyms. -- Zero tolerance for iCultists and WinDrones
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-14 06:59 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because |
| Message-ID | <jhh10clsrqurd0iq3ujtakl97co020aep2@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #376332 |
ronb wrote: >It must be hard keeping tract of so many nyms. Yeah, like when John Gohde wrote "Who needs a roomful of monkeys banging on a keyboard, when you have Snit?", and "Richard King" responded with "I see you are still begging for my attention." After its mistake was pointed-out, the thing just evaded with its "Everyone is Snit" troll. The thing is "honest", while we "lie" about it using socks. (rolling eyes) -- "Notice: no evidence of ME lying as YOU lie about me using socks" - some thing, lying shamelessly (but no one can quote it lying)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-14 07:31 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because |
| Message-ID | <7f0e9f03-02f9-4362-9058-bf55c0da841e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #376358 |
On Friday, 14 October 2016 04:59:40 UTC-7, chrisv wrote: > ronb wrote: > > >It must be hard keeping tract of so many nyms. > > Yeah, like when John Gohde wrote "Who needs a roomful of monkeys > banging on a keyboard, when you have Snit?", and "Richard King" > responded with "I see you are still begging for my attention." > > After its mistake was pointed-out, the thing just evaded with its > "Everyone is Snit" troll. > > The thing is "honest", while we "lie" about it using socks. (rolling > eyes) > > -- > "Notice: no evidence of ME lying as YOU lie about me using socks" - > some thing, lying shamelessly (but no one can quote it lying) You said Richard King said something then say "the thing" meaning Snit lied. How can one person lie when another says something? Why can you not find example of Snit lying? Snit lies less in one year than you do in a day.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-22 09:17 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because |
| Message-ID | <7da24f5b-a788-4fc6-9b23-c6bff9938796@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #376391 |
On Friday, October 14, 2016 at 8:31:43 AM UTC-6, Snit, using his 'tmelmosfire' sock puppet, whined: > On Friday, 14 October 2016 04:59:40 UTC-7, chrisv wrote: > > ronb wrote: > > > > >It must be hard keeping tract of so many nyms. > > > > Yeah, like when John Gohde wrote "Who needs a roomful of monkeys > > banging on a keyboard, when you have Snit?", and "Richard King" > > responded with "I see you are still begging for my attention." > > > > After its mistake was pointed-out, the thing just evaded with its > > "Everyone is Snit" troll. > > > > The thing is "honest", while we "lie" about it using socks. (rolling > > eyes) > > > > -- > > "Notice: no evidence of ME lying as YOU lie about me using socks" - > > some thing, lying shamelessly (but no one can quote it lying) > > You said Richard King said something then say "the thing" meaning Snit lied. > > How can one person lie when another says something? > > Why can you not find example of Snit lying? > > Snit lies less in one year than you do in a day. LOL! It's just killing' ya that you no longer have a voice on this newsgroup, isn't it? Remember this: <http://imgur.com/a/Y9mU8> Ah... the good ol' days ;)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-13 08:59 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because |
| Message-ID | <jd4vvbhuk7d1gnrhqo1joak57it0e6flqo@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #376272 |
Peter Köhlmann wrote: > "Jim" wrote: >> >> Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >>> >>> Now, the Onion, on the other hand, I enjoy regularly. And some of their >>> "articles" are quite mordant; some border on "sick". >> >> Mordant? >> Is that another word you picked up reading Mad Magazine? > >Learn some english. "mordant" is an english and french word, having the same >meaning in both languages. > >Strange that trolls have so little knowledge in all kinds of things. It's rather pathetic, seeing these stupid little ankle-biters flinging snot at their moral and intellectual superiors. They must believe that other morons and ignoramuses will be impressed... -- "As I said before... it's all about choice as long as (FOSS advocates) are the ones making the choice." - trolling fsckwit "Ezekiel", lying shamelessly
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-13 16:05 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because |
| Message-ID | <nto4a7$41k$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #376279 |
chrisv wrote: > Peter Köhlmann wrote: > >> "Jim" wrote: >>> >>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >>>> >>>> Now, the Onion, on the other hand, I enjoy regularly. And some of >>>> their "articles" are quite mordant; some border on "sick". >>> >>> Mordant? >>> Is that another word you picked up reading Mad Magazine? >> >>Learn some english. "mordant" is an english and french word, having the >>same meaning in both languages. >> >>Strange that trolls have so little knowledge in all kinds of things. > > It's rather pathetic, seeing these stupid little ankle-biters flinging > snot at their moral and intellectual superiors. > > They must believe that other morons and ignoramuses will be > impressed... > Not "impresssed". But instead feel better, because they see that the other trolls are just as abjectly stupid as they themselves are
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-14 20:18 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because |
| Message-ID | <ntrskm$6mu$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #376279 |
On 10/13/2016 9:59 AM, shitv wrote:
> It's rather pathetic, seeing these stupid little ankle-biters flinging
> snot at their moral and intellectual superiors.
Which "moral and intellectual superiors" are you referring to, lying
shit-for-brains?
* "Even for geeks like myself who like to build their own PC's, one
motherboard isn't all that much different from another. They all do
about the same things at about the same performance level."
(Mar 2016)
* Jeff Relf: "Testing is how you know if the code works or not, not
compile-time warnings."
turdv: "Heh. One doesn't need to be a pro, to know how stupid that
is..."
* "People just don't know about Linux." (Apr 2015)
* "Vista needs 4G and 2 fast CPU's to run acceptably well."
* "malware is a natural and healthy phenomena" (Mar 2012)
* cursing found in two posts to Hadron: "shitty little freedom-hating
dictator wannabee, fscking idiot, piece of shit, stupid, ignorant,
shameless asshole. asshole imbecile, stupid piece of shit, lying,
insulting freedom-hating pricks, stupid lying asshole, shithead,
jackass" Jun 27 2012
You do have a deeply sarcastic sense of humor:
* "I have honor"
* "I've never lied in cola"
* "I'm honest and fair, as always."
* "I don't lie"
* "I am 100% honest."
* "I was completely honest, as always."
heh! You're a piece of shit, as always.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-14 03:05 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because |
| Message-ID | <ntpi12$ji4$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #376272 |
On Thu, 13 Oct 2016 15:01:47 +0200, Peter Köhlmann wrote: > Jim Polaski wrote: > >> On 2016-10-13, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >>> >>> Now, the Onion, on the other hand, I enjoy regularly. And some of >>> their "articles" are quite mordant; some border on "sick". >> >> Mordant? >> Is that another word you picked up reading Mad Magazine? > > Learn some english. "mordant" is an english and french word, having the > same meaning in both languages. > > Strange that trolls have so little knowledge in all kinds of things. And they love shouting out their ignorance from the rooftops. -- Zero tolerance for iCultists and WinDrones
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-20 20:19 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because |
| Message-ID | <nubmtn$poi$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #375855 |
On 10/10/2016 2:02 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > RTFM > http://i.imgur.com/ElIVvXI.png "Usenet nincompoop" love it!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-08 17:40 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because |
| Message-ID | <B7ydncpkqPB2-mTKnZ2dnUU7-audnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #375619 |
On 2016-10-08, Octavian W. Lagrange <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >> Tattoo Vampire wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >> >>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >>> >>>> Holy shit, what a crazy k00k! >>> >>> I KF'ed the silly SOB long ago. >> >> Me too, but on this new setup I forgot to copy the kill file. >> So I have some rebuilding to do. Lotta nutcases hang out here. >> Some real fruitcakes. >> > > http://i.imgur.com/NLc25Vw.png What did you do the layout with? -- Marek Novotny https://github.com/marek-novotny
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-08 22:41 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because |
| Message-ID | <had.gi83gv@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #375632 |
Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: > On 2016-10-08, Octavian W. Lagrange <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >> Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >>> Tattoo Vampire wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >>> >>>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >>>> >>>>> Holy shit, what a crazy k00k! >>>> >>>> I KF'ed the silly SOB long ago. >>> >>> Me too, but on this new setup I forgot to copy the kill file. >>> So I have some rebuilding to do. Lotta nutcases hang out here. >>> Some real fruitcakes. >>> >> >> http://i.imgur.com/NLc25Vw.png > > What did you do the layout with? > pdflatex.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-08 18:49 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because |
| Message-ID | <JPGdnV_d2qeb5WTKnZ2dnUU7-eOdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #375638 |
On 2016-10-08, Octavian W. Lagrange <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: >> On 2016-10-08, Octavian W. Lagrange <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>> Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >>>> Tattoo Vampire wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >>>> >>>>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Holy shit, what a crazy k00k! >>>>> >>>>> I KF'ed the silly SOB long ago. >>>> >>>> Me too, but on this new setup I forgot to copy the kill file. >>>> So I have some rebuilding to do. Lotta nutcases hang out here. >>>> Some real fruitcakes. >>> >>> http://i.imgur.com/NLc25Vw.png >> >> What did you do the layout with? > > pdflatex. I would have guessed Scribus. -- Marek Novotny https://github.com/marek-novotny
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-10-08 23:04 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because |
| Message-ID | <ahjgue003g.a3@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #375640 |
Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: > On 2016-10-08, Octavian W. Lagrange <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >> Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: >>> On 2016-10-08, Octavian W. Lagrange <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>>> Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >>>>> Tattoo Vampire wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >>>>> >>>>>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Holy shit, what a crazy k00k! >>>>>> >>>>>> I KF'ed the silly SOB long ago. >>>>> >>>>> Me too, but on this new setup I forgot to copy the kill file. >>>>> So I have some rebuilding to do. Lotta nutcases hang out here. >>>>> Some real fruitcakes. >>>> >>>> http://i.imgur.com/NLc25Vw.png >>> >>> What did you do the layout with? >> >> pdflatex. > > I would have guessed Scribus. > I probably would have use Scribus, but I already had this lying around: https://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/newspaper
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web